Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing complexity of selecting mutual funds in a growing market, highlighting the role of Fund of Funds (FOF) as a guide for investment decisions, particularly focusing on the popularity of quantitative and conservative fund strategies [3][4][5]. Group 1: FOF and Fund Performance - FOFs are seen as "smart money" due to their backing by institutional research systems, which provide them with a keen market sense and professional selection logic [4][5]. - The article analyzes quarterly holdings data from FOFs to reveal institutional fund flows and market style shifts [6]. - The top actively managed equity fund by FOF holdings is the Baodao Jiuhang C (008319.OF), which has been included in the portfolios of 22 FOFs and achieved over 40% returns last year [7][9]. Group 2: Fund Performance Metrics - Baodao Jiuhang C has shown significant performance metrics, with a return of 40.14% in 2025, outperforming its benchmark and the CSI 300 index [8]. - The second fund, Baodao Growth Zhihang C (013642.OF), managed by Yang Meng, also performed well with nearly 50% returns last year, but its quarterly holding change dropped by 49.4%, indicating some profit-taking [10]. - The third fund, Fuguo Stable Growth C (010625.OF), managed by Fan Yan, is known for its balanced and stable approach, being favored by 17 FOFs [11][12]. Group 3: Investment Strategies and Trends - The article notes a trend where FOF managers prefer C-class shares for tactical allocations due to their lower transaction costs and flexibility, especially in volatile sectors like technology [31][32]. - A-class shares are typically seen as long-term holdings, while C-class shares are favored for short-term strategies, reflecting a tactical approach by FOFs [30][34]. - The upcoming regulatory changes may blur the lines between A-class and C-class shares, potentially impacting FOF strategies in the future [35].

证券研究报告 | 2026年01月27日 $\Delta$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$H${}_{\rm H}$ 公募 FOF 基金 2025 年四季度概览 截至 2025Q4，全市场已成立FOF产品数量 549 只，合计规模为 2441.88 亿元，相比 2025Q3 增加 26.20%。根据穿透后权益资产占比将FOF划 分为偏债型FOF、平衡型FOF和偏股型FOF，2025Q4 规模分别为 1611.13 亿元、454. ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the increasing role of Fund of Funds (FOF) and investment advisory services in identifying specialized and differentiated investment products in the current structural market environment [1][6] - There is a notable shift in the investment strategy from selecting "star fund managers" to choosing more transparent and practical quantitative or thematic products [6] FOF and Investment Strategies - FOFs have been actively increasing their allocations to various specialized products, particularly in active equity funds, amidst a backdrop of improved liquidity in the domestic market [1][2] - Notable quantitative products such as Nuon Multi-Strategy C and CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy C have seen significant interest from FOFs, with over 10 FOFs heavily investing in these funds by the end of Q2 [2][3] - The performance of these funds has been impressive, with Nuon Multi-Strategy C achieving a return rate exceeding 40% since Q2, while others like CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy C and Guojin Quantitative Multi-Factor C have returns around 20% [2][3] Thematic and Specialized Products - FOFs are also exploring other distinct active stock-picking products across various themes such as Hong Kong stocks, technology, dividends, gold stocks, finance, and real estate [2][3] - The demand for active equity funds is driven by the need for stable excess returns and clear investment logic, with a focus on products that can provide certainty in returns during structural market conditions [3][5] Risk Management and Investment Framework - The investment community is increasingly recognizing the importance of a comprehensive risk-return evaluation system, moving beyond traditional performance metrics to include strategy clarity and market adaptability [5][6] - Multi-asset strategies are seen as advantageous in capturing structural opportunities, allowing for diversified investments across low-correlated assets to optimize risk-return profiles [3][6] Evolution of Investment Preferences - There has been a significant evolution in the preferences of investment advisory services towards active equity funds, emphasizing the selection of strategies over individual fund managers [6] - The focus has shifted from short-term timing and stock selection capabilities of fund managers to utilizing tool-based products for long-term asset allocation [6]