Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the significance of the supply-side reform 2.0, which aims to eliminate backward production capacity and effectively address chaotic competition in the industry [1] - The supply-side reform initiated in 2015 led to substantial price increases in commodities, with rebar futures soaring from 843 yuan/ton to 3147 yuan/ton, a 273% increase, and coking coal prices rising from 203 yuan to 719 yuan, a 3.5-fold increase [1] - The recent performance of the steel industry, particularly the China Steel Index, has mirrored past trends, with a notable increase of over 3.5% in a single day, indicating a potential revival similar to the previous supply-side reform [1][4] Group 2 - The current supply-side reform is characterized by unprecedented policy strength, focusing on eliminating low-price competition and orderly phasing out of backward production capacity, suggesting a potential for significant market recovery [6] - The valuation of steel stocks should consider the cyclical nature of the industry, with many steel companies currently valued below their replacement cost by 0.35 times, indicating a sufficient margin of safety [6] - The comparison between the China Steel Index and the National Steel Industry Index shows a high degree of overlap, with both indices focusing on the steel industry, although the China Steel Index includes some coal companies [7] Group 3 - The performance of funds tracking the China Steel Index and the National Steel Industry Index has been similar, with differences in returns being minimal, generally within 0.1% [12] - Specific funds, such as the Guolian National Steel A and Penghua National Steel Industry A, have shown significant returns of 8.10% and 7.66% respectively, outperforming the CSI 300 index [14] - The article suggests that as the economy develops, steel consumption will stabilize, with a shift from rebar consumption in construction to sheet metal consumption in manufacturing, indicating a potential improvement in profitability for the steel sector [14]

| | 财通均衡一年持有期混合A | | | 偏股型 | 财通基金 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 013239 | 财通均衡一年持有期混合C | 1.0474 | 4.78 | 偏股型 | 财通基金 | | 010434 | 红土创新医疗保健股票 | 1.2308 | 4.77 | 标准股票 | 红土创新基 | | | | | | 型 | 金 | | 020018 | 国泰金鹿混合 | 1.6570 | 4.64 | 偏股型 | 国泰基金 | | 290012 | 泰信行业精选混合A | 1.6840 | 4.14 | 灵活配置 | 泰信基金 | | | | | | 型 | | | 002583 | 泰信行业精选混合C | 1.6780 | 4.09 | 灵活配置 | 泰信基金 | | | | | | 型 | | | 010716 | 财通资管消费升级一年持有期 | 0.8788 | 4.09 | 偏股型 | 财通资管 | | | 混合C | | | | | | 010715 | 财通资管消费升级一年持有期 混合A | 0.8994 | 4.09 | 偏股 ...

一顿操作猛如虎，目前已有27382只基金更新净值，谁是基金中的王者，谁又垫底，请看数据： 混合A、恒越内需驱动混合C。 | 排名 | 代码 | 基金简称 | 2025-06-03 | | 2025-05-30 | | 程机号 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | 車位净值8 | 累计净值8 | 单位净值3 | 累计净值3 | | | 1 | 515210 | 国泰中证钢铁ETF | 1.1848 | 1.3498 | 1.2022 | 1.3672 | -0.01 | | 2 | 159730 | 博时龙头家电ETF | 0.9686 | 0.9686 | 0.9822 | 0.9822 | -0.01 | | 3 | 016815 | 国联钢铁C | 1.0810 | 1.0810 | 1.0960 | 1.0960 | -0.01 | | 4 | 008190 | 国泰中证钢铁ETF联接C | 1.1462 | 1.3462 | 1.1621 | 1.3621 | -0.01 | | 5 | 159512 | 广发中证全指汽 ...

没有股票账户的投资者可关注国泰中证钢铁ETF联接C（008190），国泰中证钢铁ETF联接A （008189）。 注：指数/基金短期涨跌幅及历史表现仅供分析参考，不预示未来表现。市场观点随市场环境变化而变 动，不构成任何投资建议或承诺。文中提及指数仅供参考，不构成任何投资建议，也不构成对基金业绩 的预测和保证。如需购买相关基金产品，请选择与风险等级相匹配的产品。基金有风险，投资需谨慎。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 钢铁ETF（515210）昨日净流入超5000万元，供需改善带动盈利修复预期。 光大证券指出，2025年2月工信部修订的《钢铁行业规范条件（2025年版）》对钢铁企业实施两级评 价，在"供给侧更好适应需求变化"政策目标下，钢铁板块盈利有望修复至历史均值水平，PB估值也将 随之修复。当前热轧与螺纹钢价差处于同期低位（110元/吨），冷热轧价差环比扩大80元/吨至420元/ 吨，小螺纹（地产用）与大螺纹（基建用）价差达240元/吨。行业基本面显示，螺纹钢价格自8个月低 位反弹1.59%，全国钢铁PMI新订单指数环比回升9.9个百分点至51%，但钢铁综合毛利环比微降0.65% 至199元/吨。普钢板块PB ...