Workflow
第三方配合造假
icon
Search documents
重罚1.6亿!财务造假实锤,一上市公司面临退市,9人集体领罚
21世纪经济报道· 2025-08-08 10:53
记者丨崔文静 编辑丨黄剑 视频剪辑丨 柳润瑛 上市公司造假被重锤!证监会开出1.6亿元天价罚单,*ST高鸿及其9名责任人集体领罚。 根据证监会8月8日官网消息及上市公司公告, *ST高鸿长期开展无商业实质的笔记本电脑"空 转""走单"业务,存在严重财务造假与欺诈发行,被给予行政严惩 。其中,上市公司*ST高鸿 被罚1.35亿元,9名涉事董监高被罚75万元至750万元不等。身为"首恶之首"的*ST高鸿董事 长、时任总经理付景林被罚最重,不仅被罚款750万元,而且被市场禁入。 值得注意的是,亿元重罚只是起步! 一方面, *ST高鸿涉嫌触及重大违法强制退市,深交所将依法启动退市程序 。这意味 着,强制退市或已成为*ST高鸿难以扭转的结局。 另一方面, *ST高鸿及其主要责任人将被移送公安机关,后续很可能面临刑事严惩 。 *ST高鸿近日公告,股票可能被实施重大违法强制退市 另一个颇为值得关注的细节是:此次*ST高鸿造假案被重罚的,不只是上市公司及其"首恶", 还有配合造假的第三方。 *ST高鸿连续多年造假得以成行,与南京庆亚贸易有限公司(以下简称"南京庆亚")实控人江 庆组织开展的笔记本电脑虚假贸易业务密切相关。有鉴 ...
证监会动真格!230万罚单是开始,造假帮凶要慌了!
Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authorities are intensifying efforts to combat financial fraud in the capital market, particularly targeting third-party companies that facilitate such fraud for listed companies [1][2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is working on legislative changes to empower itself to impose administrative penalties on third-party companies involved in financial fraud [2][11]. - The CSRC has initiated a mechanism to transfer leads on fraudulent third parties to relevant government departments for legal action, which has already shown initial effectiveness [2][12][13]. - There is a notable increase in the number of listed companies facing criminal charges, with eight companies involved in criminal cases since July, and nearly twenty since early 2025 [1][4]. Group 2: Third-Party Involvement - Third-party companies that assist in financial fraud are often small, unlisted shell companies, making their fraudulent activities harder to detect [5][9]. - The involvement of third parties in financial fraud typically includes complex operations that obscure the true nature of transactions, such as mixing genuine and fake business activities [4][6]. - Specific cases, such as the Saiwei Intelligent case, illustrate how third parties like Shenzhen Haotian and Guangzhou Gaozhuo facilitated significant financial misreporting, including the transfer of over 1.2 billion yuan [7][8][9]. Group 3: Legal Precedents - The first administrative penalty against a third-party company involved in fraud occurred in the Yuebo Power case, where two individuals were fined a total of 2.3 million yuan [3][13]. - The Saiwei Intelligent case also marked a significant legal precedent, where a third-party company was held liable for 3% of the damages in a civil compensation case [3][13].
两会 | 北京证监局局长贾文勤:对配合造假者加大追责力度,完善特别代表人诉讼制度
券商中国· 2025-03-05 15:12
Core Viewpoint - The article presents six recommendations from Jia Wenqin, the director of Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau, aimed at improving the capital market, including measures to combat financial fraud, revise the Securities Investment Fund Law, and enhance the governance of illegal internet financial activities [1]. Group 1: Strengthening Regulations Against Financial Fraud - Jia Wenqin emphasizes the need for stricter accountability for third parties involved in financial fraud, suggesting amendments to the Securities Law and the introduction of regulations to clarify the legal responsibilities of these parties [2]. - The proposal includes enhancing the collaborative mechanism for addressing third-party fraud and improving the reporting and processing of fraud-related leads [2]. Group 2: Revising the Securities Investment Fund Law - The recommendation to amend the Securities Investment Fund Law aims to include private equity funds under its scope and adapt regulations to current industry developments [3]. - Suggestions include broadening the investment scope for public funds and establishing a liquidity support mechanism for public funds [3]. Group 3: Improving Special Representative Litigation System - The article discusses the importance of the special representative litigation system in protecting investors' rights and increasing the cost of illegal activities in the capital market [4]. - Recommendations include simplifying the initiation process for special representative litigation and expanding the range of entities that can initiate such lawsuits [5]. Group 4: Facilitating Subrogation Lawsuits by Investor Protection Agencies - Jia Wenqin highlights the challenges faced by investor protection agencies in initiating subrogation lawsuits and suggests developing judicial interpretations to clarify procedures and enhance the effectiveness of this system [6]. Group 5: Developing S Funds and Diversifying Exit Channels - The article introduces the concept of S Funds, which are private equity secondary market funds, and emphasizes their role in providing exit strategies for private equity and venture capital investments [7]. - Recommendations include encouraging participation from state-owned capital and insurance companies in the S Fund market and optimizing tax policies related to fund share transfers [7]. Group 6: Strengthening Governance of Illegal Internet Financial Activities - Jia Wenqin calls for enhanced governance of illegal internet financial activities, proposing the establishment of standards for financial information content on internet platforms and improved regulatory collaboration [8]. - The use of technology, such as big data and artificial intelligence, is recommended to enhance the identification and management of illegal financial activities [8].