9月29日，清华大学保卫处微信公众号"平安清华"发布关于严禁违规报备、违规载客入校的 警示通报： 近期，学校发生多起校内人员违规报备、违规载客入校的情况，部分人员参与"黑导""黄 牛"活动牟利，严重扰乱校园秩序、影响校园安全。学校已联动公安机关，依法依规依纪对 相关人员作出处理。现将典型案例进行通报，望全体人员引以为戒，遵守校园管理规定，共 同维护平安和谐的校园环境。 【案例一】一教职工与校外黑导勾连，通过违规报备方式组织团队入校参观并非法牟利，涉 案金额大，被公安机关依法行政拘留10日。根据学校相关管理规定，经研究决定，对该教 职工予以解聘处理。 【案例二】一教职工在网上发布招揽游客信息，其家属通过校内有证车辆搭载游客入校并非 法牟利，涉案人数多，其本人及家属均被公安机关依法行政拘留7日。根据学校相关管理规 定，目前已取消其校园车证及家属入校权限，后续将依规依纪进行处理。 【案例三】一学生在匿名交流平台看到预约入校研学的"求助帖"，后联系发帖人及自称研 学机构工作人员的非法中介，为20余名校外人员违规报备入校并牟利；因预约系统数量限 制，该学生还通过该平台招募"下线"，组织其他同学共同为校外人员报备入校并支 ...

手机屏幕前，"玄学大师"解读命理，声称掌握"奇门遁甲"的秘术，能够助人聚财气、旺家 庭、通事业、挡大灾。屏幕后，这些所谓的"大师"，却是一个分工明确的诈骗团伙，兜 售"天价课程"。 近日，江苏泰州姜堰警方打掉一个"玄学大师"诈骗团伙， 抓获犯罪嫌疑人71名，冻结涉案 资金2000余万元，来自全国10余个省份的3000余人被骗。 今年6月，江苏泰州市姜堰区居民傅女士在手机上看到一个免费算命的广告，声称只要提供 姓名等个人信息，就能免费获取学习课程，替家人挡病消灾。当时，傅女士的爱人身体抱 恙，于是她便添加了"算命大师"的微信。 泰州市公安局姜堰分局天目山派出所副所长 储玥飞： 一听说子女有危险，傅阿姨着急了， 立即支付了19800元。可后来"大师"又说，想要消灾得带10万元现金到指定地方，他们安 排专人作法破解。 听到又要10万元，傅女士慌了神，家人看出异常，问清情况后赶紧带她到派出所报警。姜 堰警方调查发现，一个披着"玄学"的外衣，用欺骗诱导方式进行诈骗的犯罪团伙逐渐浮出 水面。 很快，办案民警分赴全国多地，捣毁诈骗窝点2处，抓获陈某、王某等犯罪嫌疑人71名，当 场扣押涉案物品800多件，冻结涉案账户146个 ...

9月29日， 广西北海市合浦县应急管理局发布情况通报： 近日，网络上流传"合浦某月饼厂工人掉进机器，几天后才被发现""做出来的月饼被卖出去 了"等信息，经调查，相关传言纯属谣言，严重误导公众，造成极其不良的社会影响。 2025年9月6日10时56分，合浦县浦缘丰食品有限公司调试设备过程中发生一起安全生产 事故，一名员工操作不慎，手臂被面粉搅拌机卷入，头部夹伤，经抢救无效死亡。事故发生 后，我局和属地乡镇政府、派出所第一时间赶往事故现场，组织开展事故应急处置和调查等 工作。 事故发生时，该企业尚未开始生产月饼，事故发生后，我局第一时间责令企业停产整顿，至 今未恢复生产，不存在网传情况。 据 极目新闻， 9月28日晚，有网友在微信群内发文称，广西北海合浦县一家食品厂发生安 全生产事故，有工人掉入月饼机器内，做出的月饼已经被售出。 聊天记录截图 聊天记录中，该网友还发布了一张截图。截图文件显示，9月8日下午，合浦县应急委办组 织召开全县2025年食品加工企业事故警示教育会议，深刻汲取合浦县某食品加工企 业"9•6"机械伤害事故教训。这个聊天记录中，网友还表示不要买合浦的月饼。 9月29日，合浦县应急局工作人员称，针 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a controversy involving the sale of a mooncake product containing a banned additive, sodium dehydroacetate, at a RT-Mart store in Shenyang, which has raised consumer concerns about food safety and product labeling [2][5][8]. Group 1: Product Controversy - A consumer discovered that the ingredient list of the purchased Xin Siqi Five-Nut Mooncake included "sodium dehydroacetate," which is prohibited in certain food products [5][8]. - RT-Mart staff claimed that the presence of "sodium dehydroacetate" was due to an error in copying last year's information [5][8]. - Despite the controversy, five types of Xin Siqi mooncakes are still available for sale online at RT-Mart, with the Five-Nut Mooncake currently sold out [10][11]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - Sodium dehydroacetate is classified as a low-toxicity, high-efficiency broad-spectrum food preservative, effective against molds and yeasts, but long-term excessive intake can harm human health [7]. - The National Health Commission removed sodium dehydroacetate from the list of permitted additives in certain baked goods, including mooncakes, effective February 8, 2025 [8]. Group 3: Company Performance and Issues - RT-Mart's parent company, Gao Xin Retail, has faced declining performance, with total revenue of 88.13 billion yuan in the 2022 fiscal year, a 7.7% year-on-year decrease, and a net loss of 739 million yuan [16]. - In the 2024 fiscal year, revenue further declined to 72.57 billion yuan, a 13.26% drop, with losses reaching 1.605 billion yuan [17][18]. - The company has been criticized for product quality issues, with over 7,000 complaints on consumer platforms regarding expired or spoiled products [13][19]. Group 4: Management Changes and Strategic Shifts - In February 2025, Dehong Capital acquired a controlling stake in Gao Xin Retail, leading to significant management changes and restructuring efforts [18]. - RT-Mart has streamlined its operations by reducing its five operational regions to four and has been focusing on new store formats, such as the RT-Mart Super and M membership stores [21].

Core Viewpoint - Dalian Wanda Group and its legal representative Wang Jianlin have been restricted from high consumption due to economic disputes involving subsidiary project companies, with ongoing negotiations for resolution [2][5]. Group 1: Legal and Financial Issues - Dalian Wanda Group has a new execution target of over 400 million yuan, with the case filed in Beijing Financial Court on September 8, 2025 [4]. - This is not the first instance of high consumption restrictions for Dalian Wanda this year; in July, Dalian Wanda Commercial Management Group and its legal representative were also restricted due to a construction contract dispute [5]. Group 2: Company Background - Dalian Wanda Group was established in September 1992, with a registered capital of 1 billion yuan, and its business scope includes import and export of goods and technology, as well as general domestic trade [5]. Group 3: Asset Sales and Financial Strategies - To alleviate financial pressure, Wang Jianlin has taken various measures, including the sale of assets. In May 2023, a consortium was approved to acquire 48 Wanda Plaza locations across 39 cities [7]. - Wang Jianlin has sold shares in Wanda Film multiple times, losing actual control over the company, and has also sold over 25 Wanda Plazas and stakes in international assets [7][8]. - In April 2025, Wang sold 100% of Wanda Hotel Management Company for 2.49 billion yuan and is preparing to sell 30% of Quick Money Financial for 240 million yuan [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a serious product safety incident involving Bear Electric, which has led to significant public scrutiny and concerns regarding the company's product quality and safety standards [3][5][19]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On September 27, a consumer reported that a Bear Electric health pot exploded, resulting in severe burns to a one-year-old child, with 40% of the body affected [5][19]. - The child underwent emergency surgery on September 24 and will require further skin grafting and scar treatment [5][19]. - Bear Electric's customer service stated they are investigating the incident and emphasized their commitment to product safety, claiming that all products undergo multiple safety tests before leaving the factory [7][19]. Group 2: Company Background and Financial Performance - Bear Electric was established in March 2006 and specializes in creative small appliances, launching its brand "Bear" [9]. - The company went public in 2019 and has seen a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 20% in revenue from 2016 to 2023 [9]. - For the first half of 2025, Bear Electric reported total revenue of 2.535 billion yuan, an increase of 18.94% year-on-year, and a net profit of 205 million yuan, up 27.32% [9]. Group 3: Product Quality Issues - Despite high growth, Bear Electric faces significant challenges with cost and profit imbalances, particularly in personal care appliances and overseas markets, where costs surged by 489.35% and 139.60%, respectively, leading to declines in gross margins [10]. - The company has a history of product quality issues, being frequently reported for non-compliance and quality problems by regulatory authorities [16][19]. - Complaints from consumers regarding product quality, safety hazards, and poor after-sales service have been prevalent, with 1,307 complaints recorded on the Black Cat complaint platform [19][20].

Core Viewpoint - The company Shenzhen Jiangtuo Commerce Co., Ltd. decided to cancel the previously planned work on September 27, 2025, after employee complaints to the labor department regarding the adjustment of work schedules due to a typhoon, leading to a change in the company's vacation policy [2][3][4]. Group 1: Company Actions and Decisions - Shenzhen Jiangtuo initially planned to have employees work on September 27 to compensate for the time lost due to Typhoon "Hagupit" [3]. - Following employee complaints, the company announced that September 27 would remain a holiday, but it would cancel the 14-day annual leave benefit and all additional holidays [4]. - The company emphasized that it has always complied with national regulations since its establishment in 2018 and has provided various holiday benefits [4]. Group 2: Employee Reactions and Legal Context - Employee complaints led to a discussion with the labor department, which required the company to adhere to the normal Saturday holiday schedule [4]. - Some employees expressed support for the company, while others raised concerns about the potential impact of frequent schedule changes on their lives [4]. - Legal experts indicated that the company's cancellation of annual leave could be unlawful, as it contradicts the provisions of the Labor Law regarding paid annual leave [6].

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident involving Longjiang Airlines' flight LT4391, which was rescheduled to depart 15 hours earlier, has raised significant concerns regarding passenger rights and airline responsibilities in the event of major schedule changes [2][4][5]. Group 1: Incident Details - On September 26, Longjiang Airlines' flight LT4391 from Harbin to Hailar was rescheduled to depart at 6:10 AM instead of the original time of 9:55 PM, resulting in a 15-hour advance [7]. - Affected passenger, Ms. Zhou, expressed frustration over the drastic change, stating it forced her to alter her travel plans significantly, including needing to stay overnight in Harbin [4]. Group 2: Airline Response - Longjiang Airlines' customer service indicated that the schedule change was due to company planning and that notifications were sent to affected passengers [5]. - The airline offered to assist passengers with one free change to other self-operated flights or a full refund through the ticketing platform, but did not provide compensation for additional incurred costs [5]. Group 3: Legal Perspective - Legal expert Fu Jian from Henan Zejin Law Firm argued that a 15-hour schedule change constitutes a significant alteration, warranting compensation for passengers affected by the change [10]. - According to regulations, airlines are required to accommodate passengers without additional fees in cases of involuntary ticket changes due to the airline's reasons, and they may also be liable for other reasonable losses incurred by passengers [10].

Core Viewpoint - The investigation by Jiangsu Consumer Protection Committee reveals that third-party train ticket platforms' "acceleration packages" do not effectively increase ticket purchasing success rates, as all requests must ultimately queue through the official 12306 system [2][4][6]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - Nine third-party platforms were investigated, all claiming that purchasing "acceleration packages" could enhance ticket success rates, but the actual experience showed that 12306 was the first to issue tickets [2]. - Prices for these "acceleration packages" range from 48 to 60 yuan, marketed under names like "all-in-one ticket" and "worry-free ticket" [2][7]. - 12306's official response indicates that they do not provide acceleration services and have not authorized third-party platforms, which cannot guarantee faster ticket acquisition [4][6]. Group 2: Customer Responses and Behavior - Despite over 30% of surveyed consumers expressing doubts about the effectiveness of "acceleration packages," many still purchase them due to anxiety over ticket availability [11]. - Consumers indicated that the pressure to secure tickets leads them to consider these packages, even when they are aware of their questionable efficacy [11]. Group 3: Legal Perspectives - Legal experts suggest that if third-party platforms exaggerate the effectiveness of "acceleration packages," they may be guilty of false advertising and could face legal consequences [13][14]. - The potential for these services to disrupt fair competition and market order raises concerns about their legality and ethical implications [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case in Hangzhou where a man was convicted of dangerous driving after using an "intelligent driving device" while intoxicated, leading to a 20-minute period of the vehicle operating without a driver in the main seat [2][4][10]. Group 1: Incident Details - On September 13, a car was found stopped in the middle of the road with the driver absent from the main seat, prompting bystanders to call the police [3]. - The vehicle's owner, identified as Wang, had moved from the driver's seat to the passenger seat while the car was in motion, with the vehicle operating for 20 minutes without a driver [4][8]. - Wang's blood alcohol content was measured at 114.5 mg/100ml, indicating he was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the incident [4]. Group 2: Technology and Regulations - The vehicle involved was equipped with a Level 2 intelligent driving assistance system, which requires the driver to remain engaged and ready to take control [6][10]. - Wang used a device known as "intelligent driving gadget" to trick the system into believing he was still in control, allowing the vehicle to operate autonomously [10][12]. - According to national standards, Level 2 automation requires the driver to supervise the system and be ready to intervene, which Wang failed to do [10]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - The court found Wang guilty of dangerous driving, resulting in a sentence of one month and fifteen days of detention, along with a fine of 4,000 yuan [10]. - The case underscores the legal responsibilities associated with the use of intelligent driving technologies, emphasizing that both manufacturers and users may face legal repercussions [18]. Group 4: Market Implications - The article notes that such "intelligent driving gadgets" are readily available for purchase online, raising concerns about their impact on road safety [12][13]. - The local prosecutor's office plans to enhance regulatory measures and public awareness regarding the safe use of intelligent driving technologies [17].