Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implementation of a collaborative supervision mechanism by the Shandong Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision to enhance the effectiveness of grassroots oversight and address issues related to local governance and corruption [2][3][5] Group 1: Collaborative Mechanism Implementation - The Shandong Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision initiated a collaborative mechanism after discovering issues related to village-level corruption during a supervision check in Qiji Town, Yanggu County [2] - A joint investigation team was formed, consisting of members from various levels of the disciplinary inspection and supervision bodies, to address the identified issues effectively [2][3] - The province has achieved full coverage of collaborative supervision across all counties, enhancing the overall efficiency of grassroots oversight [2][4] Group 2: Organizational Structure and Functionality - The Shandong Provincial Commission has guided the establishment of collaboration groups within each area, led by county-level commission members, to streamline oversight efforts [3] - The collaborative approach emphasizes a shift from individual efforts to collective action, ensuring that supervision is focused and organized [3][5] - Specific guidelines have been set to prevent the dilution of efforts and to ensure that collaboration is targeted towards significant issues [3] Group 3: Addressing Local Governance Issues - Collaborative supervision has been utilized to identify and address systemic issues within local governance, such as the mismanagement of rural collective assets [4] - The Shandong Provincial Commission has emphasized the importance of integrating various oversight mechanisms to enhance the effectiveness of governance [4][5] - The province has outlined nine specific scenarios where collaborative case handling is necessary, ensuring a unified approach to complex cases [5]

Group 1 - The tourism industry is a pillar for Meizhou Island, and optimizing the business environment is crucial for attracting investors and ensuring a healthy development of the industry [1][2] - The local supervisory committee has identified issues in the tourism market, including illegal solicitation by businesses and inadequate supervision from relevant departments, which affect market order [1] - A special meeting was convened to address these issues, resulting in serious discussions with 12 heads of relevant units and 3 leaders in charge [1] Group 2 - The island features over 600 unique homestays, providing employment for nearly 3,000 island residents [2] - A special supervision initiative in the homestay sector revealed that inadequate policy promotion led to misunderstandings among homestay owners regarding design unit selection [2] - The supervisory committee urged tourism departments to enhance promotional efforts and established three oversight groups to address issues in the homestay approval process, including disorganized procedures and low efficiency [2]

Core Points - The investigation into Jiang Wei, former Party Secretary and President of the China Industrial Bank Hangzhou Financial Research Institute, revealed serious violations of discipline and law, including engaging in superstitious activities and accepting gifts that could influence official duties [1][2] - Jiang Wei's actions were characterized by a loss of ideals and beliefs, corruption in conduct, and abuse of power for personal gain, leading to severe disciplinary actions [1][2] Summary by Categories Disciplinary Violations - Jiang Wei severely violated the Party's political, organizational, integrity, work, and lifestyle disciplines, constituting serious job-related violations and suspected criminal activity [2] - His misconduct included not reporting personal matters truthfully, misusing public funds for personal benefits, and providing assistance to enterprises and individuals in financing and procurement while accepting substantial bribes [1][2] Disciplinary Actions - The China Industrial Bank's Party Committee decided to expel Jiang Wei from the Party and remove him from public office, confiscating his illegal gains [2] - The case has been referred to the prosecutorial authorities for legal examination and prosecution, along with the related assets [2]

Group 1 - The core issue of overdue rent collection in Wangong Community, Quanzhou, Fujian Province has been resolved after years of difficulty, with over 100,000 yuan recovered [1] - The first inspection team of the Licheng District Committee initiated a thorough investigation after residents reported the lack of transparency regarding rental income from a community-owned building rented out as a hotel [1] - The inspection team discovered that the hotel had been withholding rent due to disputes with the community, leading to a loss of state assets, and subsequently urged the hotel to pay all outstanding dues [1] Group 2 - The Licheng District Committee has implemented a "three ones" work mechanism to enhance community inspection coverage, focusing on addressing grassroots corruption and improving asset management [2] - A closed-loop management mechanism has been established for collecting public opinions, which includes on-site visits, recording, and feedback to ensure accountability and traceability of issues [2] - A "three-level assessment" mechanism has been created to monitor and evaluate the progress of problem resolution, ensuring timely handling of disciplinary issues [2] Group 3 - The inspection team has identified and addressed systemic issues such as unclear responsibilities and non-compliance with procedures, leading to the establishment of a rectification accountability mechanism [3] - Since the community inspections began, 180 surveys have been distributed, resulting in over 40 problem leads and 11 issues rectified, with the district's disciplinary committee initiating cases against 9 individuals [3] - The inspections have helped recover nearly 1 million yuan in economic losses for the community, enhancing public perception of the inspection effectiveness [3]

Group 1 - The core issue of misappropriation of collective funds in rural areas has been addressed, with the recovery of over 600,000 yuan and improved transparency in financial management [1] - The disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies in Chongzuo City have focused on issues such as mismanagement of rural collective "three funds," resulting in 145 cases investigated and 132 individuals punished [1] - A special inspection team was formed to ensure timely distribution of dividends from collective funds, recovering over 8.89 million yuan in overdue dividends for collective economic members [1] Group 2 - The use of "big data" has been emphasized to enhance the effectiveness of supervision, with the establishment of online platforms for real-time monitoring of village affairs and collective asset transactions [2] - Efforts are being made to address issues related to the management of rural "three funds," including annual audits and regular supervision, with 855 village economic responsibility audits completed, recovering 885,000 yuan for collective funds [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles is the innovative use of big data by the Shenyang Sujiatun District Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision to address issues related to the misappropriation of subsistence allowances for vulnerable groups [1][2] - A case was uncovered where a village committee member misappropriated subsistence funds intended for a sick individual, highlighting the lack of oversight in the management of these funds over a four-year period [1] - The district's disciplinary body has taken measures to ensure accountability by imposing party disciplinary actions on responsible officials and issuing supervisory recommendations to relevant departments [1] Group 2 - The district's Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision is pushing for the refinement of the "Registration System for Proxy Collection of Assistance Funds" to enhance the regulation of the collection process and supervision mechanisms [2] - A self-inspection initiative has been launched across 12 streets in the district to identify and recover funds from individuals who fraudulently claimed assistance [2] - The overall goal is to ensure that social assistance resources are distributed fairly and to promote a more standardized and rigorous approach to social assistance work in the Sujiatun District [2]

精准分类施治，从共性到个性靶向治。树牢精准理念，准确把握政策策略，精准定性量纪，严格依规依 纪依法开展专项整治。组织行业主管部门召开核查处置研判会，对查办的公职人员违规挂证取酬问题进 行集体会商，综合考虑公职人员身份、挂证时长、取酬金额、主观态度、危害后果等情况，提出恰当的 处理建议，做到定性量纪合理合法。对专项整治前，已停止挂证并清退违纪所得的干部，从轻处理；对 专项整治后，仍顶风违纪、边治边犯的干部，严肃处理。对如实报告问题、取消挂靠并上交违纪所得的 干部，从轻处理；对隐瞒不报、长期挂证、涉及金额较大的干部，严肃处理，做到纪法情理贯通融合。 以案促改促治，从治标到治本强实效。坚持惩治震慑、制度约束、提高觉悟一体发力，实现"查办一起 案件、教育一批干部、完善一套制度、规范一个行业"的综合效果。一是"一书两会"做实以案促改。对 违规挂证取酬系列案件暴露出的共性问题，制发监察建议书，督促主管部门健全完善公职人员持证报 备、廉洁承诺、自查抽查、教育惩戒等制度机制，促进行业规范管理。对问题较为突出的部门，督促及 时召开以案促改会、警示教育会，用身边事教育身边人，筑牢公职人员廉洁防线。二是"一库双审"力求 常态长效。 ...

坚持以常态促落实求长治。政治监督常态化，必须融入日常、做在经常，以常态促落实求长治。芜湖市 建立市委常委会、"四大班子"通气会定期通报党风廉政建设和反腐败斗争形势任务机制，分析研判政治 生态，持续传导责任压力。芜湖市纪委监委统筹"四项监督"，深化"室组地""室组局"联动监督，完 善"书记半年听汇报、分管领导季调度、协管常委月例会"机制，对上级交办、社会关注、重点难点问题 专班推进，持续跟进，校准偏差。落实政治监督闭环管理机制，全程跟踪问效，切实提高政治监督计划 性、有效性、针对性和权威性。依托基层公权力大数据监督平台，构建数据采集、建模分析、发现问 题、预警推送、核查处理、结果反馈"六节点"运行闭环，动态预警分析。扎实开展深入贯彻中央八项规 定精神学习教育，强素质、争先进、树形象，不断提高政治监督本领、提升政治监督质效。（吴祚麓 作者系安徽省芜湖市委常委，市纪委书记、监委主任） 政治监督是督促全党坚持党中央集中统一领导的有力举措，要在具体化、精准化、常态化上下更大功 夫。安徽省芜湖市纪委监委健全政治监督具体化精准化常态化机制，构建"清单+督查+问责"监督体 系，推动习近平总书记重要讲话精神和党中央重大决策部署 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of specialized supervision by disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies to enhance the effectiveness of oversight, focusing on major decisions from the central government and addressing urgent issues faced by the public [1] Group 1: Focus Areas of Supervision - Specialized supervision targets specific areas for concentrated oversight, ensuring strong impact and quick results by selecting appropriate entry points [2] - The focus is on major political directives, aligning supervision with the implementation of significant decisions from the central government, such as the "Four Responsibilities Coordination" mechanism and anti-corruption efforts in rural revitalization and grain purchasing [2][3] - Emphasis is placed on addressing public concerns, such as the management of rural collective assets and issues raised through citizen hotlines, to ensure that supervision is responsive to the needs of the people [3] Group 2: Collaborative Supervision Mechanisms - Establishing collaboration mechanisms with regulatory departments is crucial for integrating supervision into industry governance, enhancing the effectiveness of oversight [4] - Strengthening cooperation with audit, finance, and urban management departments to leverage their expertise for conducting specialized audits and data analysis [5] - Implementing a "room-group-field" linkage mechanism to ensure coordinated supervision across different levels, enhancing the effectiveness of oversight efforts [5] Group 3: Optimizing Supervision Approaches - Emphasizing self-inspection responsibilities among supervisory departments to ensure thorough problem identification and rectification [6] - Focusing on key supervision points by utilizing a systematic approach to identify and categorize issues, ensuring that resources are directed towards critical areas [6][7] - Maintaining a presence in the field through on-site inspections and community engagement to gather real-time feedback and adjust supervision strategies accordingly [7] Group 4: Ensuring Long-term Effectiveness of Supervision - The article advocates for a systematic and comprehensive approach to governance, emphasizing the need for timely recommendations and the closure of institutional loopholes [8] - Prioritizing accountability by swiftly addressing issues identified during supervision and ensuring responsible parties are held accountable [9] - Encouraging problem rectification through detailed action plans and ongoing monitoring to ensure effective resolution of identified issues [9]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexities surrounding the issue of corruption related to former government officials accepting benefits from private companies after retirement, particularly focusing on the case of a former police official and the legal interpretations of such actions [1][2][3]. Basic Case Facts - Qiu, a former deputy director of a city's public security bureau, provided assistance to Liu, the actual controller of a technology and culture company, using his official position from February 2018 to the end of 2021 [2]. - After Qiu's retirement in July 2022, Liu began paying him 100,000 yuan monthly under the guise of research funding, totaling 1.4 million yuan by November 2023, which Qiu used for personal expenses rather than research [2][3]. Divergent Opinions - Three differing opinions exist regarding Qiu's actions: 1. Some argue it constitutes a violation of party discipline for accepting benefits related to his former position [3]. 2. Others believe it amounts to bribery, as Qiu provided benefits to Liu's company while in office and later accepted funds post-retirement [4]. 3. A third view agrees with the second but emphasizes the need for a prior agreement between Qiu and Liu regarding the funds [4][5]. Legal Framework - The article outlines legal precedents indicating that former officials can be prosecuted for accepting benefits if they had previously used their position to benefit the giver and had a prior agreement regarding the benefits [6][7][8]. - The necessity of a "prior agreement" is emphasized, which can be explicit or implicit, to establish the connection between the official's actions while in office and the benefits received post-retirement [9][10]. Analysis of Qiu's Actions - Qiu's actions during his tenure, where he facilitated Liu's business operations, are critical in determining the legality of the funds received after retirement [10]. - The relationship between Qiu and Liu, characterized by mutual assistance and the eventual agreement on post-retirement payments, suggests a potential violation of bribery laws [11][12][13].