Core Insights - The report predicts that the old-caliber M1 year-on-year growth will decline from 6.2% in September to approximately 3.4% by the end of the year, while M2 is expected to decrease from 8.4% in September to around 8.0% by year-end [1][10] - The analysis framework for M1 and M2 growth is based on the formula: old-caliber M1 = M2 - other currencies, where M2 is derived from various leverage factors across different sectors [4][14] M1 and M2 Growth Analysis - The report outlines five key factors influencing M2 growth: corporate leverage, household leverage, foreign exchange derivation, government leverage, and other factors, with a projected M2 year-on-year decline of 900 billion [6][20] - The anticipated decline in M1 growth is attributed to a combination of factors, including a decrease in corporate loans by 300 billion and a reduction in household deposits by 6200 billion [7][33] - Historical data indicates that changes in M1 correlate with shifts in PPI and industrial inventory levels, suggesting that M1 serves as a leading indicator for these economic metrics [2][13] Investment Themes - The report emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamics of M1 and M2 in relation to asset allocation, highlighting that M1's growth is closely tied to the performance of equity markets and corporate profitability [9][33] - The analysis suggests that a stable equity market environment could lead to a shift in household deposits towards investment assets, thereby impacting M1 growth positively [34][40] Future Projections - The report forecasts that M1 growth will be approximately 2.3 trillion, with M2 growth around 25 trillion, reflecting a broader economic context where monetary policy and market conditions play crucial roles [51][53] - The anticipated government bond issuance is expected to decrease, which may further influence M2 growth dynamics in the upcoming quarters [27][30]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of tracking three financial indicators: M1 year-on-year growth, non-bank deposits, and corporate medium to long-term loans, as they reflect industrial inventory and PPI improvements, market activity, and production investment trends respectively [4][5][6] - In September, M1 year-on-year growth increased by 1.2%, while non-bank deposits decreased by 1.97 trillion, and corporate medium to long-term loans saw a slight decrease of 500 million [4][5] - The decline in non-bank deposits in September is attributed to seasonal factors, particularly the pressure on banks to meet deposit assessments at the end of the quarter, leading to a typical seasonal drop in non-bank deposits [4][5][9] Group 2 - The article discusses the implications of the significant drop in non-bank deposits in September, suggesting it does not necessarily indicate a weakening of the equity market's activity, and further observation of October's data is required [8][9] - The increase in M1 year-on-year is likely driven by a rise in household demand rather than improvements in corporate cash flow, as evidenced by the relatively modest increase in corporate deposits [10][23] - The article highlights that while the new M1 metric is statistically more accurate, historical discrepancies suggest that it may not directly correlate with corporate expectations, necessitating further analysis of traditional M1 metrics [10][24] Group 3 - In September, the total social financing increased by 3.53 trillion, a decrease of 2.3 trillion year-on-year, with a stock growth rate of 8.7% [31][32] - The article notes that corporate medium to long-term loans continued to show a decrease, with a total loan increase of 1.29 trillion, which is 300 billion less than the previous year [27][31] - M2 growth rate fell to 8.4% in September, down 0.4% from the previous month, while new M1 grew by 7.2%, reflecting a mixed trend in liquidity [32][33]