Core Viewpoints - The current liquidity assessment indicates that overall liquidity remains relatively ample, supporting financial asset valuations, despite a decline in M1 and a significant drop in enterprise deposits [3][4][12] - Future liquidity is expected to face challenges due to a decrease in interbank certificates of deposit and rising loan bases, leading to a forecasted decline in M2 growth in the first quarter of 2026 [4][5] - The current monetary policy focuses on structural adjustments and timing, with an emphasis on stimulating investment in supported sectors while controlling capacity expansion in weaker demand areas [8][36][38] Group 1: Reasons for M2 Year-on-Year Growth - M2 increased by 8.5% year-on-year in December, with a monthly addition of 3.3 trillion yuan, driven by a narrowing drag from other factors and an increase in bank claims on non-financial institutions [14][15][44] - The narrowing drag from other factors is attributed to a decrease in bond issuance and a return of funds to the non-bank sector due to the maturity of interbank certificates of deposit [18][19] - The growth in bank claims on non-financial institutions is primarily from increased loans to enterprises, but this growth is expected to be unsustainable due to high base effects and weak demand [25][40] Group 2: Reasons for M1 Year-on-Year Decline - The new M1 decreased by 3.8% year-on-year in December, primarily due to a decline in the old M1, while household demand for current deposits remained stable [28][31] Group 3: Impact of December Financial Data on Liquidity Assessment - The ratio of new household deposits to new M2 remains low, indicating overall macro liquidity is still relatively ample, but there is a potential shift from real to virtual assets as enterprise deposits decline [12][32] - The increase in non-bank deposits aligns with a surge in equity market transactions, while the drop in enterprise deposits may negatively impact expectations for economic recovery [12][32] - The December M2 increase is seen as a short-term fluctuation, with a high probability of M2 decline in the first quarter of 2026, suggesting a potential marginal decrease in overall macro liquidity [12][32] Group 4: Information from the National New Office Meeting - The meeting outlined eight monetary policies to support the real economy, including a 0.25 percentage point reduction in various structural monetary policy tool rates and increased loan quotas for small and private enterprises [36][37] - The focus is on structural adjustments, with the central bank aiming to stimulate investment in supported sectors while managing supply in weaker demand areas [36][38]

Report Industry Investment Rating - The report does not mention the industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In December 2025, the weakening of the US dollar and the improvement of risk appetite led to a steeper curve overseas, while in China, loose funds drove the yield curve to steepen. The bond market remained volatile due to the supply - demand contradiction at the long end [2]. - In 2026, the PPI is facing three positive factors: the tail - lifting factor, imported inflation, and the continued effectiveness of the "anti - involution" policy. Under the neutral scenario, the PPI is expected to turn positive in the second quarter of 2026 and reach around 1.2% by the end of the year. The mild re - inflation needs to resonate with other factors to significantly affect the bond market [3][55]. - Currently, the bond market is in a wait - and - see state. It is expected to remain volatile in the short term, lacking the motivation and space for trend trading. There are some structural opportunities, such as the follow - up rise opportunity of 5 - 7Y China Development Bank bonds and the compression opportunity of credit spreads [4]. Summary by Directory PART1: December 2025 - Curve Steepening Driven by Overseas and Domestic Factors Overseas - In December 2025, the Fed announced reserve management - style purchases (RMP) and continued to cut interest rates. The US dollar index weakened, liquidity improved, the US stock market rose, and risk appetite recovered. The US bond yield curve steepened due to factors like Fed's short - term bond purchase, market concerns about Fed independence, and rising commodity prices. Precious and industrial metals performed well, with copper benefiting from AI demand and gold and silver supported by geopolitical events [10][16]. Domestic - In November 2025, the domestic economic fundamentals showed a divergence between quantity and price, and in December, both supply and demand declined. The capital market was generally loose, and the overnight interest rate hit a new low for the year. The bond market remained volatile due to the long - end supply - demand contradiction, and the yield curve steepened [17][23]. - In terms of institutional behavior, large banks and insurance companies, as allocation players, increased their bond - buying in the secondary market in December. Large banks added some policy - related financial bonds and focused on 5 - 7 - year varieties. Insurance companies mainly added long - term treasury bonds. Trading players became conservative. Rural commercial banks mainly invested in certificates of deposit, funds reduced duration and mainly sold long - term treasury bonds, and wealth management products seasonally reduced bond allocation and slightly increased credit bond allocation [26][35][47]. PART2: How the 2026 Re - inflation Narrative May Affect the Bond Market 2026 PPI's Three Positive Factors - The tail - lifting factor can support the PPI to turn positive in the second half of 2026 even without new price - increasing factors [55]. - Imported inflation may occur as overseas capital expenditure and manufacturing investment are likely to rise in 2026. The US deficit rate may expand, and the Fed's new round of easing may release emerging market countries' capital expenditure demand [57]. - The "anti - involution" policy has shown a supporting effect on the PPI. Since August 2025, the month - on - month PPI of the mining industry has turned positive, driving the overall PPI to turn positive since October [60]. PPI Forecast under Different Scenarios - Under the pessimistic scenario, the PPI is expected to turn positive in the second half of 2026 with an average monthly PPI growth rate of 0%. Under the neutral scenario, with a monthly average PPI growth rate of 0.1%, the PPI is expected to turn positive in the second quarter of 2026 and reach around 1.2% by the end of the year. Under the optimistic scenario, with a monthly average PPI growth rate of 0.2%, the PPI is expected to turn positive in April 2026 and exceed 2% in the second half of the year [67]. PPI's Impact on the Bond Market - Historically, during the four PPI upward cycles since 2009, three typical upward periods were driven by the resonance of domestic and overseas demand or supply - demand. The PPI and the bond market generally move in the same direction, but there were several periods of divergence, mainly due to strong economic recovery expectations or PPI being mainly affected by the supply side while the domestic demand did not improve significantly and the monetary policy remained loose [69][71]. - In 2026, the mild re - inflation needs to resonate with other factors such as total demand, central bank's capital management, financial institutions' liability - side stability, and the flow of activated household deposits to significantly affect the bond market. The trading of typical total assets based on re - inflation may have limited odds [78]. PART3: Bond Market Strategy for January 2026 - In January 2026, the bond market may still be in a wait - and - see period. Potential risks include government bond supply pressure, the spring rally in the equity market, and the first - quarter credit boom. Potential positive factors include the possible relaxation of large banks' bond - allocation pressure and the relatively loose capital market, with a higher probability of a reserve - requirement ratio cut than an interest - rate cut in January [81]. - The bond market is expected to remain volatile in the short term, lacking the motivation and space for trend trading. Structurally, there are opportunities such as the follow - up rise of 5 - 7Y China Development Bank bonds and the compression of credit spreads in credit bonds [4][83].

Core Insights - The report predicts that the old-caliber M1 year-on-year growth will decline from 6.2% in September to approximately 3.4% by the end of the year, while M2 is expected to decrease from 8.4% in September to around 8.0% by year-end [1][10] - The analysis framework for M1 and M2 growth is based on the formula: old-caliber M1 = M2 - other currencies, where M2 is derived from various leverage factors across different sectors [4][14] M1 and M2 Growth Analysis - The report outlines five key factors influencing M2 growth: corporate leverage, household leverage, foreign exchange derivation, government leverage, and other factors, with a projected M2 year-on-year decline of 900 billion [6][20] - The anticipated decline in M1 growth is attributed to a combination of factors, including a decrease in corporate loans by 300 billion and a reduction in household deposits by 6200 billion [7][33] - Historical data indicates that changes in M1 correlate with shifts in PPI and industrial inventory levels, suggesting that M1 serves as a leading indicator for these economic metrics [2][13] Investment Themes - The report emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamics of M1 and M2 in relation to asset allocation, highlighting that M1's growth is closely tied to the performance of equity markets and corporate profitability [9][33] - The analysis suggests that a stable equity market environment could lead to a shift in household deposits towards investment assets, thereby impacting M1 growth positively [34][40] Future Projections - The report forecasts that M1 growth will be approximately 2.3 trillion, with M2 growth around 25 trillion, reflecting a broader economic context where monetary policy and market conditions play crucial roles [51][53] - The anticipated government bond issuance is expected to decrease, which may further influence M2 growth dynamics in the upcoming quarters [27][30]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of tracking three financial indicators: M1 year-on-year growth, non-bank deposits, and corporate medium to long-term loans, as they reflect industrial inventory and PPI improvements, market activity, and production investment trends respectively [4][5][6] - In September, M1 year-on-year growth increased by 1.2%, while non-bank deposits decreased by 1.97 trillion, and corporate medium to long-term loans saw a slight decrease of 500 million [4][5] - The decline in non-bank deposits in September is attributed to seasonal factors, particularly the pressure on banks to meet deposit assessments at the end of the quarter, leading to a typical seasonal drop in non-bank deposits [4][5][9] Group 2 - The article discusses the implications of the significant drop in non-bank deposits in September, suggesting it does not necessarily indicate a weakening of the equity market's activity, and further observation of October's data is required [8][9] - The increase in M1 year-on-year is likely driven by a rise in household demand rather than improvements in corporate cash flow, as evidenced by the relatively modest increase in corporate deposits [10][23] - The article highlights that while the new M1 metric is statistically more accurate, historical discrepancies suggest that it may not directly correlate with corporate expectations, necessitating further analysis of traditional M1 metrics [10][24] Group 3 - In September, the total social financing increased by 3.53 trillion, a decrease of 2.3 trillion year-on-year, with a stock growth rate of 8.7% [31][32] - The article notes that corporate medium to long-term loans continued to show a decrease, with a total loan increase of 1.29 trillion, which is 300 billion less than the previous year [27][31] - M2 growth rate fell to 8.4% in September, down 0.4% from the previous month, while new M1 grew by 7.2%, reflecting a mixed trend in liquidity [32][33]