并非只有扎克伯格在遵循固定的穿衣风格，在浏览器上搜索史蒂夫·乔布斯，会发现他几乎在所有照片 里都穿着黑色高领衫。而美国前总统奥巴马则只偏爱蓝色或灰色的西装，并有意避免冗杂的穿搭，以便 将决策脑力保留在处理国家事务上。据说，爱因斯坦也买了多件相同款式的西装，避开时尚多样的穿 搭，只为专注于思考。这些杰出人士都明白，过多决策会带来心理负担，因此都选择"简约"，以便最大 化一个人最宝贵的财富——脑力。 那么我们能从他们的经典穿搭策略中学到什么呢？那就是与其耗费精力在意别人的想法，不如打造自己 固定的"常服穿搭"，挑选一套百搭、舒适的"经典造型"以适用于绝大多数场合。如果作为时尚爱好者实 在忍受不了每天穿同一款"乏味"的衣服，那就尝试用不同方式搭配这套衣服，即便是同一件衣服，也可 以打造有变化的造型。独特的重复造型有助于打造令人难忘的个人风格，这能有效地保持"视觉一致 性"，人们会因为这种始终如一的穿搭而记住你。（线一凡译） 《印度时报》 8 月 25 日文章，原题：马克 · 扎克伯格同样的 " 灰色 T 恤造型 " 背后的秘密是什么：令人惊讶 的成功心理学 早晨上班面临的一大问题就是穿什么衣服，穿衣风格时而需要体现 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent Australian proposal to ban minors from using YouTube and other social media platforms has sparked intense debate, highlighting the challenges of ensuring online safety for youth in a digital age [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes - Australia has revoked the exemption previously granted to YouTube, mandating compliance with new online safety regulations aimed at protecting minors [1]. - The proposed "Social Media Minimum Age Law" will prohibit individuals under 16 from using platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and X [1]. Group 2: Effectiveness of Age Restrictions - Research indicates that strict age restrictions do not effectively prevent youth from encountering online dangers, as evidenced by Norway's experience where 72% of 11-year-olds continued to use social media despite a minimum age limit of 13 [1]. - The UK's Online Safety Act, intended to limit minors' access to social networks, has led to absurd situations where youth use virtual avatars to bypass facial recognition technology [1]. Group 3: YouTube's Influence and Risks - YouTube's viewing time surpasses that of traditional media giants like Disney and Netflix, showcasing its appeal but also revealing potential risks associated with its open platform [2]. - A study from Dartmouth College found that while YouTube's algorithm rarely recommends extremist content to users who do not seek it out, such content still exists on the platform [2]. Group 4: Call for Action - Policymakers are urged to push social media platforms to address inherent risks rather than simply imposing age restrictions, advocating for increased transparency in algorithms and targeted solutions from stakeholders [2].

Core Points - Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook, has reached a settlement in a privacy lawsuit with investors, agreeing to resolve claims that executives allowed user privacy violations, resulting in significant financial losses for the company [1][3][4] - The lawsuit sought damages amounting to $8 billion (approximately 57.5 billion RMB) against CEO Mark Zuckerberg and 10 other current and former executives [1][3] Summary by Sections - **Settlement Agreement** - A settlement agreement was reached just before the scheduled court hearing, although specific details of the agreement were not disclosed [4] - The presiding judge, Katherine McCormick, acknowledged the settlement and adjourned the court [4] - **Allegations and Claims** - Investors accused the executives, including Mark Zuckerberg and board member Marc Andreessen, of negligence regarding user privacy, leading to substantial economic damages for the company [3][6] - The lawsuit aimed to hold the defendants accountable for billions in fines and legal costs incurred by the company over recent years [3] - **Previous Penalties** - In 2019, the Federal Trade Commission imposed a $5 billion fine on Facebook for failing to comply with a data protection agreement established in 2012 [6] - The plaintiffs are seeking personal asset compensation from the defendants, who have denied all allegations, labeling them as "extreme claims" [6]

Core Points - Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and current and former directors and executives have agreed to settle a privacy lawsuit claiming damages of $8 billion [1][2] - The lawsuit accused them of allowing Facebook users' privacy to be violated, resulting in significant losses for the company [1] - The specific details of the settlement agreement have not been disclosed, and the judge congratulated both parties on reaching a resolution [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit was initiated by Meta shareholders who sought to hold Zuckerberg and other executives accountable for billions in fines and legal fees incurred by the company [1] - The Federal Trade Commission fined Facebook $5 billion in 2019 for failing to comply with a data protection agreement established in 2012 [1] - Billionaire venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, a defendant in the case and a Meta board member, was scheduled to testify but the trial concluded with the settlement [1] Group 2 - The defendants denied the allegations, labeling them as "extreme claims" [2] - Meta, which rebranded from Facebook in 2021, is not a defendant in the lawsuit and has refrained from commenting on the matter [2] - Since 2019, Meta has reportedly invested billions of dollars to enhance user privacy protections [2]

Core Viewpoint - Peter Thiel's early investment in Facebook was a significant success, but his decision to sell shares shortly after the IPO may lead to regret as the value of those shares has dramatically increased since then [2][3]. Investment Decision - Thiel invested $500,000 for a 10% stake in Facebook when the company's valuation was approximately $4.9 million [2]. - He sold about 20.1 million shares at prices ranging from $19.27 to $20.69 per share, cashing out around $400 million [2]. Current Value of Shares - If Thiel had retained his shares until now, their value would be approximately $14.76 billion, given that Meta's stock price is $736 [3]. Market Perception - Thiel believed that the university market, which was Facebook's initial audience, was significantly undervalued [4]. - He noted that investors often prefer to invest in products they use, leading to a general underestimation of products outside their personal experience [5]. Ongoing Involvement - Despite selling most of his shares, Thiel remained actively involved with Facebook until he left the board in 2022 [8]. Wealth Impact - Thiel's net worth is currently around $21.7 billion, partly due to his success with PayPal and Palantir [9]. - Facebook's growth has created numerous millionaires and billionaires, with Mark Zuckerberg being the most notable beneficiary, currently valued at $260 billion [10]. Comparison with Other Investors - Thiel's situation is contrasted with Ronald Wayne, who sold his 10% stake in Apple for $800 shortly after its founding, which would now be worth between $75 billion and $300 billion [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The increasing use of social media among teenagers presents both opportunities for engagement and significant challenges related to mental health, privacy, and exposure to harmful content, prompting calls for regulatory measures and educational initiatives across various countries [1][2][3]. Group 1: Social Media Usage and Impact - A study by the World Health Organization revealed that the percentage of teenagers facing issues due to improper social media use rose from 7% in 2018 to 11% in 2022, with an additional 12% at risk of gaming addiction [1]. - In Germany, over 93% of teenagers aged 10 and above use social media, spending an average of 95 minutes daily, with 33% unable to imagine life without it [2]. - In Sweden, police warned that criminal gangs are using social media to recruit minors for illegal activities, with some recruits as young as 11 [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Measures in Europe - Many EU countries are implementing strict age restrictions for social media use, with most platforms prohibiting registration for children under 13, and requiring parental consent for minors [3]. - The EU's "algorithm ban" under the Digital Services Act prohibits personalized advertising to minors and automatic playback features to mitigate addiction risks [3]. - Germany is exploring AI systems to assess user age based on profile information and interactions, automatically converting accounts of identified minors to "teen accounts" with content restrictions [4]. Group 3: Australia’s Legislative Actions - Australia has enacted the 2024 Cybersecurity (Minimum Age for Social Media) Amendment, banning social media use for individuals under 16, with penalties for platforms failing to comply [6]. - The Australian government is collaborating with industry experts to ensure effective implementation of age verification technologies [6]. - The "Head Up Alliance," formed by concerned parents, supports the new legislation aimed at protecting children's mental health from social media's adverse effects [7]. Group 4: Brazil's Approach to Online Safety - In Brazil, a significant portion of teenagers openly shares personal information on social media, raising privacy concerns [8]. - Brazil's Internet Civil Framework and General Data Protection Law require parental consent for collecting minors' data, with new legislation proposed to enhance online safety measures [8][9]. - Schools in Brazil are incorporating cybersecurity education into their curricula to help teenagers recognize and manage social media risks [9].

Core Viewpoint - Meta is facing a significant surge in online fraud, with its platforms, Facebook and Instagram, becoming primary venues for global scam operations, leading to substantial financial losses for users and revealing systemic regulatory failures within the company [1]. Group 1: Fraud Incidents - Businesses are being used as "endorsement tools" for scams, with real companies' information being misappropriated to create fraudulent advertisements [2]. - Edgar Guzman, a business owner, reported that over 4,400 fraudulent ads used his company's address, while he only posted 15 legitimate ads, highlighting the scale of the issue [3]. - Scammers are employing increasingly sophisticated tactics, such as using images of elderly individuals to promote fake giveaways, leading to unauthorized credit card charges for users [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Failures - The rise of cryptocurrency, AI technology, and cross-border crime networks has significantly increased the scale and impact of online fraud, with 70% of new active advertisers on Meta promoting scams or illegal products [5]. - Data from banks indicate that nearly half of the fraud cases reported through Zelle are linked to Meta platforms, with similar trends observed by regulatory bodies in the UK and Australia [5]. Group 3: Internal Response and Criticism - Internal documents reveal that Meta allows fraud advertisers to accumulate multiple violations before banning them, indicating a high threshold for enforcement actions [6]. - Meta's Marketplace platform has become a breeding ground for scams due to its peer-to-peer transaction model, yet the company has not implemented sufficient measures to address this issue [6]. - Despite claims of increasing anti-fraud investments, analysts suggest that combating fraud is not a top priority for Meta, as evidenced by a lack of investment in automated fraud detection tools [8].

Core Viewpoint - Meta is facing a significant surge in online fraud, with its platforms Facebook and Instagram becoming primary venues for global scam operations, revealing systemic failures in content moderation [1] Group 1: Fraud Incidents - Numerous businesses, such as "Half Price Wholesale," have reported that scammers are using their information to create fake advertisements, leading to customer complaints and financial losses [2] - A survey indicated that over 4,400 different ads used the address of the aforementioned company, while the actual owner only posted 15 ads [2] - Scammers are employing increasingly sophisticated tactics, including using images of elderly individuals to promote fraudulent offers, resulting in unauthorized credit card charges [2] Group 2: Regulatory Failures - The rise of cryptocurrency, AI technology, and cross-border crime networks has significantly increased the scale and impact of online fraud [3] - A 2022 report from Meta revealed that 70% of new active advertisers on its platform were promoting scams, illegal goods, or low-quality products [3] - Data from banks and regulatory bodies indicate a high proportion of fraud cases linked to Meta, with nearly half of the fraud cases reported through Zelle being associated with Meta platforms [3] Group 3: Inadequate Anti-Fraud Measures - In response to criticism, Meta claims to be addressing a "fraud epidemic" and has implemented various measures, including testing facial recognition technology and increasing user warnings [4] - Despite these claims, Meta's legal defense argues that it bears no legal responsibility for fraud on its platforms, stating it has no obligation to resolve user fraud issues [4] - Analysts suggest that Meta's resource allocation indicates that combating fraud is not a top priority, with more focus on issues like human trafficking and self-harm content rather than fraud prevention [5]

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission has fined Apple and a metaverse platform company for violating the Digital Markets Act, with penalties of €500 million and €200 million respectively [1][2]. Group 1: Apple - Apple was found to restrict app developers from directing users to third-party channels in its app store, depriving users of access to alternative services [1]. - The company failed to justify the necessity of these restrictions, and the EU has mandated the immediate removal of such limitations [1]. - If Apple does not comply within 60 days, it may face further fines [2]. Group 2: Metaverse Platform Company - The metaverse platform company introduced a "consent or pay" model in 2023, requiring users of Facebook and Instagram to either consent to data integration for personalized ads or pay a monthly fee for an ad-free experience [1]. - This model was deemed non-compliant with legal requirements by the EU, leading to the imposed fine [1]. - Similar to Apple, the company faces potential additional penalties if it does not rectify the situation within 60 days [2].

声明说，苹果公司在其应用商店中限制应用开发者引导用户使用第三方渠道，剥夺了用户获取替代 优惠服务的权利。苹果公司未能证明相关限制具有必要性，欧盟要求其立即解除相关限制，并不得 再采取具有类似效果的做法。 资料图。本文来源：新华社 苹果公司被罚款5亿欧元 欧盟委员会23日发布新闻公报，认定美国苹果公司和元宇宙平台公司违反《数字市场法案》，对 两家公司分别处以5亿欧元和2亿欧元罚款。 声明说，元宇宙平台公司2023年在欧盟地区推出"同意或付费"模式，要求其旗下"脸书"和"照片 墙"用户要么同意将个人数据整合用于接收个性化广告，要么支付月费以使用无广告版本服务。欧 盟认为这一模式不符合相关法律要求，因此作出处罚决定。 声明说，若苹果和元宇宙平台公司未在60天内落实整改，可能面临进一步罚款。此次处罚为欧盟 《数字市场法案》生效以来首次作出的非合规认定。 ■ ...