胡开恩，湖北省宜都市聂家河镇聂家河社区车湾居民小组住户。 我是国营湖北华中精密仪器厂的退休职工，车湾居民小组有300多位住户，大多是厂里的退休职工和家 属，年龄都偏大。上了年纪，腿脚都不利索，有的拄拐杖，有的甚至要坐轮椅，时常有个头疼脑热的需 要往医院跑。但是，我们这儿离城区20多公里，到镇上最近的卫生院也要走两三公里，看病就医一直是 个"老大难"。 我自己有高血压、糖尿病，时常需要检查、开药，而子女又不在身边，得等到他们回来才能带我上医 院。前一阵，镇纪委干部到这边走访，我抱着试试的态度，反映了就医难题：我们这些老人看病太不方 便了，如果相关部门能想办法让我们在家门口看病就好了。 过了一段时间，镇纪委干部给我打电话，跟我讲了问题进展，镇政府和相关部门将为我们新建立一个医 疗服务点，解决就医不便的问题。 原本只是抱怨两句，没想到接访的镇纪委干部认真作了记录，还仔细询问了我们社区有多少住户、都是 多大年纪、是不是独居老人。其他老邻居也纷纷跟他们说了"看病难"的困扰，他们都仔细记了下来。 镇纪委干部还跟我讲，他们会根据收集到的问题，督促相应责任部门认真解决。 第二天，镇纪委干部和镇卫生院干部一起到社区了解情况，还 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission has issued a notice to strengthen the supervision of risk management and compliance departments within China Construction Bank, emphasizing accountability for non-compliance and the importance of robust compliance management [1][2]. Group 1: Compliance Management - The notice highlights the close relationship between compliance management and anti-corruption efforts, indicating that enhancing supervision of compliance in banking operations is a key measure to promote integrity [1]. - The supervisory body aims to implement a strong management system for compliance, thereby reinforcing the operational compliance framework of China Construction Bank [1]. Group 2: Accountability and Oversight - An analysis of recent disciplinary cases at China Construction Bank reveals that most corruption cases are linked to serious business violations, indicating a need for stricter adherence to regulations [2]. - The supervisory body is working with internal control and compliance departments to address violations through a comprehensive approach that includes investigation, correction, and treatment [2]. - Serious issues identified during supervision will lead to accountability for both direct and leadership responsibilities, enhancing the ability to prevent severe violations and corruption in key areas [2]. Group 3: Credit Compliance Management - The supervisory body is promoting the establishment of long-term mechanisms for managing major credit violations, including processes for investigation and accountability [3]. - There is a shift from post-incident accountability based on credit losses to real-time accountability based on credit violations, which aims to strengthen the rigidity of credit management systems and reduce opportunities for power abuse [3].

"行政审批流程繁琐、资源要素保障不足等严重制约输变电产业高质量发展。"此前，崇仁县纪委监委深 入输变电企业开展调研，分析出制约输变电产业发展的3类19个问题，并督促相关部门积极作为，推进 问题整改。针对部分企业反映办证审批流程繁琐等情况，县纪委监委及时将相关问题反馈给高新区管委 会及相关职能部门，督促立行立改。在监督推动下，高新区健全完善"线上信息归集+线下主动帮办"联 通机制，设立输变电"全产业链审批"服务专区，为企业提供全流程"一站式"服务，并设立"帮办代办"工 作站，输变电企业开办时间由3个工作日压缩至1个工作日。 为进一步优化营商环境，崇仁县纪委监委严查营商环境领域不正之风和腐败问题，深入纠治作风顽疾， 推动相关职能部门改进作风、优化服务。该县纪委监委全面起底近年来的问题线索，严肃查处输变电产 业项目实施、资金使用及政策落实过程中吃拿卡要、截留挪用、贪污侵占等行为。在查处崇仁高新区党 工委原副书记陈某某利用职权吃拿卡要、收受企业钱物，并通过虚构项目、虚假验收等方式贪污项目资 金等问题后，该县纪委监委督促高新区及相关部门举一反三、以案促改促治，推动完善项目监督管理、 人员轮岗、涉企执法、行政审批等制度2 ...

近日，在重庆市万州区余家镇"以案四说"警示教育大会上，该镇纪委对九龙村3名村干部利用职务便利 侵占征地补偿款的严重违纪违法行为进行了深刻剖析。"这3名村干部严重违纪违法案问题线索来源于巡 察发现，这是我区提升对村（社区）巡察质效，着力发现问题的一个缩影。"万州区委巡察办副主任介 绍。 万州区探索创新巡察方式方法，推动巡察组与纪检监察、组织、信访、农业农村等部门强化联动协同， 聚焦群众身边不正之风和腐败问题集中整治，着力发现并推动查处村（社区）干部以权谋私、贪污侵 占、截留挪用、虚报冒领、吃拿卡要、优亲厚友等违纪违法问题。六届区委第七轮巡察以来，已移交村 （社区）干部问题线索50件。 万州区还将村（社区）巡察整改情况纳入巡察整改成效评估指标体系，紧盯"方案制定、进展报送、实 地评估"三个关键点，实施精准预警与发函督办，确保监督成效。"我们将持续探索创新，不断完善巡察 工作机制，让巡察利剑高悬，守护好群众切身利益。"万州区委巡察办主要负责同志表示。（重庆市纪 委监委 || 责任编辑 刘靖晗） 巡前，组织纪检监察、组织、信访等部门"面对面"开展情况通报，了解被巡察党组织政治生态、主要廉 政风险点、信访反映等情况，据 ...

article 27 2019-05-11 11:12:10 THE WILL 黑龙江省齐齐哈尔市纪委监委紧盯开发区产业政策落实、资金使用等关键环节强化政治监督，护航开发区高质量发展。图为该市富拉尔基区纪检监察干部在 富拉尔基经济开发区走访了解产业链升级项目有关情况。崔明太 摄 政治监督是督促全党坚持党中央集中统一领导的有力措施，必须做到党中央重大决策部署到哪里，政治监督就跟进到哪里。黑龙江省齐齐哈尔市纪委监委准 确把握政治监督在强国建设、民族复兴中的定位和作用，始终把践行"两个维护"作为根本遵循，自觉融入经济社会发展大局，以系统思维谋篇布局，以创新 举措破解难题，以严实作风狠抓落实，推动政治监督向实发力、向深拓展，在护航党中央决策部署落地见效中彰显监督实效。 构建工作推进体系，凝聚协同监督合力 坚持问题导向、目标导向、结果导向相统一，深化运用台账管理工作机制，建立动态监督台账，通过"更新—跟踪—反馈—销号"的闭环管理，确保政治监督 有的放矢、推进有序。 围绕重大决策部署落实，建立"重点任务类"监督台账。建立年度政治监督工作子台账，坚持"任务清单化、清单项目化、项目责任化"，分级分类列明23类73 项监督重点 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of case quality as a standard for evaluating the standardization, legalization, and normalization of disciplinary inspection and supervision work [1] - The case review department in Nanjing's Qinhuai District actively collaborates with relevant departments to enhance case quality, thereby promoting high-quality development in disciplinary inspection and supervision [1] - The department focuses on early intervention in serious violations, providing guidance on evidence standards and procedural connections to improve case handling [1] Group 2 - The case review department establishes clear standards and guidelines for handling common disciplinary violations, issuing operational guidelines that include 39 requirements to ensure quality control [2] - The department utilizes self-check lists and feedback reports to promote proactive quality management and corrective actions post-case resolution [2] - Regular evaluations and cross-checks with other districts are conducted to systematically address issues affecting case quality [2] Group 3 - The department emphasizes the importance of case reviews and practical training to enhance the capabilities of personnel involved in case handling [3] - By analyzing past complex cases, the department aims to refine strategies and broaden case handling approaches, avoiding narrow focus on individual cases [3] - Continuous research into corruption-prone areas is conducted to identify root causes and propose comprehensive measures to combat corruption [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Guo, a former director of a supply and marketing cooperative, who is implicated in serious violations of party regulations, including excessive hospitality and corruption, leading to his expulsion from the party and criminal prosecution for bribery and embezzlement [1][5]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - Guo joined the Communist Party in April 2003 and held various positions, including director of the supply and marketing cooperative in B Town, A County. In 2022, during the liquidation of the cooperative, it was found that Guo had not performed his duties adequately, leading to his dismissal [2][3]. Violations of Regulations - From October 2020 to July 2021, the cooperative, under Guo's direction, violated regulations by providing cigarettes and high-end alcohol during business receptions, totaling 18,800 yuan. Guo is directly responsible for these actions [3][11][14]. Criminal Charges - Guo is charged with bribery for accepting 1,142,000 yuan from a real estate company between 2005 and 2009, and embezzlement for misappropriating 627,000 yuan of public funds from 2015 to 2017, which he later returned [3][5][17]. Investigation and Disciplinary Actions - The A County Discipline Inspection Commission initiated an investigation on July 19, 2024, leading to Guo's expulsion from the party on September 27, 2024, and subsequent criminal prosecution for bribery and embezzlement [4][5]. Court Proceedings - On June 6, 2025, the A County People's Court sentenced Guo to five years in prison and imposed fines totaling 200,000 yuan for his crimes, with the judgment already in effect [6]. Definition of State Staff - The article discusses whether Guo qualifies as a state worker, concluding that he is considered a public servant due to his appointed role in the cooperative, which was managed under state guidelines [7][10]. Misconduct in Hospitality - The cooperative's management established strict rules against excessive hospitality, which Guo violated by approving inappropriate expenses during receptions, reflecting a broader issue of misconduct in public service [11][12][13]. Calculation of Bribery Amounts - Guo's acceptance of bribes was calculated at 1,142,000 yuan, with the article explaining that returning funds after being investigated does not negate the crime of bribery [15][18].

Core Points - The article emphasizes the importance of strict adherence to regulations against the misuse of public funds for tourism, highlighting the ongoing efforts to combat this issue within the Communist Party of China [4][5][12] Group 1: Regulations and Disciplinary Actions - The article outlines specific behaviors classified as violations, including using public funds for tourism under the guise of training or research, altering official travel itineraries for personal leisure, and participating in activities organized by subordinate units that serve as a cover for tourism [5][10][11] - Disciplinary measures for violations vary based on severity, ranging from warnings to expulsion from the Party, depending on the circumstances and impact of the misuse of funds [12][13] Group 2: Historical Context and Evolution of Regulations - The article traces the evolution of the disciplinary regulations regarding public fund misuse, noting significant amendments made in 2003, 2015, and 2018 to address emerging issues and clarify definitions of misconduct [7][9] - The 2023 revision further specifies the responsibilities of direct and leadership personnel in relation to violations, reinforcing accountability [7][13] Group 3: Identification and Accountability - The article stresses the need for precise identification of responsible parties, focusing on direct and leadership roles in the organization of public fund misuse activities [13][14] - It highlights the subjective aspect of violations, indicating that intentional misconduct is a key factor in determining accountability [14]

陕西省大荔县纪委监委坚持强化全面从严治党政治责任，推动健全各负其责、统一协调的管党治党责任 格局，着力构建系统集成、协同高效的监督网络，持续推进全面从严治党向基层延伸、向群众身边延 伸。 推动各类监督贯通协同。坚持系统观念，持续完善以党内监督为主导、各类监督贯通协调机制，深化纪 检监察监督与人大监督、民主监督、司法监督、群众监督、舆论监督等各类监督的贯通联动，健全完善 线索移送、措施配合、成果共享等工作机制，促进力量整合、程序契合、工作融合。强化"纪巡审"联动 监督，制定深化纪检监察监督与巡察监督、审计监督贯通协同工作办法，与巡察机构、审计机关建 立"绿色通道"，综合考虑巡察间隔时间和审计频次、业务板块等因素，找准"纪巡审"联动契合点，建立 问题线索移送、信息互联互通、监督成果共用等制度机制，着力提升联动监督质效。整合村级监督力 量，选派25名镇纪检监察干部担任村纪检委员，171名村纪检委员兼任村务监督委员会主任，将监督触 角延伸到群众身边，推动解决群众急难愁盼问题。（潘宏伟 作者系陕西省大荔县委常委，县纪委书 记、监委主任） 督促落实主体责任。大荔县纪委监委积极履行协助职责，协助县委完善县委常委会领导班子及 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening grassroots supervision in the context of anti-corruption efforts, highlighting the need for optimized structures and enhanced effectiveness in grassroots disciplinary inspection and supervision [1]. Group 1: Strengthening Supervision System - The establishment of a comprehensive supervision system is crucial, integrating various supervisory forces such as inspection, auditing, and financial oversight to enhance grassroots supervision [2]. - A new mechanism for integrated supervision and case handling has been implemented, dividing the area into two zones for better coordination among 12 towns, 6 disciplinary inspection offices, and 9 stationed inspection teams [2]. - The role of village-level disciplinary committee members is being emphasized, with measures taken to ensure effective coverage and problem identification, resulting in 52 problem leads discovered this year, with 35 cases filed [2]. Group 2: Enhancing Case Handling - The approach of "case handling as the most effective supervision" is being reinforced, with district-level leadership providing guidance to local committees on case management [3]. - A collective judgment mechanism has been established to enhance collaboration among various departments, ensuring thorough scrutiny of key elements in case handling [3]. - The strategy includes leveraging existing cases to uncover additional leads, exemplified by a bribery case that led to the investigation of 30 individuals and the detention of 7 [3]. Group 3: Deepening Rectification and Governance - The integration of grassroots supervision with the rectification of local corruption issues is being prioritized, focusing on the implementation of policies related to rural revitalization and public welfare [4]. - Continuous monitoring of issues in critical areas such as education, healthcare, and food safety is being conducted, with strict actions against corruption and misappropriation [4]. - An information platform is being utilized for online supervision of rectification processes, with accountability measures in place for ineffective responses [4].