上银资源精选混合发起式A（023448）基金经理为卢扬。 12月23日，中孚实业涨5.06%，截至发稿，报8.30元/股，成交2.80亿元，换手率0.87%，总市值332.66亿 元。 资料显示，河南中孚实业股份有限公司位于河南省巩义市新华路31号，成立日期1997年1月28日，上市 日期2002年6月26日，公司主营业务涉及煤炭开采、火力发电、电解铝和铝精深加工产品的生产、销售 及技术研发。主营业务收入构成为：有色金属94.76%，电力9.96%，煤炭2.71%，其他业务0.47%。 从基金十大重仓股角度 数据显示，上银基金旗下1只基金重仓中孚实业。上银资源精选混合发起式A（023448）三季度持有股 数40.57万股，占基金净值比例为3.33%，位居第八大重仓股。根据测算，今日浮盈赚取约16.23万元。 上银资源精选混合发起式A（023448）成立日期2025年3月21日，最新规模2196.08万。成立以来收益 67.28%。 截至发稿，卢扬累计任职时间11年58天，现任基金资产总规模9.26亿元，任职期间最佳基金回报 64.03%， 任职期间最差基金回报-29.25%。 风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Shangyin New Energy Industry Selected Mixed Fund has completed its liquidation process due to significant losses, with a cumulative loss of 53.43% since its inception in April 2022, leading to a net asset value of approximately 26.7 million RMB to be distributed to investors [1][3]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Liquidation - The fund was launched during a favorable market environment for the new energy sector but faced severe challenges shortly after its establishment, including oversupply in the photovoltaic sector and intensified price wars in the energy storage field [3]. - The fund's net asset value fell to 0.507 RMB by the end of 2024, with an annual loss of 1.09%, ranking 2784 out of 4112 in its category [3][6]. - The fund's scale shrank from 200 million RMB at inception to 41 million RMB by the first quarter of 2025, triggering automatic termination due to falling below the 200 million RMB threshold [6]. Group 2: Market Context and Industry Trends - The liquidation of the Shangyin New Energy Fund is part of a broader trend, with 90 funds liquidated since 2025, over 30% of which are in the new energy and pharmaceutical sectors [8]. - The new energy sector is experiencing a downturn, with the photovoltaic industry still facing challenges and lithium battery material prices nearing cost levels, leading to continuous downward revisions of profit expectations [8]. - The fund's management structure is heavily weighted towards fixed-income products, with equity products making up only 1.16% of its total management scale, indicating a potential mismatch in investment strategy [8][9].