本报记者 彭衍菘 孙珩进一步表示，这一现象更反映出公募行业的转型——从过往单纯追求规模扩张，转向重视投资者回报的精细化运营模 式，长远来看有助于提升行业口碑与投资者信任度。 对于普通投资者而言，面对高波动的绩优基金，如何理性参与？对此，深圳市前海排排网基金销售有限责任公司公募产品 运营曾方芳对《证券日报》记者表示，第一，采取定期定额的投资方式，例如每月投入固定金额，这样可以在市场下跌时买入 更多份额，从而摊薄成本、平滑波动。同时，在市场上涨时，定投也能发挥显著优势。当市场处于上升趋势时定投，随着时间 的推移，投资者能够持续积累基金份额，分享市场上涨带来的收益。第二，设置合理的目标收益率，一旦达成及时止盈；也可 设定最大回撤阈值，触及即止损。此外，可参考指数估值分位水平，在市场高估时择机退出。第三，通过"核心—卫星策略"进 行组合配置，分散投资以降低整体组合的波动风险。 事实上，上述基金此前已多次提示风险。其2025年中期报告明确提出，产品聚焦新质生产力相关行业，高成长性伴随高波 动，投资者需先厘清三大问题：是否已经通过底层资产了解清楚产品的特性、能否承受历史最大回撤、是否匹配投资期限与收 益预期，越是市场热度 ...

Group 1 - The report emphasizes the importance of public fund managers focusing on performance benchmarks to prevent "style drift" and create excess returns while controlling tracking error [10][11][28] - The report explores quantitative strategies from the perspective of active equity fund managers to reduce tracking error without affecting excess returns [10][28] - The report highlights that industry neutralization strategies can effectively reduce portfolio deviation from benchmarks while ensuring excess returns are not impacted [28][60] Group 2 - Industry neutralization strategies ensure that the industry allocation of the portfolio matches that of the benchmark index, maintaining the relative proportions of stocks within existing industries [16][28] - The report presents two methods for industry neutralization: one based on CITIC's primary industry classification and another based on industry clustering, each with its advantages and disadvantages [28][60] - The performance metrics for a fund applying industry neutralization show a reduction in annualized tracking error from 12.07% to 8.17%, with an increase in annualized excess return from 4.89% to 5.26% [20][28] Group 3 - Style neutralization strategies involve recalculating stock weights to ensure the portfolio's exposure to style factors aligns with the benchmark [29][60] - The report indicates that the effectiveness of style neutralization is limited, with some funds experiencing increased tracking error after optimization [29][61] - The report suggests that the complexity of the Barra_CNE5 multi-factor risk model may contribute to the ineffectiveness of style neutralization, as it includes various factors beyond style [37][61] Group 4 - The "Core-Satellite" strategy allocates a percentage of the portfolio to replicate the benchmark index while allowing for active management of the remaining portion to generate excess returns [40][60] - The report recommends a core allocation between 30% and 50% to balance benchmark tracking and management flexibility [41][60] - The report discusses sampling methods to replicate index performance, with the stratified sampling method showing the best results in terms of tracking error and excess returns [48][49]