中国经济网北京12月19日讯 近日，华夏时报发布《宝盈基金"科技悍将"张天闻清仓式卸任，科技赛 道"押注式投资"引争议》一文。文中称，2025年12月15日，宝盈基金公告，基金经理张天闻同时离任其管理 的四只基金——宝盈智慧生活混合、宝盈半导体产业混合发起式、宝盈基础产业混合与宝盈人工智能股票。 文章还称，从业绩表现看，张天闻管理的基金普遍取得较高的正回报。其中，宝盈半导体产业混合发起 式A在其任职期间回报高达93.18%，同类C份额亦达到90.24%；宝盈基础产业混合A回报为85.51%，C份额达 到82.70%。此外，他在人工智能与智慧生活主题基金中也表现突出，如宝盈人工智能股票A任职回报达 75.79%，宝盈人工智能股票C任职回报达72.07%；宝盈智慧生活混合A任职回报为51.30%，宝盈智慧生活混 合C任职回报为49.67%。 但业内一种尖锐的质疑也指出张天闻管理的产品疑似"风格漂移"与"押注式投资"。其管理的四只基金名 称虽涵盖"智慧生活""基础产业""人工智能"和"半导体"，但投资范围高度重叠于TMT及硬科技赛道。这种高 度集中的持仓策略，本质上放大了单一赛道风险。 根据中国经济网记者了解，张天 ...

Core Viewpoint - The sudden resignation of fund manager Zhang Tianwen from four funds at Baoying Fund has raised concerns in the industry, especially given his previous success in managing funds focused on technology sectors [2][3]. Group 1: Fund Manager's Performance - Zhang Tianwen managed funds that achieved significant returns, with the Baoying Semiconductor Industry Mixed Fund A (017075) returning 93.18% and the Baoying Basic Industry Mixed Fund A (010383) returning 85.51% during his tenure [3]. - Other funds under his management, such as Baoying Artificial Intelligence Stock A (005962) and Baoying Smart Life Mixed A (011170), also showed strong performance, with returns of 75.79% and 51.30% respectively [3]. Group 2: Concerns Over Investment Strategy - There are concerns regarding a potential "style drift" and "betting-style investment" in Zhang's managed funds, as they heavily overlap in the TMT (Technology, Media, Telecommunications) and hard technology sectors [5][6]. - The concentrated holding strategy in these funds amplifies risks associated with a single sector, making performance highly dependent on market trends rather than the fund manager's active management skills [6]. Group 3: Company Response - Baoying Fund stated that each fund managed by Zhang Tianwen adhered to its specific investment logic and strategy, emphasizing that the funds are not merely overlapping but have distinct focuses within the technology sector [7].

Core Viewpoint - Yongying Fund's stock funds have underperformed compared to peers over the past six months, despite some individual funds experiencing significant gains due to concentrated investments in technology sectors [1][6]. Group 1: Fund Performance - Yongying Fund's stock funds have consistently lagged behind the average returns of similar funds over the past five years, three years, and one year, failing to outperform the CSI 300 index [1][6]. - As of December 4, 2023, Yongying Technology Select Fund (022364) achieved a remarkable annual return of 200.34%, ranking first among 18,728 funds, significantly outperforming the second-best fund, AVIC Opportunity Navigator (140.43%) [1][2]. - Approximately 40% of Yongying Fund's active equity products are currently in a loss position, with over 30% of these products experiencing cumulative losses exceeding 30% [1][8]. Group 2: Investment Strategy - The recent surge in performance is attributed to a concentrated investment strategy in the technology sector, particularly cloud computing, which has yielded high returns in a favorable market environment [5]. - This "betting" investment strategy, while effective in the short term, poses risks of increased volatility and potential significant losses if the market conditions change adversely [5][6]. - Yongying Fund has multiple technology-themed funds, referred to as the "Yongying Seven Brothers," which also employ similar concentrated investment strategies [5]. Group 3: Fund Management and Costs - Yongying Fund has seen a significant increase in its public fund management scale, reaching 552.718 billion yuan, with a growth of 430 billion yuan over five years [3]. - The fund's high turnover rate among managers, with an average tenure of only 3.6 years, raises concerns about the stability and continuity of investment strategies [9]. - The fund's trading costs are notably high, with the commission-to-management fee ratio for passive index funds reaching 1.22, which is nearly five times the industry average [13].

Group 1 - The article discusses the resurgence of "betting-style" investment strategies among public funds in the A-share market, driven by structural market conditions [1][5] - Some actively managed equity funds are concentrating their holdings in specific sectors, often deviating significantly from their performance benchmarks, which are typically broad indices like the CSI 300 [1][4] - A case study of a fund that has doubled its net asset value within a year highlights its concentrated investment in the innovative drug sector, with over 95% of its top ten holdings in this area [2][3] Group 2 - The article notes both successes and failures of the "betting-style" strategy, with some funds performing well in sectors like innovative drugs and gold, while others, such as those heavily invested in real estate and traditional liquor stocks, have underperformed [3][4] - The trend of modifying funds to focus on popular sectors is prevalent among smaller public fund companies, aiming to attract more investments [5][6] - The regulatory environment is shifting, with an emphasis on strengthening the constraints of performance benchmarks, which may lead to clearer investment directions for these funds and higher expectations for fund managers' foresight [6][7]