Core Viewpoint - The recent announcement by Reliable Co., Ltd. regarding the dismissal of independent director Jing Naiquan has sparked significant controversy, with both the company and Jing presenting conflicting narratives about the reasons and implications of this decision [1][2][3] Group 1: Company Announcement and Actions - Reliable Co., Ltd. announced the board's decision to dismiss independent director Jing Naiquan, citing loss of independence and failure to fulfill duties [1][2] - The company disclosed a lengthy announcement attachment of over 20 pages, containing nearly 20,000 words of debate surrounding the dismissal [1][3] - The management accused Jing of bias towards director Bao Jia and inappropriate behavior towards two secretaries [1][3] Group 2: Responses from Jing Naiquan - Jing Naiquan responded by labeling the dismissal reasons as "absurd, superficial, and illegal," claiming it was a retaliation for differing opinions with the major shareholder [1][2] - He argued that the dismissal challenges the integrity of the independent director system in China [1][3] Group 3: Salary and Governance Issues - The core issue for the dismissal, according to the company, revolves around independence, particularly regarding discussions about Bao Jia's salary, where Jing allegedly acted in Bao's interest [2][3] - Jing countered that the company had not terminated Bao's employment, yet removed her from her position without assigning new duties, raising concerns about governance practices [2][3] - The company’s secretary stated that the board is working to address governance issues and ensure compliance with established rules [2][3] Group 4: Market Reactions and Internal Dynamics - There are widespread concerns in the market regarding internal conflicts and governance at Reliable Co., Ltd., with accusations of a power struggle led by chairman Jin Liwei [2][3] - The company aims to stabilize market expectations and ensure that daily operations are not disrupted by this incident [2][3]

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between the chairman Jin Liwei and director Bao Jia of Kexin Co., Ltd. has intensified, leading to the dismissal of independent director Jing Naiquan, raising concerns about the independence of the board [1][5][9] Group 1: Board Decisions and Voting - On February 23, Kexin Co. announced the dismissal of independent director Jing Naiquan, with 5 out of 7 board members voting in favor and 2 (Bao Jia and Jing Naiquan) voting against [2][3] - The company stated that Jing Naiquan lost his independence and failed to fulfill his duties as an independent director [2][5] Group 2: Reasons for Dismissal - The core reason for Jing Naiquan's dismissal was his alleged "collapse of independence" regarding matters involving Bao Jia's high salary, which Kexin Co. claims undermined the decision-making process [5][6] - Bao Jia argued that Jing Naiquan maintained independent judgment and that the dismissal was retaliation from Jin Liwei for his principled stance [4][5] Group 3: Salary Dispute - The central issue of contention is Bao Jia's reported salary of 2.43 million yuan for 2024, which he claims is justified and supported by arbitration records [7][9] - Kexin Co. contends that Bao Jia's high salary is inappropriate, especially since he did not work for the company in 2025, and that the company was misled into believing it was under "arbitration pressure" to pay [9] Group 4: Regulatory Concerns - A company secretary suggested that the Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau conduct a special investigation into Kexin Co.'s related party transactions and the performance of independent directors, emphasizing the need for improved governance and oversight [1][9]

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between the chairman of Kexin Co., Ltd. Jin Liwei and director Bao Jia has intensified, leading to the dismissal of independent director Jing Naiquan, who has been accused of losing independence [1][5][7]. Group 1: Company Governance Issues - Kexin Co., Ltd. announced the dismissal of independent director Jing Naiquan, with 5 out of 7 board members voting in favor, while Bao Jia and Jing Naiquan opposed the motion [4][5]. - The company claims that Jing Naiquan failed to fulfill his duties and lacked the professional ethics expected of an independent director, leading to the decision to terminate his position [5][7]. - Bao Jia argues that the dismissal is a retaliatory action by Jin Liwei against Jing Naiquan for maintaining independent judgment and opposing Bao Jia's interests [6][11]. Group 2: Compensation Controversy - The central issue of the dispute revolves around Bao Jia's high salary of 2.43 million yuan, which he claims is justified, while the company argues it is inappropriate given his lack of service in 2025 [3][10][11]. - Kexin Co., Ltd. has raised concerns about Jing Naiquan's actions during discussions about Bao Jia's compensation, suggesting that he exhibited a bias that undermined his independence [8][9]. - Bao Jia asserts that Jin Liwei's actions regarding his salary and role in the company demonstrate a breach of trust and integrity [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The candidates for independent directors at Guangdong Dongfeng New Materials Group Co., Ltd. have declared their qualifications and independence, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Candidate Qualifications - Candidates possess basic knowledge of listed company operations and have over 5 years of relevant work experience in law, economics, accounting, finance, or management [1][2]. - Candidates have participated in training and obtained certification recognized by the securities exchange [1][2]. - Candidates meet the requirements set forth by various laws and regulations, including the Company Law of the People's Republic of China and the Management Measures for Independent Directors of Listed Companies [1][2][3]. Group 2: Independence Criteria - Candidates confirm their independence by stating they do not fall under specific disqualifying conditions, such as holding significant shares in the company or having close relationships with major stakeholders [2][3][8]. - Candidates are not involved in any significant business dealings with the company or its major shareholders [3][8]. Group 3: Integrity and Compliance - Candidates have no adverse records, including administrative penalties from the China Securities Regulatory Commission or criminal charges within the last 36 months [9][15]. - Candidates have not been publicly reprimanded by the securities exchange or have any major credit issues [9][15]. - Candidates have undergone a qualification review by the company's nomination committee and have no conflicts of interest with the nominating party [9][15].

Group 1 - The board of directors of China International Trade Center Co., Ltd. has reviewed the self-assessment report on the independence of its independent directors and confirmed that they do not fall under any disqualifying categories as per the regulations [1][2] - The disqualifying categories include individuals who hold positions in the company or its subsidiaries, direct or indirect shareholders owning more than 1% of shares, and those with significant business dealings with the company [1] - The board believes that all independent directors comply with the requirements set forth in the "Management Measures for Independent Directors of Listed Companies" and the "Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Listed Companies of Shanghai Stock Exchange" [2]

Core Viewpoint - The independent directors of Hangzhou Jiebei Group Co., Ltd. have been evaluated for their independence and found to meet the requirements set forth in relevant regulations and guidelines [1]. Group 1: Independent Directors' Independence Evaluation - The board of directors conducted an assessment of the independence of independent directors Guo Jun, Mao Mingchen, and Pan Songting, confirming that they do not hold any positions other than independent directors within the company or its major shareholders [1]. - The independent directors have no interests or relationships that could hinder their ability to make objective judgments regarding the company [1]. - The evaluation aligns with the requirements of the "Management Measures for Independent Directors of Listed Companies" and the "Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Listed Companies" revised in December 2023 [1]. Group 2: Individual Reports from Independent Directors - Guo Jun reported that during the 2024 term, he fulfilled his duties and confirmed that he does not violate any independence requirements as per relevant laws and regulations [2]. - Mao Mingchen also submitted a report affirming his independence and compliance with the necessary regulations during his tenure [4]. - Pan Songting provided a similar report, stating that he maintained his independence and adhered to the regulatory requirements throughout the 2024 period [7].

Group 1 - The board of directors of Guilin Fuda Co., Ltd. has conducted a self-assessment of the independence of its independent directors, confirming that all three independent directors meet the independence requirements as per the relevant regulations [1][2] - The independent directors, Qin Lian, Li Wanfeng, and Jiang Hongyun, have not held any positions other than independent directors within the company or its major shareholders, ensuring no conflicts of interest [1] - The independent directors maintain a high level of independence, providing impartial and professional opinions for the company's decision-making processes [2]

Core Viewpoint - The report assesses the independence of the independent directors of Jiangxi Guoke Military Industry Group Co., Ltd., confirming that they meet the requirements set forth by relevant regulations [1]. Group 1: Independent Directors' Independence Assessment - The independent directors Zhu Xingwen, Duan Zhaoping, and Yi Rong do not hold any positions other than independent directors within the company and have no relationships that could impair their independent judgment [1]. - The board of directors concludes that the independent directors comply with the independence requirements outlined in the "Management Measures for Independent Directors of Listed Companies" and the "Self-Regulatory Guidelines for the Science and Technology Innovation Board" [1]. Group 2: Individual Reports from Independent Directors - Zhu Xingwen confirms adherence to legal and regulatory requirements, stating no conflicts of interest exist that would violate independence standards [2][3]. - Duan Zhaoping also reports compliance with independence requirements, ensuring no relationships that could affect his judgment [4][6]. - Yi Rong similarly asserts that there are no violations of independence requirements and commits to ongoing compliance checks during her tenure [7][9].

Group 1 - The board of directors of Keda Guandun Quantum Technology Co., Ltd. conducted a self-assessment of the independence of its independent directors, confirming that all independent directors meet the independence requirements as per the regulations [1] - The independent directors, including Xu Congwei, Li Yaokuan, Zhou Yana, Cheng Zhiyong, and Zhang Min, have not held any positions other than independent directors within the company or its major shareholder units during the reporting period [1] - The independent directors maintained a high level of independence throughout 2024, fulfilling their responsibilities in accordance with the strict regulations and requirements outlined in the relevant governance guidelines [1]

Group 1 - The company has three independent directors: Jin Yongli, Zhang Wei, and You Song [1] - The self-assessment of the independent directors indicates that they meet the independence requirements as per the regulations, with no direct or indirect interests that could affect their objective judgment [1] - The board confirms that the independent directors have not held any positions other than their role as independent directors and have no conflicts of interest with the company or its major shareholders [1] Group 2 - The independent directors have maintained a high level of independence throughout the reporting period, fulfilling their responsibilities in accordance with relevant regulations and the company's articles of association [1] - The independent directors provide fair and independent professional opinions that contribute to the company's decision-making process [1]