Core Viewpoint - The increasing use of social media among teenagers presents both opportunities for engagement and significant challenges related to mental health, privacy, and exposure to harmful content, prompting calls for regulatory measures and educational initiatives across various countries [1][2][3]. Group 1: Social Media Usage and Impact - A study by the World Health Organization revealed that the percentage of teenagers facing issues due to improper social media use rose from 7% in 2018 to 11% in 2022, with an additional 12% at risk of gaming addiction [1]. - In Germany, over 93% of teenagers aged 10 and above use social media, spending an average of 95 minutes daily, with 33% unable to imagine life without it [2]. - In Sweden, police warned that criminal gangs are using social media to recruit minors for illegal activities, with some recruits as young as 11 [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Measures in Europe - Many EU countries are implementing strict age restrictions for social media use, with most platforms prohibiting registration for children under 13, and requiring parental consent for minors [3]. - The EU's "algorithm ban" under the Digital Services Act prohibits personalized advertising to minors and automatic playback features to mitigate addiction risks [3]. - Germany is exploring AI systems to assess user age based on profile information and interactions, automatically converting accounts of identified minors to "teen accounts" with content restrictions [4]. Group 3: Australia’s Legislative Actions - Australia has enacted the 2024 Cybersecurity (Minimum Age for Social Media) Amendment, banning social media use for individuals under 16, with penalties for platforms failing to comply [6]. - The Australian government is collaborating with industry experts to ensure effective implementation of age verification technologies [6]. - The "Head Up Alliance," formed by concerned parents, supports the new legislation aimed at protecting children's mental health from social media's adverse effects [7]. Group 4: Brazil's Approach to Online Safety - In Brazil, a significant portion of teenagers openly shares personal information on social media, raising privacy concerns [8]. - Brazil's Internet Civil Framework and General Data Protection Law require parental consent for collecting minors' data, with new legislation proposed to enhance online safety measures [8][9]. - Schools in Brazil are incorporating cybersecurity education into their curricula to help teenagers recognize and manage social media risks [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential shift in the regulatory landscape for large technology companies in the U.S., highlighting recent antitrust actions that may disrupt their dominance and foster competition in the tech industry [1][2][3]. Group 1: Antitrust Actions - A federal court in Virginia ruled that Google illegally monopolized two online advertising technology markets, violating antitrust laws [2]. - A district court broke the "Apple Tax" monopoly, prohibiting Apple from charging fees on purchases made outside its app store and restricting developers from directing users to external purchasing options [2]. - The FTC's antitrust lawsuit against Meta (Facebook's parent company) is ongoing, with potential implications for the separation of its services like Instagram and WhatsApp [2][5]. Group 2: Impact on Competition - The antitrust measures could revitalize competition in the tech sector, providing opportunities for smaller companies and improving service quality [3][5]. - If Facebook is forced to separate its services, it could lead to the emergence of multiple social media platforms with different algorithms, enhancing user experience [5]. - A successful lawsuit against Amazon could create a more competitive marketplace, allowing consumers to find better-priced products [5]. Group 3: Historical Context and Lessons - The article references the historical context of AT&T's breakup in 1984, which initially fostered innovation but eventually led to a new form of duopoly in the telecommunications industry [6][7]. - The current situation emphasizes the need for ongoing regulatory oversight to prevent technology companies from abusing their market power [7].

Core Viewpoint - Meta is facing a significant surge in online fraud, with its platforms, Facebook and Instagram, becoming primary venues for global scam operations, leading to substantial financial losses for users and revealing systemic regulatory failures within the company [1]. Group 1: Fraud Incidents - Businesses are being used as "endorsement tools" for scams, with real companies' information being misappropriated to create fraudulent advertisements [2]. - Edgar Guzman, a business owner, reported that over 4,400 fraudulent ads used his company's address, while he only posted 15 legitimate ads, highlighting the scale of the issue [3]. - Scammers are employing increasingly sophisticated tactics, such as using images of elderly individuals to promote fake giveaways, leading to unauthorized credit card charges for users [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Failures - The rise of cryptocurrency, AI technology, and cross-border crime networks has significantly increased the scale and impact of online fraud, with 70% of new active advertisers on Meta promoting scams or illegal products [5]. - Data from banks indicate that nearly half of the fraud cases reported through Zelle are linked to Meta platforms, with similar trends observed by regulatory bodies in the UK and Australia [5]. Group 3: Internal Response and Criticism - Internal documents reveal that Meta allows fraud advertisers to accumulate multiple violations before banning them, indicating a high threshold for enforcement actions [6]. - Meta's Marketplace platform has become a breeding ground for scams due to its peer-to-peer transaction model, yet the company has not implemented sufficient measures to address this issue [6]. - Despite claims of increasing anti-fraud investments, analysts suggest that combating fraud is not a top priority for Meta, as evidenced by a lack of investment in automated fraud detection tools [8].

Core Viewpoint - Meta is facing a significant surge in online fraud, with its platforms Facebook and Instagram becoming primary venues for global scam operations, revealing systemic failures in content moderation [1] Group 1: Fraud Incidents - Numerous businesses, such as "Half Price Wholesale," have reported that scammers are using their information to create fake advertisements, leading to customer complaints and financial losses [2] - A survey indicated that over 4,400 different ads used the address of the aforementioned company, while the actual owner only posted 15 ads [2] - Scammers are employing increasingly sophisticated tactics, including using images of elderly individuals to promote fraudulent offers, resulting in unauthorized credit card charges [2] Group 2: Regulatory Failures - The rise of cryptocurrency, AI technology, and cross-border crime networks has significantly increased the scale and impact of online fraud [3] - A 2022 report from Meta revealed that 70% of new active advertisers on its platform were promoting scams, illegal goods, or low-quality products [3] - Data from banks and regulatory bodies indicate a high proportion of fraud cases linked to Meta, with nearly half of the fraud cases reported through Zelle being associated with Meta platforms [3] Group 3: Inadequate Anti-Fraud Measures - In response to criticism, Meta claims to be addressing a "fraud epidemic" and has implemented various measures, including testing facial recognition technology and increasing user warnings [4] - Despite these claims, Meta's legal defense argues that it bears no legal responsibility for fraud on its platforms, stating it has no obligation to resolve user fraud issues [4] - Analysts suggest that Meta's resource allocation indicates that combating fraud is not a top priority, with more focus on issues like human trafficking and self-harm content rather than fraud prevention [5]

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission has fined Apple and a metaverse platform company for violating the Digital Markets Act, with penalties of €500 million and €200 million respectively [1][2]. Group 1: Apple - Apple was found to restrict app developers from directing users to third-party channels in its app store, depriving users of access to alternative services [1]. - The company failed to justify the necessity of these restrictions, and the EU has mandated the immediate removal of such limitations [1]. - If Apple does not comply within 60 days, it may face further fines [2]. Group 2: Metaverse Platform Company - The metaverse platform company introduced a "consent or pay" model in 2023, requiring users of Facebook and Instagram to either consent to data integration for personalized ads or pay a monthly fee for an ad-free experience [1]. - This model was deemed non-compliant with legal requirements by the EU, leading to the imposed fine [1]. - Similar to Apple, the company faces potential additional penalties if it does not rectify the situation within 60 days [2].

声明说，苹果公司在其应用商店中限制应用开发者引导用户使用第三方渠道，剥夺了用户获取替代 优惠服务的权利。苹果公司未能证明相关限制具有必要性，欧盟要求其立即解除相关限制，并不得 再采取具有类似效果的做法。 资料图。本文来源：新华社 苹果公司被罚款5亿欧元 欧盟委员会23日发布新闻公报，认定美国苹果公司和元宇宙平台公司违反《数字市场法案》，对 两家公司分别处以5亿欧元和2亿欧元罚款。 声明说，元宇宙平台公司2023年在欧盟地区推出"同意或付费"模式，要求其旗下"脸书"和"照片 墙"用户要么同意将个人数据整合用于接收个性化广告，要么支付月费以使用无广告版本服务。欧 盟认为这一模式不符合相关法律要求，因此作出处罚决定。 声明说，若苹果和元宇宙平台公司未在60天内落实整改，可能面临进一步罚款。此次处罚为欧盟 《数字市场法案》生效以来首次作出的非合规认定。 ■ ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission has fined Apple and a metaverse platform company for violating the Digital Markets Act, with fines of €500 million and €200 million respectively [2][3] Group 1: Apple Inc. - Apple was found to restrict app developers from directing users to third-party channels, depriving users of access to alternative services [2] - The company failed to demonstrate the necessity of these restrictions, and the EU has mandated the immediate removal of such limitations [2] - If Apple does not comply within 60 days, it may face further fines [3] Group 2: Metaverse Platform Company - The metaverse platform company introduced a "consent or pay" model in 2023, requiring users of Facebook and Instagram to either consent to data integration for personalized ads or pay a monthly fee for an ad-free experience [2] - This model was deemed non-compliant with legal requirements by the EU, leading to the imposed fine [2] - Similar to Apple, the company faces potential additional fines if it does not rectify the situation within the specified timeframe [3]

欧盟对美国科技巨头罚款7亿欧元 欧盟委员会23日发布新闻公报，认定美国苹果公司和元宇宙平台公司违反《数字市场法案》，对两家公司分别处以5亿欧元和2亿欧元罚款。 声明说， 苹果公司在其应用商店中限制应用开发者引导用户使用第三方渠道，剥夺了用户获取替代优惠服务的权利。 苹果公司未能证明相关限制具有必 要性，欧盟要求其立即解除相关限制，并不得再采取具有类似效果的做法。 声明说， 元宇宙平台公司2023年在欧盟地区推出"同意或付费"模式，要求其旗下"脸书"和"照片墙"用户要么同意将个人数据整合用于接收个性化广告， 要么支付月费以使用无广告版本服务。 欧盟认为这一模式不符合相关法律要求，因此作出处罚决定。 日单量97，刘强东登骑手排行榜第一？京东回应！ i N 新华网 -- 扫描二维码，关注新华网财经号 财 经 ■ 声明说，若苹果和元宇宙平台公司未在60天内落实整改，可能面临进一步罚款。此次处罚为欧盟《数字市场法案》生效以来首次作出的非合规认定。 来源： 新华社 记者：张兆卿 关注" 新华网财经 "视频号 更多财经资讯等你来看 往期推荐 昨夜，全线大涨！金价，剧烈波动！ ...