Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration's policies are significantly undermining U.S. scientific research and funding, leading to widespread concerns about the future of science in the country [1][3][11]. Group 1: Impact on Federal Research Funding - The Trump administration has threatened to cut billions in funding for research universities and has already terminated over 1,000 grants in critical areas such as climate change and cancer research [1][20]. - The proposed 2026 budget may drastically reduce federal scientific investments, with potential cuts of 50% to NASA's science budget and 40% to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [2][22]. - The NIH, which received nearly $48 billion in funding, is crucial for U.S. research, having funded over 99% of drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 [9][31]. Group 2: Scientific Community's Response - A public letter from approximately 1,900 members of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine expressed alarm over the damage to U.S. science, with 94% of surveyed scientists worried about the future [3][37]. - The scientific community is concerned that the dismantling of federal support will lead to a significant decline in innovation and competitiveness, with many researchers considering opportunities abroad [26][27]. Group 3: Long-term Consequences - Experts warn that the damage inflicted by the Trump administration could take decades to reverse, with a significant loss of knowledge and talent in the scientific workforce [7][19]. - The reduction in federal funding is expected to hinder technological innovation, affecting industries reliant on research and development [31][32]. - The shift towards private funding may not adequately replace government support, particularly for high-cost, large-scale research projects [33][34]. Group 4: University and Research Institution Challenges - U.S. universities are facing unprecedented challenges due to funding cuts and political pressures, with many institutions already tightening graduate admissions and research funding [21][24]. - The Trump administration's stance on federal funding has created a hostile environment for research, leading to fears of a decline in the quality and quantity of scientific output [25][30]. - The potential loss of international talent is a significant concern, as many foreign researchers are reconsidering their plans to study or work in the U.S. due to the current political climate [26][27].

Core Points - The event celebrated the 100th anniversary of the All-China Federation of Trade Unions and recognized 119 individuals from Shandong, including 80 national labor models and 39 advanced workers [1] - The recognized individuals represent various sectors, including manufacturing, education, health, scientific research, and government, highlighting the diversity and grassroots focus of the awards [2] - The awards reflect a strong emphasis on the manufacturing sector, with 64.3% of recognized workers coming from this field, and a significant representation of frontline workers and technical professionals [2] Group 1 - A total of 119 individuals from Shandong were honored, including 80 national labor models and 39 advanced workers [1] - The recognized individuals include 99 Communist Party members and 28 women, showcasing political representation and gender diversity [2] - 94.1% of the honorees are from county-level or lower government agencies, state-owned enterprises, and grassroots organizations, emphasizing the focus on ordinary laborers [2] Group 2 - 45.4% of the recognized individuals are from key industries such as new generation information technology, high-end equipment, new energy, and new materials [2] - 23.5% of the honorees have received provincial or higher-level scientific and technological awards, indicating a commitment to technological advancement [2] - Among the 24 farmers recognized, 12.5% are "Qilu Rural Stars," and 25% are leaders of agricultural production organizations, highlighting efforts in rural revitalization [2][3]