伯乐在线 . 伯乐在线分享IT互联网职场和精选干货文章（原域名已不再维护）。组织维护10万+star的开源技术资源库， 包括：Python, Java, C/C++, Go, JS, CSS, Node.js, PHP, .NET 等 这事居然还上微博热搜了： 以下文章来源于伯乐在线 ，作者伯小乐 小麻哥今年 27 岁，河南郑州某央企的程序员，年薪大概 15 万元。 小麻哥 认为，跑外卖是一种解压的方式，因为在工作中经常要做很多逻辑思考，一下班就想放松。 跑外卖就只用看 着手机，前往某个地方取餐，还能吹吹风，跟女友一起溜达看看城市夜景。 小麻哥说表示， 总体而言还是挺好玩的，就像寻宝游戏，拿到餐，抵达目的地后获得金币。 小麻哥 也做自媒体，评论区里也有不友好的言论，说我一个有工作的人为什么要抢别人没工作的人饭碗。 对于恶评，他说看得还是比较开的，比较无所谓，有时候阐述一下自己的观点，但更多的是不予理会。 网友留言 "15 万的央企程序员，有个毛的压力" "主要不是跑外卖，更多可能是希望自媒体能火，那就主营业务变成网红了" "醉翁之意不在于下班跑外卖，而是把跑外卖的经历拍成短视频，本意还是想发展自媒体。至于跑外 ...

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly state an investment rating for ARM, but it provides insights into the company's performance and future expectations, indicating a generally positive outlook based on growth drivers in AI and custom chip solutions. Core Insights - ARM's FY1Q26 revenue was $1.05 billion, slightly below market consensus of $1.06 billion, with EPS at $0.35, in line with expectations. Royalty revenue increased by 25% YoY to $585 million, while License revenue decreased by 0.8% YoY to $468 million due to a strong base in FY1Q25 [1][6]. - The company is evolving towards full-end solutions to address increasing chip complexity and extended development cycles, with strong demand for Compute Subsystem (CSS) solutions, which have licensing fees twice that of Armv9 [2][7]. - ARM's custom chips are driving significant growth in cloud-based AI, with over 70,000 enterprises running AI workloads on Arm Neoverse chips, representing a 40% YoY increase. The company expects to capture nearly 50% market share among leading hyperscale customers this year [3][8]. - For 2Q26, ARM expects revenue between $1.01 billion and $1.11 billion, with a midpoint representing a 25% YoY increase. Non-GAAP EPS is projected to be between $0.29 and $0.37, with a median of $0.33, slightly below market expectations [9]. Summary by Sections Financial Performance - FY1Q26 revenue: $1.05 billion, slightly below consensus of $1.06 billion - EPS: $0.35, in line with expectations - Royalty revenue: $585 million, up 25% YoY - License revenue: $468 million, down 0.8% YoY [1][6] Business Strategy - ARM is transitioning to full-end solutions to tackle chip complexity and development cycles - Demand for CSS exceeds expectations, with licensing fees significantly higher than previous models - ARM supports chiplet development and aims to expand into complete solutions [2][7] AI and Market Outlook - Over 70,000 enterprises using Arm Neoverse chips for AI workloads, a 40% YoY increase - Expected market share among hyperscale customers to approach 50% - ARM's platform combines AI performance with energy efficiency, enhancing TCO [3][8] Future Guidance - 2Q26 revenue guidance: $1.01 billion to $1.11 billion, midpoint indicating 25% YoY growth - Non-GAAP EPS guidance: $0.29 to $0.37, median of $0.33, below market consensus [9]

Core Viewpoint - Understanding the distinction between being "useful" and being "valued" in the workplace is crucial for career development and personal growth [3][4]. Group 1: Definitions and Implications - "Useful" refers to being proficient in specific tasks, allowing superiors to delegate work confidently, but often leads to being seen as merely filling gaps rather than being integral to strategic discussions [6]. - "Valued" means being included in core conversations and decision-making processes, which provides opportunities for meaningful growth and contribution to the company [6]. Group 2: Personal Experiences - During a company crisis, an individual was recognized as essential not just for past performance but for future contributions, receiving a retention bonus equivalent to 50% of total compensation [10]. - In a later role, despite achieving targets and receiving bonuses, the individual felt stagnant as they were not invited to strategic discussions, highlighting the difference between being "useful" and "valued" [12]. Group 3: Recommendations - Individuals are encouraged to reflect on their roles and assess whether they are merely "useful" or genuinely "valued" within their organizations [13].

Core Concept - A developer named Benjamin Aster created a clone of Minecraft using only HTML and CSS, without any JavaScript, showcasing the potential of these technologies in building interactive web applications [1][3][17]. Project Overview - The project consists of 480 lines of CSS and 46,022 lines of HTML, resulting in a 3D world where users can add and remove blocks and rotate the view [3][4][17]. - The game allows interaction within a 9x9x9 grid, featuring 7 different types of blocks [3][6]. Technical Implementation - The project utilizes 35,001 `<label>` tags and 5,840 `<input type="radio">` buttons to manage the state of the blocks, with each block having six sides represented by labels [6][7]. - The `:has()` selector in CSS is a key technique that enables the interaction logic, allowing for dynamic visibility of block types based on user selection [6][13]. - To generate the extensive HTML structure, Aster employed Pug, a templating language, which simplifies the creation of nested elements [6][7]. Animation and Interaction - CSS animations are used to control the 3D view and rotation, with specific rules defined for button interactions that trigger animations [9][12]. - The design allows for a seamless user experience, where pressing and holding buttons initiates animations that manipulate 3D transformation properties [12]. Community Response - The project gained significant attention on Hacker News, with users expressing admiration for the innovative use of CSS and the creativity behind the implementation [13][14]. - Aster noted that the project was originally an experimental work from three years ago, aimed at exploring the limits of pure CSS [14][17]. Access and Experience - Users can experience the project through a dedicated website, which has seen increased traffic, leading Aster to switch hosting services to accommodate the demand [14][15]. - For optimal performance, it is recommended to access the project using desktop browsers, particularly those based on Chromium or Firefox [15].

Core Viewpoint - The article humorously illustrates how different programming languages would approach the creation of a newborn baby, showcasing the unique characteristics and quirks of each language's syntax and style [1][3][6]. Group 1: Python - The Python version emphasizes precision, capturing the birth time down to the millisecond, reflecting the meticulous nature of a programmer [1]. - It includes a welcoming function for the newborn, demonstrating object-oriented programming principles [3]. Group 2: Java - The Java implementation is characterized by a heavy use of getter methods, highlighting the verbosity often associated with Java code [5]. - It also includes a welcoming message, similar to the Python version, showcasing the commonality of this feature across languages [3]. Group 3: JavaScript - The JavaScript version introduces randomness in determining the baby's gender, adding a playful element to the code [6]. - It also includes a whimsical welcome function, reflecting the dynamic nature of JavaScript [6]. Group 4: C++ - The C++ version focuses on memory management, with the newborn being allocated on the stack to prevent memory leaks, showcasing the language's emphasis on performance [8]. Group 5: Go - The Go implementation is noted for its strict struct alignment, reflecting the language's focus on simplicity and clarity [10]. Group 6: PHP - The PHP version uses an array to represent the newborn, indicating a more flexible and less structured approach compared to other languages [10]. - It features an anonymous function for the welcome message, which is a common practice in PHP [10]. Group 7: Bash - The Bash script version humorously suggests that the newborn will likely become an operations and maintenance professional, reflecting the practical use of shell scripting [11]. Group 8: HTML - The HTML representation of the newborn suggests a static structure, with a recommendation to add animations, indicating a focus on front-end design [15]. Group 9: C - The C version uses the var keyword, indicating a more modern and flexible approach to variable declaration, typical of C developers [15].