美联储理事丽莎·库克（Lisa Cook）的律师周二表示，将就美国总统特朗普解除库克职务一事提起诉讼。 库克的律师Abbe Lowell在一份声明中说： 特朗普总统无权罢免美联储理事丽莎·库克。他试图仅凭一封移交函就将她解职，这在事实和法律上都毫无依据。我们将提起诉讼，挑战这一非法行为。 媒体分析指出， 如果库克提起诉讼，该案件最终可能会由美国最高法院裁决。 1913年《联邦储备法》规定，美国总统只能在"有正当理由"的情况下罢免美联 储理事会的成员。长期以来，这一"正当理由"被理解为渎职或失职等严重不当行为。 在对罢免令提出异议时，库克可以立即寻求禁令，使自己在诉讼进行期间恢复职位。 特朗普解雇库克事件 上周，美国司法部对库克展开刑事调查。此前，联邦住房金融局的Bill Pulte指控库克在住房抵押贷款申请中作虚假陈述。Pulte指出，库克据称在密歇根州和佐 治亚州房产的文件上签字，声称每处房产都是她的主要住所。他称此举是为了可能获得更低的利率和更优惠的贷款条件。这些文件的签署时间早于库克加入美 联储。 特朗普周一晚间在致库克的信中引用了这些指控，并以此通知她被免职。 库克周一在声明中回应称："特朗普总统声称 ...

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute surrounding the dismissal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook by President Trump raises significant questions about the authority of the presidency over Federal Reserve appointments and the potential implications for monetary policy independence [2][11]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Lisa Cook's attorney announced plans to file a lawsuit against President Trump, claiming he lacks the authority to dismiss her without just cause, as defined by the Federal Reserve Act [2][5]. - The lawsuit could potentially escalate to the Supreme Court, as the Federal Reserve Act stipulates that a president can only remove a board member for "just cause," traditionally interpreted as serious misconduct [2][4]. - Cook may seek an injunction to restore her position while the lawsuit is ongoing [3]. Group 2: Allegations and Context - The dismissal follows allegations from Bill Pulte, who accused Cook of making false statements on mortgage applications to secure better loan terms, which reportedly occurred before her appointment to the Federal Reserve [4][5]. - Trump's notification of Cook's dismissal referenced these allegations, which Cook has publicly denied, asserting that there is no legal basis for her removal [5][6]. Group 3: Implications for Federal Reserve - Trump's actions signify an attempt to exert greater control over the Federal Reserve, potentially reshaping its board to align with his economic policies, particularly his preference for lower interest rates [7][11]. - If Trump successfully replaces Cook, he would hold a majority on the seven-member Federal Reserve Board, which could significantly influence future monetary policy decisions [11]. - The Federal Reserve has stated it will comply with any court ruling regarding Cook's status, emphasizing the importance of board members' long-term tenure and protection from arbitrary dismissal [10]. Group 4: Political Reactions - The move has drawn criticism from Democratic lawmakers, who view it as an unlawful power grab that undermines the independence of the Federal Reserve [11]. - Elizabeth Warren, a prominent Democratic senator, condemned the dismissal as a desperate attempt by Trump to deflect blame for economic issues facing Americans [11].

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute surrounding the dismissal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook by President Trump raises significant questions about the authority of the President to remove members of the Federal Reserve Board and the implications for the independence of the Federal Reserve [2][11]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Implications - Lisa Cook's attorney announced plans to file a lawsuit against President Trump, asserting that he lacks the authority to dismiss her without just cause as defined by the Federal Reserve Act [2][5]. - The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 stipulates that the President can only remove a Federal Reserve Board member for "just cause," which has historically been interpreted as serious misconduct [2]. - Cook may seek an injunction to restore her position while the lawsuit is ongoing [3]. Group 2: Background of the Dismissal - The dismissal follows a criminal investigation initiated by the Department of Justice regarding allegations of false statements made by Cook in mortgage applications [4][5]. - Trump cited these allegations in his notification to Cook regarding her dismissal, claiming just cause for the action [5]. Group 3: Political Reactions and Future Implications - Trump's actions are seen as an escalation in his efforts to exert control over the Federal Reserve, potentially impacting monetary policy significantly [11]. - If Trump successfully replaces Cook, he would hold a majority on the seven-member Federal Reserve Board, which could lead to a shift in policy direction favoring interest rate cuts [11]. - Democratic lawmakers have condemned Trump's actions, framing them as an unlawful power grab that undermines the Federal Reserve's independence [12].

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute surrounding the dismissal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook by President Trump raises significant questions about the authority of the President to remove members of the Federal Reserve Board and the implications for the independence of the Federal Reserve [2][11]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Implications - Lisa Cook's attorney announced plans to file a lawsuit against President Trump, asserting that he lacks the authority to dismiss her without just cause as defined by the Federal Reserve Act [2][5]. - The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 stipulates that the President can only remove a Federal Reserve Board member for "just cause," which has historically been interpreted as serious misconduct [2][11]. - Cook may seek an injunction to restore her position while the lawsuit is ongoing [3]. Group 2: Background of the Dismissal - The dismissal follows a criminal investigation by the Department of Justice into allegations of false statements made by Cook regarding mortgage applications [4][5]. - Trump cited these allegations in his notification of Cook's dismissal, claiming just cause for her removal [5][7]. Group 3: Political Reactions and Consequences - Trump's actions have been criticized by Democratic lawmakers, who view the dismissal as an attempt to undermine the Federal Reserve's independence and as a power grab [12]. - Analysts suggest that if Trump successfully replaces Cook, he could gain a majority on the seven-member Federal Reserve Board, which could significantly influence monetary policy [11][12]. Group 4: Federal Reserve's Response - The Federal Reserve has stated that it will comply with any court ruling regarding Cook's status and emphasized the importance of long-term terms for board members to ensure independent monetary policy decisions [10].

Core Viewpoint - Trump's nomination of Stephen Miran to the Federal Reserve Board is seen as a significant move to reshape the Fed's leadership and align it more closely with his economic agenda, particularly in advocating for lower interest rates and financial deregulation [2][4][17]. Summary by Sections Nomination Announcement - Trump announced the nomination of Stephen Miran to fill the vacancy left by Adriana Kugler's resignation from the Federal Reserve Board [2][3]. Background of Stephen Miran - Miran is praised by Trump for his unparalleled expertise in economics and has been a close advisor since Trump's second term began [3]. - He is known for his influential "Mar-a-Lago Accord" paper advocating for a lower long-term value of the dollar and has publicly questioned the independence of the Federal Reserve [4][5]. Views on Federal Reserve - Miran has criticized the Fed's flexible inflation targets and warned that failure to manage inflation could lead to legislative changes to the Federal Reserve Act or the dismissal of board members by future presidents [6]. - He has also pointed out that the Fed's policies have created market expectations for aggressive easing in response to economic downturns [7]. Proposed Reforms - Miran has co-authored a report suggesting radical reforms for the Federal Reserve, including: - Granting voting rights to all Fed officials at every FOMC meeting [8]. - Allowing state governors to control local oversight committees for selecting regional Fed presidents [9]. - Permitting the White House to dismiss Fed officials at any time [10]. - Prohibiting board members from taking executive branch positions for four years after their term [11]. - Requiring Congress to allocate the Fed's operating budget [12]. Market Reactions - Wall Street's reaction to Miran's nomination is mixed, with some investors viewing it positively for potential rate cuts, while others express concerns about his qualifications and political stance [13][14]. - Analysts generally believe that Miran's nomination will not alter expectations for an upcoming rate cut by the Fed [14]. Implications of the Nomination - If confirmed, Miran will serve until the end of January, with limited opportunities to influence rate decisions [16]. - His nomination is seen as the beginning of Trump's long-term plan to reshape the Fed, introducing a strong "MAGA perspective" into the FOMC [17].

Core Viewpoint - Trump's nomination of Stephen Miran is seen as the beginning of a long-term plan to reshape the Federal Reserve, potentially undermining the authority of current Chairman Jerome Powell [1][15]. Group 1: Nomination Details - Trump officially nominated Stephen Miran to fill the vacant Federal Reserve Board seat left by Adriana Kugler's resignation, praising Miran's unparalleled expertise in economics [3]. - Miran's nomination is viewed as a significant step in Trump's efforts to reform the Federal Reserve leadership during his second term [4][15]. Group 2: Miran's Policy Views - Miran has publicly questioned the independence of the Federal Reserve and advocates for radical reforms, including allowing all Federal Reserve officials to vote at every meeting and granting the White House the power to dismiss central bank officials at any time [4][7]. - He is known for his influential "Mar-a-Lago Accord," which argues for measures to lower the long-term value of the dollar [5][6]. Group 3: Market Reactions - Wall Street's reaction to Miran's nomination is mixed, with some investors believing it could be beneficial for the market, while others express concerns about his qualifications and political stance [12]. - Analysts generally agree that Miran's nomination is unlikely to change expectations for an upcoming interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve [13][14]. Group 4: Implications for the Federal Reserve - If confirmed, Miran will serve until the end of January, with limited opportunities to influence rate decisions, especially given the high likelihood of a rate cut in September [14]. - His appointment is interpreted as a significant symbolic move, introducing a strong "MAGA perspective" into the Federal Open Market Committee, indicating a potential shift in the operational and policy discourse of the Federal Reserve [15].