房企债务危机

Search documents
知名房企巨头上海总部大楼被6折甩卖 公司3年巨亏400亿元
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-10-07 13:48
每日经济新闻消息,据阿里资产拍卖平台,近日,阳光城总部滨江国际广场1号楼拍卖成交。本次拍卖起 始价为11.3亿元,此次拍卖经过37轮竞拍,最终成交价格为13.1亿元。 阿里资产处置平台显示,滨江国际广场1号楼原名为"阳光控股大厦",坐落于上海市杨浦区黄浦江畔,毗 邻杨树浦路和东方渔人码头,拥有一线黄浦江景色。 成交价仅为首次起拍价6成 此前曾4次流拍 值得注意的是,相较于首次起拍价,滨江国际广场1号楼此次的成交价格仅为当初的六成。据悉,滨江国 际广场1号楼此前曾经被拍卖过4次。2024年1月,该写字楼首次被拍卖,起拍价为21亿元,因无人出价而 流拍。2024年2月、2025年7月、2025年8月,该写字楼3次被拍卖,起拍价分别为19.81亿元、14.57亿元、 13.12亿元,同样因无人参与以流拍作为结束。 债务违约后,阳光城曾积极开展自救。为疏解债务压力,阳光城将多处优质资产处置变现,包括变卖所持 兴业银行股权、转让万物云部分股权等。 图片来源:阿里资产拍卖平台 公开信息显示,滨江国际广场1号楼原为闽系房企 阳光城集团总部,2017年迁入并更名为"阳光控股大 厦",坐落于上海市杨浦区黄浦江畔,拥有一线黄浦江 ...
知名房企巨头上海总部大楼被6折甩卖,“坐拥黄浦江一线江景”!公司3年巨亏400亿元,到期未付债务超650亿元,创始人被限制高消费
新浪财经· 2025-10-07 07:35
据阿里资产拍卖平台,近日,阳光城总部滨江国际广场1号楼拍卖成交。本次拍卖起始价为 11.3亿元,此次拍卖经过37轮竞拍,最终成交价格为13.1亿元。 阿里资产处置平台显示,滨江国际广场1号楼原名为"阳光控股大厦",坐落于上海市杨浦区 黄浦江畔,毗邻杨树浦路和东方渔人码头,拥有一线黄浦江景色。 成交价仅为首次起拍价6成 此前曾4次流拍 值得注意的是,相较于首次起拍价,滨江国际广场1号楼此次的成交价格仅为当初的六成。 据悉,滨江国际广场1号楼此前曾经被拍卖过4次。2024年1月,该写字楼首次被拍卖,起 拍价为21亿元,因无人出价而流拍。2024年2月、2025年7月、2025年8月,该写字楼3次 被拍卖,起拍价分别为19.81亿元、14.57亿元、13.12亿元,同样因无人参与以流拍作为 结束。 公开信息显示,滨江国际广场1号楼原为 闽系房企 阳光城集团总部,2017年迁入并更名 为"阳光控股大厦",坐落于上海市杨浦区黄浦江畔,拥有一线黄浦江景色。 据阿里资产拍卖平台,该写字楼被阳光城集团抵押,是《中建投信托-阳光控股大厦单一资 金信托贷款合同》项下的债务提供抵押担保,被担保债权本金总额为9.33亿元。由于阳光 ...
房地产若持续低迷,明年或将迎来四大棘手难题,请提前预警
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-25 13:06
对地方政府来说,房地产低迷直接戳中了"钱袋子"的痛点。土地出让金一直是地方财政的重要支柱,2024年占比近四成,可2024年1-8月全国国有土地使用 权出让收入同比直接降了25.4%,少了20218亿元。这个下滑趋势要是延续到明年,地方财政的压力会陡增。 钱少了,麻烦就来了。城市里的道路维修、公园建设、养老医疗等民生支出,很多都依赖土地收入支撑。更关键的是,三四线城市已经陷入"库存高、卖地 难"的死循环:全国6.8亿平方米的商品房库存里,三四线城市占了七成以上,去化周期高达47.6个月,远超12个月的合理区间。土地卖不出去,财政收入跟 不上,地方既没资金搞城市更新,又难以为房企纾困,很可能形成"市场低迷—财政紧张—调控乏力"的恶性循环。 房地产若持续低迷,明年或将迎来四大棘手难题 走在小区楼下,总能看见中介门店玻璃上的房源贴纸换了又换,原本热闹的新房售楼处如今只剩零星几个置业顾问在整理资料;打开业主群,讨论"房价又 跌了多少"的消息比吐槽物业的还多,有邻居挂了半年的二手房,降了20万还是没等来买家。这两年房地产的冷意,早已从行业数据渗透到了普通人的日常 里。住建部2025年的报告显示,全国城镇住房总量已突破3 ...
评司论企|恒大退市,阵痛未止
克而瑞地产研究· 2025-08-22 03:34
Core Viewpoint - China Evergrande Group's delisting from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange marks the end of its 16-year listing journey, highlighting the company's dramatic rise and fall in the real estate industry, culminating in a liquidity crisis and significant financial losses [2][3][4]. Group 1: Company Overview - China Evergrande was listed in 2009 with a market value exceeding HKD 700 billion, becoming the largest private real estate company in mainland China [2]. - The company achieved record sales in 2016 and its founder, Xu Jiayin, became the richest person in China in 2017 [2]. - By 2020, Evergrande announced plans to reduce debt and control its scale, but the situation deteriorated rapidly, leading to a liquidity crisis in 2021 [2][5]. Group 2: Financial Impact - As of June 2023, external investors held approximately 34% of China Evergrande's shares, with the stock price plummeting from around HKD 15 per share at the end of 2020 to HKD 0.163 before delisting, resulting in a market value of only HKD 21.52 billion [5][7]. - The company is now considered a "zombie stock," with little to no liquidity post-delisting, and shareholders face significant losses [7]. Group 3: Liquidation Process - The liquidation process is ongoing, with creditors claiming a total debt of approximately HKD 350 billion (USD 45 billion) as of July 31, 2025, while the assets under the liquidator's control are valued at around HKD 27 billion (USD 3.5 billion) [9]. - The liquidator has prioritized the monetization of Evergrande Property, which is seen as a crucial asset for creditors [9]. - Legal actions are being pursued against key figures in the company, including Xu Jiayin, to recover approximately USD 6 billion in misreported dividends and compensation [9]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The delisting of China Evergrande signifies a new phase of accelerated risk clearance in the real estate sector, with expectations of more companies facing delisting and liquidation [17]. - The ongoing financial distress of Evergrande and similar firms poses a broader risk to creditors, industry stakeholders, and homebuyers, indicating potential long-term impacts on the real estate market [17].
扛不住了!核心资产贱卖
Ge Long Hui· 2025-08-15 06:32
Core Viewpoint - The recent forced auctions of key assets from major real estate companies, Huangting International and China Aoyuan, signal severe financial distress and potential insolvency for these firms, reflecting broader challenges in the real estate sector [2][6][10]. Group 1: Auction Details - Huangting International's asset, the Crystal Island Commercial Center (Shenzhen Huangting Plaza), is set for auction on September 9, with an estimated value of approximately 4.36 billion yuan and a starting price of about 3.05 billion yuan [2]. - China Aoyuan's former headquarters in Zhujiang New Town will be auctioned in four lots on August 19, with a total starting price of around 85.3 million yuan, and the lowest lot starting at just 21 million yuan, translating to a unit price of 16,000 yuan per square meter [4]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Both auctions are critical for the survival of the respective companies, with Huangting International's sale potentially determining its delisting fate, while Aoyuan's headquarters auction signifies a deep financial crisis [6][10]. - The auction prices for both assets have significantly decreased, nearly halving from their initial valuations, indicating a severe decline in asset value [6][10]. - Huangting International's total liabilities are approximately 7.71 billion yuan against total assets of about 8.03 billion yuan, resulting in a debt-to-asset ratio of 96% [13][14]. Group 3: Broader Market Impact - The forced sale of these prime assets in major cities at steep discounts raises concerns about the liquidity and valuation of other real estate assets, potentially leading to further devaluation across the sector [8][11]. - The situation reflects a trend where distressed real estate firms are compelled to liquidate valuable assets, which could exacerbate their financial difficulties and lead to accelerated bankruptcy proceedings [9][12]. - The ongoing financial struggles of these companies may lead to a broader negative sentiment in the real estate market, impacting investor confidence and asset valuations [10][11].