鹤壁市鹤山区纪委监委构建"多层级、全覆盖"评查体系，案件移送审理前，案件承办部门对照"事实证 据完整性、定性处理准确性、程序手续合规性、文书制作规范性"四大类清单开展自查自评；案件审理 室每季度随机抽取重点案件进行抽查；乡镇（街道）纪（工）委实行"分片交叉互查"，确保评查无死 角、全覆盖。义马市纪委监委推行三级案件评查模式，案件承办人员进行系统性自查初审，各协作区组 织开展交叉互评，案件审理室进行集中复盘审议，逐案反馈问题，并推动整改落实，有效提升案件查办 质效。 案件评查重点在"评"，关键在"改"。河南省纪检监察机关坚持查纠并举、以查促改，对评查发现的问题 建立台账、分类定责、限时整改，以整改实效筑牢案件质量"防火墙"。南阳市纪委监委紧盯问责案件评 查发现的问题，层层压实整改责任，组织开展整改情况"回头看"，确保问题改彻底。同时，系统归纳梳 理评查发现的突出问题，形成专题评查报告印发全市纪检监察机关学习借鉴，提升纪检监察干部依规依 纪依法办案水平。泌阳县纪委监委对评查发现的问题实行"一案一反馈、一问题一整改"，通过现场点问 题、清单交任务、限期销号清零等方式，推动问题立行立改。同时，建立整改动态台账，定期开 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection emphasizes the importance of high-quality case handling in the development of discipline inspection and supervision work, highlighting the need for a robust case quality review mechanism to ensure accountability and improvement in the process [1] Group 1: Mechanism Improvement - The review mechanism will be refined by establishing clear evaluation standards and a comprehensive assessment system, breaking down the review content into 17 specific items and creating 76 quantifiable scoring criteria [2] - A daily online and offline review system will be established to strengthen the foundation of case quality assessment, ensuring a systematic approach to identifying and rectifying issues [2] Group 2: Regular Review Practices - Regular assessments of completed cases will shift from semi-annual to quarterly evaluations, allowing for continuous monitoring and comprehensive health checks of the cases handled by direct management units [3] - In 2024, a thorough review of 48 self-handled disciplinary cases will be conducted, focusing on the entire process from initial handling to case file management [3] Group 3: Expanding Review Content - The review process will incorporate both online and offline methods, with specialized training for review personnel to ensure consistency in evaluation standards [4] - The review will also include the examination of disciplinary recommendations and their effectiveness, ensuring that issues identified during case handling are addressed to improve governance [5] Group 4: Post-Review Actions - The review process is seen as a starting point for deeper rectification and mechanism optimization, with regular summaries and notifications issued to address identified issues [6] - A dual mechanism of positive reinforcement and accountability will be implemented to enhance the effectiveness of the review process and ensure compliance with corrective measures [6] Group 5: Training and Guidance - Training programs will be organized annually to enhance the professional capabilities of discipline inspection personnel, focusing on practical case handling and emerging corruption issues [7] - Practical training methods, such as simulated case testing and case discussions, will be employed to improve the skills and knowledge of the staff [7]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and National Supervisory Commission's inspection team is conducting on-site evaluations of disciplinary cases at the China Construction Bank's Xinjiang branch to enhance the quality of case handling and promote high-quality development in discipline inspection and supervision [1][2]. Group 1: Evaluation Mechanism - The inspection team has revised the "Case Quality Evaluation Standards and Scoring Details," focusing on five aspects: evidence, qualitative handling, procedural compliance, management norms, and execution, with 17 evaluation items and 76 scoring criteria [1][2]. - A comprehensive evaluation system has been established, incorporating online evaluations, on-site evaluations, and special evaluations to strengthen the foundation of case quality assessments [1]. Group 2: Evaluation Frequency and Findings - The frequency of evaluations for completed cases has increased from semi-annual to quarterly, allowing for regular monitoring and timely feedback [2]. - From July to August, the inspection team completed a second round of evaluations, identifying issues in qualitative handling and promoting corrective actions [2]. Group 3: Training and Guidance - The inspection team regularly summarizes evaluation results, addressing typical issues such as insufficient evidence and procedural non-compliance, and requires units to implement corrective measures [3]. - Annual training sessions are held for discipline inspection personnel, enhancing their professional capabilities and addressing common quality issues through targeted guidance materials [4]. Group 4: Future Directions - The inspection team aims to further deepen case quality evaluations and innovate evaluation methods to enhance the standardization and legal compliance of discipline inspection work across the organization [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining high-quality standards in case handling within the disciplinary inspection and supervision system, highlighting the role of the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision's case review department in ensuring case quality and providing guidance throughout the process [5][9]. Group 1: Case Quality Assurance - The case quality is described as the "lifeline" of disciplinary enforcement work and a key factor for high-quality development in inspection and supervision [5]. - The case review department has established a comprehensive quality control system through precise reviews, all-around business guidance, and multi-dimensional quality assessments [5][6]. - In September 2022, the case review department was recognized as an advanced collective in the national disciplinary inspection and supervision system [5]. Group 2: Internal Review and Guidance - The case review department is responsible for reviewing cases of violations of party discipline and job-related misconduct, providing opinions on handling or punishment according to regulations [6]. - A tiered review system was established in 2018 to enhance case quality, involving initial reviews by case handlers followed by feedback for further investigation [6][7]. - Regular meetings are held to discuss case reports, ensuring all substantive and procedural disputes are resolved before submission for broader discussion [6][9]. Group 3: Addressing Complex Cases - The case review department plays a crucial role in resolving complex issues within cases, as demonstrated by a specific case involving a provincial enterprise leader accused of serious violations [8]. - The department provided comprehensive reviews and suggestions for further investigation, leading to a more accurate understanding of the case and its implications [8]. Group 4: Business Guidance and Standardization - The case review department has initiated comprehensive business guidance to address the lack of capacity and skills at the grassroots level, drafting work methods and providing templates for case handling [10]. - These initiatives aim to enhance the standardization and legal compliance of grassroots disciplinary inspection work [10][12]. Group 5: Case Quality Evaluation - Case quality evaluations are essential for improving case handling, with a three-tiered evaluation mechanism established to ensure ongoing quality improvement [13]. - The evaluation process includes learning relevant policies, communicating with case handlers, and identifying issues through a structured feedback mechanism [13][14]. - The department has successfully reduced the rate of case returns and the number of serious quality issues, indicating a positive trend in case quality [14].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the initiative taken by the Yangqu County Procuratorate to enhance the quality of legal documents through an external evaluation team, which includes various legal professionals and representatives [1][2] - The evaluation team conducted a thorough review of 55 legal documents, focusing on common types such as indictments and non-prosecution decisions, to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance with legal standards [1][2] - Following the evaluation, the Yangqu County Procuratorate plans to establish standardized templates for the four types of legal documents and implement regular quality assessments and training to promote continuous improvement in document quality [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and National Supervisory Commission emphasizes the importance of case quality in disciplinary inspection work, highlighting ongoing efforts to improve case handling effectiveness and compliance with regulations [2][3]. Group 1: Supervision and Inspection - The disciplinary inspection team at the National Pipeline Network Group conducted a quality supervision check at three affiliated companies, identifying 17 issues related to unclear investigations and inadequate disciplinary actions [2]. - A comprehensive supervision checklist with 34 items was developed to cover all aspects of case handling, including report acceptance and evidence processing [2]. - Since the beginning of the year, the inspection team has visited 14 affiliated units, uncovering and correcting 49 issues related to evidence, case classification, and disciplinary execution [2]. Group 2: Case Quality Evaluation - The inspection team has conducted annual case quality evaluations for four consecutive years, focusing on weak areas such as evidence handling and disciplinary measures [3]. - A feedback mechanism was established, where results from the 2024 case quality evaluations were communicated to 30 affiliated units, prompting comprehensive rectifications [2][3]. - The team utilizes an information system for centralized case management, allowing for real-time access to completed case files for evaluation purposes [3]. Group 3: Continuous Improvement and Training - The inspection team aims to enhance case quality through targeted guidance and supervision, addressing specific issues identified during evaluations [3]. - Regular training sessions and practical guides are provided to improve the understanding and application of disciplinary measures among staff [3]. - Future plans include normalizing case quality supervision, refining professional capabilities, and standardizing disciplinary practices to achieve overall improvements in case handling quality [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has initiated a new round of case quality evaluations to enhance the quality of disciplinary inspection and supervision work across the province [1][2][3] Group 1: Evaluation Process - The evaluation will utilize self-examination, cross-evaluation, and upper-level sampling to assess cases that have been concluded in the past three years [1] - A comprehensive evaluation framework has been established, including daily evaluations, comprehensive evaluations, and special evaluations to ensure continuous improvement in case handling quality [3][4] Group 2: Implementation and Standards - Local disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies are actively implementing case quality evaluations, with specific standards and criteria developed for assessments [2] - The evaluation process includes a detailed checklist of 31 items focusing on evidence, qualitative handling, and other aspects to ensure dynamic monitoring of case quality [2] Group 3: Training and Capacity Building - The provincial commission has organized training sessions to analyze case quality issues, providing guidance to various levels of disciplinary inspection and supervision personnel [2] - Typical cases are selected for in-depth analysis to enhance the overall quality of case handling across the province [2] Group 4: Feedback and Continuous Improvement - A closed-loop quality control process has been established to discover problems, provide feedback, track supervision, and promote improvements [3] - Issues identified during evaluations are compiled into problem lists and quality evaluation reports, which are then communicated to relevant agencies for timely rectification [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of the Daitian County Discipline Inspection Commission and Supervisory Committee in improving the quality of case reviews and ensuring strict adherence to regulations and laws in handling disciplinary cases [1][2][5]. Group 1: Case Review and Quality Control - The Daitian County Discipline Inspection Commission's case review office has processed 349 cases involving 367 individuals in 2023, with no wrongful convictions reported [1]. - A quality assessment mechanism has been established, focusing on a "self-check + evaluation + feedback + supervision + rectification" approach, with 299 cases reviewed and over 650 issues rectified since 2024 [5][6]. - The office emphasizes the importance of accurate case classification and appropriate disciplinary measures, as demonstrated in a case involving a village accountant where the initial classification was deemed inappropriate [2][3]. Group 2: Training and Capacity Building - The case review office has implemented a dual-track learning model combining theory and practical examples, enhancing the professional skills of its staff through interactive training sessions [1][6]. - Experienced staff members actively mentor newer colleagues, fostering a culture of knowledge sharing and continuous improvement [1][5]. - The office has developed guiding documents and "pocket books" to standardize case handling procedures, ensuring that all personnel can easily access necessary information [6]. Group 3: Communication and Support - The case review office engages in empathetic communication with individuals involved in disciplinary actions, as seen in a case where a party member was assisted in understanding the importance of party discipline [4]. - The office's approach combines strict adherence to regulations with a supportive attitude, aiming to maintain the integrity of the disciplinary process while addressing individual concerns [4][5].

Group 1 - The Anhui Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has initiated a comprehensive case quality evaluation work for 2025, which will last for 10 months and involve self-assessment, cross-evaluation, and focused reviews of completed cases [1] - The evaluation will involve a three-level linkage among provincial, municipal, and county levels, with various institutions conducting self-checks and cross-evaluations to identify issues in case quality [1] - Four case quality evaluation teams have been established to randomly select no less than 10% of cases for focused reviews, emphasizing problem orientation and compliance with procedures [1] Group 2 - The Anhui Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision will analyze and provide feedback on the issues identified during the evaluation, with reports on case quality and accountability being communicated appropriately [2] - The commission has been regularly conducting case quality evaluations to enhance the case handling quality system and improve overall case effectiveness [2] - In the second half of 2024, a comprehensive evaluation will be conducted on cases related to corruption and misconduct at the grassroots level across 16 municipalities and 104 counties, addressing issues such as improper case handling and inadequate corrective measures [2]