Core Viewpoint - The rise of fraudulent AI training schemes targeting the elderly highlights the exploitation of technology for profit rather than empowerment [2][3][4] Group 1: Nature of the Fraud - Fraudulent AI training programs lure elderly individuals with promises of easy income and quick learning, often using tactics like "free trial classes" and "limited spots" to create urgency [2][3] - Many elderly participants are misled into believing they will receive personalized instruction, only to find themselves in large group sessions with minimal actual training [2][3] - The portrayal of AI as a means to achieve high income is misleading, as actual earnings from AI-generated content are significantly lower than advertised [3] Group 2: Psychological Manipulation - The schemes exploit the psychological vulnerabilities of the elderly, who desire to remain relevant and fear being left behind by technological advancements [3][4] - Language used in marketing, such as "second career" and "active thinking," exacerbates feelings of anxiety among older adults, making them more susceptible to scams [3] Group 3: Platform Responsibility - The lack of accountability from online platforms allows these fraudulent activities to flourish, as they often fail to enforce regulations regarding the verification of trainers and the content they promote [3][4] - Customer service responses to refund requests are often dismissive, citing "private transactions" as a reason to evade responsibility for the fraudulent claims made by training institutions [3] Group 4: Need for Protective Measures - A multi-faceted approach is necessary to combat these scams, including legal measures to classify fraudulent AI training as a crime and the establishment of a blacklist for offending institutions [4] - Platforms should implement specialized review mechanisms for courses targeting the elderly, particularly those promising high returns with little effort [4] - Community initiatives should focus on educating the elderly and their families about digital fraud, using real-life examples to dismantle deceptive marketing tactics [4]

Group 1 - "AI talent" Luo Fuli announced her joining Xiaomi on November 12, stating her commitment to AGI research [3][4] - Luo Fuli previously worked at Alibaba's DAMO Academy and DeepSeek, where she developed multilingual pre-training models and participated in deep learning projects [4] - Xiaomi's founder Lei Jun reportedly offered a salary of tens of millions to recruit Luo Fuli for leading AI large model research [4] Group 2 - Xiaomi reported a total payment amount exceeding 29 billion yuan during the Double 11 shopping festival, expressing gratitude for customer support [10] - The company aims to enhance its competitive edge and international brand image through the issuance of H-shares and listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange [21] Group 3 - Tencent Music's third-quarter revenue reached 8.46 billion yuan, marking a year-on-year increase of 20.6%, with online music service revenue growing by 27.2% [28] - Xinhua Insurance reported a cumulative insurance premium income of 181.973 billion yuan from January to October, reflecting a 17% year-on-year growth [30] Group 4 - Ningde Times exported 120 GWh of lithium batteries in the first three quarters, accounting for nearly 60% of the national total [15] - The company announced the mass production of its fifth-generation lithium iron phosphate battery, achieving breakthroughs in energy density and cycle life [15][16]

AI培训"坑老"需警惕(百姓关注) 第一期学习过程中，"老师"在群内频繁展示学员的高收入截图，反复宣传："AI是当今风口，是改变晚 年生活的极佳机会。"在这样的氛围下，大多数学员又续报了第二期课程。 河北石家庄市读者老刘年纪大了，体力劳动力不从心，想学习一项新技能补贴家用。"大家虽然退休 了，但只要学会AI，包能开启职业第二春！"在短视频平台上，一则由"叶熙老师"发布的"AI免费培训， 利润分成"广告吸引了他。 "对方承诺利润分配比例是我拿八成、企业拿两成，还提供免费教学，只需缴纳1580元入班保证金，而 且学不会可全额退款。"老刘动心了，支付了费用。不料现实情况与他们宣传的大相径庭。老刘被拉进 一个企业微信群，总人数1200多人。群里有自称"老师"的人，却从未传授任何实用技术。 老刘通过客服微信，询问如何具体学习。客服回复仅宣称只要跟着学，代发一条赚20元，日收入超200 元。 "'老师'从不露脸，所谓的教学也只是不断重复一些如何激活账号、如何涨粉之类的话术，连最简单的 AI工具使用都没教过。"更令老刘疑惑的是，"老师"不在群内统一答疑，只接受私信。而且禁止群内成 员私下互通消息，一经发现便会被移除。 不仅 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the emergence of fraudulent AI training schemes targeting elderly individuals, promising high returns and easy learning opportunities, but ultimately leading to financial loss and disappointment for participants [1][4]. Group 1: Fraudulent Practices - Many AI training programs lure elderly individuals with enticing advertisements claiming they can learn AI and earn substantial income, often requiring upfront fees [1][3]. - Participants report that the promised training is minimal or non-existent, with instructors failing to provide practical skills and instead focusing on marketing tactics [2][3]. - The training often involves high-pressure sales tactics, such as limited-time offers and false success stories, to encourage impulsive spending among seniors [4]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Individuals like "Lao Liu" and "Zhao Ayi" have shared experiences of paying significant fees (e.g., 1580 yuan and 2680 yuan) for courses that do not deliver on their promises, leading to financial strain [1][3]. - Refund requests are often met with resistance, with companies offering minimal refunds under restrictive conditions, further exacerbating the financial loss for participants [3][4]. Group 3: Regulatory and Platform Responsibilities - Legal experts suggest that these training programs may be engaging in false advertising, urging elderly individuals to be cautious and seek proper contracts before enrolling [4]. - There is a call for platforms hosting these training sessions to take responsibility for monitoring content and ensuring compliance with regulations to protect vulnerable populations [5].

Core Insights - The AI training market is experiencing rapid growth, driven by the hype surrounding artificial intelligence and the promise of high-paying jobs for those who complete these courses [1][4][8] - Many training institutions are making exaggerated claims about job placement rates and course effectiveness, often lacking transparency regarding their instructors' qualifications and the actual content of their programs [5][6][8] Group 1: Training Market Dynamics - The AI training market has over 210,000 companies, with more than 60,000 established within the last year, indicating a surge in demand for AI skills [4] - Institutions are targeting young individuals' fears of job loss due to AI, promoting courses that promise quick employment with minimal prerequisites [2][3] Group 2: Course Structure and Costs - Courses often require extensive hours, with basic AI training needing around 400 hours and advanced skills requiring an additional 200+ hours, leading to total costs exceeding 29,000 yuan [2][3] - The pricing structure is often misleading, with institutions advertising low per-hour rates while the total cost becomes significantly higher than traditional education [2][3] Group 3: Quality and Credibility Concerns - Many training programs are criticized for their lack of rigorous academic standards, with instructors' credentials often unverified and course content heavily condensed [4][5] - The focus on practical skills over theoretical knowledge may leave students unprepared for actual job requirements in the AI field [5][6] Group 4: Employment Guarantees and Refund Policies - Claims of "100% job placement" are frequently made but lack substantiation, raising concerns about the reliability of such promises [6][8] - Refund policies are often contentious, with institutions imposing conditions that may disadvantage students seeking to withdraw from courses [7][8]

Core Insights - The AI training market is experiencing rapid growth, driven by the hype surrounding artificial intelligence and the promise of high-paying jobs for those who complete training programs [6][8] - Many training institutions are making exaggerated claims about job placement rates and course effectiveness, often lacking transparency regarding their instructors' qualifications and the actual content of their courses [5][7][8] Group 1: Training Market Dynamics - The AI training market has over 210,000 companies, with more than 60,000 established within the last year, indicating a surge in demand for AI skills [6] - Training programs often promise quick employment and high salaries, appealing to young people's fears of job loss due to AI [3][4] - Institutions like 达内教育 and 黑马程序员 offer courses that can cost upwards of 29,000 yuan for comprehensive training, significantly exceeding the cost of a typical four-year university education [3][4] Group 2: Course Structure and Quality - Many courses are marketed as "zero-based" and claim to cover extensive content in a short time, but the actual learning pace is often too fast for beginners [4][7] - The curriculum often focuses on practical skills rather than the theoretical foundations necessary for advanced roles in AI, such as algorithm development [7] - There is a lack of clarity regarding the qualifications of instructors, with many institutions failing to provide evidence of their teachers' backgrounds [5][7] Group 3: Employment Guarantees and Refund Policies - Institutions frequently advertise "100% job placement" guarantees, but these claims are often unsubstantiated and misleading [8][10] - Refund policies are complex and may include hidden fees, raising concerns about their fairness and legality [9][10] - Complaints about AI training programs are prevalent on social media, with issues ranging from difficulty in obtaining refunds to discrepancies between advertised and actual course content [10]

Core Insights - The AI training market is experiencing rapid growth, driven by the hype surrounding AI technologies and the promise of quick employment opportunities for young individuals [4][9][18] - Many training institutions are making exaggerated claims about job placement and course effectiveness, often lacking proper educational credentials and transparency regarding their instructors [10][12][19] Group 1: Market Dynamics - The AI training sector has over 210,000 companies, with more than 60,000 established within the last year, indicating a surge in demand for AI skills [9] - Training programs often promise low entry barriers and quick learning paths, but the actual course content may be overly condensed and not suitable for beginners [10][12] Group 2: Course Structure and Costs - Courses can be expensive, with some institutions charging upwards of 29,000 yuan for comprehensive training, which is significantly higher than traditional education costs [5][8] - Many programs require extensive hours of study, with some institutions offering over 600 hours of content, which may not be feasible for those with no prior knowledge [5][8] Group 3: Employment Promises and Challenges - Institutions frequently advertise "100% job placement" guarantees, but these claims are often unsubstantiated and misleading [13][19] - The skills taught in these fast-track programs may not align with the requirements of core AI roles, which typically demand a solid theoretical foundation and practical experience [10][13] Group 4: Refund Policies and Consumer Rights - Refund policies are often complex and may include hidden fees, raising concerns about their fairness and legality [15][16] - Complaints about AI training programs are prevalent, with over 1,200 reported issues related to misleading advertising and difficulties in obtaining refunds [18][19]

Core Insights - The AI training market is experiencing rapid growth, driven by the hype surrounding AI technology, but it is fraught with issues such as misleading advertising, questionable course quality, and unverified instructor credentials [1][7][9] Group 1: Market Dynamics - The AI training sector has over 210,000 companies, with more than 60,000 established within the last year, indicating a surge in demand for AI skills [7] - Many training institutions lack proper educational qualifications and operate under broad service categories to avoid scrutiny [8] Group 2: Course Structure and Costs - Training programs often promise quick employment and high salaries, but the reality is that the courses are expensive, with total costs exceeding typical four-year undergraduate tuition [5][6] - For example, a basic AI course can cost around 19,800 yuan for 400 hours, while advanced courses can add another 29,000 yuan, totaling over 48,000 yuan [6] Group 3: Quality of Education - The rapid pace of these courses is criticized, with students expressing concerns that the curriculum is too condensed to be effective, especially for those without a background in AI [6][10] - Many programs focus on practical skills rather than foundational knowledge, which is essential for core AI roles [10] Group 4: Employment Guarantees and Refund Policies - Training institutions often make exaggerated claims about job placement rates and employment guarantees, which are difficult to substantiate [10][13] - Refund policies are often seen as unfair, with conditions that heavily favor the institutions, raising legal concerns about their validity [11][12] Group 5: Consumer Sentiment and Complaints - There is a growing number of complaints from consumers regarding the quality of training and difficulties in obtaining refunds, with over 1,200 complaints related to AI training reported [12] - Social media platforms are filled with negative reviews from students who feel misled by the promises made by these training institutions [12]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of selecting AI training institutions with practical capabilities in the rapidly evolving AI landscape, highlighting the significant differences in course update rates and instructor backgrounds among various training providers [1][2][4][12] Group 2 - The AI training market in 2025 is characterized by diversification and specialization, with three main segments: enterprise training, personal career enhancement, and youth education. Enterprise-level AI training is the fastest-growing area, with over 75% of companies planning to implement AI learning initiatives [2][10] - Leading training institutions have significantly reduced course update cycles to as short as two weeks, ensuring that students learn the latest technologies rather than outdated knowledge. Institutions like Rongzhi Technology and Yunzhisheng are noted for their rapid course iteration capabilities [2][7][10] Group 3 - Rongzhi Technology is identified as a leader in enterprise-level AI training, with a course update frequency of two weeks and a high client renewal rate of 85%. The institution has developed a proprietary model that has received certifications from major companies [4][7] - DeepBlue Technology exemplifies a successful government-enterprise training model, collaborating with the Shanghai Human Resources Bureau to create a national AI training base, resulting in a high employment rate for graduates [4][6] - Daren Education is noted for its transformation in the AI era, introducing an O2O dual-teacher classroom model and achieving an average salary of over 15K for graduates within three months [6][10] Group 4 - The quality of AI training is heavily influenced by the instructors' industry backgrounds. Top institutions feature instructors with significant real-world experience, enhancing the practical value of the training [9][10] - There is a clear distinction between enterprise-level and personal-level training, with enterprise training focusing on practical applications and personal training emphasizing skill acquisition and certification [10][11] Group 5 - Practical advice for selecting training institutions includes understanding specific needs, evaluating course quality, instructor expertise, and employment services, rather than solely relying on brand reputation [11][12] - The article warns against institutions that promise job placement without disclosing specific partnerships, emphasizing the importance of practical skills in a rapidly changing job market [11][12]

以下文章来源于螺旋实验室 ，作者螺旋君 螺旋实验室 . 公众情绪瞭望者 将投中网设为"星标⭐"，第一时间收获最新推送 以月入过万！你要不要学？" "有这种好事，怎么没见你发到家族群里？"对Deepseek，曾佳早见怪不怪了，这几个月熏陶下来， 小红书10个人里有8个都在用它生成赛博文案。但老妈却很谨慎，又小声说："这赚钱的好事，哪能 给别人抢了啊？" "这赚钱的好事，哪能给别人抢了啊？" 作者丨安晓 编辑丨 坚果 来源丨螺旋实验室 这届老年人不领鸡蛋、不买保险保健品，也不加销售微信，早就被短视频和直播带货话术洗礼过的他 们，练就一身"陌生人勿近之身"。但当"AI速成班"、"躺赚理财课"的广告精准化作弹窗出现时，对老 年人的吸引力堪比真假靳东和上头短剧。 曾佳妈最近就中招了，上个周末曾佳回爸妈家吃饭，饭后聊天看到妈妈坐在沙发上摆弄手机，屏幕上 的老师戴个眼镜，一脸严肃地在讲什么是Deepseek、Deepseek网站是什么、怎么注册…… 年过60，智能手机都玩不太明白的老妈，居然一本正经钻研起了时下最流行的国产AI？ 起初曾佳以为是哪个好友转发给妈妈的公益课，也没多想，调侃了一句"平时也没见你这么上心，怎 么突 ...