9月5日，中钢天源盘中上涨2.29%，截至09:40，报10.70元/股，成交4346.76万元，换手率0.55%，总市 值80.67亿元。 分红方面，中钢天源A股上市后累计派现7.21亿元。近三年，累计派现4.06亿元。 资金流向方面，主力资金净流入340.58万元，大单买入893.97万元，占比20.57%，卖出553.39万元，占 比12.73%。 机构持仓方面，截止2025年6月30日，中钢天源十大流通股东中，香港中央结算有限公司位居第八大流 通股东，持股879.18万股，相比上期减少88.01万股。 中钢天源今年以来股价涨49.52%，近5个交易日跌8.94%，近20日涨5.42%，近60日涨23.47%。 责任编辑：小浪快报 资料显示，中钢天源股份有限公司位于安徽省马鞍山市雨山区霍里山大道南段9号，成立日期2002年3月 27日，上市日期2006年8月2日，公司主营业务涉及工业原料业务、金属制品业务、电子元件业务、装备 业务和专业技术服务业务。主营业务收入构成为：工业原料33.73%，电子元器件24.27%，检验检测 19.60%，金属制品17.23%，冶金、矿山、机电工程专用设备4.07%，其他 ...

为什么日本会产生这种反近代式的发展变化呢？如果以近代西欧历史为标准，这种变化是可以说是非近代式的。现代人大都居住在工业化社会中，但如果 抛弃现代人的既有观点，那么江户时代日本的这种变化，可以说还是有一定的合理之处的。前工业化社会中农业生产量的扩大，如果要通过资本增加来实 现，最终必定需要依靠家畜的大量使用来促进农业生产技术的变革。 支撑这种生产技术变革的有两点，一是扩大通过畜力投入提高效益的经营方式的规模，二是扩大家畜养殖的空间和条件（包括放牧地区和饲料栽培土地的 扩大）。英国以及西欧诸国在近代化发展初期，就拥有可以促进家畜利用的土地，以及其他可以进一步提高利用率的土地。在这个时期，英国的可耕地面 积与人口数量的比值就远远超过了日本。 与此相反，日本在市场经济起步阶段，可耕地中就有相当多的部分已被开垦为耕地，为养殖家畜、栽种饲料寻找可用耕地的需求就同人口增加、耕地面积 扩大的需求之间产生了矛盾。耕地的面积在江户时代不断增加，到了幕末时期，可耕地已被基本开垦完毕，开始为人类用作生产粮食和工业原料。 相比于英国，日本的情况可能更近似于欧洲大陆各国。 江户时代农业技术的发展并非依赖于能够提高劳动生产力的资本的增加， ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent trade agreement between the U.S. and Vietnam is seen as a strategic move that undermines the interests of other countries, particularly China, amidst ongoing trade tensions initiated by the Trump administration [1][6]. Group 1: Trade Agreement Details - The agreement significantly reduces tariffs on Vietnamese goods exported to the U.S. from 46% to 20%, while imposing punitive tariffs of up to 40% on third-country goods transshipped through Vietnam [1][3]. - Vietnam has agreed to open its market to U.S. goods with zero tariffs across various sectors, including agricultural products and high-tech items, and has allowed U.S. customs to conduct inspections [3][4]. Group 2: Economic Implications for Vietnam - Vietnam's economy is heavily reliant on the U.S. market, with a trade surplus ranking third globally in 2024, trailing only China and Mexico [3]. - The agreement poses risks for Vietnam, as over 60% of its electronic components and 80% of its plastic materials are imported from China, making its manufacturing sector vulnerable to disruptions in trade relations with China [6][7]. Group 3: Reactions from China and Other Countries - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has expressed strong opposition to the agreement, emphasizing that negotiations should not harm third-party interests and warning of potential retaliatory measures [6][9]. - The agreement may encourage other ASEAN countries, such as Thailand and Malaysia, to follow suit, potentially impacting China's trade relations in the region [7][9]. Group 4: Broader Global Trade Dynamics - The U.S. stands to gain significantly from this agreement, enhancing its bargaining power in future trade negotiations and increasing customs revenue from tariffs [4][6]. - The agreement has also prompted India to accelerate its negotiations with the U.S. to prevent potential shifts in manufacturing away from India to other countries [7].