乘龙M3
Search documents
东风柳汽人士:首次还原「车头掉落」疑云与细节
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-08-05 11:05
Core Viewpoint - The collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and design of the truck, particularly focusing on the locking mechanism of the truck's cabin and the test conditions [1][6][8]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test was conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [1][4]. - The truck involved was a second-hand Dongfeng Liuqi M3, which had been modified for the test, including weight adjustments and the installation of an autonomous driving system [8][9]. - The test speed was noted to be higher than conventional standards, with the SUV traveling at 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h, resulting in a relative speed of 100 km/h [8][9]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of the Truck - The truck's cabin is designed with a locking mechanism that can be either mechanical or hydraulic, with the hydraulic system being more reliable but costlier [3][4]. - If the locking mechanism is not engaged properly before a collision, the cabin can detach from the chassis, which raises questions about the truck's structural integrity [4][5]. - The test's outcome, where the truck's cabin appeared to detach, suggests that the locking mechanism may not have been engaged, which is atypical for such vehicles [4][5]. Group 3: Industry Reactions and Implications - Dongfeng Liuqi, the manufacturer of the truck, has expressed concerns over the test's execution and the subsequent public perception, emphasizing the need for transparency in the testing process [1][13]. - Li Auto's recent statements indicate a desire to distance itself from the controversy, acknowledging the unintended consequences of the test on Dongfeng Liuqi's reputation [14]. - The incident highlights the ongoing challenges in the commercial vehicle sector regarding safety standards and public trust, especially in the context of competitive marketing strategies [12][14].
专访东风柳汽人士:首次还原“车头掉落”疑云与细节
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-08-05 09:51
Core Viewpoint - The recent collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and design of the truck, particularly focusing on the locking mechanism of the truck's cabin and the test conditions [1][6][7]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test was conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [1][3]. - The truck involved was a second-hand Dongfeng Liuqi M3, which had undergone modifications, including weight adjustments and the installation of an autonomous driving system, potentially affecting the test results [7][8]. - The test speed was noted to be higher than conventional standards, with the SUV traveling at 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h, resulting in a relative speed of 100 km/h [7][8]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of the Truck - The truck's cabin is designed with a locking mechanism that can be either mechanical or hydraulic, with the hydraulic system being more reliable but costlier [3][4]. - If the locking mechanism is not engaged properly before a collision, it can lead to the cabin detaching from the chassis, which is a significant safety concern [4][5]. - The incident has raised questions about the structural integrity of the truck, as it is unusual for a truck cabin to detach from the chassis during a collision with a passenger vehicle [4][6]. Group 3: Industry Reactions and Implications - Dongfeng Liuqi, the manufacturer of the truck, has expressed concerns over the lack of detailed data from the collision test, which hampers their ability to assess the situation accurately [1][2]. - The incident has sparked a public relations challenge for both Li Auto and Dongfeng Liuqi, with the latter issuing a statement emphasizing its commitment to quality and safety [11]. - The automotive industry is witnessing a trend where collision tests are used as marketing tools, which may lead to misinterpretations of vehicle safety [10][11].
独家专访东风柳汽人士:首次还原“车头掉落”疑云与细节
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-08-05 09:25
Core Viewpoint - The collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and structural integrity of the truck, particularly focusing on the locking mechanism of the truck's cabin and the test conditions used [1][2][3]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test was conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [1][3]. - The truck involved was a second-hand Dongfeng Liuqi M3, which may have had maintenance issues affecting the test results [5]. - The test speed was noted to be unusually high, with the SUV traveling at 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h, resulting in a relative speed of 100 km/h, exceeding conventional standards for commercial vehicle testing [5][6]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of the Truck - The truck's cabin is designed with a locking mechanism that can be either mechanical or hydraulic, with the hydraulic version being used in the M3 model [2][3]. - If the hydraulic lock is not properly engaged, even minor impacts can cause the cabin to detach from the chassis, which raises questions about the truck's design and safety features [3][4]. - The test's focus on extreme conditions is not standard for commercial vehicle safety assessments, which typically involve different parameters [6][7]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident has sparked a "trust crisis" for Dongfeng Liuqi, a well-established brand in the commercial vehicle sector, which has been in operation for nearly 35 years [1][9]. - The marketing strategies for commercial vehicles differ significantly from passenger vehicles, with less emphasis on dramatic safety tests, which may affect public perception [8][9]. - Li Auto's recent statements indicate a desire to distance itself from the controversy while acknowledging the impact on Dongfeng Liuqi's reputation [9].
理想i8把“重卡”撞飞?乘龙再回击:安全不是空口无凭的理想!
Zhong Guo Qi Che Bao Wang· 2025-08-04 08:55
Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and the Dongfeng Liuqi truck has sparked significant public debate regarding vehicle safety and marketing ethics [2][9]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On July 29, Li Auto showcased a video during the i8 launch, depicting a collision with a truck, which raised questions about the safety of the truck model involved [2][6]. - The truck shown in the video was identified as a medium truck with a total weight of 8 tons, contrary to Li Auto's claim of it being a heavy truck [6][7]. - The video demonstrated a dramatic collision where the truck's cabin detached, leading to public skepticism about the physics of the scenario [7][8]. Group 2: Responses from Companies - Dongfeng Liuqi, the parent company of the truck brand, issued a statement on July 31, accusing Li Auto of unauthorized use and distortion of the test video, claiming it misrepresents the safety of their vehicles [5][9]. - Li Auto responded by stating that the collision test was conducted by a third-party testing agency and expressed willingness for a live retest, further escalating the conflict [11]. - On August 1, Dongfeng Liuqi released a counter-advertisement emphasizing the safety features of their trucks, highlighting the use of high-strength steel and robust design [5][13]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Marketing Implications - The public reaction has been mixed, with some supporting Li Auto's claims while others criticized the validity of the test, suggesting that the truck may have been empty during the test [8][9]. - The incident has ignited discussions about the boundaries of marketing in the automotive industry, particularly regarding the ethical implications of exaggerated claims [13].