Core Viewpoint - The 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China emphasizes the construction of a technology finance system that aligns with technological innovation, aiming to enhance financial support for major national technological tasks and technology-based SMEs [1] Group 1: Capital Market Technology Finance Overview - Regulatory bodies have introduced a series of supportive policies, including the "National Nine Articles," "Sixteen Articles on Technology," and "Eight Articles on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board," to create a favorable policy environment for the development of technology finance [2] - As of June 2025, there are 1,660 listed companies in strategic emerging industries, accounting for 18.83% of the total market capitalization, an increase of 17.16 percentage points over the past decade [2] - The bond market has seen significant direct financing, with a cumulative issuance of 1.2 trillion yuan in sci-tech bonds supporting the development of enterprises in cutting-edge fields such as semiconductors and artificial intelligence [2] Group 2: Challenges and Obstacles in Securities Companies' Services for Technology Finance - There are systemic challenges in the reasonable valuation of technology companies, with a lack of effective identification and assessment capabilities for core technology routes and patent barriers [3] - Many technology companies are in high R&D investment stages, often facing long-term losses, making traditional valuation metrics like DCF, PB, and PE difficult to apply [3] - Information asymmetry exists, as some startups maintain strong confidentiality over core technologies, hindering investors' ability to assess true technological levels and potential [3] Group 3: Collaboration Mechanisms and Support Systems - There is a lack of efficient collaboration mechanisms between securities companies and knowledge innovation sources such as universities and research institutions, leading to bottlenecks in technology transfer and capital connection [4] - Securities companies often do not actively embed themselves in the early stages of technology innovation, lacking regular platforms for industry-academia-research integration [4] - The existing internal management and evaluation systems of securities companies heavily rely on short-term financial performance, which does not effectively incentivize long-term value creation behaviors [5] Group 4: Optimization Paths for Securities Companies' Technology Finance Services - A new service model centered on "investment banking + research + investment" is being developed to provide comprehensive, accompanying services for technology companies [6] - Research efforts are being strengthened to provide timely and accurate industry information and market analysis for technology companies [7] - Collaboration with universities, research institutions, and financial entities is being enhanced to create a comprehensive service center for technology finance, offering differentiated services based on the development stages of enterprises [7]