Group 1 - Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT) has made significant progress in basic research through a dual approach of "mechanism reform + evaluation orientation," exemplified by Professor Duanmu Haosui's recent publication in a leading economics journal within two years [1] - HIT has published 13 academic papers in prestigious journals like Nature and Science, and has introduced a new batch of high-level innovative talents in basic research over the past five years, demonstrating the effectiveness of its reform in building an innovation ecosystem [1] Group 2 - HIT is reforming its talent evaluation system to better suit the long-term and high-risk nature of basic research, moving away from traditional metrics that may not apply to foundational studies [2] - The university has seen a rise in exceptional young researchers, such as Professor Lv Haibao, who achieved a rapid promotion and made groundbreaking contributions in condensed matter physics [2] - HIT's supportive environment has encouraged young researchers to focus on their work, leading to a more vibrant research atmosphere [2] Group 3 - HIT aims to leverage its basic research capabilities to create knowledge and cultivate talent, as stated by the university's Party Secretary Chen Jie, with a focus on building a high-level faculty and nurturing innovative talents [3] - The establishment of the Life Sciences Center has become a model for talent cultivation, successfully addressing several world-class challenges in virus structure and immunity within a decade [3] - HIT has launched various talent support initiatives, including the "Youth Top Talent Recruitment Program" and "Spring Goose Talent Program," resulting in the establishment of 178 youth scientist studios to foster academic communities [3] Group 4 - Zhao Weisong, a young faculty member at HIT, has achieved significant breakthroughs in biomedical imaging technology, supported by the university's funding and resources for young scientists [4] - The increasing number of talented young researchers joining HIT reflects the institution's growing reputation and supportive research environment [4] - HIT plans to initiate the "Foundation Building Strategy" to provide targeted policy support for cutting-edge basic research [4] Group 5 - HIT is navigating the complexities of basic research with a robust support system and mechanism reforms, positioning itself as a leader in the field [5]

又一家海外大学被"点名"！教育部留学服务中心日前发布公告，暂停泰国彭世洛大学学历学位认证申请。 加强审查的原因包括虚报博士招生规模、恢复或变相恢复因违规发放而被撤销的学位等。 教育部留学服务中心建议广大留学人员密切关注加强审查系列公告，审慎选择公告涉及院校（项目）。 公告提到，泰国彭世洛大学（Phitsanulok University）在核查工作中，提供相互冲突、不真实、不准确信息，导致相关认证工作无法继续开展。根据《国 （境）外学历学位认证办法》第三十九条，决定暂停受理泰国彭世洛大学学历学位认证申请，并对相关认证申请开展复查。 此前，该中心已发布多条关于海外高校学历学位认证再次加强认证审查的公告。其中涉及菲律宾亚当森大学、菲律宾永恒大学拉古纳分校、法国克莱蒙高等 商学院、法国IPAG高等商学院、法国欧洲互联网应用学院等多所高校。 正规海外学历学位如何认证？ 近年来，海外注水文凭成为社会热议话题。学生出国留学，如何选择正规高等学校？海外学历学位如何判定正规性？认证流程是什么？ 出国留学 如何选择正规高等学校 学生出国留学前，需要综合考虑各国教育主管部门、质量保障机构以及院校官网发布的信息，谨慎选择国（境）外 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the contrasting perceptions of a Chinese graduate, Jiang, who delivered a speech at Harvard University, highlighting the divide between elite institutions and the general public's sentiments regarding fairness and opportunity in society [2][10][13]. Group 1: Jiang's Speech and Public Reaction - Jiang's speech at Harvard was met with both applause and criticism, reflecting a shift in public sentiment towards elite achievements and the perceived unfairness of opportunities [2][3][4]. - The public's skepticism towards Jiang's success stems from her background, as her father holds a prominent position in a biodiversity organization, leading to questions about the role of privilege in her achievements [3][5][10]. - Despite Jiang's efforts to clarify her independence from her father's influence, the public remains unconvinced, indicating a broader distrust of elite narratives [5][6][10]. Group 2: Harvard's Globalization Stance - Harvard's choice to feature Jiang in its graduation ceremony symbolizes the institution's commitment to globalization, which contrasts with the sentiments of many Americans who prioritize national interests [9][10]. - The article argues that while Harvard's ideals may be noble, they fail to address the real concerns of the public, who are more focused on immediate economic and social issues rather than abstract global principles [10][11][14]. - The disconnect between elite institutions like Harvard and the general populace is highlighted, suggesting that the elite are out of touch with the struggles faced by ordinary people [11][13][14]. Group 3: Comparison with Other Institutions - The article contrasts Jiang's speech with that of Andrew Yang, a graduate from Columbia University, who focused on relatable themes of struggle and community, making his message more accessible to the public [16][17]. - Yang's approach is presented as a more genuine representation of the collective human experience, in contrast to Jiang's perceived elitism and detachment [16][17].

Core Viewpoint - Wuhan University of Technology has announced procurement intentions for 39 items of laboratory equipment, with a total budget of 156 million yuan, scheduled for procurement between December 2024 and June 2025 [1][2]. Procurement Summary - The procurement includes advanced systems such as intelligent all-weather testing and comparison systems, electromagnetic field-assisted multifunctional material preparation systems, and plasma high-energy ball milling systems for building materials, among others [2][4]. - The total budget for the procurement is 156 million yuan, with specific allocations for various equipment types, including: - Intelligent all-weather testing and comparison system: 7.9 million yuan [4]. - Electromagnetic field-assisted multifunctional material preparation system: 4.6 million yuan [4]. - Plasma high-energy ball milling system for building materials: 4 million yuan [4]. - Intelligent high-altitude climate testing system: 8.7 million yuan [5]. - Key performance testing system for materials: 7.45 million yuan [5]. - Thermodynamic performance evaluation system for glass/microcrystalline glass: 5.5 million yuan [5]. - Full electric and laser manufacturing system for microcrystalline glass: 8.9 million yuan [5]. Equipment Specifications - The intelligent all-weather testing and comparison system is designed to simulate extreme environmental conditions and perform high-precision comparisons and analyses of material properties [4][5]. - The electromagnetic field-assisted multifunctional material preparation system aims to develop low-carbon manufacturing techniques for advanced building materials [4][5]. - The plasma high-energy ball milling system will enable the preparation of new types of high-activity clinker and microcrystalline glass under mild conditions, significantly reducing carbon emissions during the manufacturing process [5]. - The intelligent high-altitude climate testing system will assess the durability of materials under extreme conditions typical of high-altitude environments [5]. - The key performance testing system for materials will evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of materials in marine climate conditions [5]. Additional Equipment and Features - Other notable equipment includes a functional near-infrared spectrometer for non-invasive measurement of brain activity in drivers, and a lithium-ion battery material intelligent experimental teaching platform [6][7]. - The procurement also includes advanced optical platforms for electronic materials and components, as well as various systems for automated testing and simulation in educational settings [6][7][8].

Group 1 - The core issue involves the freezing of over $3 billion in federal education funds for Harvard University since April 2025, alongside the revocation of its eligibility to enroll foreign students, although this order was quickly halted by a U.S. court [2] - Other prestigious institutions like Princeton University and the University of Pennsylvania have also seen millions of dollars in federal education funds frozen [2] - The U.S. Department of Education is investigating 10 universities for alleged anti-Semitism and 52 universities for cases related to racism [2] Group 2 - Right-wing individuals in the U.S. perceive universities as breeding grounds for liberal ideologies, claiming that campuses have become leftist institutions pursuing "absolute freedom" [6] - The Trump administration believes that protests against Israel during the Israel-Palestine conflict have morphed into support for racism, anti-Semitism, and terrorism under leftist influence [6] - A survey conducted by Harvard's anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim bias investigation group revealed that many Jewish and Muslim students face bias, exclusion, and alienation in academic settings [6] Group 3 - The Trump administration aims to replace the previous administration's notion of "political correctness" with a stricter version, leading to concerns about freedom of speech on campuses [8] - International students express worries that their viewpoints may affect their studies and employment opportunities in the U.S., including visa revocation [8] - The ideological divide in the U.S. is impacting the normal academic and social lives of international students, particularly Chinese students, who face more complex challenges compared to their peers from other countries [8] - The U.S. may impose restrictions on Chinese students' applications in various fields under the guise of national security, leading to the most challenging application environment in 20 years for Chinese students studying in the U.S. [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses how Trump's understanding of power is limited to coercion and transactional relationships, which is undermining the United States' global influence, particularly its soft power, due to rising unilateralism, trade protectionism, and cultural conservatism [1][10]. Group 1: Impact on Scientific Research - Trump's administration has significantly reduced funding for scientific research, with the National Science Foundation's new project funding dropping nearly 50% compared to the previous year, particularly affecting engineering, education, and computer science [2][4]. - Major research institutions like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have had to implement large-scale layoffs due to funding cuts, with NIH terminating support for over 700 research projects in just one month [4][9]. - The Trump administration's focus on "useful research" has led to a decline in support for basic research, which is crucial for long-term scientific advancement, indicating a shift towards a more utilitarian view of science [3][5]. Group 2: Higher Education and Cultural Tensions - The Trump administration has pressured universities to reform their diversity initiatives and has threatened funding cuts, leading to significant financial repercussions for institutions like Harvard and Princeton [7][8]. - A survey indicated that approximately 75% of American researchers are considering leaving the U.S. due to the uncertain policy environment and funding cuts, highlighting a potential brain drain [4][5]. - The conflict between Trump's administration and universities reflects a broader cultural clash between conservative and progressive values, with implications for academic freedom and the future of higher education in the U.S. [6][8]. Group 3: International Relations and Soft Power - Trump's "America First" policy has led to a departure from multilateralism, with the U.S. becoming the least supportive country of multilateralism among 193 UN member states [10][12]. - The administration's aggressive trade policies and withdrawal from international agreements have strained relationships with allies and reduced the U.S.'s global standing [11][13]. - Trump's approach has resulted in a significant decline in the U.S.'s soft power, as countries reassess their relationships with the U.S. and become more cautious in their engagements [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The "Double Hundred Action" initiated by Guangdong aims to enhance the quality of development in rural areas by leveraging the resources and expertise of 125 universities and institutions to support 86 counties, promoting collaboration between academia and local governments [10][11][12]. Group 1: Talent and Technology Integration - The initiative involves a partnership between universities and counties, referred to as "Hundred Schools Linking Hundred Counties," which aims to ignite intellectual engines and cultivate grassroots talent [4][10]. - A total of 889 cooperation projects have been established under the "Double Hundred Action," with 180 industry-university-research platforms created, attracting 21 large enterprises and generating 7.9 billion yuan in investment [33][35]. Group 2: Agricultural Development - The South China Agricultural University has been instrumental in enhancing the quality and value of local agricultural products, such as the transformation of the "Zijin Tea" into a product with an annual output value exceeding 2 billion yuan [10][51]. - The Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences has focused on the lychee industry, implementing advanced preservation techniques that extend the shelf life of lychees to one year, thus facilitating their export [52][56]. Group 3: Public Services Enhancement - Twelve normal universities have signed agreements with 15 cities in eastern and western Guangdong to upgrade educational resources, including the establishment of new schools to provide over 8,000 quality educational slots [62][66]. - Medical institutions in Guangdong are enhancing local healthcare services by establishing specialized alliances and information platforms, resulting in the creation of 22 accessible hospitals [73][75].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing reform of the evaluation system for scientific and technological talents in China, emphasizing the importance of innovation and contribution over traditional metrics like publication count [2][6]. Group 1: Evaluation Reform Implementation - The Ministry of Science and Technology and eight other departments initiated a pilot program for talent evaluation reform in September 2022, involving six regions and 21 universities and research institutions [2]. - Shanghai University is one of the pilot units, where a new evaluation mechanism focusing on innovation quality and contribution is being implemented [4]. Group 2: Research and Development Focus - At Shanghai University, interdisciplinary teams are formed to tackle complex mechanical problems, showcasing a collaborative approach to research [2]. - Young researcher Li Mengjiao from the Microelectronics Institute is engaged in advanced integrated circuit research, benefiting from a six-year evaluation period that emphasizes resource coordination rather than solely focusing on publications [8]. Group 3: Policy and Standards Development - The Ministry of Science and Technology reports that over 50 policy documents have been issued to support the pilot program, enhancing the evaluation autonomy of trial units [10]. - More than 100 institutional documents related to the evaluation reform have been published or revised by the 21 pilot universities and research institutions [11]. Group 4: Evaluation Criteria - The current evaluation framework categorizes talents based on their research focus, with specific criteria for basic research, applied research, and social welfare research [13]. - Over 90% of central pilot units are implementing long-term evaluations of 6 to 10 years for basic research and young scientific talents, aligning evaluations with national strategic needs [13]. Group 5: Future Directions - The Ministry of Science and Technology plans to develop policy documents to further refine industry talent evaluation standards and norms [15].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict between Harvard University and the Trump administration over the recruitment of international students has raised significant concerns about academic freedom and the future of international education in the U.S. [1][3][4] Group 1: Impact on Harvard University - The Trump administration's decision to revoke Harvard's eligibility to enroll international students has created a crisis for thousands of students, forcing them to consider transferring or facing loss of legal status [2][4] - Harvard University has responded by filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming that the actions taken are illegal and lack necessary procedures [4][6] - The university's international student population, approximately 6,800, constitutes about 27% of the total student body, highlighting the critical role these students play in the institution's financial structure [7] Group 2: Broader Implications for U.S. Education - The Trump administration's actions are not isolated to Harvard; they reflect a growing trend affecting multiple U.S. educational institutions, leading to a chilling effect on academic freedom [3][15] - The economic contribution of international students to the U.S. is substantial, with last year's international student population generating approximately $43 billion in revenue [8] - Concerns are rising about the potential decline in international student enrollment, which could have long-term negative effects on U.S. higher education and research funding [8][10] Group 3: Global Response and Talent Migration - The political climate in the U.S. is prompting many international students, particularly from China, to reconsider their future in American academia, with some opting for opportunities in Europe or returning to their home countries [12][14] - Several universities in Hong Kong and Europe are actively recruiting students affected by U.S. policies, indicating a shift in the global academic landscape [13][14] - The potential loss of top talent from the U.S. could reshape the future of higher education, as institutions abroad seek to attract those disillusioned by the current U.S. educational environment [11][15]

Core Viewpoint - Harvard University is facing challenges due to the Trump administration's policies against international students, which has sparked significant support for these students during the graduation ceremony [1][2][4]. Group 1: Graduation Ceremony Highlights - Approximately 9,000 graduates attended the graduation ceremony, where the president of Harvard, Alan M. Garber, emphasized the importance of international students [2]. - Graduates and professors displayed stickers stating "Harvard is not Harvard without international students" to protest against the Trump administration's restrictions [2]. - A graduate representative highlighted that Harvard is at the center of a national struggle in higher education, reflecting the changes since their enrollment [4]. Group 2: Impact of Trump Administration Policies - The Trump administration has intensified its actions against several universities, including Harvard, by targeting policies related to diversity and anti-Semitism [4]. - Harvard professor Steven Levitsky noted that a significant portion of his students are international, expressing disbelief at the idea of Harvard without them [5]. - Levitsky suggested that the administration's focus on Harvard is strategic, aiming to set a precedent for other universities [6]. Group 3: Legal Developments - A federal judge in Massachusetts temporarily halted the Trump administration's policy that would revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students [7]. - The Department of Homeland Security had announced the cancellation of Harvard's eligibility for the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, prompting Harvard to file a lawsuit [7]. - Harvard's president condemned the "ban" as illegal and harmful to thousands of students and scholars [7]. Group 4: Visa Processing Updates - The U.S. State Department announced a temporary pause in processing international student visas while reviewing new social media scrutiny rules [10]. - The State Department spokesperson indicated that the suspension of visa processing would not last long, and applicants should check for updates [10].