本报讯（记者 陈佳琳 通讯员 姚佳 舒政）1月26日早晨7时04分，D914次列车抵达上海站。旅客陆续下 车后，列车长吴佳雯如往常一样巡视车厢。在6号车厢27号铺位下方，她发现一个被遗忘的黑色行李 箱。箱子异常沉重，她与乘务员合力才将其抬至餐车。 在上海铁路公安处乘警的全程录像见证下，行李箱被打开，里面竟整整齐齐码着十来包黄金饰品，每包 大约1000克，共计12公斤。 7时半左右，旅客回了电话，声音很着急。原来他们是珠宝公司的，带了7箱展品来上海参展，下车时新 员工不小心把最重要的一箱黄金落车上了。旅客说已经让同事赶回车站，希望能直接取回。吴佳雯理解 他们的急切，但也清楚地知道，这么贵重的东西不能随便交接。她建议按规定通知车站和公安，旅客却 更着急了："要是走公安流程，今天上午的布展就来不及了。" 听着旅客恳切的语气，吴佳雯立刻和上海铁路公安处乘警支队取得联系。接报后，乘警支队启动简易程 序，派员陪同车长现场进行发还。一小时后，旅客的同事赶到上海站，经仔细核对确认无误后。现场办 完交接手续，旅客的同事连声道谢："真的太感谢了，您这样既按规定办事，又帮我们节省了时间。" 铁路部门再次提醒广大旅客：乘车时请务必清 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the Panama Canal port controversy, where the Chinese government has initiated countermeasures against Panama's Supreme Court ruling that revoked the port concession rights of a Hong Kong company, impacting China-Panama relations [1][3] - The Chinese government has requested state-owned enterprises to suspend negotiations on new projects with Panama, potentially jeopardizing billions of dollars in investments [3] - China's customs have intensified inspections on imports from Panama, signaling dissatisfaction and warning of consequences if Panama continues to confront China [3] Group 2 - The situation is influenced by external forces, particularly the U.S., which had anticipated the Supreme Court's decision and indicated plans for Maersk to take over the port, revealing intentions to diminish China's influence in Latin America [5] - The relationship between the Panama government and the U.S. is viewed as a short-term strategy that could lead to significant risks if not managed carefully [5] - The ongoing geopolitical dynamics highlight that Panama's decisions are not merely commercial disputes but involve deeper geopolitical relationships, testing the spirit of national contracts [7]

Core Viewpoint - The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) has announced the qualification pre-qualification documents for the development of two new container terminals and a 76-kilometer energy pipeline, following a ruling by the Panama Supreme Court that deemed the concession of the ports operated by Hutchison unconstitutional, which may cause concern among potential investors [3][11]. Energy Pipeline Project - The first project involves the construction of a pipeline approximately 76 kilometers long, capable of transporting 2.5 million barrels of products such as propane, butane, and ethane daily [4][12]. Container Terminal Project - The second project includes the development of the Corozal and Telfers container terminals, aimed at increasing Panama's container throughput to 5 to 6 million TEUs annually through phased development of new, independent, and competitive terminals, thereby enhancing Panama's status as a globally competitive multimodal hub [5][12]. Qualification Requirements - The qualification requirements (RFQ) will assess applicants' operational and project development experience, as well as their environmental and social management experience and financial information. For the pipeline project, applicants must provide details of comparable projects from the past 15 years, while applicants for the new terminals must list at least six terminals operated in the past year and have developed a terminal project of at least 1 million TEUs in the past 10 years [3][11]. Timeline for the Projects - The qualification pre-qualification process will conclude on April 8, 2026. The second phase is expected to take 4 to 6 months, followed by 3 to 4 months for bidding, and another 3 to 4 months for evaluation. The entire process from the start of the qualification pre-qualification is anticipated to take 14 months [3][11]. Temporary Management of Port Operations - APM Terminals, a subsidiary of Maersk Group, will temporarily manage the operations of the ports following the Supreme Court ruling. Analyst Lars Jensen noted that this temporary management does not automatically give Maersk an advantage in the upcoming bidding process, emphasizing that the bidding will be open to global operators [8][15]. Arbitration by Cheung Kong - Cheung Kong Holdings announced that its subsidiary, Panama Ports Company, will actively seek arbitration against the Republic of Panama in response to the Supreme Court ruling. The board expressed strong opposition to the ruling and will continue to consult legal advisors while reserving all rights, including pursuing further domestic and international legal proceedings [9][16].

2月5日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。 林剑。图源：外 交部网站 总台央视记者：中方多次就巴拿马最高法院裁定香港长和集团持有巴拿马运河两端港口运营权违宪表 示，中方将坚决维护中方企业正当合法权益。请问中方下步将采取什么措施？是否已同巴方就港口下步 运营进行沟通？ 林剑：中方此前已就巴拿马有关港口问题多次阐明立场。日前，中国国务院港澳事务办公室发布文章， 指出巴拿马最高法院有关裁决罔顾事实、背信弃义，严重损害中国香港企业合法权益，强调中国政府坚 定维护中国企业正当合法权益。你可以查阅。 总台央视记者：追问一下，据报道，针对巴拿马最高法院的裁决，长和集团4日发表公告表示，强烈反 对巴方有关裁决，将就此发起国际仲裁，并保留进一步诉诸法律程序的权利。中方对此有何评论？ 林剑：刚才我已经阐明了中方的立场。中方将坚决维护中国企业正当合法权益。 今日俄罗斯记者：2月4日立春节气当天，俄中两国元首举行视频通话。据俄罗斯总统助理乌沙科夫表 示，应中国领导人邀请，普京总统计划在2026年上半年对中国进行访问。请问中方能否提供更多信息？ 林剑：昨天，习近平主席同普京总统举行视频会晤，就双边关系和共同关心的国际和地区热点问题深入 ...

转自：智通财经 【外交部：巴拿马最高法院有关裁决罔顾事实 背信弃义】智通财经2月5日电，外交部发言人林剑主持2 月5日例行记者会。会上有记者提问称：中方多次就巴拿马最高法院裁定香港长和集团持有巴拿马运河 两端港口运营权违宪，表示中方将坚决维护中方企业正当合法权益，请问中方下一步将会采取什么样的 措施？是否已同巴方就港口下步运营进行沟通？ 林剑对此表示，中方此前已就巴拿马有关港口的问题 多次阐明立场。日前中国国务院港澳事务办公室发布文章指出，巴拿马最高法院的有关裁决罔顾事实， 背信弃义，严重损害中国香港企业合法权益，强调中国政府坚定维护中国企业的正当合法权益，你可以 查阅。 有记者提问称：据报道，针对巴拿马最高法院的裁决，4号长和集团发表公告表示，强烈反对巴 方的有关裁决，将就此发起国际仲裁，并保留诉诸进一步法律程序的权利。那么中方对此有何评论？ 林剑对此表示，刚才我已经阐明了中方的立场，中方将坚决维护中国企业的正当合法权益。（环球网） ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly supports the rights of Chinese enterprises, particularly in response to the Panama Supreme Court's ruling against Hong Kong's CK Hutchison Holdings regarding port operations at both ends of the Panama Canal [1] Group 1: Government Response - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has reiterated its position on the Panama Supreme Court's ruling, emphasizing that the decision disregards facts and undermines the legitimate rights of Hong Kong enterprises [1] - The State Council's Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office has issued a statement condemning the ruling as a betrayal and a serious infringement on the rights of Chinese companies [1] Group 2: Company Actions - CK Hutchison Holdings has expressed strong opposition to the Panama Supreme Court's ruling and announced plans to initiate international arbitration while reserving the right to pursue further legal actions [1]

有记者追问：据报道，针对巴拿马最高法院的裁决，4日，长和集团发表公告表示强烈反对巴方有关裁 决，将就此发起国际仲裁，并保留诉诸进一步法律程序的权利。中方对此有何评论? 林剑：刚才我已经阐明了中方的立场，中方将坚决维护中国企业正当合法权益。 （文章来源：中国新闻网） 中国外交部发言人林剑5日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：中方多次就巴拿马最高法院裁定香港长和集团持有巴拿马运河两端港口运营权"违宪"表 示，中方将坚决维护中方企业正当合法权益。请问中方下步将采取什么措施?是否已同巴方就港口下步 运营进行沟通? 林剑：中方此前已就巴拿马有关港口的问题多次阐明立场。日前，中国国务院港澳事务办公室发布文 章，指出巴拿马最高法院的有关裁决罔顾事实、背信弃义，严重损害中国香港企业的合法权益，强调中 国政府坚定维护中国企业的正当合法权益，你可以查阅。 ...

林剑表示，中方将坚决维护中国企业的正当合法权益。（央视新闻） 每经AI快讯，2月5日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。记者提问，据报道，针对巴拿马最高法院 裁决长和集团在巴特许经营合同违宪，4日，长和集团发表公告表示强烈反对巴方有关裁决，将就此发 起国际仲裁，并保留诉诸进一步法律程序的权利。中方对此有何评论? ...

Core Viewpoint - The sudden shutdown of the key canal ports has resulted in a loss of billions for the company, sparking a global outcry over the Panamanian government's decision [1] Group 1: Company Response - The company has strongly opposed the Panamanian ruling and announced plans to initiate domestic litigation and international arbitration, demonstrating a firm stance against the unexpected pressure [3] - The ports in question, Balboa and Cristobal, are crucial to the company's global operations, and the unexpected loss of operating rights has jeopardized future revenue projections, potentially amounting to hundreds of billions [5] - The company argues that the ruling contradicts both the contract and local laws, highlighting that previous audits confirmed compliance with contractual obligations [5] Group 2: Political and Geopolitical Context - The abrupt change in the Panamanian government's stance appears to be influenced by political factors, with U.S. officials linking port issues to national security, suggesting that the legal dispute may be a tool in geopolitical maneuvering [5] - The incident raises concerns about the sanctity of contracts in strategic locations, warning that if other Latin American countries follow suit, the global investment environment could be severely impacted [7] - The Chinese government has expressed its commitment to protecting the rights of its enterprises, indicating that the situation may escalate into a prolonged international arbitration battle [9]

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong-based company Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited (CKH) is initiating arbitration against the Panamanian government following a ruling by the Panamanian Supreme Court that invalidated the port concession agreements held by its subsidiary, Panama Ports Company (PPC), citing "unconstitutionality" [1][3]. Group 1: Company Actions and Responses - PPC has formally initiated arbitration proceedings against the Republic of Panama through the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) due to actions taken by the Panamanian government that are deemed inconsistent with the legal framework governing the concession agreements [3][4]. - The company has expressed strong opposition to the Panamanian Supreme Court's ruling and the subsequent actions taken by the government, which include aggressive measures to take over PPC's operations [3][4]. - PPC has reported that it has made extensive efforts to resolve the conflict through negotiation, but the Panamanian government has ignored its requests for dialogue [4]. Group 2: Legal and Economic Implications - The Panamanian Supreme Court's ruling has not yet been published or come into effect, but the government has already begun actions based on this unannounced ruling, including inspections and demands for access to PPC's assets and information [4]. - The ruling and the government's actions are seen as a violation of the concession agreements and relevant laws, prompting PPC to seek extensive compensation based on financial assessments [4][7]. - The situation is viewed as detrimental to Panama's international credibility and could have long-term negative impacts on its business environment and economic development [7]. Group 3: International Context and Reactions - Analysts suggest that the dispute over the Panama Canal port operations is not merely a commercial issue but is intertwined with geopolitical tensions, particularly between the U.S. and China [5]. - The U.S. has expressed support for the Panamanian Supreme Court's decision, viewing it as a victory in its efforts to diminish Chinese influence in Central America [5][6]. - The Chinese government has condemned the ruling, asserting that it undermines the rule of law and contract spirit, and has warned that Panama will face significant political and economic consequences if it continues down this path [1][6][7].