时隔十年，上证指数重上3800点。 2025年8月22日，A股三大指数集体震荡走强，上证指数收涨逾1%至3825.76点，为近十年来首次站上3800点，沪、深、京三市全天总成交额达2.58万亿 元。自今年二季度以来A股市场持续反弹，相对4月7日的低点，上证指数已大涨近14%。 同样，今年来主动权益基金（包括灵活配置型基金、普通股票型基金、偏股混合型基金在内，以下同）赚钱效应显现。以万得基金指数为例，万得普通股 票型基金指数和万得偏股混合型基金指数年初至今分别大涨24.96%和24.72%，在各大基金指数榜中分别位列第二和第三，仅次于万得QDII混合型基金指 数的27.12%。 来源：Wind（截至2025年8月22日） Wind统计表明，2025年8月22日，年内净值增长率翻倍的主动权益基金（A/C分列，以下同）共计有22只，分别包括长城医药产业精选（A/C）、中银港 股通医药（A/C）、永赢科技智选（A/C）、中信建投北交所精选两年定开（A/C）、永赢医药创新智选（A/C）等。如领涨的长城医药产业精选A和长城 医药产业精选C今年来的净值增长率分别高达130.76%和129.97%。 新经济e线获悉，在年内净 ...

Core Viewpoint - Despite a bullish market over the past year, more than 20 actively managed equity funds have recorded negative returns, highlighting performance disparities within the fund industry [2][4]. Group 1: Market Performance - The major indices, including the Shanghai Composite Index, Shenzhen Component Index, and ChiNext Index, have seen cumulative gains of approximately 30%, 40%, and 60% respectively over the past year [4]. - As of August 18, 5033 actively managed equity funds have an average net value growth rate of 34.65%, with a median of 30.65%, and 99.56% of these funds recorded positive returns [4]. Group 2: Underperforming Funds - Over 20 actively managed equity funds have posted negative returns, with the worst-performing fund declining over 6%, resulting in a performance gap of more than 255 percentage points compared to the top-performing fund [4][5]. - These underperforming funds have also lagged behind their performance benchmarks, with the highest underperformance exceeding 25 percentage points [5]. Group 3: Fund Characteristics - Many of the underperforming funds are classified as "mini funds," with assets under management of less than 50 million yuan, which face operational challenges due to their small size [8]. - The underperformance is attributed to factors such as significant deviations from market trends, high fixed management costs, and limited flexibility in stock selection and position adjustments [8][9]. Group 4: Specific Fund Examples - Tianzhi Core Growth Fund has a net value growth rate of -6.5% over the past year, significantly underperforming the average return of 40.97% for similar funds [8]. - Guorong Rongxin Consumer Select Fund has a decline of 6.21% over the past year, with a cumulative net value drop of over 44% in the last five years [9]. - Beixin Ruifeng External Growth Fund has also seen a decline of over 5% in the past year, with a cumulative net value growth rate of 43.40% since its inception [9].

Core Insights - The equity market has experienced a bullish trend over the past year, with most active equity funds showing positive net value growth, yet over 20 funds have reported negative returns [1][2][3]. Performance Overview - As of August 18, the Shanghai Composite Index, Shenzhen Component Index, and ChiNext Index have recorded cumulative gains of approximately 30%, 40%, and 60% respectively [3]. - The average net value growth rate for 5,033 active equity funds is 34.65%, with a median of 30.65%, and 99.56% of these funds have positive returns [3]. Notable Fund Performance - Three funds have achieved over 200% growth, with the highest reaching a net value growth rate of 249.27% [3]. - 83 funds have doubled their net value, primarily investing in advanced manufacturing and innovative pharmaceuticals, benefiting from policy support and technological breakthroughs [3]. Underperforming Funds - Despite the overall positive performance, over 20 active equity funds have recorded negative returns, with the worst-performing fund declining over 6%, resulting in a 255 percentage point difference from the top-performing fund [3][4]. - These underperforming funds have also lagged behind their performance benchmarks, with some underperforming by more than 25 percentage points [4]. Investment Strategy Issues - Many of the underperforming funds have misaligned their investment strategies with market trends, often holding positions in sectors that are not currently favored [5]. - A significant number of these funds are classified as "mini funds," with assets under management below 50 million yuan, facing operational challenges due to their small size [5]. Specific Fund Examples - Tianzhi Core Growth Fund has a net value growth rate of -6.5% over the past year, significantly underperforming compared to the average return of 40.97% for similar funds [6]. - Guorong Rongxin Consumer Select Fund has seen a decline of 6.21%, trailing its benchmark by nearly 17 percentage points [6]. - Beixin Ruifeng External Growth Fund has also reported a decline of over 5%, underperforming its benchmark by more than 25 percentage points [7]. Summary of Underperforming Funds - A list of underperforming funds includes Tianzhi Core Growth, Guorong Rongxin Consumer Select A, and Beixin Ruifeng External Growth, among others, with varying degrees of negative returns [9].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the recovery of actively managed equity funds established in 2021, with over 170 funds returning to positive net asset values as of August 13, 2023, and an average return exceeding 20% this year, outperforming the overall market [1][2][6] - The performance of specific funds, such as those focused on the North Exchange and innovative pharmaceutical sectors, has been particularly strong, with some funds achieving total returns of over 137% since inception [2][3] - Despite the recovery, many funds are facing significant redemption pressures, especially those concentrated in sectors like new energy, liquor, and pharmaceuticals, which aligns with the trends observed in "track funds" issued between 2019 and 2021 [4][5] Group 2 - The redemption pressure is notably high for funds that have recently returned to positive net asset values, with some funds experiencing substantial declines in share volume despite recovering their net asset values [4][5] - The market is witnessing a shift from a negative cycle to a more stable fundraising environment for new actively managed equity funds, with over 600 billion yuan raised in new fund launches this year [6][7] - The redemption funds are likely to flow into financial assets, with a preference for higher-risk products such as public funds and stocks, while some may also move towards lower-risk insurance products [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the diligent efforts of active fund managers, particularly focusing on Li Wenbin, who has been actively seeking investment opportunities despite the challenges faced by active equity funds in recent years [1][29]. Group 1: Active Fund Management - Active fund managers have been working hard behind the scenes, especially during a period when active equity funds have underperformed compared to the market from 2022 to 2024 [1][3]. - Li Wenbin has demonstrated strong industry judgment, successfully identifying strategic investment opportunities in sectors like artificial intelligence, semiconductor materials, and biomedicine, achieving significant returns [3][21]. - The performance of Li Wenbin's funds, such as the Yongying Technology Driven A with a return of 64.22% and the Yongying Ruijian Progress A with a return of 40.21%, showcases the potential of active management [3][29]. Group 2: Industry Challenges and Strategies - The rise of passive funds has led to a need for active funds to differentiate themselves, focusing on unique product designs and absolute return thinking [5][8]. - The article discusses the importance of adapting to market changes and the necessity for fund managers to maintain a focus on investor returns rather than merely chasing performance rankings [8][10]. - The active equity market is seen as having clear strategic opportunities, particularly in the context of China's asset revaluation and the impact of policy guidance and technological breakthroughs [4][21]. Group 3: Investment Philosophy - Li Wenbin emphasizes a dual approach in stock selection, focusing on both stable companies and high-quality growth stocks, with a strong emphasis on ESG management and financial health [13][14]. - The investment strategy includes a rigorous process of verifying investment logic and adjusting forecasts based on market realities, highlighting the importance of adaptability in investment management [18][19]. - The article notes that the lack of a short-selling mechanism in the A-share market can lead to rapid loss of excess returns once a method becomes widely accepted [9]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The article suggests that the current A-share market presents structural opportunities driven by technological innovation and national defense considerations, with a focus on artificial intelligence as a leading sector [21][22]. - The ongoing global military revolution emphasizes the importance of information, automation, and intelligence in military equipment, which aligns with investment strategies in the defense sector [23]. Group 5: Personal Commitment - Li Wenbin's commitment to continuous learning and hard work is highlighted, with over 300,000 words of study notes accumulated in a year and a half, reflecting a dedication to improving investment strategies [25][28]. - The culture at Yongying Fund emphasizes enhancing investor experience and long-term growth over merely increasing fund size, indicating a shift in focus within the industry [10][11].

Summary of Key Points from Conference Call Records Industry Overview - The recent market uptrend has been significantly driven by high-risk preference funds such as leveraged funds and private equity funds, while low-risk preference funds are focusing on structural opportunities [1][2][6]. Core Insights and Arguments - **Active Equity Funds**: There has been a marginal improvement in the issuance and redemption of active equity funds, with July's new issuance reaching 9.7 billion yuan, indicating a recovery from a previous low cycle [3][4]. - **ETF Performance**: Broad-based ETFs faced redemption pressure with a net outflow of 76.7 billion yuan in July, while industry-themed ETFs saw a net inflow of 31.7 billion yuan, particularly in sectors like cyclical, manufacturing, and finance [5]. - **Leverage Funds**: The inflow of leveraged funds has been rapid and significant since July, contributing to the bullish market sentiment [6]. - **Insurance Capital**: Insurance holdings increased significantly, reaching approximately 400 billion yuan in Q1, with the proportion of insurance capital in equity assets rising to 8.4%, the highest since 2022 [8][9]. - **Foreign Investment**: Foreign capital participation in A-shares has been increasing, with net inflows of nearly 20 billion yuan in July, indicating a recovery in market confidence [10]. - **Private Equity Funds**: The management scale and positions of private equity funds have increased significantly, marking them as a crucial source of incremental capital in the current market [11]. - **Retail Investor Participation**: Although the number of new accounts has risen, retail investor confidence remains slow to recover, with institutional investors primarily driving the current market uptrend [12]. - **IPO and Refinance Activity**: There has been a notable increase in IPO and refinancing activities among listed companies, but the pressure on market liquidity remains low compared to previous years [13]. Additional Important Insights - The issuance of floating management fee products has significantly contributed to the recovery of active equity fund issuance, with 22.7 billion yuan from these products in June [4]. - The market has seen three phases of industry-themed ETF growth in 2023, each associated with the TMT technology growth backdrop [5]. - The recent policies have facilitated insurance capital's entry into the market, with a notable increase in the number of stakes taken by insurance funds in listed companies [9].

Core Viewpoint - After three years of underperformance, active equity funds have rebounded significantly in 2024, with a notable performance divergence among top fund managers [1][3]. Performance Overview - The "Wande Mixed Equity Fund Index," representing active equity funds, showed a performance of -21.03% in 2022, -13.52% in 2023, and a positive 3.45% in 2024, compared to the Shanghai Composite Index's performance of -15.13%, -3.70%, and 12.67% respectively [3]. - As of August 6, 2024, the Wande Mixed Equity Fund Index has increased by 16.67%, outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index by over 8 percentage points and the CSI 300 Index by over 12 percentage points [3]. Star Fund Managers' Performance - Among 242 active equity funds managed by star fund managers with over 10 billion in assets, only 35% outperformed the Wande Mixed Equity Fund Index, while 68% outperformed the Shanghai Composite Index, and 85% outperformed the CSI 300 Index [4][5]. - Notably, over 60% of these funds underperformed the average of active equity funds, with 30% lagging behind the Shanghai Composite Index [5]. Sector Analysis - The underperformance of some star fund managers is attributed to their heavy investments in core stocks, particularly in the food and beverage sector, which has seen declines this year [5][11]. - The food and beverage sector index dropped by 6.06%, with the liquor index down by 8.41% as of August 7, 2024 [5]. Top Performers - Fund managers like Ge Lan and Zhao Bei have excelled, with Ge Lan's funds showing returns of 68.97% and 25.36% respectively, primarily due to heavy investments in innovative drugs, especially in Hong Kong stocks [7]. - Zhao Bei's funds have also performed well, with returns of 89.92% and 63.59%, benefiting from significant allocations to innovative drugs [7][8]. Growth Style Managers - A number of growth-oriented fund managers have also shown strong performance, with returns exceeding 30% for several funds managed by Du Meng and Li Xiaoxing [9]. - These managers have successfully navigated structural market changes by investing in emerging sectors such as AI, innovative drugs, and new consumption [9]. Underperformers - Some previously top-performing fund managers, such as Zheng Chengran and Liu Yanchun, have struggled, with several funds showing negative returns due to heavy exposure to underperforming sectors like liquor and renewable energy [11]. - The rapid market style shifts and the inability to adapt investment strategies have contributed to their underperformance [11]. Future Outlook - The public fund industry is expected to evolve towards a more team-oriented and systematic approach, with a shift away from reliance on star fund managers [12].

Core Insights - The article highlights the increasing role of Fund of Funds (FOF) and investment advisory services in identifying specialized and differentiated investment products in the current structural market environment [1][6] - There is a notable shift in the investment strategy from selecting "star fund managers" to choosing more transparent and practical quantitative or thematic products [6] FOF and Investment Strategies - FOFs have been actively increasing their allocations to various specialized products, particularly in active equity funds, amidst a backdrop of improved liquidity in the domestic market [1][2] - Notable quantitative products such as Nuon Multi-Strategy C and CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy C have seen significant interest from FOFs, with over 10 FOFs heavily investing in these funds by the end of Q2 [2][3] - The performance of these funds has been impressive, with Nuon Multi-Strategy C achieving a return rate exceeding 40% since Q2, while others like CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy C and Guojin Quantitative Multi-Factor C have returns around 20% [2][3] Thematic and Specialized Products - FOFs are also exploring other distinct active stock-picking products across various themes such as Hong Kong stocks, technology, dividends, gold stocks, finance, and real estate [2][3] - The demand for active equity funds is driven by the need for stable excess returns and clear investment logic, with a focus on products that can provide certainty in returns during structural market conditions [3][5] Risk Management and Investment Framework - The investment community is increasingly recognizing the importance of a comprehensive risk-return evaluation system, moving beyond traditional performance metrics to include strategy clarity and market adaptability [5][6] - Multi-asset strategies are seen as advantageous in capturing structural opportunities, allowing for diversified investments across low-correlated assets to optimize risk-return profiles [3][6] Evolution of Investment Preferences - There has been a significant evolution in the preferences of investment advisory services towards active equity funds, emphasizing the selection of strategies over individual fund managers [6] - The focus has shifted from short-term timing and stock selection capabilities of fund managers to utilizing tool-based products for long-term asset allocation [6]

The provided content does not contain any specific quantitative models or factors, nor does it include detailed construction processes, formulas, or backtesting results for such models or factors. The report primarily focuses on the performance, allocation, and trends of active equity funds in various industries during Q2 2025. Below is a summary of the key points: - Active equity funds' net asset value weighted average return in Q2 2025 was 2.14%, with a median return of 1.85%[6][15][115] - The top 10 funds by return in Q2 2025 achieved approximately 30% growth, with a total net subscription of 9.02 billion yuan[8][39][41] - The top 10 funds by net subscription in Q2 2025 collectively reached 217.30 billion yuan, with a median return of 12.55%[39][40] - Active equity funds' overall stock positions increased slightly to 85.97% in Q2 2025, up 0.50 percentage points from Q1 2025[7][28][115] - The top four industries with the highest active equity fund allocations in Q2 2025 were electronics, healthcare, electric power and new energy equipment, and food and beverages[9][43][46] - The top four industries with the highest active equity fund overweighting in Q2 2025 were telecommunications (2.08 percentage points), banking (0.71 percentage points), defense and military (0.61 percentage points), and electronics (0.45 percentage points)[9][43][46] - The top four industries with the highest absolute returns in Q2 2025 were telecommunications (21.77%), commercial trade (21.55%), agriculture (19.03%), and insurance (12.51%)[108][116] - Non-sector-themed funds showed the highest active overweighting in telecommunications (2.09 percentage points), banking (0.92 percentage points), insurance (0.58 percentage points), and defense and military (0.46 percentage points)[9][111][116] No quantitative models or factors were explicitly mentioned in the report. The focus was on fund performance, industry allocation, and market trends.

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant performance disparity between actively managed equity funds and thematic ETFs, particularly in the booming sectors of humanoid robots and innovative pharmaceuticals, with ETFs gaining substantial scale due to their advantages in capturing market trends [1][2]. Group 1: Performance of Funds - The innovative pharmaceutical sector has seen a strong market performance, leading to a total of 17 "doubling funds" in 2023, all of which are related to this theme, with 10 being actively managed equity funds and 7 being thematic ETFs [1]. - The top-performing innovative pharmaceutical funds include several actively managed funds and ETFs, with notable mentions such as Huatai-PB Hang Seng Innovative Pharmaceutical ETF and others [1]. - Despite the strong performance of actively managed funds, their scale growth has lagged behind that of ETFs, with the top 10 innovative pharmaceutical active funds having a total scale of only 9.4 billion yuan at the end of Q2, while the 7 ETFs increased their scale by 12.9 billion yuan to reach 28.4 billion yuan [2]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The rapid growth of ETFs is attributed to their passive tracking mechanism, which allows them to effectively capture beta returns from high-growth sectors, making them more appealing to investors compared to actively managed funds [3]. - The expansion of ETFs has put pressure on actively managed equity funds, which are struggling to attract new investments despite their strong performance, as investors prefer the transparency and lower costs associated with ETFs [4]. - The management fees for ETFs are generally lower than those for actively managed funds, further enhancing their attractiveness to investors [4]. Group 3: Future Trends - The emergence of new ETFs focused on themes such as artificial intelligence and cloud computing indicates a shift in investor preference towards passive investment strategies, while the success of actively managed funds will increasingly depend on the historical performance of fund managers [5]. - The coexistence of passive and active investment strategies is essential, as both serve different investor needs and risk profiles, with active funds playing a crucial role in value discovery [5][6].