以下文章来源于科创板日报 ，作者科创板日报 科创板日报 . 专注科创板和科技创新，上海报业集团主管主办，界面财联社出品。 惠普CEO Enrique Lores则警告称， 2026年下半年"可能尤其艰难"，必要时将上调价格。 他指出， 内存芯片约占一台PC成本的15%– 18%。 据悉，由于内存价格上涨，PC 厂商正面临不断上升的利润压力。 联想、惠普、戴尔、三星电子与LG电子等正重新评估2026年产品规划， 包括AI PC与平板电脑。 值得一提的是，几天前美光宣布终止运营消费品牌Crucial，专注于满足来自于数据中心相关客户需求，因为这类客户的利润率明显更高。 TrendForce最新报告指出，内存价格上涨已显著推升消费电子产品的物料成本（BOM），迫使品牌提高零售价格，从而抑制市场需求。受 此影响， TrendForce将2026年笔电出货量预测从原先同比增长1.7%下调至同比下降2.4%。 "存储芯片短缺已经从组件级问题升级为宏观经济风险。" 科技咨询公司Greyhound Research CEO Sanchit Vir Gogia警告，AI基础设施 建设"正在与无法满足其实际需求的供应链发生碰撞" ...

编造标签，煽动群众对立；物欲横流，宣扬扭曲价值观；内容失格，污染网络环境；劣迹斑斑却试图"换壳重生"。这几类乱象在当前的网络生态中尤为凸 显。 12月3日，中央网信办集中通报了包括"户晨风"、"张雪峰"、"阑夕"等在内的一批网络名人账号违法违规处置案例。此次行动因涉及多位头部网红而引发 广泛关注。 "户晨风"编造"安卓人""苹果人" 煽动群众对立 安卓房子、苹果房子，从何而来？这是网红博主"户晨风"在网上发表的极端言论，在多个平台长期编造所谓"安卓人""苹果人"等标签，人为制造并激化社 会群体间的对立情绪。 网络账号"户晨风"在多个平台长期编造所谓"安卓人""苹果人"等煽动群体对立言论，各平台相关账号已关闭。 实际上，从展示跨国消费差异到制造阶层对立，户晨风以"苹果、安卓论"收割流量，该账号因突破监管红线被封禁，多平台账号被彻底注销。 为了博取眼球、吸引流量，户晨风在他的视频和直播中构建了一套以"苹果/安卓"为核心的极端话语体系。在他的口中，"苹果人"就是所谓"精英阶层"，特 征包括使用iPhone手机、驾驶特斯拉汽车、在山姆会员店消费。 中国政法大学网络法学研究所教授郭旨龙：户晨风的行为是在网络上看起来像是 ...

12月3日，中央网信办集中通报了包括"户晨风"、"张雪峰"、"阑夕"等在内的一批网络名人账 号违法违规处置案例。此次行动因涉及多位头部网红而引发广泛关注。 网络账号"户晨风"在多个平台长期编造所谓"安卓人""苹果人"等煽动群体对立言论，各平台相 关账号已关闭。 编造标签，煽动群众对立；物欲横流，宣扬扭曲价值观；内容失格，污染网络环境；劣迹斑斑 却试图"换壳重生"。这几类乱象在当前的网络生态中尤为凸显。 安卓房子、苹果房子，从何而来？这是网红博主"户晨风"在网上发表的极端言论，在多个平台 长期编造所谓"安卓人""苹果人"等标签，人为制造并激化社会群体间的对立情绪。 "煽动群众对立"乱象 实际上，从展示跨国消费差异到制造阶层对立，户晨风以"苹果、安卓论"收割流量，该账号因 突破监管红线被封禁，多平台账号被彻底注销。 中国传媒大学网络空间全球治理研究中心教授 徐培喜：煽动所谓的使用苹果和安卓的这种阶 层对立，有些是他们故意制造的，比如说男女之间的对立和歧视，煽动年轻人和老年人之间的 对立。如果他是为了博取流量、增加粉丝，攫取经济利益，随意传播有害信息去误导公众，非 常严重破坏了健康的网络生态秩序。 为博流量毫无底线 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) are implementing new regulations to enhance information security by prohibiting the use of Android phones on military lines and mandating that officers of the rank of lieutenant colonel and above use Apple iPhones for official communications [1][2]. Group 1 - The new policy aims to reduce the risk of mobile phone breaches among senior military officials and strengthen overall information security [1]. - The military plans to standardize the operating system at higher levels to simplify security management and updates [2]. - Specific implementation timelines and exceptions for personal devices used for work have not yet been disclosed [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent banning of internet influencer "Hu Chenfeng" and others for creating divisive content to gain traffic, highlighting the need for stricter platform responsibilities and regulations to combat such behavior [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Actions Taken Against Influencers - "Hu Chenfeng" experienced a significant increase in followers from 120,000 to 2.1 million within six months by promoting divisive narratives, leading to his account being banned [1]. - Other influencers, such as "Happy Pig Pig," have also faced permanent bans for inciting extreme group opposition and spreading discriminatory remarks [2]. - In August, Weibo announced penalties against accounts that provoked gender opposition, including reduced exposure and temporary or permanent bans [2]. Group 2: Expert Opinions on Legal Implications - Legal experts suggest that the actions of influencers creating divisive labels may violate laws against public insult and defamation, potentially leading to criminal charges [3]. - The guidelines from the Supreme People's Court and other authorities indicate that severe cases of online insults could constitute a crime, emphasizing the need for accountability [3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Platforms - Experts recommend that platforms enhance their responsibilities by implementing stricter preventive measures and creating a database to identify and monitor divisive content [3][4]. - Platforms should also establish a credit management system to track users who incite division, potentially restricting their account functionalities [4]. - It is advised that platforms report any suspected illegal activities to relevant authorities promptly [4].

Group 1 - The article highlights the innovative use of Nano Banana Pro integrated with NotebookLM, transforming academic papers into engaging comics, making them more accessible and enjoyable to read [1][7] - Users have discovered new functionalities of Nano Banana Pro, such as its ability to mimic human handwriting and accurately interpret handwritten notes and diagrams, enhancing its utility in educational contexts [8][17] - The article mentions that the former AI director of Tesla, Andrej Karpathy, has endorsed the use of Nano Banana Pro for solving problems, noting its accuracy in recognizing handwritten solutions [8][11] Group 2 - Google has made significant advancements in AI with the release of Gemini and Nano Banana, leading to a surge in its stock price and market capitalization, surpassing Microsoft [24] - The article references a humorous incident involving Google's CEO, who addressed a long-standing meme about the placement of cheese in a hamburger emoji, showcasing the company's commitment to refining its AI capabilities [27][32] - The advancements in AI technology, as demonstrated by the ability to understand physical world logic and spatial positioning, signify a substantial leap in AI's capabilities, marking Google's return to a leading position in the industry [32][33]

Group 1 - The article discusses the negative impact of labeling individuals, particularly older adults, in the online space, highlighting how terms like "老登" are used to create division and generate traffic [1][2] - It explains the tactics used by certain online influencers, such as 户晨风, who categorize people into groups like "苹果人" and "安卓人" to provoke conflict and gain followers, despite the misleading nature of these labels [2][3] - The article emphasizes the psychological effect of labeling, where individuals conform to the characteristics of the labels assigned to them, leading to a cycle of conflict and division among different groups [3] Group 2 - The piece calls for a collective effort from regulatory bodies, platforms, and society to address the complexities of the online discourse environment and promote a healthier online space [3] - It suggests that the ultimate goal of these influencers is to monetize their influence through traffic generation, and that cutting off their profit sources is essential for effective governance [3] - Recent actions against influencers like 户晨风 indicate a growing awareness and response to the harmful effects of such labeling practices, leading to self-regulation among similar accounts [3]

Group 1 - The article discusses the negative impact of social media influencers, particularly focusing on the case of Hu Chenfeng, who has been banned from multiple platforms for inciting social division and promoting extreme views for the sake of gaining attention and followers [2][5][9] - Hu Chenfeng's content categorized users as "Apple people" representing the elite and "Android people" as the lower class, creating a divisive narrative that exploits consumer habits for commercial gain [7][9] - Experts emphasize the need for stricter regulations and a multi-faceted approach to manage online content, including improving platform algorithms and encouraging mainstream media to play a role in guiding public discourse [11][13] Group 2 - The article highlights the dangers of spreading rumors in public domains, which can lead to public panic and misinformation, particularly in areas like disaster reporting and economic news [14][24] - Specific cases of misinformation are cited, including false claims about electricity price changes and fabricated disaster videos, which were spread without verification, leading to administrative penalties for the perpetrators [16][20][23] - Experts recommend that the public should prioritize information from official sources and mainstream media to avoid falling for rumors and misinformation [26]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding internet celebrity Hu Chenfeng, who was banned for creating divisive content that categorized smartphone users into "elite Apple users" and "lower-tier Android users," highlighting the negative impact of such tactics on social cohesion and the importance of regulatory actions against harmful online behavior [1][3][5][8]. Group 1: Content Creation and Regulation - Hu Chenfeng initially gained popularity by showcasing cross-border consumption differences but shifted to creating a divisive ranking system to attract attention [3]. - The categorization of users based on their smartphone choices and shopping habits is criticized as an absurd and harmful practice that reduces personal choices to social labels [5][8]. - Regulatory bodies have taken action against Hu Chenfeng, leading to the suspension of his accounts across multiple platforms, emphasizing that online spaces are not lawless [8][11]. Group 2: Impact of Controversial Content - The article highlights that the creation of controversial content can lead to increased engagement and viewership, which in turn attracts advertisers, despite the potential societal harm [8][11]. - Other cases of misinformation and sensationalism were also mentioned, including false claims about electricity price hikes and manipulated AI-generated videos, which resulted in administrative penalties and detentions [8][11]. - The article calls for a collective effort from both regulators and the public to combat harmful content and promote quality over controversy in online discourse [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the negative impact of social media influencers, particularly focusing on the case of Hu Chenfeng, who has been banned for inciting social division and promoting extreme views for the sake of gaining attention and followers [1][2]. Group 1: Case of Hu Chenfeng - Hu Chenfeng, a social media influencer with millions of followers, used divisive rhetoric to create a false dichotomy between "Apple people" and "Android people," which he leveraged to attract traffic and monetize his content [1]. - His content portrayed "Apple people" as the elite class and "Android people" as the lower class, thus manipulating consumer habits into social identity markers [1]. - Following his controversial actions, Hu Chenfeng's accounts were banned and subsequently deleted across multiple platforms on September 20 [1]. Group 2: Expert Opinions - Experts, including Zhao Jingwu from Beihang University, emphasize that Hu's actions are more concerning than similar influencers, as he consistently incited cognitive division among netizens through his labeling [2]. - The practice of creating sharp oppositional topics and stirring anxiety among groups for commercial gain is highlighted as a significant issue [2]. - Zhang Hongzhong from Beijing Normal University suggests establishing a graded management mechanism to regulate harmful content and promote a more inclusive online environment [2].