Group 1: Core Argument - The essence of capitalism's self-regulation is a misinterpretation; it is a product of class struggle rather than benevolence from the ruling class [2][3] - The welfare state and labor rights are not improvements from capitalism but rather concessions made under pressure from the working class [2][3] - The current state of capitalism is more cunning and financialized than in the 19th century, with unresolved contradictions accumulating globally [4][5] Group 2: Analysis of Financial Systems - The U.S. stock market is characterized as a casino of virtual capital, reflecting the deepening contradictions of capitalism [3][4] - The U.S. national debt is described as the largest form of virtual capital, relying on the exploitation of global labor [6][7] - The proposed "dollar stablecoin" is seen as a misguided attempt to salvage a hollow financial system, leading to further instability [7][8] Group 3: Implications of Dollar Stablecoin - The dollar stablecoin represents a new form of financial colonization, creating a dependency on U.S. financial systems in the digital realm [12][14] - It perpetuates a hidden global seigniorage, extracting value from global users while offering little in return [18][19] - The stablecoin system enhances financial surveillance and control, undermining the autonomy of individuals and nations [20][21] Group 4: Global Economic Dynamics - The dollar stablecoin threatens the monetary sovereignty of developing countries, exacerbating financial instability and inequality [21][22] - A call for international solidarity among the working class is emphasized as a necessary response to the challenges posed by the dollar stablecoin [22][23] - The ultimate solution lies in the abolition of capitalism itself, as monetary systems will always serve as tools of class oppression under capitalism [24][25]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current status and potential of stablecoin usage in Yiwu, China, highlighting the gap between market expectations and actual merchant adoption [1][9]. Group 1: Stablecoin Usage in Yiwu - Yiwu has become a focal point for stablecoin applications in cross-border payments, with estimates suggesting over $10 billion in stablecoin transactions in 2023 [1][9]. - Despite claims of over 3,000 merchants using stablecoins like USDT, many merchants are unaware of stablecoins and express concerns about compliance and costs [1][2][8]. - A small number of merchants show interest in stablecoins, but most still rely on traditional payment methods [7][9]. Group 2: Yiwu International Trade City - Yiwu International Trade City is the largest small commodity distribution center globally, with over 6.4 million square meters of operating space and 75,000 business units [3]. - The city attracts over 560,000 foreign buyers annually, with products exported to 233 countries and regions [3]. Group 3: Advantages and Challenges of Stablecoins - Stablecoins offer advantages such as reduced transaction times (from days to minutes) and lower costs compared to traditional cross-border payment methods [12]. - However, the widespread adoption of stablecoins faces challenges, including the potential loss of export tax rebates and the need for traditional banking data for loans [13][14]. - Merchants are also concerned about the risks associated with stablecoin transactions, such as money laundering and account freezes [14]. Group 4: Regulatory Considerations - Yiwu Small Commodity City is monitoring the regulatory framework for stablecoins in Hong Kong and may apply for a stablecoin license through its cross-border payment platform, Yiwu Pay [16].