Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing pressure and anxiety faced by young people in a competitive job market, particularly in elite educational systems that prioritize certain fields over others, leading to a sense of existential crisis among graduates [2][4][6]. Group 1: Educational System and Its Impact - The elite education system is criticized for producing "excellent sheep" who are compliant but lack critical thinking and a sense of purpose, resulting in anxiety and a lack of curiosity among top graduates [4][6]. - The phenomenon of degree inflation is highlighted, where the number of bachelor's degrees awarded in the U.S. increased by 84% from 1991 to 2022, while the population grew by only 31%, leading to a devaluation of degrees [8][11]. - The decline in the quality of undergraduate education, particularly in humanities, is noted, with humanities graduates now making up less than 3% of the total, down from 11% 50 years ago [16][18]. Group 2: Career Choices and Market Saturation - Many students are flocking to stable fields like finance, consulting, and technology, which leads to market saturation and increased competition for limited positions [6][11]. - The article emphasizes the need for students to pursue unique paths and develop distinct skills rather than following the crowd into popular fields, which may not guarantee job security or satisfaction [11][22]. - The importance of soft skills, creativity, and emotional intelligence is underscored as essential for future job markets, especially in the face of AI advancements [20][22]. Group 3: Personal Development and Meaning - The article argues that the true measure of life’s value should not be tied to salary or prestige but rather to personal fulfillment and meaningful engagement with the world [12][13]. - Young people are encouraged to explore their passions and interests early on, rather than conforming to societal expectations of success [12][36]. - The need for a shift in mindset regarding education and career paths is emphasized, advocating for a more holistic approach to personal and professional development [28][30].

世界为什么越来越卷了？ 这可能是许多年轻人的困惑：资源和人才都在加速流向技术尖端引领的少数行业；另一边，全球文科塌陷，职业教育培养不出对口的人才，反而大量的人 都在争抢着极少数"光鲜"的岗位…… 优绩主义的尽头没有绝对的胜利者，那些名校最为优秀的毕业生，却可能是最焦虑的一群人——他们时常觉得，世界好像一个巨大的仓鼠轮，自己被逼着 不停奔跑，却总感觉还在原地踏步，找不到行动的意义。 图源《无法成为野兽的我们》 早在2015年，《优秀的绵羊》就曾预示过这种未来——这本书出自威廉·德雷谢维奇（William Deresiewicz），彼时在美国引起了巨大反响。在常青藤盟校 待了20多年后，他辞去了自己的耶鲁大学的终身教职，他写到，我们的精英教育体系只培养出了一群"优秀的绵羊"，这些学生们顺从地、老老实实向同一 个方向前进，"他们懂得如何做一名学生，却不知道如何思考。他们虽聪明、富有天分，却也充满焦虑、胆小怕事，对未来一片茫然，缺乏好奇心和目标 感。" 德雷谢维奇的洞察全部源于对精英教育体系的观察和亲身经历——他一共辗转过至少3个不同的专业。出身于一个聚集"知识分子"的犹太家庭，本科他循 规蹈矩选择了生物学和心理学的 ...

世界为什么越来越卷了？ 这可能是许多年轻⼈的困惑：资源和⼈才都在加速流向技术尖端引领的少数⾏业；另⼀边，全球⽂科塌陷，职业教 育培养不出对⼝的⼈才，反⽽⼤量的⼈都在争抢着极少数"光鲜"的岗位…… 优绩主义的尽头没有绝对的胜利者，那些名校最为优秀的毕业⽣，却可能是最焦虑的⼀群⼈⸺他们时常觉得， 世 界好像⼀个巨⼤的仓⿏轮，⾃⼰被逼着不停奔跑，却总感觉还在原地踏步，找不到⾏动的意义。 图源《⽆法成为野兽的我们》 德雷谢维奇的洞察全部源于对精英教育体系的观察和亲⾝经历⸺他⼀共辗转过⾄少3个不同的专业。出⾝于⼀个 聚集"知识分⼦"的犹太家庭，本科他循规蹈矩选择了⽣物学和⼼理学的双学位项⽬，⼤学毕业后，他随⼤流申请 了法学院，⼜在最后节点放弃律师、去了新闻学院……但直到最后他才意识到真正能让⾃⼰快乐的是学习英语语⾔ ⽂学。 按照世俗观念，他的选择可以说相当不"明智"⸺从通往财富之路的理⼯科跳到"前途灰暗"的⽂科。有句话 说，敢主动学习⽂科的⼈（排除那些⾮⾃愿流落到这⾥的⼈），都是极致的理想主义者。德雷谢维奇正是如此，察 觉到精英教育体系的"系统BUG"后，他勇敢跳出了那套评价体系，并让更多⼈看到制度的弊端。 如今，20 ...