这场围绕生存的终极考验，早已在静默中开始。 01 时代的辉煌："搜索霸主"的崛起 "百度一下"，似乎已经是一个遥远的事情。 自上世纪90年代崛起，搜索引擎以其关键词匹配与网页排序技术，成功解决了信息匮乏时代"从无到有"的获取难题，百度也因此成为绝对的流量入口。但 人工智能时代，传统搜索的局限日益凸显：搜索结果良莠不齐，页面广告无处不在，面对一个需要深度思考和复杂解答的问题，用户往往需要在成堆的链 接中自行拼凑答案。 答案搜索的困境中，AI以一种颠覆者的姿态登场。它不再仅仅提供链接，而是直接生成答案、创作内容、执行任务，而互联网时代下需要用户筛选、点 击、辨别的传统搜索模式，价值还剩下多少？ 百度，这位曾经的搜索霸主，如今正被自己赖以生存的互联网范式革命推至悬崖边缘。AI要革的，或许不是某一家公司的命，而是整个"搜索"本身。当 新时代的潮水改变方向，百度是能乘风破浪，还是被拍在沙滩上？ 那是一个海归浪潮翻滚、互联网创业喷涌而出的草莽时代。 1999年，Google网站在美国上线，互联网世界的入口开始从导航和门户转为搜索引擎。同年底，在硅谷做了8年搜索业务的李彦宏回国，他带着刚融来的 120万美元，在北大一间宾馆 ...

央广网北京9月29日消息（记者 殷雨婷）9月29日，百度百科与农业农村部帮扶司达成合作，成 为"乡村工匠国际交流推介活动"独家中文百科支持平台。双方将共同推动全国6000余名乡村工匠名师入 驻百度百科"繁星计划"，通过数字化手段传承乡村技艺、弘扬工匠文化。 2025年中国农民丰收节期间，农业农村部帮扶司指导中国乡村发展基金会、中国农业电影电视中心 等单位，于 9月26日至27日在全国农业展览馆举办乡村工匠国际交流推介活动，旨在推进乡村工匠培育 工程，引导广大乡村工匠参与国际交流合作，发展乡村特色产业，带动农民就业增收。 此次与农业农村部达成合作后，百度百科将通过AI智能体、数字人、词条建设等形式，系统性收 录非遗传承人、工艺大师等乡村工匠的技艺档案。首批已有200余名乡村工匠名师入驻"繁星计划"，包 括国家级非物质文化遗产项目草编代表性传承人王群英、中国工艺美术大师庞永辉等，未来逐步覆盖全 国6000余名乡村工匠名师。 据了解，"繁星计划"是百度百科于2024年发布的知识传播与共建计划，旨在推动中文知识平台的开 放性与权威性，促进知识的普惠与传播。该计划依托百度搜索的流量分发优势和先进技术，与各领域专 业人士 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent court ruling against a network technology company for unfair competition highlights the ongoing rivalry between Baidu and ByteDance, particularly in the context of AI and content ecosystems [1][2][3]. Legal Dispute - The Beijing Haidian Court ruled that the network technology company, Interactive Encyclopedia, engaged in unfair competition by scraping over 600,000 entries from Baidu Encyclopedia without authorization, resulting in a compensation order of 5 million yuan for economic losses and 3 million yuan for reasonable expenses [1][4]. - This case marks the first instance of a legal dispute involving encyclopedia data competition in China, with the court emphasizing the need to protect the interests of platform operators in the competitive landscape [2][4]. Competitive Landscape - The competition between Baidu and ByteDance has been extensive, with at least 234 legal cases since 2016, primarily revolving around unfair competition and copyright disputes [4][5]. - Baidu's core business remains in search, while ByteDance has shifted its focus from search to content platforms, indicating a strategic pivot in their competitive approaches [6][8]. AI Development - Both companies are heavily investing in AI, with Baidu being an early mover in the field, launching its Wenxin model in 2019 and generating significant revenue from AI cloud services [10][11]. - ByteDance has been slower to respond but is now ramping up its AI initiatives, including the launch of its Doubao model family and a focus on AGI research [10][13]. Market Dynamics - The AI cloud computing market is highly competitive, with both companies vying for market share. Baidu's intelligent cloud revenue grew by 42% year-on-year, while ByteDance's Doubao model has seen a dramatic increase in usage [11][12]. - The ongoing price war in the AI model market has intensified competition, with ByteDance offering significantly lower prices for its models, prompting responses from other tech giants [11][12]. Future Outlook - The rivalry between Baidu and ByteDance is expected to continue evolving, particularly as both companies enhance their AI capabilities and seek to establish themselves as leaders in the AI landscape [10][13]. - The competition will not only test their strategic and technological capabilities but also their ability to innovate in a rapidly changing market [10][13].

Core Viewpoint - A recent court ruling has reignited the competition between Baidu and ByteDance, with a focus on data competition related to Baidu Baike, where a network technology company was found guilty of unfair competition for scraping over 600,000 entries from Baidu Baike and was ordered to pay 5 million yuan in damages and 3 million yuan in reasonable expenses [1][2][4]. Group 1: Legal Context - This case marks the first instance of a legal dispute involving data competition related to encyclopedia entries in China, highlighting the importance of content ecosystems in the search engine market [2][4]. - The court ruled that the network technology company, Interactive Baike, lacked legal authorization and disrupted market competition, violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law [4][5]. - Since 2016, there have been at least 234 legal cases between Baidu and ByteDance, primarily concerning unfair competition and copyright disputes [5]. Group 2: Strategic Shifts - ByteDance's acquisition of Interactive Baike in 2019 was part of its strategy to enter the search market, but the company has since shifted its focus towards content platforms and community engagement [2][6]. - Despite initial ambitions in the search domain, ByteDance's search-related products have not gained significant traction, leading to a strategic pivot towards content community platforms [6][7]. - Baidu has been quicker to adapt to the AI landscape, launching its Wenxin model in 2019 and generating significant revenue growth from AI-related services [7][10]. Group 3: AI Competition - Both Baidu and ByteDance are now competing in the AI sector, with Baidu having a more established presence in AI infrastructure and applications [7][8]. - The AI market is characterized by intense competition, particularly in cloud computing, where both companies are vying for market share [8][9]. - As of early 2025, Baidu's revenue reached 32.5 billion yuan, with a 42% year-on-year increase in intelligent cloud revenue, while ByteDance's model, Doubao, has seen a dramatic increase in usage [9][10].

Core Viewpoint - The recent court ruling against ByteDance for unauthorized data scraping from Baidu's encyclopedia highlights the growing legal and ethical challenges in the UGC (User-Generated Content) industry, emphasizing the need for platforms to respect intellectual property rights and establish clearer boundaries for data usage [1][3][8]. Group 1: Legal Implications - The court ruled that ByteDance's actions constituted unfair competition, resulting in a compensation of 5 million yuan for economic losses and 3 million yuan for reasonable expenses to Baidu [1][3]. - This case sets a precedent for the legal status of "platform data integration rights," indicating that UGC platforms can no longer indiscriminately use data owned by others [8][10]. - The ruling reflects a broader industry trend where platforms must navigate the complexities of data rights and compliance, moving away from a "grab-and-use" mentality [8][19]. Group 2: Industry Dynamics - The UGC model has proven effective, with platforms like Douyin (TikTok) generating approximately 20 million pieces of content daily, significantly reducing content production costs compared to traditional PGC (Professionally Generated Content) models [6][10]. - However, the intense competition for user attention has led to a "content overdraft" crisis, where platforms prioritize quantity over quality, resulting in a proliferation of low-quality content [10][12]. - The legal battles between platforms underscore the urgent need for a sustainable content ecosystem that balances user engagement with respect for intellectual property [19][24]. Group 3: Future Outlook - As competition intensifies, platforms must innovate and enhance content quality to retain users, moving away from practices like plagiarism and market suppression [19][24]. - The industry is at a crossroads, where the focus will shift from mere data acquisition to building a value community that benefits creators, platforms, and users alike [24][27]. - The recent rulings serve as a warning for platforms to abandon short-sighted compliance strategies and embrace a more responsible approach to content and data management in the AI era [27][28].