2026年2月，韩国第二大交易平台Bithumb搞了个"随机宝箱"活动，原本要给用户发点小奖励，结果后台一不小心把"韩元"单位写成了"比特币"。 这下麻烦大了，249个幸运儿账户里突然多出了62万枚比特币，按当时市值算，等于天价的400多亿美元。 现实却是，这家平台真正拥有的比特币不过4.6万枚，多出来的那几十万枚不过是数据库里的数字幻影，根本没有任何实际价值。 这次事件的爆发，直接戳破了比特币"总量2100万枚不变"的神话。 表面上看，比特币挖矿有限额，数量有限才有稀缺性，但这次平台后台随手一改，居然能"造"出超量币。 这说明，所谓的"去中心化"、"代码不可篡改"在实际操作中是多么脆弱。 普通投资者手里的数字资产，一旦出现这种漏洞，随时可能变成一堆毫无价值的字符。 实际上，全球大多数比特币交易都集中在几家大平台，这些平台由资本控制，用户资产和交易数据都掌握在少数人手中。 交易所能冻结账户、限制提现，甚至制造假币，用户遇到损失却无从追责。 像FTX崩盘、门头沟被盗、这次Bithumb事件，都暴露了虚拟货币市场监管的空白和风险。 比特币被吹成"数字黄金""避险资产"，实则缺乏国家信用背书，也没有实体资产支撑。 ...

《通知》强调，虚拟货币相关业务活动属于非法金融活动。在中国境内开展法定货币与虚拟货币兑换业务、虚拟货币之间的兑换业务、作为中央对手方买 卖虚拟货币等相关业务活动，涉嫌非法发售代币票券、擅自公开发行证券、非法经营证券期货业务、非法集资等非法金融活动，一律严格禁止，坚决依法 取缔。境外单位和个人不得以任何形式非法向境内主体提供虚拟货币相关服务。 虚拟货币依托区块链技术，支持点对点交易，突破物理上的"国境"概念，相关风险极易跨境传导。为切实防范风险，《通知》明确提出，未经相关部门依 法依规同意，中国境内主体及其控制的境外主体不得在境外发行虚拟货币。(完) 中新社北京2月6日电 (陶思阅)中国人民银行等八部门6日联合印发《关于进一步防范和处置虚拟货币等相关风险的通知》(下称《通知》)。《通知》重申 中国境内对虚拟货币坚持禁止性政策。同时，未经相关部门依法依规同意，境内外任何单位和个人不得在境外发行挂钩人民币的稳定币。 《通知》明确，虚拟货币不具有与法定货币等同的法律地位。比特币、以太币、泰达币等虚拟货币具有非货币当局发行、使用加密技术及分布式账本或类 似技术、以数字化形式存在等主要特点，不具有法偿性，不应且不能作为货 ...

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China and eight other departments have reiterated a strict prohibition on virtual currency activities, classifying them as illegal financial activities, and emphasizing the risks associated with such investments [1][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The recent notice issued on February 6 reaffirms the long-standing policy against virtual currencies, stating that all related business activities are strictly prohibited within the country [3]. - This notice follows previous regulations from 2013 and 2021, which also classified virtual currencies like Bitcoin and stablecoins as not having the same legal status as fiat currency [3]. Group 2: Market Impact - On February 5, Bitcoin's price fell below $70,000 for the first time since November 2024, with a maximum drop of 9.74% in 24 hours, leading to significant losses for many investors [1]. - Other cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, Solana, Binance Coin, and Dogecoin, also experienced substantial declines, resulting in severe financial repercussions for investors [1]. Group 3: Nature of Virtual Currencies - Virtual currencies are characterized by their lack of legal status equivalent to fiat currencies, existing as non-government issued digital assets that utilize encryption and distributed ledger technology [1][3]. - The notice emphasizes that virtual currencies should not and cannot circulate as money in the market, highlighting their inherent risks [1].

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China and seven other departments issued a notification to further prevent and address risks associated with virtual currencies and related activities, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations and enforcement to maintain national security and social stability [2][3]. Background of the Notification - The notification was prompted by the resurgence of speculative activities related to virtual currencies and tokenization of real-world assets, which disrupt economic and financial order and threaten public property safety. Previous efforts in 2021 to curb such activities had shown significant results, but new challenges have emerged [3]. Definition of Virtual Currencies and Tokenization - Virtual currencies, including Bitcoin and stablecoins, are reaffirmed as not having the same legal status as fiat currencies and are deemed illegal financial activities within China. The notification reiterates the prohibition of any related business activities [4][10]. - Real-world asset tokenization involves converting ownership and income rights into tokens using encryption and distributed ledger technology. Such activities are also prohibited unless specifically authorized by regulatory bodies [5][11]. Regulatory Requirements for Virtual Currencies - The notification outlines that virtual currencies cannot meet customer identification and anti-money laundering requirements, posing risks for illegal activities. All related business activities are strictly prohibited [6]. - It emphasizes that stablecoins linked to fiat currencies cannot be issued abroad without regulatory approval, as they may undermine monetary sovereignty [6][10]. Requirements for Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Activities - Domestic entities must adhere to strict regulations when engaging in overseas tokenization activities, ensuring compliance with local laws and regulations. Any unauthorized activities are prohibited [7][17]. - Financial institutions must manage their overseas subsidiaries in compliance with domestic regulations, ensuring proper risk management and customer due diligence [18]. Specific Measures Proposed in the Notification - A collaborative framework between central and local authorities is established to enhance risk prevention and management related to virtual currencies and asset tokenization [8][19]. - The notification calls for improved risk monitoring and management, including cross-departmental data sharing and local government involvement in identifying and addressing risks [13][19]. - Continuous efforts to regulate virtual currency mining activities and combat illegal financial activities are emphasized, with local governments held accountable for enforcement [15][20]. Legal Responsibilities - Violations of the notification's provisions will result in penalties, and criminal liability may be pursued for serious offenses. Any financial activities involving virtual currencies that contravene public order will be deemed invalid, with associated losses borne by the investors [20].

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China and eight other departments have reiterated a strict prohibition on virtual currency-related activities, classifying them as illegal financial activities [1][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Stance - The recent notice emphasizes that virtual currencies do not have the same legal status as fiat currencies and that all related activities are strictly prohibited within the country [3][4]. - This regulatory stance has been consistent since 2013, with previous notices reinforcing the illegality of virtual currency transactions and their classification as illegal financial activities [3][4]. Group 2: Market Impact - Following the announcement, Bitcoin's price fell below $70,000 for the first time since November 2024, with a maximum drop of 9.74% in 24 hours, leading to significant losses for investors [1]. - Other cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, Solana, Binance Coin, and Dogecoin, also experienced substantial declines, resulting in many investors facing severe financial repercussions [1]. Group 3: Investor Caution - Investors are warned against believing in myths of quick wealth in the cryptocurrency market and are encouraged to adopt a correct investment mindset and enhance their risk awareness [4].

Core Viewpoint - The recent joint notification from eight departments, including the central bank and the securities regulatory commission, clearly states that all business activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Assets (RWA) are illegal within China, emphasizing the need for financial safety [1][4][12] Group 1: Virtual Currency Regulations - Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT are not considered legal tender and cannot be used for transactions protected by law [1] - Any activities involving facilitating transactions, operating platforms, or issuing tokens for financing are classified as illegal financial activities and are strictly prohibited [4] - The notification reiterates a consistent regulatory stance from 2013 to the present, highlighting the government's ongoing efforts to combat risks associated with virtual currencies [12] Group 2: RWA and Tokenization - RWA refers to the tokenization of real-world assets, where assets like real estate can be divided into digital tokens, misleadingly marketed as low-threshold investments but are essentially speculative traps [6] - Any fundraising activities involving RWA that solicit investments from the public are banned, and domestic entities must seek approval from relevant authorities for any blockchain-based financing [6] Group 3: Payment Services and Employment - All payment tools, including banks, WeChat, and Alipay, are prohibited from providing services related to virtual currencies and RWAs [9] - Job postings for positions like "digital currency trader" may indicate fraudulent activities, warranting caution [9]

2月6日金融一线消息，中国人民银行、国家发展改革委、工业和信息化部、公安部、市场监管总局、金 融监管总局、中国证监会、国家外汇局发布《关于进一步防范和处置虚拟货币等相关风险的通知》。通 知指出，虚拟货币不具有与法定货币等同的法律地位。比特币、以太币、泰达币等虚拟货币具有非货币 当局发行、使用加密技术及分布式账本或类似技术、以数字化形式存在等主要特点，不具有法偿性，不 应且不能作为货币在市场上流通使用。 虚拟货币相关业务活动属于非法金融活动。在境内开展法定货币与虚拟货币兑换业务、虚拟货币之间的 兑换业务、作为中央对手方买卖虚拟货币、为虚拟货币交易提供信息中介和定价服务、代币发行融资以 及虚拟货币相关金融产品交易等虚拟货币相关业务活动，涉嫌非法发售代币票券、擅自公开发行证券、 非法经营证券期货业务、非法集资等非法金融活动，一律严格禁止，坚决依法取缔。境外单位和个人不 得以任何形式非法向境内主体提供虚拟货币相关服务。 责任编辑：曹睿潼 2月6日金融一线消息，中国人民银行、国家发展改革委、工业和信息化部、公安部、市场监管总局、金 融监管总局、中国证监会、国家外汇局发布《关于进一步防范和处置虚拟货币等相关风险的通知》。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese tax authority has mandated a self-assessment for residents regarding overseas income from 2022 to 2024, indicating a significant shift in tax compliance and oversight for virtual currency investors [2][3][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Background - The self-assessment is part of China's participation in the CRS (Common Reporting Standard) for global tax information exchange, marking a transition to a more stringent regulatory environment for overseas income [3]. - The new individual income tax law includes anti-avoidance provisions, allowing tax authorities to adjust taxes for individuals using offshore entities for tax avoidance [4]. - The focus on high-net-worth individuals' overseas income is driven by the need for increased fiscal revenue and tax equity in a digital economy [5]. Group 2: Taxation of Virtual Currencies - There is a misconception among investors that profits from virtual currency trading are not taxable due to regulatory restrictions, which poses a significant risk [6]. - The principle of tax independence means that the legality of income does not affect its taxability; profits from virtual currency transactions are subject to taxation under the personal income tax law [7]. - The classification of income from virtual currency transactions as "capital gains" has been recognized, and tax authorities may use existing regulations to enforce taxation on these profits [8]. Group 3: Regulatory Developments - Traditional CRS frameworks have limitations, primarily focusing on conventional financial assets, leaving a gap in the regulation of virtual currencies [10]. - The OECD has introduced the CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) to address these gaps, with several offshore jurisdictions moving to include crypto-asset transactions in their reporting [11]. - The movement of significant funds from crypto transactions to offshore bank accounts raises red flags for tax authorities, triggering potential investigations [12]. Group 4: High-Risk Groups - Three groups are identified as high-risk for scrutiny: large holders of cryptocurrencies, individuals using offshore shell companies to hold crypto assets, and miners or project founders with significant cash-out activities [13]. Group 5: Compliance Strategies - Taxpayers are advised to conduct a thorough review of their overseas financial activities, focusing on transactions related to exchanges and large fund movements [14]. - It is essential to differentiate between principal and profit in financial records to prepare for potential tax obligations [15]. - Proactive compliance during the self-assessment phase can mitigate penalties, while failure to disclose may lead to severe fines and interest [16]. - Consulting with cross-border tax professionals can help in utilizing legal tax reduction strategies rather than evasion [17]. Group 6: Conclusion - The mandate for a three-year review of overseas income signifies a major shift in China's tax management, moving towards global auditing practices [18]. - As data exchange technologies evolve, regulatory transparency will increase, making tax compliance essential for protecting personal wealth and avoiding legal repercussions [18].

Group 1 - Gold reached a new high, and silver followed suit, indicating a potential shift in market dynamics where the traditional relationship of gold outperforming silver may be changing [1] - In the past 24 hours, a total of 107,859 individuals experienced liquidation, with a total liquidation amount of $196 million, including $129 million from long positions and $66.99 million from short positions [1][2] Group 2 - Bitcoin (BTC) saw a precise entry point for long positions at $88,500, with a minimum drop to around $88,450, resulting in a gain of over 1,000 points [3] - Ethereum (ETH) reached a high of $2,984, showing a stable small increase, with indicators suggesting a potential recovery in the near future [6] - The GameFi sector is experiencing a strong resurgence, with AXS and SAND stabilizing above key moving averages, indicating further upward potential [18]

交易的根本是生存，其次才是收益，所以每次操作之前先想清楚自己的操作是否合理，本金是否安全，要形成一套属于自己的交易思路，不断优化完善，币 圈院士的建议虽然不能让你一夜暴富，但是能做到一直有你，只有在币圈长期生存下去并且坚持到最后的人，才能得到自己想要的结果，希望你能听懂， 别忘了，最黑暗的时刻往往是黎明前的时刻。在追逐梦想的路上，你永远不是孤单一人，你还有我 我是币圈院士一个一直在保护韭菜的战士，祝愿我的粉丝们在2025年实现财务自由，一起加油！ 币圈院士：2026.1.13以太坊（ETH）最新行情分析参考 以太坊现价3130，现在是北京时间凌晨四点半，北上入场点打到了3070，但是行情并没有想象中的进入高潮，而是继续温水煮青蛙，这个时候做快线波段的 币友可以休息了，喜欢做趋势的币友北上继续持有，做一个防守带上止损位，只要确保了安全以后剩下的交给时间，目标关注前高3300 四小时K线来回插针，底部试探了3060强弱，顶部冲击了3170，目前主力在EMA趋势指标高位横盘3120一带，显示北上的动能，MACD放量以后，DIF和 DEA来到了0轴线附近，主力若再次冲击前高3160一带，那么多头有很大概率继续拉伸向上 ...