Core Insights - The UK is deepening bilateral investment and cooperation with China in the field of science and technology, highlighted by its role as the guest country at the 25th China International Investment and Trade Fair [1] - As of July 2025, the UK is projected to have invested over $35 billion in China, while China's direct investment in the UK exceeds $32 billion [1] - UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) plays a significant role in facilitating over 800 joint projects with China, investing approximately £440 million over the past 18 years [4] Investment and Cooperation - The UK is China's third-largest foreign investment source in Europe and the second-largest destination for Chinese direct investment [1] - The UKRI has established a strong partnership with China, focusing on mutual benefits in research and innovation [7] - The UKRI's annual budget exceeds £8 billion, supporting international scientific collaboration through joint funding and academic exchanges [2] Research Areas and Potential - Key areas for future collaboration include artificial intelligence, climate change, healthcare, and sustainable agriculture [5] - The UKRI emphasizes the importance of producing publicly accessible scientific outcomes that address global challenges [8] - There is a focus on health-related research, particularly in infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, and the impacts of climate change on health [9] Future Prospects - UKRI is exploring new funding opportunities to enhance the scale and impact of UK-China research cooperation [9] - The organization aims to strengthen dialogue and collaboration between researchers from both countries, promoting joint projects and talent mobility [9] - UKRI is committed to translating research outcomes into practical applications that generate economic value, fostering mutual growth and development [9]

作为目前国内金额最高的青年科技人才资助项目之一，"科学探索奖"聚焦基础科学和前沿技术领域，专注资助青年科技工作者，每位获奖人将在5年内获得 总计300万元人民币的奖金，并且可以自由支配奖金。 8月25日，"科学探索奖"2025年获奖名单新鲜出炉，50位青年科学家榜上有名。《每日经济新闻》记者在现场注意到，年轻获奖者人数增多、女性获奖者人 数破纪录是今年名单的两大特点。 中国科学院院士、深圳医学科学院创始院长、深圳湾实验室主任、"科学探索奖"管理委员会委员颜宁说："今年18%的获奖人是女性，这是探索奖历年来女 性获奖人最多的一次，也是给有志于从事科研工作的年轻女性一个很大的激励：她可以，我也行，这条路前人走过了，没那么难。这是一个非常重要的信 号。" 女性获奖者人数破纪录 每经记者｜丁舟洋 毕媛媛 每经编辑｜张海妮 杨振宁、施一公等14位科学家和腾讯公司创始人马化腾于2018年共同发起"科学探索奖"。该奖项自设立以来，长期支持青年科学家开展原创突破性研究。 在不断树立女性科研工作者榜样的过程中，颜宁也承受着压力。正如她在微博中所言，把自己暴露在公共场所某种程度上是一种牺牲。"但在我过去二十年 的成长中，因为有匡 ...

Core Points - The proposed budget cuts by President Trump for the fiscal year 2026 represent unprecedented reductions in federal science funding, which could have immeasurable impacts on American science [1][4][18] - The budget proposal suggests a disproportionate reduction in federal science funding, with significant cuts to key agencies such as NSF, NIH, and EPA [1][7][9][15] Federal Science Funding Cuts - The overall non-defense spending is set to decrease by 23%, with the National Science Foundation (NSF) facing a 56% budget cut, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget reduced by approximately 40%, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) budget cut by 55% [1][7][9][15] - The NSF's budget will drop by about $5 billion compared to 2024, primarily affecting climate science and clean energy projects [7] - NIH's budget is proposed to decrease from $48 billion in 2025 to $27 billion in 2026, marking the most severe cut in its history [9] Impacts on Specific Agencies - The NIH will consolidate its 27 institutes and centers into five new focus areas, eliminating funding for minority health and international research [10] - The CDC's budget is expected to be reduced by one-third, impacting chronic disease prevention programs [11] - NASA's budget will decrease by 24.3% to $18.8 billion, with significant cuts to its science departments and climate monitoring projects [12][13] - The Department of Energy (DoE) will see a nearly $5 billion reduction, particularly affecting climate science and clean energy research [14] - The EPA's budget will drop to $4.2 billion, with major cuts to environmental research and the dissolution of its Office of Research and Development [15] Congressional Response - The final federal budget will be determined by Congress, but there are indications that many members may support Trump's proposals [3][18] - Concerns have been raised by scientific policy experts regarding the long-term implications of these cuts on the future of American science and the message it sends to young scientists [4][18]

Core Points - The National Science Foundation (NSF) has halted all funding for research projects, both new and existing, as part of a broader shift in government policy under the Trump administration [1][5][15] - This decision follows a new policy introduced by NSF leadership that requires staff to filter out research proposals that do not align with the agency's priority projects [2][3] - The NSF has already terminated 1,040 funding grants, amounting to approximately $739 million, with a significant number of projects being cut due to their focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion [5][15] Funding and Budget Cuts - The NSF's funding situation is dire, with only about 25% of the budget approved for the fiscal year 2025 received so far, raising concerns about future funding availability [15] - The Trump administration has proposed a budget cut of at least 50% for the NSF, which translates to over $4 billion, reflecting a shift in research priorities towards artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and nuclear energy [15][16] - The NSF is expected to face significant reductions in funding for climate, clean energy, and social science projects, while areas like artificial intelligence and quantum information may remain unaffected [16][17] Internal Reactions and Consequences - There is a growing atmosphere of disappointment and concern within the NSF, with some staff members resigning in response to the new policies [4][5] - Researchers across various fields have expressed outrage and confusion over the abrupt termination of their funding, with many feeling powerless against the NSF's decisions [9][10][11] - The NSF's actions are anticipated to have long-term negative impacts on the scientific community and the future of U.S. technological leadership [17][18]