对于应聘高管的门槛，渤海人寿提出了不少要求。除了年龄、满足任职要求等基本条件，分管保险业务的副总经理需具有从事保险工作15年及以 上，担任寿险公司副总经理、总经理助理相当管理职务2年及以上，或者担任寿险公司省级分公司负责人或总公司保险业务部门负责人8年及以上 的年限；而分管战略企划、资本运营的副总经理需具有从事保险等金融企业工作十年及以上，且担任国有企业高级管理人员相当管理职务3年及 以上的年限要求，具有保险公司高级管理人员履职经历者优先。 中小险企通过市场化渠道选聘高管渐成潮流。9月15日，北京商报记者注意到，渤海人寿日前发布面向社会公开选聘高级管理人员的公告，计划 选聘2名副总经理。渤海人寿并非个例，在此之前，东吴财险、浙商财险等多家中小险企都曾面向社会公开招聘总经理或副总经理，越来越多险 企青睐通过市场化渠道选聘高管。 在业内人士看来，面对当前保险行业竞争压力，险企需要引入新鲜血液推动破局，"海选"高管能够成为选拔人才的有力补充，预计后续公开选聘 人才需求增加会是趋势，中小险企尤其显著。 "海选"高管渐成趋势 近日，渤海人寿发布了面向社会公开选聘高级管理人员的公告。该公司拟选聘副总经理两名，一名负责分管 ...

港股市场"零息"可转债发行潮涌 资本工具创新助力高质量发展|港美股看台|港美股看台 今年以来，多家港股上市公司发行"零息"可转债吸引了市场的关注。 继中国平安今年6月完成117.65亿港元零息可转债发行后，中国太保近日宣布，完成155.56亿港元零息可 转债发行，创下"历史上最大规模的港元零票息可转债""境内外同时上市国有金融企业首单境外可转 债"及"2025年至今亚太区金融机构板块最大的海外再融资项目"等多项纪录。 "零息"可转债发行潮涌 近日，中国太保宣布，发行155.56亿港元零息可转债，在零票息前提下，最终实现溢价发行，长线投资 者认购比例超过七成，转股溢价率为25%。 中国太保表示，本次发行募集资金将主要用于支持保险主业及公司"大康养、人工智能+、国际化"三大 战略发展。在保险行业由规模扩张转向价值创造的新发展阶段，本次募资充分展现了中国太保聚焦主责 主业，坚定围绕战略重点，坚守价值、坚信长期，开启新一轮高质量发展的战略思路。 据证券时报记者梳理，今年以来，已有阜博集团、百度集团、中国平安、顺丰控股、阿里巴巴、中兴通 讯、中国太保等多家港股上市公司公告发行"零息"可转换债券或"零息"可交换债券。 对 ...

Core Viewpoint - The issuance of "zero-interest" convertible bonds by Hong Kong-listed companies has gained significant attention this year, with major firms like China Pacific Insurance achieving record-breaking fundraising amounts, indicating a trend towards innovative financing tools to optimize capital structure and support strategic transformation [1][2]. Group 1: Zero-Interest Convertible Bonds Issuance - China Pacific Insurance recently completed a HKD 155.56 billion zero-interest convertible bond issuance, marking the largest scale of such bonds in history and setting multiple records in the Asia-Pacific financial sector [1][2]. - Other companies, including Baidu, Alibaba, and China Ping An, have also announced similar issuances, reflecting a broader trend among Hong Kong-listed firms to utilize zero-interest bonds for capital raising [2][3]. Group 2: Benefits of Zero-Interest Bonds - The zero-interest design alleviates financial pressure on companies by eliminating interest payments during the bond's term, which is particularly advantageous in the current low-interest-rate environment [3][4]. - Compared to direct stock issuance, convertible bonds mitigate the immediate dilution of existing shareholders' equity, maintaining a stable ownership structure [3][4]. - The efficient approval process for these bonds allows companies to quickly secure financing to support business development [3]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Investor Sentiment - The high conversion premiums associated with zero-interest bonds reflect market confidence in the future growth of the issuing companies, as seen in the significant premiums set during recent issuances [4][5]. - The current favorable capital market environment has attracted a high proportion of long-term investors, indicating strong recognition of the long-term value of leading companies [5][6]. Group 4: Impact on Economic Development - The funds raised through zero-interest convertible bonds are primarily directed towards emerging industries, enhancing the capital strength of companies and supporting high-quality economic development [7][8]. - The issuance of these bonds not only provides financial support but also helps improve corporate governance and attract international capital, thereby boosting the overall vitality and international appeal of the Hong Kong stock market [7][8].

格隆汇9月15日丨中国太保(601601.SH)公布，上海国际集团有限公司拟将其持有的本公司5559万股A股 股份（占本公司总股本的0.58%）无偿划转至上海久事（集团）有限公司，将其持有的本公司1000万股 A股股份（占本公司总股本的0.10%）无偿划转至上海电气控股集团有限公司。本次股东权益变动系国 有股权无偿划转，不涉及要约收购。 ...

今年以来，多家港股上市公司发行"零息"可转债吸引了市场的关注。 在今年港股市场行情火热的情况下，中国太保等头部企业通过零息可转债实现"低成本融资+战略赋能"的双赢，为行业树立了资本运作新标杆。受访人士认为，港 股上市公司正通过创新融资工具优化资本结构，为战略转型注入长期动能。 "零息"可转债发行潮涌 近日，中国太保宣布，发行155.56亿港元零息可转债，在零票息前提下，最终实现溢价发行，长线投资者认购比例超过七成，转股溢价率为25%。 中国太保表示，本次发行募集资金将主要用于支持保险主业及公司"大康养、人工智能+、国际化"三大战略发展。在保险行业由规模扩张转向价值创造的新发展阶 段，本次募资充分展现了中国太保聚焦主责主业，坚定围绕战略重点，坚守价值、坚信长期，开启新一轮高质量发展的战略思路。 据证券时报记者梳理，今年以来，已有阜博集团、百度集团、中国平安、顺丰控股、阿里巴巴、中兴通讯、中国太保等多家港股上市公司公告发行"零息"可转换债 券或"零息"可交换债券。 继中国平安今年6月完成117.65亿港元零息可转债发行后，中国太保近日宣布，完成155.56亿港元零息可转债发行，创下"历史上最大规模的港元零票息可转 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive crackdown on illegal activities in the financial sector, particularly focusing on loan fraud and extortion under the guise of insurance claims [1][2]. Group 1: Loan Fraud Case - The case involving Ning and others highlights a scheme where individuals were packaged as "professional debtors" to commit loan and credit card fraud, resulting in a total fraud amount of over 7.38 million yuan [3][4]. - The court sentenced Ning to 16 years in prison and imposed fines totaling 800,000 yuan for his role in the loan and credit card fraud [4]. - The financial regulatory authority noted that such schemes severely disrupt the financial management order and pose risks to national financial security, necessitating strict legal action against the involved parties [4][5]. Group 2: Insurance Extortion Case - The case involving Lin and Ma illustrates a fraudulent scheme where they induced policyholders to withdraw insurance claims by fabricating evidence of misconduct by insurance companies, leading to losses of 2.1762 million yuan for the insurers [7][8]. - The court found Lin and Ma guilty of extortion, sentencing Lin to 11 years and Ma to 10 years in prison, with additional fines imposed [9]. - The financial regulatory authority stressed that any organization or individual must not engage in illegal activities related to insurance claims, as these actions disrupt the normal complaint and rights protection channels [10].

Core Points - The article highlights the emergence of illegal "agent refund" activities in the financial sector, particularly through social media platforms, where individuals pose as professionals to exploit consumers [1][2][13] - Regulatory bodies have intensified efforts to combat these illegal practices, leading to significant legal actions against offenders [1][12][14] Group 1: Illegal Activities - "Agent refund" schemes are typically operated by illegal intermediaries who charge high fees and encourage consumers to fabricate evidence to file complaints against insurance companies [2][4] - The illegal activities have resulted in substantial financial losses for insurance companies, with offenders inducing consumers to demand refunds that exceed the actual cash value of their policies [12][17] Group 2: Regulatory Response - The National Financial Regulatory Administration and the Ministry of Public Security have issued warnings and taken legal actions against individuals involved in these schemes, with notable cases resulting in lengthy prison sentences [1][12] - Regulatory bodies have emphasized the need for stricter content management on social media platforms to prevent the spread of misleading information related to insurance refunds [5][6] Group 3: Impact on Consumers - Consumers who engage with illegal intermediaries face multiple risks, including loss of insurance coverage and potential financial exploitation [16][17] - The presence of "agent refund" schemes disrupts the normal complaint and redress mechanisms available to consumers, leading to broader market distortions [14][15]

中国经济网北京9月15日讯 国家金融监督管理总局网站昨日发布了宜春监管分局行政处罚信息公开 表。太平财产保险有限公司宜春中心支公司及相关责任人存在以下违法违规行为：给予投保人保险合同 约定以外利益。国家金融监督管理总局宜春监管分局对太平财产保险有限公司宜春中心支公司罚款7万 元；对傅钰、严俏等责任人员给予警告并罚款共计3.5万元。 以下为原文： | 序号 | 当事人名称 | 主要违法违规行 | 行政处罚内容 | 作出决定机关 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | 为 | 对太平财产保险有 | | | | 太平财产保 | 给予投保人保险 合同约定以外利 | 限公司宣春中心支 | | | | 险有限公司 | | 公司罚款7万元; | 国家金融监督 | | 1 | 宜春中心支 | | 对傅钰、严俏等责 | 管理总局宣春 | | | 公司及相关 | 篇 | 任人员给予警告并 | 监管分局 | | | 责任人 | | 罚款共计3.5万 | | | | | | 元。 | | （责任编辑：徐自立） ...

2025年9月15日，中国太保收到上海国际集团告知函，为支持上海国有资本布局调整，国际集团拟将 5559万股A股（占总股本0.58%）无偿划转至久事集团，1000万股A股（占总股本0.10%）无偿划转至电 气控股。本次划转尚需上海市国资委批准，不涉及要约收购，也不会改变公司无控股股东和实控人的情 况。划转前，国际集团及其子公司共持股10.66%；划转后，持股降至9.97%，久事集团持股升至 1.52%，电气控股持股0.10%。久事集团和电气控股承诺12个月内不减持。 ...

中国经济网北京9月15日讯 国家金融监督管理总局网站今日发布了大连监管局行政处罚信息公开表（大金罚决字〔2025〕37、 38、39号）。 高君丽（时任太平人寿大连分公司海川支公司代理人）、李元瑞（时任太平人寿大连分公司明锐支公司代理人）、黄文翠（时任 太平人寿大连分公司明锐支公司代理人）存在以下违法违规行为：欺骗投保人。国家金融监督管理总局大连监管局决定对高君丽、李 元瑞、黄文翠分别责令改正并给予警告。 | 序 | 当事人名称 | 行政处罚决定 | 主要违法违 | 行政处罚内 | 作出决定 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 를 | | 书文号 | 规行为 | 网 | 机关 | | 1 | 高君丽(时任 太平人寿大连 | 大全罚决字 | | 青令改正, | 国家金融 临督管理 | | | | [2025] 37 | 欺骗投保人 | | | | | 分公司海川支 | 를 | | 给予警告 | 总局大连 | | | 公司代理人) | | | | 監管局 | | 2 | 李元瑞(时任 | 大金罚决字 [2025] 38 | 欺骗投保人 | | 国家金融 | | | ...