2025年9月7日，在一个炎热的日子里，一位农民在一片黑色的大豆田里喷洒了混合了水的肥料。Buddhika Weerasinghe—Getty Images 美国大豆农民正进入收获季节，但从中国（历史上最大的客户）那里没有收到任何订单，这对农业部门 的稳定性以及对美国经济的更广泛影响敲响了警钟。 美国大豆协会主席、肯塔基州的第九代农民凯勒·拉格兰（Caleb Ragland）对美国500,000大豆种植者面 临的危机发出了严厉警告。"现在，我们处于一个非常可怕的境地，"拉格兰在抖音视频中说，这段视频 引起了全国对农民困境的关注。 在另一场CNN的采访中，拉格兰强调了中国对美农业的重要性："中国购买的美国大豆数量超过了所有 其他外国客户购买量的总和，"他表示，并指出美国50%的大豆用于出口，而中国占到了总需求量的四 分之一。 中国订单的缺失代表着一种与正常交易模式显著背离的情况。中国通常占美国大豆总购买量的25%以 上，而每年向该国销售的大豆数量中，大约三分之一通常会在这个季节的这个时候被预订。这意味着截 至目前，原本预计会销售给中国的美国大豆总量中的约8%至9%目前为零。 农民面临着迫在眉睫的金融危机 这场贸 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that President Trump has threatened tariffs and export controls against countries implementing digital taxes, potentially escalating trade tensions between the US and the UK, as well as the EU [1] - Trump's comments specifically target the UK's digital services tax and the EU's Digital Services Act, which he claims are designed to harm American tech companies [1] - Despite a recent trade agreement between the US and the EU, Trump's threats could put additional pressure on their trade relations [1] Group 2 - The UK currently imposes a 2% digital services tax on companies with global revenues exceeding £500 million, affecting major tech firms like Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon [2] - US officials have repeatedly criticized the UK's digital services tax, which remains in place despite the trade agreement reached with the US [2] - The EU's Digital Services Act requires large tech companies to more actively regulate their platform content, facing criticism from the US during recent trade negotiations [2] Group 3 - Canada has already made concessions by canceling its digital services tax in response to US pressure, which is seen as an effort to ease trade tensions [3] - Canada's decision serves as a precedent for other countries facing similar pressures from the US, highlighting the influence of the Trump administration in protecting American tech interests [3] - As Trump re-engages on the issue of digital taxes, more countries may face the dilemma of balancing their tax policies with the risk of trade disputes [3]