Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by Disney and Universal Pictures against Midjourney marks a significant legal battle in the entertainment industry regarding copyright issues related to generative AI technology [2][3][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Disney and Universal Pictures have filed a 110-page lawsuit against Midjourney, providing examples of generated images that closely resemble iconic characters from their franchises [3]. - The companies argue that Midjourney has used their copyrighted materials without authorization, claiming that the AI company has ignored previous requests to cease infringement [3][4]. - Disney's legal representatives emphasize that the infringement remains theft regardless of the technology used, highlighting the importance of copyright protection for content creators [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Copyright revenue is a crucial income source for both Disney and Universal Pictures, with Disney reporting a 7% year-over-year revenue increase to $23.621 billion for Q2 of fiscal year 2025, and a net profit of approximately $3.275 billion [4]. - Universal's parent company, Comcast, reported a revenue of $29.887 billion in Q1, with a net profit of $3.375 billion, although both figures showed a year-over-year decline [4]. Group 3: Industry Context - Midjourney is a leading player in the "text-to-image" AI sector, generating $300 million in revenue from its subscription services in 2024 [4]. - The lawsuit reflects a broader trend of copyright disputes between large content companies and AI firms, with previous cases involving OpenAI and music companies also highlighting similar issues [6][7]. - The legal landscape for AI copyright is still evolving, with traditional copyright frameworks being applied to new technologies, raising questions about authorship and the nature of AI-generated works [7][8]. Group 4: Challenges in Copyright Management - The current copyright management systems struggle to keep pace with AI's automatic data scraping capabilities, complicating the tracking and licensing of images [8][9]. - Legal experts note that the responsibility for copyright infringement often falls on the users of AI technology, while the AI models themselves are not recognized as legal entities [8][9].

中新网6月12日电(宫宏宇)据路透社报道，迪士尼与环球影业11日对AI图像生成企业Midjourney提起版权 诉讼，指控其热门AI图像生成器未经授权使用两家电影公司旗下知名角色，包括《冰雪奇缘》中的艾 莎公主、小黄人和《星球大战》中的达斯·维德等。 据了解，Midjourney是当前受欢迎的AI图像生成器之一，能在数秒内根据文本提示生成对应图像。 迪士尼和环球影业向加州联邦法院提交的诉状称，Midjourney存在两项侵权行为：一是利用其知识产权 训练AI模型，二是生成包含知名角色的侵权图像。两家企业认为，Midjourney的行为是"无底线的抄 袭"。 该诉讼在洛杉矶联邦地区法院提交。CNN指，这是好莱坞电影制片厂与AI企业之间的首起重大法律诉 讼。 Midjourney未立即对此回应。不过，CNN提到在2023年的一起诉讼中，Midjourney曾抗辩称：AI生成的 每张图像仅为模型训练数据中的"微不足道片段"，正如艺术家感知的每个视觉元素(每张面孔、每片夕 阳、每幅画作)与作家阅读的每段文字，都只是塑造其想象力的海量素材中微小组成部分。 迪士尼高级执行副总裁兼首席法务合规官古铁雷斯对此则严正声明称：" ...