中央纪委国家监委网站 吕佳蓉 近日，中央纪委国家监委驻中国建设银行纪检监察组案件审理室组成评查小组，赴中国建设银行新疆维 吾尔自治区分行，对该行纪委2024年以来办结的违纪案件开展现场评查。 "近两年，共评查直管单位纪委已办结案件1997件，年度评查覆盖率达100%。对组内自办的48件违纪违 法案件进行自查，一案一评、逐案反馈，发现并督促整改问题72个。"驻建行纪检监察组有关负责同志 说。 做实案件质量评查"后半篇文章"，驻建行纪检监察组定期总结案件质量评查情况，点名道姓通报直管单 位纪委已办结案件中证据不足、定性不准、量纪不当、程序不合规、文书不规范等典型问题，要求各单 位深入整改、举一反三，实现"评查一案，全员受教"的效果。对案件质量问题较多的直管单位纪委相关 负责同志进行约谈，通报存在的突出问题，督促剖析问题成因，采取有效措施从根源上整改。 前不久，驻建行纪检监察组编发第6期《审理业务参考》，聚焦国有银行管理人员套取营销费用行为性 质辨析，党员公职人员醉驾应如何适用条规和确定处分档次，如何认定党员领导干部参与赌博的行为性 质等内容做好答疑解惑，为全行纪检机构审理同类型案例提供借鉴和指导。 评查既要督促解 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining high-quality standards in case handling within the disciplinary inspection and supervision system, highlighting the role of the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision's case review department in ensuring case quality and providing guidance throughout the process [5][9]. Group 1: Case Quality Assurance - The case quality is described as the "lifeline" of disciplinary enforcement work and a key factor for high-quality development in inspection and supervision [5]. - The case review department has established a comprehensive quality control system through precise reviews, all-around business guidance, and multi-dimensional quality assessments [5][6]. - In September 2022, the case review department was recognized as an advanced collective in the national disciplinary inspection and supervision system [5]. Group 2: Internal Review and Guidance - The case review department is responsible for reviewing cases of violations of party discipline and job-related misconduct, providing opinions on handling or punishment according to regulations [6]. - A tiered review system was established in 2018 to enhance case quality, involving initial reviews by case handlers followed by feedback for further investigation [6][7]. - Regular meetings are held to discuss case reports, ensuring all substantive and procedural disputes are resolved before submission for broader discussion [6][9]. Group 3: Addressing Complex Cases - The case review department plays a crucial role in resolving complex issues within cases, as demonstrated by a specific case involving a provincial enterprise leader accused of serious violations [8]. - The department provided comprehensive reviews and suggestions for further investigation, leading to a more accurate understanding of the case and its implications [8]. Group 4: Business Guidance and Standardization - The case review department has initiated comprehensive business guidance to address the lack of capacity and skills at the grassroots level, drafting work methods and providing templates for case handling [10]. - These initiatives aim to enhance the standardization and legal compliance of grassroots disciplinary inspection work [10][12]. Group 5: Case Quality Evaluation - Case quality evaluations are essential for improving case handling, with a three-tiered evaluation mechanism established to ensure ongoing quality improvement [13]. - The evaluation process includes learning relevant policies, communicating with case handlers, and identifying issues through a structured feedback mechanism [13][14]. - The department has successfully reduced the rate of case returns and the number of serious quality issues, indicating a positive trend in case quality [14].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the initiative taken by the Yangqu County Procuratorate to enhance the quality of legal documents through an external evaluation team, which includes various legal professionals and representatives [1][2] - The evaluation team conducted a thorough review of 55 legal documents, focusing on common types such as indictments and non-prosecution decisions, to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance with legal standards [1][2] - Following the evaluation, the Yangqu County Procuratorate plans to establish standardized templates for the four types of legal documents and implement regular quality assessments and training to promote continuous improvement in document quality [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and National Supervisory Commission emphasizes the importance of case quality in disciplinary inspection work, highlighting ongoing efforts to improve case handling effectiveness and compliance with regulations [2][3]. Group 1: Supervision and Inspection - The disciplinary inspection team at the National Pipeline Network Group conducted a quality supervision check at three affiliated companies, identifying 17 issues related to unclear investigations and inadequate disciplinary actions [2]. - A comprehensive supervision checklist with 34 items was developed to cover all aspects of case handling, including report acceptance and evidence processing [2]. - Since the beginning of the year, the inspection team has visited 14 affiliated units, uncovering and correcting 49 issues related to evidence, case classification, and disciplinary execution [2]. Group 2: Case Quality Evaluation - The inspection team has conducted annual case quality evaluations for four consecutive years, focusing on weak areas such as evidence handling and disciplinary measures [3]. - A feedback mechanism was established, where results from the 2024 case quality evaluations were communicated to 30 affiliated units, prompting comprehensive rectifications [2][3]. - The team utilizes an information system for centralized case management, allowing for real-time access to completed case files for evaluation purposes [3]. Group 3: Continuous Improvement and Training - The inspection team aims to enhance case quality through targeted guidance and supervision, addressing specific issues identified during evaluations [3]. - Regular training sessions and practical guides are provided to improve the understanding and application of disciplinary measures among staff [3]. - Future plans include normalizing case quality supervision, refining professional capabilities, and standardizing disciplinary practices to achieve overall improvements in case handling quality [3].

本级审理发现的问题进行分类梳理，汇编后在一定范围通报，督促相关纪检监察机构对照检查、整改提 升，形成纠错一次、规范一批的长效机制。 在省纪委监委示范带动下，该省各级纪检监察机关扎实推进案件质量评查工作。遵义市纪委监委以季度 为周期，定期对全市15个县（市、区）纪委监委已办结案件开展质量评查。黔西南布依族苗族自治州纪 委监委对照上级纪检监察机关案件质量评查标准，细化8大项120余小项评查标准，明确具体问题的认定 情形和尺度标准，及时发现问题并推动整改。凯里市纪委监委从事实证据、定性处理等6个方面列出31 项评查清单，采取日常自查、交叉评查、全面评查、集中评查工作模式，对案件办理质量实行动态监 管。 贵州各级纪检监察机关将案件质量评查作为规范监督执纪执法的有力抓手，紧盯突出问题，及时纠偏正 向、强力夯基固本。近日，贵州省纪委监委举办案件质量剖析讲堂，案件审理室负责同志紧扣全省纪检 监察系统案件质量评查情况，从案件质量方面存在的问题、原因剖析、相关要求与工作建议三个方面， 面向省、市、县、乡纪检监察干部授课。通过选取典型案例进行深度剖析，为各级办案工作"问诊把 脉"，推动全省各级纪检监察机关进一步提升案件质量。 与 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of the Daitian County Discipline Inspection Commission and Supervisory Committee in improving the quality of case reviews and ensuring strict adherence to regulations and laws in handling disciplinary cases [1][2][5]. Group 1: Case Review and Quality Control - The Daitian County Discipline Inspection Commission's case review office has processed 349 cases involving 367 individuals in 2023, with no wrongful convictions reported [1]. - A quality assessment mechanism has been established, focusing on a "self-check + evaluation + feedback + supervision + rectification" approach, with 299 cases reviewed and over 650 issues rectified since 2024 [5][6]. - The office emphasizes the importance of accurate case classification and appropriate disciplinary measures, as demonstrated in a case involving a village accountant where the initial classification was deemed inappropriate [2][3]. Group 2: Training and Capacity Building - The case review office has implemented a dual-track learning model combining theory and practical examples, enhancing the professional skills of its staff through interactive training sessions [1][6]. - Experienced staff members actively mentor newer colleagues, fostering a culture of knowledge sharing and continuous improvement [1][5]. - The office has developed guiding documents and "pocket books" to standardize case handling procedures, ensuring that all personnel can easily access necessary information [6]. Group 3: Communication and Support - The case review office engages in empathetic communication with individuals involved in disciplinary actions, as seen in a case where a party member was assisted in understanding the importance of party discipline [4]. - The office's approach combines strict adherence to regulations with a supportive attitude, aiming to maintain the integrity of the disciplinary process while addressing individual concerns [4][5].

Group 1 - The Anhui Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has initiated a comprehensive case quality evaluation work for 2025, which will last for 10 months and involve self-assessment, cross-evaluation, and focused reviews of completed cases [1] - The evaluation will involve a three-level linkage among provincial, municipal, and county levels, with various institutions conducting self-checks and cross-evaluations to identify issues in case quality [1] - Four case quality evaluation teams have been established to randomly select no less than 10% of cases for focused reviews, emphasizing problem orientation and compliance with procedures [1] Group 2 - The Anhui Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision will analyze and provide feedback on the issues identified during the evaluation, with reports on case quality and accountability being communicated appropriately [2] - The commission has been regularly conducting case quality evaluations to enhance the case handling quality system and improve overall case effectiveness [2] - In the second half of 2024, a comprehensive evaluation will be conducted on cases related to corruption and misconduct at the grassroots level across 16 municipalities and 104 counties, addressing issues such as improper case handling and inadequate corrective measures [2]