2025年11月，安溪县检察院开展案件质量随机评查活动，以全院检察官当年办案量不少于6%的比例， 从1500余件已审结或生效的案件中抽取106件进行评查。评查内容包括实体公正、程序规范、办案效果 及司法责任制落实等10余项，评查结果纳入检察官年度业绩考核，记入检察官司法档案。 "此次案件质量随机评查活动，旨在把常见多发的'积弊顽疾'找出来，指出案件在事实认定、证据采 信、法律适用、监督履职、文书制作等方面存在的问题，从理念、能力及责任落实上分析原因，制定整 改和预防措施。"安溪县检察院负责人介绍。评查中发现的一些问题，如个别法律条文引用不够具体、 有的用词容易产生歧义、案卡填写欠规范等，尽管不影响监督整体质效，但绝不能小看。要把细枝末节 的"小问题"置于显微镜下"放大看"，从一点一滴抓起、一枝一节改起，形成严谨规范的办案作风。 "小节"不小看 "小题"也大做 福建安溪：开展案件质量随机评查活动 本报讯（全媒体记者张仁平 通讯员陈冰冰）"案件质量合格是最基本的要求，要从写好每一份法律文 书、规范表述每一个法律术语做起，甚至细致到每一个标点符号的用法……"新年伊始，福建省安溪县 检察院通报评查检察官办案情况，列出 ...

中央纪委国家监委网站 张丽敏 "整改不是终点，而是要让审查调查人员检视短板不足，从源头上解决问题，形成查审合力。"甘肃省纪 委监委案件审理室负责人表示。从个案纠错向类案剖析拓展，既找准"病灶"，又开好"药方"。该省纪检 监察机关案件审理部门深化案件成果运用，会同监督检查室、审查调查室、派驻机构梳理行业性、系统 性问题，把个案审理与推动整改、完善制度贯通起来。 "我们坚持查纠并举、以查促改，对评查发现的问题建立台账、分类定责、限时整改。针对评查暴露出 的普遍性、倾向性问题，抽调相关业务骨干开展专题业务培训，持续靶向发力补齐能力短板。"甘肃省 纪委监委相关负责同志表示。 以精准规范的审理实践赋能案件质量提升。甘肃省纪委监委案件审理室深挖案例资源，加强类案分析， 聚焦历次案件质量评查中反复暴露的程序手续、管理规范方面典型问题，形成靶向整改清单，通过举办 省级案件质量评查反馈培训会、下发审理提示、业务答疑等多种方式，督促各级审理部门校准自身工作 偏差，向相关单位精准反馈问题，引导办案人员强化纪法思维，将法治方式贯通监督执纪执法全过程， 确保案件查办政治效果、纪法效果、社会效果有机统一。 在开展群众身边不正之风和腐败问 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of enhancing case quality in the disciplinary inspection and supervision work in Henan Province, focusing on systematic evaluation and improvement mechanisms [1][3] - The Henan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has established a multi-level evaluation system to ensure comprehensive scrutiny of key aspects such as evidence, classification, procedures, documentation, and execution of penalties [1][3] - The evaluation process includes daily assessments and concentrated reviews of self-handled cases, accountability cases, and cases from dispatched agencies, promoting self-examination and correction [1][2] Group 2 - The Anyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has developed a quality control mechanism that includes self-assessment, collaborative evaluation, and follow-up reviews to ensure thorough oversight of case handling [2] - The Hebi City He District Commission has implemented a "multi-level, full coverage" evaluation system, requiring case handlers to conduct self-assessments against four key criteria before case transfer [2] - The Nanyang Municipal Commission focuses on accountability case evaluations, ensuring thorough rectification of identified issues and promoting a culture of continuous improvement among disciplinary inspection personnel [3] Group 3 - The emphasis on "evaluation" and "correction" highlights the dual approach of identifying and rectifying issues, with a focus on establishing a dynamic accountability system for problem resolution [3] - The implementation of a dynamic rectification ledger and regular follow-up reviews ensures that issues are addressed promptly and effectively, preventing recurrence [3][4] - The establishment of a comprehensive case quality system includes guidelines for common issues, training sessions for staff, and targeted support to enhance operational standards [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection emphasizes the importance of high-quality case handling in the development of discipline inspection and supervision work, highlighting the need for a robust case quality review mechanism to ensure accountability and improvement in the process [1] Group 1: Mechanism Improvement - The review mechanism will be refined by establishing clear evaluation standards and a comprehensive assessment system, breaking down the review content into 17 specific items and creating 76 quantifiable scoring criteria [2] - A daily online and offline review system will be established to strengthen the foundation of case quality assessment, ensuring a systematic approach to identifying and rectifying issues [2] Group 2: Regular Review Practices - Regular assessments of completed cases will shift from semi-annual to quarterly evaluations, allowing for continuous monitoring and comprehensive health checks of the cases handled by direct management units [3] - In 2024, a thorough review of 48 self-handled disciplinary cases will be conducted, focusing on the entire process from initial handling to case file management [3] Group 3: Expanding Review Content - The review process will incorporate both online and offline methods, with specialized training for review personnel to ensure consistency in evaluation standards [4] - The review will also include the examination of disciplinary recommendations and their effectiveness, ensuring that issues identified during case handling are addressed to improve governance [5] Group 4: Post-Review Actions - The review process is seen as a starting point for deeper rectification and mechanism optimization, with regular summaries and notifications issued to address identified issues [6] - A dual mechanism of positive reinforcement and accountability will be implemented to enhance the effectiveness of the review process and ensure compliance with corrective measures [6] Group 5: Training and Guidance - Training programs will be organized annually to enhance the professional capabilities of discipline inspection personnel, focusing on practical case handling and emerging corruption issues [7] - Practical training methods, such as simulated case testing and case discussions, will be employed to improve the skills and knowledge of the staff [7]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and National Supervisory Commission's inspection team is conducting on-site evaluations of disciplinary cases at the China Construction Bank's Xinjiang branch to enhance the quality of case handling and promote high-quality development in discipline inspection and supervision [1][2]. Group 1: Evaluation Mechanism - The inspection team has revised the "Case Quality Evaluation Standards and Scoring Details," focusing on five aspects: evidence, qualitative handling, procedural compliance, management norms, and execution, with 17 evaluation items and 76 scoring criteria [1][2]. - A comprehensive evaluation system has been established, incorporating online evaluations, on-site evaluations, and special evaluations to strengthen the foundation of case quality assessments [1]. Group 2: Evaluation Frequency and Findings - The frequency of evaluations for completed cases has increased from semi-annual to quarterly, allowing for regular monitoring and timely feedback [2]. - From July to August, the inspection team completed a second round of evaluations, identifying issues in qualitative handling and promoting corrective actions [2]. Group 3: Training and Guidance - The inspection team regularly summarizes evaluation results, addressing typical issues such as insufficient evidence and procedural non-compliance, and requires units to implement corrective measures [3]. - Annual training sessions are held for discipline inspection personnel, enhancing their professional capabilities and addressing common quality issues through targeted guidance materials [4]. Group 4: Future Directions - The inspection team aims to further deepen case quality evaluations and innovate evaluation methods to enhance the standardization and legal compliance of discipline inspection work across the organization [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining high-quality standards in case handling within the disciplinary inspection and supervision system, highlighting the role of the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision's case review department in ensuring case quality and providing guidance throughout the process [5][9]. Group 1: Case Quality Assurance - The case quality is described as the "lifeline" of disciplinary enforcement work and a key factor for high-quality development in inspection and supervision [5]. - The case review department has established a comprehensive quality control system through precise reviews, all-around business guidance, and multi-dimensional quality assessments [5][6]. - In September 2022, the case review department was recognized as an advanced collective in the national disciplinary inspection and supervision system [5]. Group 2: Internal Review and Guidance - The case review department is responsible for reviewing cases of violations of party discipline and job-related misconduct, providing opinions on handling or punishment according to regulations [6]. - A tiered review system was established in 2018 to enhance case quality, involving initial reviews by case handlers followed by feedback for further investigation [6][7]. - Regular meetings are held to discuss case reports, ensuring all substantive and procedural disputes are resolved before submission for broader discussion [6][9]. Group 3: Addressing Complex Cases - The case review department plays a crucial role in resolving complex issues within cases, as demonstrated by a specific case involving a provincial enterprise leader accused of serious violations [8]. - The department provided comprehensive reviews and suggestions for further investigation, leading to a more accurate understanding of the case and its implications [8]. Group 4: Business Guidance and Standardization - The case review department has initiated comprehensive business guidance to address the lack of capacity and skills at the grassroots level, drafting work methods and providing templates for case handling [10]. - These initiatives aim to enhance the standardization and legal compliance of grassroots disciplinary inspection work [10][12]. Group 5: Case Quality Evaluation - Case quality evaluations are essential for improving case handling, with a three-tiered evaluation mechanism established to ensure ongoing quality improvement [13]. - The evaluation process includes learning relevant policies, communicating with case handlers, and identifying issues through a structured feedback mechanism [13][14]. - The department has successfully reduced the rate of case returns and the number of serious quality issues, indicating a positive trend in case quality [14].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the initiative taken by the Yangqu County Procuratorate to enhance the quality of legal documents through an external evaluation team, which includes various legal professionals and representatives [1][2] - The evaluation team conducted a thorough review of 55 legal documents, focusing on common types such as indictments and non-prosecution decisions, to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance with legal standards [1][2] - Following the evaluation, the Yangqu County Procuratorate plans to establish standardized templates for the four types of legal documents and implement regular quality assessments and training to promote continuous improvement in document quality [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and National Supervisory Commission emphasizes the importance of case quality in disciplinary inspection work, highlighting ongoing efforts to improve case handling effectiveness and compliance with regulations [2][3]. Group 1: Supervision and Inspection - The disciplinary inspection team at the National Pipeline Network Group conducted a quality supervision check at three affiliated companies, identifying 17 issues related to unclear investigations and inadequate disciplinary actions [2]. - A comprehensive supervision checklist with 34 items was developed to cover all aspects of case handling, including report acceptance and evidence processing [2]. - Since the beginning of the year, the inspection team has visited 14 affiliated units, uncovering and correcting 49 issues related to evidence, case classification, and disciplinary execution [2]. Group 2: Case Quality Evaluation - The inspection team has conducted annual case quality evaluations for four consecutive years, focusing on weak areas such as evidence handling and disciplinary measures [3]. - A feedback mechanism was established, where results from the 2024 case quality evaluations were communicated to 30 affiliated units, prompting comprehensive rectifications [2][3]. - The team utilizes an information system for centralized case management, allowing for real-time access to completed case files for evaluation purposes [3]. Group 3: Continuous Improvement and Training - The inspection team aims to enhance case quality through targeted guidance and supervision, addressing specific issues identified during evaluations [3]. - Regular training sessions and practical guides are provided to improve the understanding and application of disciplinary measures among staff [3]. - Future plans include normalizing case quality supervision, refining professional capabilities, and standardizing disciplinary practices to achieve overall improvements in case handling quality [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has initiated a new round of case quality evaluations to enhance the quality of disciplinary inspection and supervision work across the province [1][2][3] Group 1: Evaluation Process - The evaluation will utilize self-examination, cross-evaluation, and upper-level sampling to assess cases that have been concluded in the past three years [1] - A comprehensive evaluation framework has been established, including daily evaluations, comprehensive evaluations, and special evaluations to ensure continuous improvement in case handling quality [3][4] Group 2: Implementation and Standards - Local disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies are actively implementing case quality evaluations, with specific standards and criteria developed for assessments [2] - The evaluation process includes a detailed checklist of 31 items focusing on evidence, qualitative handling, and other aspects to ensure dynamic monitoring of case quality [2] Group 3: Training and Capacity Building - The provincial commission has organized training sessions to analyze case quality issues, providing guidance to various levels of disciplinary inspection and supervision personnel [2] - Typical cases are selected for in-depth analysis to enhance the overall quality of case handling across the province [2] Group 4: Feedback and Continuous Improvement - A closed-loop quality control process has been established to discover problems, provide feedback, track supervision, and promote improvements [3] - Issues identified during evaluations are compiled into problem lists and quality evaluation reports, which are then communicated to relevant agencies for timely rectification [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of the Daitian County Discipline Inspection Commission and Supervisory Committee in improving the quality of case reviews and ensuring strict adherence to regulations and laws in handling disciplinary cases [1][2][5]. Group 1: Case Review and Quality Control - The Daitian County Discipline Inspection Commission's case review office has processed 349 cases involving 367 individuals in 2023, with no wrongful convictions reported [1]. - A quality assessment mechanism has been established, focusing on a "self-check + evaluation + feedback + supervision + rectification" approach, with 299 cases reviewed and over 650 issues rectified since 2024 [5][6]. - The office emphasizes the importance of accurate case classification and appropriate disciplinary measures, as demonstrated in a case involving a village accountant where the initial classification was deemed inappropriate [2][3]. Group 2: Training and Capacity Building - The case review office has implemented a dual-track learning model combining theory and practical examples, enhancing the professional skills of its staff through interactive training sessions [1][6]. - Experienced staff members actively mentor newer colleagues, fostering a culture of knowledge sharing and continuous improvement [1][5]. - The office has developed guiding documents and "pocket books" to standardize case handling procedures, ensuring that all personnel can easily access necessary information [6]. Group 3: Communication and Support - The case review office engages in empathetic communication with individuals involved in disciplinary actions, as seen in a case where a party member was assisted in understanding the importance of party discipline [4]. - The office's approach combines strict adherence to regulations with a supportive attitude, aiming to maintain the integrity of the disciplinary process while addressing individual concerns [4][5].