Core Viewpoint - China's bird protection efforts have shown significant results, with populations of several endangered species experiencing stable growth [1][3]. Group 1: Achievements in Bird Protection - The number of nationally protected bird species in China has reached 394, an increase of nearly 50% during the 14th Five-Year Plan period [3]. - Key migratory bird habitats have been identified, with 1,140 important sites and comprehensive protection and restoration efforts underway for 821 critical habitats [3]. - Historical highs in the monitoring of wintering waterbird populations are expected in 2024 and 2025 [3]. Group 2: International Recognition and Collaboration - Representatives and experts from Japan, South Korea, and Australia have expressed high appreciation for China's achievements in wetland and bird protection [5]. - China's experience is considered a valuable reference for global coastal wetland protection and migratory bird habitat management [5]. - There is an expectation for enhanced cooperation with China to contribute more wisdom and strength to global biodiversity governance [5].

Core Points - The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has released ISO 17298, the first biodiversity-related standard within the ISO framework, aimed at providing organizations with a practical and scalable framework for assessing and managing their biodiversity impacts, dependencies, risks, and opportunities [3][4] - ISO 17298 addresses the practical shortcomings of the 2022 Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which, while providing guidelines, lacked operational applicability [4] - The standard is particularly relevant for enterprises, requiring them to meet specific criteria to obtain certification, thus complementing policies like the 2024 guidelines for sustainable development reports from the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges [3][4] Summary by Sections ISO 17298 Overview - ISO 17298 serves as a guideline and requirement for organizations to implement biodiversity management practices [4] - The standard includes seven core dimensions: understanding and awareness, strategic considerations, operational practices, monitoring and evaluation, collaboration and participation, training and education, and legal compliance [3] Application for Enterprises - Companies must first identify their relationship with biodiversity before assessing risks and opportunities, with the identification process being a significant challenge [5] - The biodiversity dependency assessment is highlighted as a critical module, exemplified by Kweichow Moutai's reliance on local water resources and microorganisms [4][5] Financial Institutions - ISO 17298 provides standardized risk assessment tools for financial institutions to evaluate biodiversity-related risks systematically and accurately [4] Current Trends in China - As of 2024, 60% of Chinese manufacturing companies are actively disclosing biodiversity-related information, indicating a growing awareness of biodiversity issues [7] - The 2024 guidelines from the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges require companies to disclose significant impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity [6] - Despite progress, there is still room for improvement in integrating biodiversity protection into long-term business strategies, particularly in financial disclosures [8]

Group 1 - Biodiversity provides the fundamental material basis and ecological security for human survival, with global economic activities relying on nature for $58 trillion, which is over half of the global annual GDP [1] - The theme for the 2025 International Day for Biological Diversity emphasizes the relationship between biodiversity protection and the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, highlighting the need for participation from the business sector [1] - Enterprises are key stakeholders in biodiversity governance, with their operations deeply intertwined with biodiversity, affecting industries such as agriculture, food and beverage, infrastructure, and pharmaceuticals [2][3] Group 2 - China, as one of the richest countries in biodiversity, has initiated mechanisms to encourage corporate participation in global biodiversity governance, including joining the Global Partnership for Business and Biodiversity (GPBB) [3][4] - The establishment of the Corporate Partnership for Biodiversity (CPBB) aims to create a long-term mechanism for corporate involvement in biodiversity protection, enhancing collaboration among government, industry, and the public [3][5] - The CPBB has significantly raised awareness and participation in biodiversity protection among enterprises, providing platforms for policy dialogue, best practice sharing, and technical support [5] Group 3 - Despite progress, challenges remain in corporate participation in biodiversity governance, including limited understanding of the relationship between business operations and biodiversity risks [6][7] - There is a lack of unified standards and norms for assessing the impact of industries on biodiversity, with over 60% of companies facing difficulties in disclosing biodiversity-related information [6][7] - To deepen corporate roles in biodiversity governance, a multi-faceted approach involving policy development, public engagement, and corporate responsibility is necessary [8][9] Group 4 - Companies should develop strategies that promote biodiversity protection and sustainable use, integrating biodiversity management throughout their value chains [9] - Establishing a social responsibility reporting system to disclose actions and outcomes related to biodiversity protection is essential for transparency [9] - The collaboration of government, enterprises, social organizations, and the public is crucial for effective biodiversity protection, aiming for a harmonious coexistence between humans and nature [9]

Group 1 - The relationship between humans and nature is a fundamental aspect of human society, and the development of civilization has always revolved around this theme [1] - Industrial civilization has led to human-centered, materialistic, and utilitarian views, resulting in the exploitation of natural resources and ecological imbalance [1] - The ecological crisis has prompted a reevaluation of the relationship between humans and nature, leading to the emergence of Xi Jinping's ecological civilization thought as a guiding principle for harmonious coexistence [1][2] Group 2 - Xi Jinping's ecological civilization thought represents a theoretical innovation regarding the relationship between humans and nature, integrating traditional ecological wisdom and modern sustainable development experiences [2] - Key concepts include "harmonious coexistence between humans and nature," "green mountains and clear waters are invaluable assets," and "a good ecological environment is the most inclusive form of public welfare" [2] - The thought emphasizes the importance of respecting, conforming to, and protecting nature, advocating for a development model that integrates ecological protection with economic growth [1][2] Group 3 - The modern concept of "coexistence" encompasses four dimensions: relationality, action, ethics, and sociality, emphasizing the interconnectedness of individuals and their environments [4] - The goal of "coexistence" is to minimize tension between humans and nature while maximizing human interests through a relational principle rather than an individualistic approach [4] - Achieving a harmonious relationship between humans and nature requires a shift from anthropocentrism to a vision of a beautiful Earth where humans coexist with other life forms [4] Group 4 - The core of "coexistence" lies in managing the relationship between humans and nature, guided by Xi Jinping's ecological civilization thought, promoting coordinated development in carbon reduction, pollution control, and ecological restoration [5][6] - The development of a modern economic system that is resource-saving and environmentally friendly is essential, alongside significant ecological projects aimed at biodiversity protection and integrated ecosystem management [6] - Systematic governance thinking is necessary to balance protection and development, ensuring sustainable progress towards a beautiful China [6]