1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information about the industry investment rating in the provided content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - TMT industry funds led the gains, and funds accelerated their inflow into cross - border ETFs [1]. - Among the seven types of fund products this week, active equity funds had the highest weekly average return rate of 3.92%. The other types of funds were ranked in descending order of weekly average return rates: ETF funds (3.31%), quantitative funds (2.80%), QDII funds (1.73%), FOF funds (1.32%), bond funds (0.05%), and REITs funds (-1.95%) [3]. - Year - to - date, QDII funds had an average return rate of 20.88%, leading among various types of funds. The other types of funds were ranked in descending order of return rates: active equity funds (20.02%), quantitative funds (16.79%), REITs funds (16.21%), ETF funds (16.19%), FOF funds (8.71%), and bond - type funds (2.03%) [8]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Cross - Category Fund Product Return Overview - This week, active equity funds had the highest weekly average return rate of 3.92%. The other types of funds were ranked in descending order of weekly average return rates: ETF funds (3.31%), quantitative funds (2.80%), QDII funds (1.73%), FOF funds (1.32%), bond funds (0.05%), and REITs funds (-1.95%) [3][8]. - Year - to - date, QDII funds had an average return rate of 20.88%, leading among various types of funds. The other types of funds were ranked in descending order of return rates: active equity funds (20.02%), quantitative funds (16.79%), REITs funds (16.21%), ETF funds (16.19%), FOF funds (8.71%), and bond - type funds (2.03%) [8]. 3.2 Active Equity Funds 3.2.1 Performance of Major Broad - Based Indexes in A - share and Hong Kong Stock Markets - This week, major broad - based indexes in the A - share market generally rose, with the ChiNext Index having the highest weekly increase of 8.58%, followed by the STAR 50 Index with a weekly increase of 5.53%. The Shanghai 50 Index had the smallest increase, with a weekly increase of 1.57%. Major broad - based indexes in the Hong Kong stock market also rose this week, with the Hang Seng Index and the Hang Seng Tech Index increasing by 1.65% and 1.52% respectively [11]. 3.2.2 Performance of Shenwan Primary Industry Indexes - This week, most Shenwan primary industry indexes rose. The communication, electronics, and non - bank finance industry indexes performed relatively well, with weekly increases of 7.66%, 7.02%, and 6.48% respectively. The textile and apparel, steel, and banking industry indexes performed weakly, with weekly increases of -1.37%, -2.04%, and -3.19% respectively [14]. 3.2.3 Overview of Returns of High - Performing Active Equity Funds - This week, the overall average return rate of active equity funds was 3.92%. Yongying Digital Economy Smart Selection Hybrid Initiation A performed the best, with a weekly return rate of 18.81%, mainly stimulated by news such as the launch of the first domestic commercial electron - beam lithography machine and Huawei's release of AI inference innovation technology UCM, which may reduce the dependence on HBM, driving up the relevant sectors. The heavy - holding stocks of high - performing funds were mostly in industries such as electronics, communication, and power equipment [16]. 3.2.4 Overview of Returns of Industry Active Equity Funds - This week, the average return rate of industry active equity funds was 4.89%, higher than the overall level of active equity funds. Among the sub - industries, TMT industry funds performed the best this week, with an average return rate of 6.81%. Medical industry funds had a weekly average return rate of 4.51%, ranking second. Consumer industry funds had a relatively weak performance, with a weekly average return rate of 0.71%. The average return rates of the other three types of industry funds were: mid - stream manufacturing (4.42%), financial real estate (2.69%), and cyclical (1.68%) [18]. 3.2.5 Overview of Returns of Non - Industry Active Equity Funds - This week, the average return rate of non - industry funds was 3.80%, close to the overall level of active equity funds. The growth - style funds performed the best this week, with a weekly average return rate of 4.66%. The average return rates of the other two styles were: value - style (2.63%) and balanced - style (3.73%) [21]. 3.3 Quantitative Funds 3.3.1 Overview of Quantitative Fund Returns - This week, the average return rate of quantitative funds was 2.80%. Huatong CSI Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship 50 Index Enhancement A had the highest weekly return rate of 9.59%. In terms of strategy types, index - enhancement funds had the best weekly average return of 3.20% this week. The weekly average return rates of the other two types were: active quantitative funds (2.64%) and stock long - short funds (-0.38%) [23]. 3.3.2 Overview of Returns of Major Index - Enhancement Quantitative Funds - This week, among index - enhancement quantitative funds, funds tracking the CSI 1000 Index performed the best, with an average return rate of 3.24%. The weekly average return rates of funds tracking the CSI 300, CSI 500, and SZSE Component Indexes were 2.18%, 3.02%, and 2.70% respectively. In terms of excess returns, the proportion of funds achieving positive excess returns this week was 18.10%, a significant decrease from last week. Funds tracking the CSI 300 Index had a relatively better average excess return of -0.19%. The weekly average excess return rates of funds tracking the other three indexes were: CSI 500 Index (-0.85%), CSI 1000 Index (-0.85%), and SZSE Component Index (-1.16%) [25]. 3.4 Bond Funds 3.4.1 Performance of Major Bond Indexes - This week, major indexes in the bond market generally declined. The CSI Aggregate Bond Index had a weekly change of -0.32%, closing at 260.02. The CSI Treasury Bond Index had a weekly change of -0.47%, closing at 246.32. The CSI Credit Bond Index had a weekly change of -0.19%, closing at 213.27 [27]. 3.4.2 Performance of Convertible Bond Indexes - This week, the CSI Convertible Bond Index had a change of 1.60%, closing at 475.25. The weekly trading volume increased by 10.19%. The median convertible bond price rose by 1.54%, closing at 132.72. The median conversion premium rate increased by 1.15% to 27.24% [29]. 3.4.3 Overview of Bond Fund Returns - This week, the average return rate of bond - type funds was 0.05%. Golden Eagle Yuanfeng Bond A performed the best, with a weekly return rate of 5.28%. Most high - performing bond funds were convertible bond - type and partial - debt hybrid funds [32]. 3.4.4 Overview of Pure - Bond Fund Returns - This week, the average return rate of pure - bond funds was -0.17%. The return rates of short - term and medium - long - term pure - bond funds were -0.03% and -0.20% respectively. Green Fortune Pure Bond A performed relatively the best, with a weekly average return rate of 0.64% [34]. 3.4.5 Overview of Hybrid Bond Fund Returns - This week, the weekly average return rate of hybrid bond funds was 0.21%. The return rate of hybrid bond - type first - level funds was -0.02%, and that of hybrid bond - type second - level funds was 0.38%. Golden Eagle Yuanfeng Bond A performed the best, with a weekly return rate of 5.28% [36]. 3.4.6 Overview of Partial - Debt Hybrid and Flexible Allocation Bond Fund Returns - This week, the average return rate of partial - debt hybrid bond funds was 0.50%, and that of flexible allocation bond funds was 0.35%. Hua'an Zhilian Hybrid (LOF) A performed the best, with a weekly return rate of 5.26% [38]. 3.4.7 Overview of Convertible Bond Fund Returns - This week, the average return rate of convertible bond - type funds was 2.33%. Southern Changyuan Convertible Bond A performed the best, with a weekly average return rate of 4.40% [40]. 3.5 ETF Funds 3.5.1 Overview of ETF Fund Fund Flows - This week, ETF funds had a net outflow of 3.212 billion yuan, a month - on - month change of -120.44%. In terms of types, except for stock - type and money - market ETFs, which had net outflows, the other types of ETFs had net inflows. Cross - border ETFs had a net inflow of 18.854 billion yuan this week, a month - on - month increase of 45.03%, and the net inflow amount was at a historical high. Bond - type ETFs had a net inflow of 12.763 billion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 31.95%, and the net inflow amount was also at a historical high. Stock - type ETFs had a net outflow of 24.01 billion yuan, a month - on - month change of -337.54%. Among the sub - types, except for industry - index and style - index ETFs, which had small net inflows, the other types had net outflows. Thematic - index ETFs had the largest net outflow of 16.083 billion yuan, with a month - on - month change of nearly 13 times [42]. 3.5.2 Overview of ETF Funds with the Highest Net Inflows by Index - In terms of tracking indexes, the equity indexes with the highest net inflows this week, ranked by the total net inflow amount, were: the Shanghai 50 Index (4.351 billion yuan), the Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet Index (3.58 billion yuan), and the CSI 1000 Index (3.358 billion yuan). Among the bond - index - tracking ETFs, the ETFs tracking the AAA Sci - tech Innovation Bond Index and the CSI Convertible and Exchangeable Bond Index also had relatively high total net inflows, with total net inflows of 4.306 billion yuan and 3.114 billion yuan respectively [46]. 3.5.3 Overview of ETF Funds with the Highest Net Outflows by Index - This week, the indexes with the highest total net outflows were all equity indexes. Ranked by the total net inflow amount, they were: the STAR 50 Index (11.045 billion yuan), the STAR Chip Index (4.575 billion yuan), the ChiNext Index (3.172 billion yuan), the SZSE Component Index (3.169 billion yuan), and the CSI All - Share Semiconductor Index (2.586 billion yuan) [49]. 3.5.4 Overview of ETF Funds with the Highest Net Inflows - This week, most of the ETFs with the highest net inflows were bond - type and scale - index ETFs. The ETF with the largest net inflow this week was the Shanghai 50ETF, with a net inflow of 4.212 billion yuan. Harvest Sci - tech Innovation Bond ETF had a weekly net inflow of 3.987 billion yuan, ranking second. Among cross - border ETFs, the Hong Kong Stock Connect Non - Bank ETF had a weekly net inflow of 3.112 billion yuan, also ranking relatively high [51]. 3.5.5 Overview of ETF Funds with the Highest Net Outflows - This week, most of the ETFs with the highest net outflows were thematic - index ETFs and scale - index ETFs. The ETF with the largest net outflow this week was the STAR 50ETF, with a weekly net outflow of 7.032 billion yuan. Yin Hua Ri Li ETF had a weekly net outflow of 5.823 billion yuan, ranking second. Among thematic - index ETFs, the STAR Chip ETF had a net outflow of 1.336 billion yuan, ranking relatively high [53]. 3.5.6 Overview of Returns of High - Performing ETF Funds - This week, the overall average change rate of ETF funds was 3.31%. The STAR Market Growth ETF had the highest weekly increase of 19.38%. Most high - performing ETF funds were thematic - index ETFs, with investment themes including fintech, artificial intelligence, and energy - storage batteries [56]. 3.6 FOF Funds - This week, the average return rate of FOF funds was 1.32%. Bank of Communications Smart Selection Progressive Three - Month Holding - Period Hybrid Initiation (FOF) A performed the best, with a weekly return rate of 6.58%. In terms of types, stock - type FOF funds performed the best, with an average return rate of 3.02%. The performances of the other two types were: hybrid - type FOF (1.35%) and bond - type FOF (0.01%) [58]. 3.7 QDII Funds - This week, the overall average return rate of QDII funds was 1.73%. Bosera Hang Seng Healthcare (QDII - ETF) had the highest weekly return rate of 7.15%. The average return rates of different types of QDII funds were: stock - type (2.06%), hybrid - type (1.97%), bond - type (0.10%), and other - type (-0.76%) [60]. 3.8 REITs Funds - This week, the average change rate of REITs funds was -1.95%. China Resources Commercial REIT performed the best, with a weekly change rate of 0.62% [62].

Group 1 - Ningbo Yunsen (600366.SH) experienced a price increase of 3.52% today, with a turnover rate of 29.54% and a transaction volume of 4.697 billion [1] - Two institutional investors ranked as the second and fourth largest sellers, offloading shares worth 307 million, while quantitative funds were the second, third, fourth, and fifth largest buyers, purchasing shares worth 341 million [1] - The "Shandong Gang" was the fifth largest seller, selling shares worth 5.922 million [1] Group 2 - The top five buying institutions included the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect, which accounted for 4.75% of total transactions with a purchase amount of 223.151 million [2] - Guotai Junan Securities Headquarters ranked second with a purchase amount of 103.465 million, representing 2.20% of total transactions [2] - UBS Securities Shanghai Garden Shiqiao Road Securities Office ranked third with a purchase amount of 93.760 million, accounting for 2.00% of total transactions [2] Group 3 - The top five buying institutions also included CRST, which had a purchase amount of 15.145 million, representing 43.92% of its total transactions [3] - GF Securities Shenzhen Shen Nan East Road Securities Office ranked third with a purchase amount of 15.145 million, accounting for 43.24% of its total transactions [3] - The total amount for the top five buying and selling institutions combined was 563.684 million, representing 12.00% of total transactions [3]

Core Viewpoint - A significant divergence in market outlook is occurring on Wall Street, characterized by a contrast between algorithm-driven quantitative funds and cautious human traders [1] Group 1: Market Dynamics - Systematic strategy funds have increased their long positions in stocks to the highest level since early 2020, driven by strong market momentum, with the S&P 500 rebounding nearly 30% from its April low [1][2] - In contrast, subjective fund managers have reduced their stock exposure from "neutral" to "moderately underweight" due to ongoing concerns about global trade, corporate earnings, and economic growth [1][2] - The aggressive buying by quantitative funds has led to extreme positioning, with commodity trading advisors (CTAs) holding $50 billion in long positions in U.S. stocks, placing their risk exposure in the 92nd percentile historically [2][3] Group 2: Investor Sentiment - Human traders are hesitant to buy expensive stocks at historical highs, with some hoping for a market pullback to justify new purchases [2][3] - Analysts believe that the current "human vs. machine" stalemate will not last long, with potential for increased market volatility if subjective traders begin to sell due to weak economic or earnings data [4] - The cautious positioning of human traders may act as a safety net for the market, potentially preventing a larger sell-off when a correction occurs [5]

Core Insights - The article highlights the increasing role of Fund of Funds (FOF) and investment advisory services in identifying specialized and differentiated investment products in the current structural market environment [1][6] - There is a notable shift in the investment strategy from selecting "star fund managers" to choosing more transparent and practical quantitative or thematic products [6] FOF and Investment Strategies - FOFs have been actively increasing their allocations to various specialized products, particularly in active equity funds, amidst a backdrop of improved liquidity in the domestic market [1][2] - Notable quantitative products such as Nuon Multi-Strategy C and CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy C have seen significant interest from FOFs, with over 10 FOFs heavily investing in these funds by the end of Q2 [2][3] - The performance of these funds has been impressive, with Nuon Multi-Strategy C achieving a return rate exceeding 40% since Q2, while others like CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy C and Guojin Quantitative Multi-Factor C have returns around 20% [2][3] Thematic and Specialized Products - FOFs are also exploring other distinct active stock-picking products across various themes such as Hong Kong stocks, technology, dividends, gold stocks, finance, and real estate [2][3] - The demand for active equity funds is driven by the need for stable excess returns and clear investment logic, with a focus on products that can provide certainty in returns during structural market conditions [3][5] Risk Management and Investment Framework - The investment community is increasingly recognizing the importance of a comprehensive risk-return evaluation system, moving beyond traditional performance metrics to include strategy clarity and market adaptability [5][6] - Multi-asset strategies are seen as advantageous in capturing structural opportunities, allowing for diversified investments across low-correlated assets to optimize risk-return profiles [3][6] Evolution of Investment Preferences - There has been a significant evolution in the preferences of investment advisory services towards active equity funds, emphasizing the selection of strategies over individual fund managers [6] - The focus has shifted from short-term timing and stock selection capabilities of fund managers to utilizing tool-based products for long-term asset allocation [6]

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry in China has shown significant growth in management scale, with a total of approximately 34.05 trillion yuan as of June 30, 2025, marking an increase of 1.64 trillion yuan from the end of 2024 [3][4]. Group 1: Management Scale and Growth - As of June 30, 2025, the total management scale of 162 licensed public fund institutions is about 34.05 trillion yuan, with non-monetary fund management scale at approximately 20.11 trillion yuan, reflecting a growth of 1.03 trillion yuan from the end of 2024 [3][4]. - The top 30 public fund institutions account for 72.75% of the total non-monetary fund management scale, with a minimum threshold of 169.9 billion yuan to be included in this group [4]. - Among the top 30 institutions, 26 have seen an increase in non-monetary fund management scale compared to the end of 2024, with seven institutions experiencing growth rates of 10% or more [4][9]. Group 2: Leading Institutions - The top three public fund institutions by non-monetary management scale are E Fund, Huaxia Fund, and GF Fund, maintaining their positions consistently over the past three quarters [4][10]. - E Fund has a management scale of 2.16 trillion yuan, while Huaxia Fund follows closely with 2.10 trillion yuan, both exceeding 1 trillion yuan in non-monetary management scale [4][10]. - The average growth rate for the 162 public fund institutions in the first half of 2025 is 7.58%, with 92 institutions achieving net growth in non-monetary scale [10][11]. Group 3: Fund Types and Performance - The total management scale of stock, mixed, and bond funds is approximately 18.82 trillion yuan, accounting for 93.58% of the total non-monetary management scale [13]. - Stock funds have shown a quarterly growth of 6.09% and a half-year growth of 7.7%, while bond funds have increased by 8.71% quarterly [13][14]. - Alternative investment funds have seen significant growth, with a quarterly increase of 45.6% and a half-year increase of 97.62%, indicating a rising demand for diversified investment options [13][14]. Group 4: Notable Growth Institutions - The top three institutions by net growth in non-monetary management scale are Fuguo Fund (847.48 billion yuan), GF Fund (720.25 billion yuan), and Huitianfu Fund (631.6 billion yuan) [10][11]. - Dongcai Fund has the highest growth rate at 48.18%, followed by Haifutong Fund at 39.41% and Huatai Bosheng Fund at 39.14% [10][11]. - Yongying Fund has achieved the highest growth in stock fund management scale, with increases of 111.37% and 60.75% for half-year and quarterly periods, respectively [17].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights that several high-performing quantitative funds are implementing purchase limits to manage investor enthusiasm and ensure strategy effectiveness [1][2][3] - Recent announcements from Guojin Fund indicate that the purchase limit for its quantitative products has been significantly reduced from 10 million yuan to 10,000 yuan, reflecting a rapid response to inflows [2][3] - The average net value increase of quantitative funds has reached 12% this year, with specific funds like Guojin Quantitative Selection and Guojin Quantitative Multi-Factor showing net value increases around 30% [2][3] Group 2 - The scale of Guojin Quantitative Selection and Guojin Quantitative Multi-Factor increased by 1 billion yuan and 1.3 billion yuan respectively, with growth rates of 54% and 45% compared to the previous quarter [3] - Industry experts suggest that controlling the growth rate of quantitative funds is essential to mitigate operational challenges and maintain performance continuity, thereby protecting long-term investor interests [3] - The recent trend of concentrated purchase limits serves as a warning signal, as historical instances have shown that such actions often precede significant fluctuations in fund net values [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the strong performance of small-cap stocks in the A-share market, significantly outperforming larger indices, leading to a surge in public quantitative fund net values, with over 97% of these funds achieving positive returns this year [1][2][3] - The Wind data indicates that as of July 28, 314 out of 652 public quantitative funds have reached historical net value highs, representing over 48% of the total [2][3] - The small-cap stock index reached a historical high of 476,824.12 points on July 29, with a year-to-date return of 50.23%, while the mid-cap indices also showed substantial gains compared to larger indices [2][3] Group 2 - Due to the limited capacity of small-cap stocks to absorb funds, several high-performing products have implemented purchase limits, with some reducing daily purchase limits to as low as 1,000 yuan [3][4] - Approximately 28 quantitative products, including the CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy Fund, have suspended large purchases, indicating a trend towards tighter purchase limits across the sector [4] - Fund managers suggest that a comfortable management scale for small-cap products is around 20 billion yuan, with a target position maintained between 60% to 80% to manage risks effectively [4] Group 3 - Analysts express concerns about the high "crowding" in small-cap stocks, which could lead to significant risks if market sentiment shifts, although the likelihood of extreme adjustments similar to early 2024 is considered low [6][7][8] - The reliance on sentiment and liquidity in small-cap stocks has raised concerns about their underlying fragility, with many stocks driven by themes rather than solid performance, leading to potential valuation bubbles [6][7] - Fund managers have cautioned about the need to monitor market volatility closely and prepare for potential risks, emphasizing that the current high levels of investment in small-cap stocks may not be sustainable [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - Xizang Tianlu (600326.SH) experienced a significant increase, hitting the daily limit and recording six consecutive days of gains, indicating strong market interest and trading activity [1] Trading Activity - The stock recorded a turnover rate of 37.99% and a total transaction value of 8.13 billion yuan [1] - The Shanghai Stock Connect saw a net sell of 53.63 million yuan, with purchases amounting to 259 million yuan and sales reaching 313 million yuan [1] - Notable selling positions included GF Securities (000776) with a sell amount of 439 million yuan and a notable trader "Zuoshu Xin Yi" selling 133 million yuan [1] - Overall, the top trading seats bought 600 million yuan and sold 1.082 billion yuan, resulting in a net sell of 482 million yuan [1]

Summary of Conference Call Records Industry Overview - The capital market has shown a "barbell" structure since 2023, with large-cap and small-cap companies performing well, while mid-cap companies have been relatively flat. Large-cap stocks benefit from state-owned enterprises and insurance funds, while small-cap stocks are driven by on-market funds and quantitative private equity strategies [1][2][5]. Key Insights and Arguments - **Market Dynamics**: The A-shares and H-shares have performed more evenly, influenced by the southbound capital flow into Hong Kong stocks [1][5]. - **Investment Shifts**: The decline in deposit rates has led residents to seek higher certainty investment products, such as participating whole life insurance, creating a positive feedback loop through bank channels [1][6]. - **Future Market Outlook**: The market outlook remains optimistic, particularly for the financial sector. The valuation recovery of large-cap stocks led by insurance funds is expected to continue, while small-cap stocks are reaching new highs, although some pullbacks are inevitable [1][7]. - **Incremental Capital**: Recent incremental capital is limited, with insurance wealth management contributing approximately 1 trillion annually. However, after September, there will be a shift towards dividend insurance, prompting insurance companies to increase equity investments, with an estimated 30%-40% of new funds directed towards high-growth assets, bringing in 300-400 billion [1][8]. Additional Important Content - **Asset Allocation Changes**: The new accounting standards require insurance companies to increase standardized asset allocation, which is expected to promote stock market development [4]. - **Bank Wealth Management Trends**: The average yield on bank wealth management products is around 2.5%, with a gradual shift towards multi-asset strategies, including equities, convertible bonds, REITs, and alternative assets, expected to bring in around 100 billion annually [1][8]. - **Public Fund and Securities Company Trends**: Public funds have seen stable active equity scales, while FOF products have significantly increased due to their focus on controlling drawdowns and absolute returns [9]. Securities companies are leveraging off-market derivatives like DCN to meet investor demand for high-yield fixed-income products [10][11]. - **Regulatory Impact on Quantitative Funds**: New regulations have led to a significant increase in the issuance of neutral strategy products by quantitative funds, which are primarily linked to small-cap stocks [12][13]. - **Future of Off-Market Derivatives**: The off-market derivatives business is expected to have a positive impact on the capital market, although it carries risks, particularly in volatile conditions [15][16]. Potential Sources of Incremental Capital - Future incremental capital may come from insurance funds, bank wealth management, FOFs, and overseas funds, especially in a low-risk-free rate environment and with the potential for RMB appreciation [17].

Core Viewpoint - In the first half of 2025, the popularity of quantitative trading continues to rise amid increased activity in small-cap stocks and market volatility, with a significant number of quantitative funds showing positive returns [1][3]. Group 1: Performance of Quantitative Funds - As of June 30, 2025, there are 1,258 quantitative funds with an average return of 4.72% and a median return of 3.74%, with 86.15% of these funds achieving positive returns [1]. - Among the three categories of public quantitative funds, active quantitative funds have the highest returns, with average and median returns of 7.5% and 5.91% respectively [1]. - Index-enhanced funds, while slightly lower in returns, have the highest proportion of positive returns at 92.09% [1]. Group 2: Top Performing Funds - The threshold for the top 10 index-enhanced quantitative funds is set at 18.77%, with all top 10 funds tracking small-cap stock indices [3]. - The top three funds in the index-enhanced category are managed by 创金合信基金, 招商基金, and 长盛基金 [3]. - The top-performing index-enhanced fund, 创金合信北证50成份指数增强A, achieved a return of 37.17% in the first half of 2025 [5]. Group 3: Active Quantitative Funds - The threshold for the top 10 active quantitative funds is the highest at 24.64%, with the top three funds managed by 诺安基金, 中加基金, and 汇安基金 [8]. - The leading active quantitative fund, 诺安多策略A, recorded a return of 40.62% [10]. - The second-ranked fund, 中加专精特新量化选股A, achieved a return of 35.55% [11]. Group 4: Quantitative Hedge Funds - The threshold for the top 10 quantitative hedge funds is 0.82%, with 中邮基金, 富国基金, and 申万菱信基金 managing the top three funds [12]. - 工银瑞信基金 has two funds listed among the top 10 [12].