Core Viewpoint - Linus Torvalds emphasizes that AI is just another tool in software development, similar to compilers, which enhances productivity without eliminating the need for programmers [1][24]. Group 1: Role and Contributions - Over the past two decades, Torvalds has transitioned from being a programmer to a technical leader and maintainer, primarily observing the progress of Linux and Git rather than actively coding [5][7]. - The core work of long-standing projects like Linux is maintenance and continuous support, with ongoing modifications to the kernel for better organization and stability [9][10]. Group 2: AI and Software Development - AI's role in the Linux kernel is still experimental, with ongoing efforts to utilize AI for patch management and code review, but it has also caused significant disruptions [21][20]. - Despite the hype around AI, Torvalds believes that it will not replace programmers but rather enhance their efficiency and open new development opportunities [24][25]. Group 3: Hardware and Industry Trends - The rise of companies like Nvidia and AMD has shifted focus from traditional CPUs to accelerated processing units (APUs), although Linux remains integral to system maintenance and operation [17][18]. - The involvement of Nvidia in the Linux kernel has increased due to the growing importance of AI in cloud services, marking a positive shift in collaboration [19]. Group 4: Personal Insights and Management Style - Torvalds admits to spending most of his time reviewing emails rather than coding, often not responding unless there are issues, which can lead to a perception of being unapproachable [30][31]. - He encourages finding hobbies outside of work to manage stress, highlighting the importance of engaging in activities where failure is acceptable and can be enjoyable [26][27].

Core Insights - Linus Torvalds emphasizes that he has transitioned from being a programmer to a system maintainer, focusing on overseeing the development of Linux rather than directly coding [4][6][7] - The introduction of AI in software development is viewed as a tool that enhances productivity without replacing programmers, similar to how compilers transformed programming practices [21][25] - The rise of Nvidia and AMD has shifted the hardware focus away from traditional CPUs to accelerated processing units, yet Torvalds believes that general-purpose CPUs remain crucial for Linux [17][18][19] Group 1: Role Transition and Development - Torvalds states that for nearly 20 years, he has not been a programmer but rather a technical leader and maintainer of Linux [4][6] - He notes that the core work of long-standing projects like Linux is maintenance and continuous support, rather than reaching a final completion point [8][9] - The development model of the Linux kernel has remained stable over the past 15 years, although Torvalds has shifted from primarily saying "no" to sometimes saying "yes" to new ideas [10][11] Group 2: AI and Software Development - Torvalds has not personally used AI to assist in coding but acknowledges that others are exploring its application in kernel development [21][23] - He highlights that AI's impact on the Linux community has been largely experimental, with some disruptions caused by AI crawlers affecting kernel.org [20][21] - The potential for AI to enhance productivity is recognized, but it is believed that the need for skilled programmers will persist as new development areas emerge [25][26] Group 3: Hardware Evolution - The conversation notes a significant shift in hardware focus from CPUs to GPUs and APUs, driven by companies like Nvidia and AMD [17][18] - Torvalds argues that while AI and accelerated processors are gaining attention, the role of Linux in managing systems and user interfaces remains vital [18][19] - The involvement of Nvidia in the Linux kernel development is seen as a positive outcome of the AI boom, indicating a growing interest in Linux from hardware manufacturers [19][20]

Core Viewpoint - Linus Torvalds emphasizes that AI is just another tool in software development, similar to compilers, which enhances productivity without eliminating the need for programmers [2][27]. Group 1: Role and Contributions - Linus Torvalds states that he has transitioned from being a programmer to a system maintainer and observer, highlighting that the real contributions come from others in the community [6][9]. - Over the past 35 years, the core work of maintaining and supporting the Linux kernel has become increasingly important, with ongoing modifications to improve code cleanliness and stability [10][11]. Group 2: AI and Software Development - Torvalds has not personally used AI to assist in coding and believes that while AI can enhance productivity, it will not replace programmers [27][25]. - The Linux community is exploring AI's potential in code review and maintenance, but most applications remain experimental and face challenges, such as AI interference with infrastructure [23][22]. Group 3: Hardware and Industry Changes - The rise of Nvidia and AMD has shifted focus from traditional CPUs to accelerated processing units (APUs), although Torvalds maintains that general-purpose CPUs remain crucial for Linux [19][20]. - AI's growth has led to Nvidia's increased involvement in the Linux kernel, which is seen as a positive development for the open-source community [21]. Group 4: Personal Insights and Hobbies - Torvalds shares his experience of building guitar pedals as a hobby to relieve stress, emphasizing the importance of having interests outside of work [29][30]. - He acknowledges that while he spends much of his time reviewing emails, he rarely responds, which may lead to misconceptions about his demeanor [32][34].

"过去将近 20 年里，我其实已经不是程序员了。" "至于我发明的 Git，我现在也只是旁观者的角色。" "我以前常说我的工作就是拒绝（提案），但如今反而要在一些长期维护者的反对声中，对新东西说'同意或者是'。" "Vibe Coding 让人做到了以前做不到的事情，但从维护者视角来看，要维护它生成的代码'可能糟糕透顶了'。" 这些话并非是玩笑话，也非自嘲，而是 Linux 之父、Git 的发明者 Linus Torvalds 在面对技术浪潮时的清醒自白。 本月早些时候，Linus Torvalds 与 Verizon 开源负责人 Dirk Hohndel 在韩国首尔举办的 Linux Foundation 开源峰会上进行了一场对谈。他谈到了自己角色的 转变、谈到了 AI 如何重塑软件开发，以及在越来越多的硬件更多依赖 Nvidia 的专有 GPU 和 CUDA 而不是开源 Linux 时的想法，也谈到了 Rust 在内核团 队引发的冲突，聊到了 kernel.org 被各种 AI 爬虫工具严重干扰的现实困境，还有自己日常面对的压力以及缓解方式。 在 AI 热潮几乎重写开发者命运的当下，Torvalds 坦言 ...

Core Insights - The server operating system market in China is experiencing significant growth, driven by the expansion of the digital economy and the acceleration of digital transformation across enterprises [1][6][8] - The total installed capacity of server operating systems in China is projected to increase from 2.987 million units in 2019 to 5.135 million units by 2024, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.45% [1][8] - The market is dominated by Linux, which holds a 79.6% share, while Windows Server accounts for 19.9% and other systems like Unix only 0.5% [8][10] Industry Overview - Server operating systems are critical for managing and coordinating hardware and software in enterprise IT systems, with major types including Windows Server, Linux, and Unix [1][3] - The industry is supported by a robust ecosystem of companies, including major players like China Software, Kirin Software, and Huawei, focusing on open-source technologies and self-developed capabilities [2][11] Market Growth - The market size of the server operating system industry in China is expected to grow from 4.59 billion yuan in 2019 to 9.4 billion yuan by 2024, reflecting a CAGR of 15.42% [8][9] - The demand for server operating systems is primarily concentrated in sectors such as finance, government, internet, energy, and telecommunications, with finance leading at 21.5% market share [10] Development Trends - The industry is moving towards cloud-native and intelligent architectures, integrating cloud computing and microservices to enhance operational efficiency [14] - There is a growing emphasis on ecosystem development, focusing on full-stack collaboration and open-source innovation to create a sustainable industrial ecosystem [15] - Customization for vertical industries is becoming a key trend, with server operating systems being tailored to meet specific needs in finance, government, and industrial sectors [16]

Core Points - Microsoft has officially blocked the KMS38 activation method, leading to a significant number of users losing access to their activated Windows and Office products overnight [1][3] - KMS38 was widely regarded as a safe and easy way to activate Windows and Office without cost, allowing users to receive official updates [2][3] - The blocking of KMS38 is part of Microsoft's broader strategy to tighten control over its software ecosystem and push users towards Windows 11 [5][6] Group 1 - KMS38 was an open-source activation tool developed by the Massgrave team, known for its simplicity and safety, allowing users to activate Windows and Office without modifying system files [2][3] - Following the latest Patch Tuesday update, all devices relying on KMS38 have lost activation, prompting users to purchase legitimate licenses, with Windows 11 keys starting at approximately $10 and Office 2021 Pro at around $39 [3][4] - Microsoft has removed the main activation option from KMS38 and suggested users consider alternative activation methods like HWID or TSforge, which are still operational [4] Group 2 - The timing of Microsoft's decision to block KMS38 is speculated to be influenced by the retirement of Windows 10, pushing users to upgrade to Windows 11, which has stringent hardware requirements [5][6] - Microsoft has been tightening its policies, having previously blocked offline installation methods for Windows 11, indicating a shift towards a more controlled and cloud-centric ecosystem [6] - The rise of counterfeit versions of KMS38 and associated security risks has prompted Microsoft to take action, as popular tools can easily be mimicked and infected with malware [6][7] Group 3 - As Windows 11 becomes more restrictive, there is a growing interest in alternative operating systems like Linux, with users considering migration due to hardware limitations and the desire to avoid licensing fees [7][8] - The development of Linux desktop systems has accelerated, with improved gaming capabilities and user experiences, leading to a potential shift in user preferences away from Windows [7][8] - While Linux and ChromeOS may not replace Windows overnight, they present viable options for users unwilling to pay for licenses or comply with stringent account management [8]

Hello, welcome to a guide to hardware handoff using the Software Hardware Exchange Loop (SHEL) flow. This video will begin by introducing and describing the SHEL. Then, an XSA will be generated from an AMD Vivado Example design for the VEK385.Using that XSA, a system device tree will then be created. After that, the system device tree will be used to build a custom Linux build and configuration information with the gen-machine-conf command. Lastly, a boot.bin and EDF Linux disk image WIC will be created fro ...

Core Insights - Innovation is viewed as a key strategy for companies to maintain competitiveness and drive new business development, relying on both top-down and bottom-up creative inputs [1][2] - Middle managers play a crucial role in filtering employee ideas before they reach senior leadership, which can enhance efficiency but may also hinder the advancement of valuable ideas [1][2] Research Findings - In initial experiments, it was found that when managers support successful employee ideas, both the manager and employee gain status, but the employee's gain is greater, leading to a relative decline in the manager's status [2] - Conversely, when supported ideas fail, both parties lose status, with managers experiencing a more significant loss compared to the potential gain from successful ideas [2][3] - The phenomenon termed "creative supporter dilemma" indicates that while managers may wish to support employee ideas, they often face status loss in doing so, particularly when ideas fail [3][10] Managerial Considerations - Managers anticipate that supporting successful ideas will lead to a loss of status relative to employees, and they also expect to lose status if they support ideas that fail [4] - This perception of status change can lead managers to reject potentially innovative ideas, despite organizational aspirations for innovation [4][10] Recommended Actions - Companies should establish innovation review teams to evaluate ideas collectively, reducing reliance on individual managers and mitigating personal biases [5][6] - Creating platforms for knowledge sharing can facilitate idea exchange and innovation, similar to successful open-source models [7] - Adjusting managerial incentives to minimize perceived status loss from supporting innovative ideas is crucial, especially for more innovative concepts [8] - Cultivating a culture that embraces learning from failure can help reduce the stigma associated with unsuccessful ideas, as seen in companies like Google and Corning [9][10]

Core Insights - The "Asterinas" open-source operating system won the Best Paper Award at the prestigious SOSP 2025 conference, highlighting its research in high-performance memory management and gaining international academic recognition [1][3] Group 1: Conference and Recognition - SOSP is recognized as the "Olympics" of computer systems, with significant participation from major tech companies like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, making it a key indicator of research excellence in the field [3] - This year's SOSP received 368 submissions, with only 66 accepted, and only three Best Paper Awards were given, underscoring the competitive nature of the conference [1][3] Group 2: Technical Innovations - The award-winning paper, "CortenMM: Efficient Memory Management with Strong Correctness Guarantees," presents a novel technology that addresses long-standing issues in memory management systems, specifically performance bottlenecks and concurrency safety [3][4] - CortenMM eliminates the need for a separate software abstraction layer by implementing a "single-layer abstraction" system architecture, allowing applications to interact directly with hardware-enhanced interfaces, resulting in significant performance improvements [4] Group 3: Performance Metrics - CortenMM's design leads to performance enhancements, achieving up to 26 times the performance of Linux in real-world applications by removing additional synchronization overhead [4] - The research team utilized Rust's safety features and advanced formal verification tools to ensure the correctness of CortenMM's core concurrent code, effectively eliminating complex concurrency vulnerabilities [4] Group 4: Future Developments - The "Asterinas" operating system is set to be open-sourced to global developers in October 2024, with three papers already accepted at top conferences, indicating strong ongoing research and community engagement [5]

Core Insights - Google's Gemini 3.0 Pro has demonstrated the ability to create a fully functional web-based operating system that mimics macOS, Windows, and Linux environments using simple prompts [2][8][14] - The AI's capability to generate complex user interfaces and functionalities has led to significant excitement among users, with many considering it a potential game-changer in programming models [7][8] - Despite the impressive results, some users caution that the generated environments are merely simulations and not true operating systems, highlighting the distinction between emulation and actual implementation [14] Group 1: Gemini 3.0 Pro Capabilities - Gemini 3.0 Pro successfully replicated macOS features, including animations, window minimization, and a functional terminal, all within a single HTML file [2][3] - The AI was also able to create a web version of Windows with similar functionalities, including a text editor, terminal with Python, and a game [8][9] - Users have reported that the AI can generate a fully functional Linux desktop environment as well, showcasing its versatility [12][13] Group 2: User Reactions and Comparisons - Users expressed amazement at the capabilities of Gemini 3.0 Pro, suggesting it could become the strongest programming model to date if the final version meets expectations [7] - Comparisons were made with Claude 4.5 Sonnet, which failed to deliver similar results under the same prompts, emphasizing Gemini's superior performance [10] - The excitement surrounding Gemini 3.0 Pro has led to increased anticipation for its official release, with speculation that it may be announced in the coming months based on the frequency of demo videos [14][15]