Workflow
爆仓
icon
Search documents
X @憨巴龙王
憨巴龙王· 2025-10-07 01:51
现在是2025年了,操盘的又升级了。21年以前,都是散户做多,资金费随便吃,仓位随便开,我基本都5x杠杆玩山寨。22年的时候,散户被割晕了,开始学会做空了,主力就玩小币拉升,引诱散户做空,然后一直拉现货。负溢价你受不了。现在25年了,散户也知道小币不能做空,主力找不到对手盘了,就开始搞套利的了。之前pumpbtc应该是有傻大户被爆了几千万刀,最高点3分钟翻倍,然后1分钟持仓掉了4000万刀,典型的套利被爆,主力自动adl。还有hype上xpl也是操纵爆套利的,还有昨晚的bybit的seraph。我也玩小币套利,但是我爆仓价基本都是×100倍。也就是一天拉10倍我都游刃有余。对于小资金还好,不对劲直接砍仓就行了。对于大资金来说,最麻烦的是,你砍不了,别人就是爆你的。比方说我2000万刀保证金,开一个小币套利100万刀,爆仓价看似20倍,但是现在动不动一天拉10倍,这时候你仓位就是1000万刀,你根本不可能减仓的,一定会加速,主力就是盯着爆你去的。 ...
X @憨巴龙王
憨巴龙王· 2025-10-06 20:52
有人知道,这种情况,bybit爆仓是按指数价格(现货)触发的吧?那跟3.12一样,100%不会爆,随便滚仓空?憨巴龙王 (@dotyyds1234):不知道啥情况啊,看到晚了,正好空在山顶,有点后怕啊。我要是0.6看到,肯定也空了,后面拉3倍,给我拉爆了(bybit没钱)。运气好....正好看到的时候就在最高点。 https://t.co/ni8VvxLH0k ...
加密货币继续暴跌,以太坊失守3900美元大关,多头遭大规模强平
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-09-25 22:32
以太坊跌破3900美元关口,创近七周新低,延续了本周以来的加密货币大幅回调的势头,整个加密货币市场已蒸发超过1400亿美元市值。 9月25日,全球第二大加密货币以太坊一度下挫超7%,触及3823美元低点,随后小幅反弹、日内跌幅仍达6.55%。 Coinglass显示,近24小时全球共有近25万人被爆仓,爆仓总金额超11亿美元。 | 总爆仓 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1小时爆仓 | $1691.44万 | 4小时爆仓 | $5.55亿 | | 多車 | $1316.74万 | 多車 | $5.18亿 | | 空車 | $374.70万 | 空車 | $3767.11万 | | 12小时爆仓 | $8.21亿 | 24小时爆仓 | $11.48亿 | | 多車 | $7.45亿 | 多車 | $10.49亿 | | 空单 | $7623.21万 | 空单 | $9971.55万 | | E CALL P | A T-A L + O = m = ( ) } + | 1日人 4 人 人 灯 小 小 / 1 / | | 爆仓热力图显示,比特币与Solana两者爆仓规模分列第 ...
X @0xLIZ
0xLIZ· 2025-08-29 02:30
妈妈只希望你不要再炒币了。找个正经的班上当个主管多好,稳稳当当地赚钱。考个公务员让爸妈早点安心。你盯盘了三年,显示器都烧坏两个了,人还没熬出头。 爸爸担心你哪天爆仓就想不开,愁得降压药当饭吃。前几天妈妈寄的护肝片,你怎么没拆封啊?你这孩子到底还是太拼命,天天熬夜复盘,眼睛红得像个兔子。唉,回头是岸,靠炒币能财富自由的百里挑一。如果当年校招你没拒那个银行管培生offer,咱家现在该多舒坦啊。儿啊,妈也不图你当什么“币圈大佬”,活着回来就好。但赚钱不是光靠胆子大就行的—— 凌晨三点的爆仓短信响个不停,群里的“老师”喊单时比谁都准,一亏钱就玩消失,更别提那些不当人的狗庄,想拉就拉,想砸就砸……先别盯那红红绿绿的K线了,回家住几天补补觉。妈托人问了老家电网的岗位,工资拿到手是少,但心里踏实啊!还不用天天担心被“插针”收割! 你见哪个群友真靠合约暴富的?唉,都是交易所用高倍杠杆画饼哄你们卖命的!小时候你拼个四驱车,眼睛都亮晶晶的,现在瞳孔里全是K线,发际线退得比“瀑布”来得还快……都是炒币害的啊,唉……下个月你爸退休宴摆好了,千万别拿“行情来了要盯盘”推脱。妈再给你转五百,买顶好点的帽子遮遮,你爸呀,最怕看你像根被割秃 ...
碳酸锂期货敲警钟:1600万本金亏完,穿仓者倒欠期货公司464万
Hu Xiu· 2025-08-14 23:26
Core Viewpoint - The recent volatility in lithium carbonate futures has led to significant losses for investors, highlighting the importance of risk management in futures trading [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - An investor lost their entire principal of 16 million and owes the futures company 4.64 million due to a margin call and subsequent liquidation of positions [2][3]. - The incident serves as a warning for all futures traders regarding the necessity of effective risk control measures [2][3]. Group 2: Market Conditions - Since August 6, lithium carbonate futures have seen a cumulative increase of over 20%, with price fluctuations exceeding 30% [8][9]. - The trading volume for lithium carbonate futures has surged, with recent trading days recording volumes of 1.2454 million and 1.4177 million contracts, compared to previous levels of only tens of thousands [9]. Group 3: Price Movements - The market experienced a three-day rally last week, with a weekly increase of over 11%, and a significant price surge on Monday leading to a limit-up situation [11][14]. - The price of lithium carbonate has recently reached 85,300 yuan, following a period of volatility and speculation regarding supply disruptions [16]. Group 4: Supply and Demand Dynamics - The market reacted to rumors of production halts at the Jiangxiawo mine, which produces approximately 6,000 tons of lithium carbonate per month, accounting for about 9% of domestic supply [14]. - The supply uncertainty, combined with strong demand from the energy storage sector and recovering battery sales, is expected to support prices in the short term [26]. Group 5: Risk Management Strategies - To avoid similar incidents, it is crucial for investors to manage their positions and leverage carefully, maintaining sufficient margin buffers [21][23]. - Implementing stop-loss and take-profit strategies, as well as considering hedging or spread strategies in volatile markets, can mitigate risks [22].
1600万本金亏完,穿仓客户倒欠期货公司464万!碳酸锂期货敲警钟
财联社· 2025-08-14 14:20
Core Viewpoint - The recent volatility in lithium carbonate futures has highlighted significant risks in futures trading, particularly the occurrence of "margin calls" and "negative balances" due to extreme market conditions and insufficient liquidity [1][2][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A recent incident involved an investor who lost 16 million yuan and ended up owing 4.64 million yuan to a futures company due to a margin call in lithium carbonate futures trading [1]. - The terms "margin call" and "negative balance" are critical in understanding the risks associated with futures trading, where a negative balance occurs when losses exceed the available margin [2]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The recent trading environment for lithium carbonate has been characterized by significant price fluctuations, with trading volumes increasing sharply to 1.2454 million and 1.4177 million contracts over two days [7]. - The market was influenced by rumors and subsequent confirmation of production halts at a key lithium mine, which raised concerns about supply constraints [9][11]. Group 3: Price Movements - Lithium carbonate futures experienced a three-day rally, with a weekly increase exceeding 11%, and a peak price of 85,300 yuan per ton [10][12]. - The supply concerns from the halted production at the Ningde Times mine, which produces approximately 6,000 tons per month, have significantly impacted market sentiment [11]. Group 4: Risk Management - The occurrence of margin calls and negative balances in extreme market conditions is not uncommon, often resulting from traders holding onto losing positions without stop-loss measures [13]. - Futures companies typically respond to extreme market conditions by increasing margin requirements and limiting position sizes to mitigate systemic risks [14][15]. Group 5: Market Outlook - The current market for lithium carbonate is marked by ongoing divergence between bullish and bearish sentiments, driven by uncertainties in supply, recovering demand, and high inventory levels [16][17]. - Short-term price strength is expected due to strong demand in the energy storage sector, but medium-term caution is advised as supply recovery and inventory pressures may lead to price corrections [18].
1600万本金亏完 穿仓客户倒欠期货公司464万 碳酸锂期货敲警钟
Feng Huang Wang· 2025-08-14 09:23
Core Viewpoint - The recent volatility in lithium carbonate futures has led to significant financial losses for investors, highlighting the importance of risk management in futures trading [1][2]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - Since August 6, lithium carbonate futures have increased by over 20%, with fluctuations exceeding 30% [4]. - The trading volume for lithium carbonate futures surged, with recent days recording volumes of 1.2454 million and 1.4177 million contracts, compared to previous levels of only tens of thousands [4]. - The market experienced a three-day rally, with a weekly increase of over 11%, and a single-day price increase of 8% on Monday [6]. Group 2: Supply Concerns - The market's rapid price increase was fueled by rumors of production halts at the Jiangxiawo mining area owned by CATL, which was confirmed over the weekend [8]. - The Jiangxiawo mine is estimated to produce around 6,000 tons of lithium carbonate per month, accounting for approximately 9% of domestic supply, raising concerns about supply tightening [8]. Group 3: Risk Management - The concepts of "liquidation" and "negative balance" are critical in futures trading, with liquidation occurring when margin balances fall below required levels, and negative balance occurring when losses exceed the account balance [2]. - In extreme market conditions, futures companies may implement measures such as increasing margin requirements and limiting position sizes to mitigate systemic risks [11]. - Investors are advised to control their positions and leverage, maintain a margin buffer, and set stop-loss orders to avoid being caught in extreme market movements [12]. Group 4: Market Sentiment - Despite the recent price increases, there remains a divide between bullish and bearish sentiments in the lithium carbonate market, driven by uncertainties in supply, recovering demand, and high inventory levels [13]. - The current market dynamics suggest a strong probability of maintaining high prices in the short term, but caution is advised regarding potential corrections due to supply recovery and inventory pressure [13].
以太坊市场风云录:XBIT 最新双雄吸金看市场变迁,爆仓往事暗藏启示
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-09 14:32
Core Insights - Grayscale's Ethereum (ETH) saw a significant net inflow of $34.6 million, while Ethereum PoW fork (ETHW) attracted $24.8 million, totaling over $59 million in a single day, indicating a positive market sentiment amidst volatility [1][4] - The inflow into Grayscale ETH, although lower than the peak in December, signals institutional confidence in mainstream cryptocurrencies, particularly as traditional funds begin to reallocate amidst a slowing Federal Reserve interest rate hike expectation [4] - The unexpected inflow into ETHW may be attributed to the community's successful "hashrate upgrade," which improved block confirmation speed by 30%, despite its weak fundamentals and reliance on short-term speculation [3][4] Grayscale ETH Insights - Grayscale ETH's net inflow of $34.6 million is a positive signal for the market, especially as it coincides with ETH trading in the $2900-$3100 range, suggesting potential institutional accumulation at lower levels [1][4] - The premium rate for Grayscale ETH has improved from -3.2% to -1.8%, indicating a recovery in market recognition and sentiment [1] Ethereum PoW Fork (ETHW) Insights - ETHW's net inflow of $24.8 million is surprising given its previous marginalization, with its market cap dropping to 0.3% of ETH [3] - The increase in ETHW's trading activity is linked to its recent technical improvements, but caution is advised due to its low staking volume and reliance on speculative trading [3] Market Dynamics - The inflow trends reflect a divergence in market behavior, with institutional investors showing long-term confidence in ETH while retail investors chase high-volatility opportunities in ETHW [4] - The shift of funds from Bitcoin to altcoins, as evidenced by Bitcoin's lower net inflow of $12 million, suggests a broader market rotation [4] Historical Context - The article references a significant market crash on February 3, where ETH dropped 25%, leading to massive liquidations across the crypto market, highlighting the risks associated with high leverage [6] - Following the crash, there was a notable recovery in institutional interest, with a record net inflow of $300 million into Ethereum ETFs, indicating a "buy the dip" mentality among institutions [7] Inflation Concerns - Post-transition to Proof of Stake (PoS), Ethereum's inflation rate has returned to 0%, raising concerns about the effectiveness of token burning mechanisms [9] - Despite the inflation concerns, the PoS inflation rate remains lower than that of Proof of Work (PoW) and Bitcoin, suggesting a potential long-term advantage for ETH [9]