2、回应我方的合法诉求、就恢复我方对安世半导体的合法控制权、保障我方股东权利等关键议题提出 具有建设性的方案。 3、立即响应磋商请求，开启对话进程。我方再次郑重要求安世荷兰就控制权问题与闻泰科技立即展开 专项磋商，从根本上化解矛盾，为恢复全球半导体产供链稳定畅通创造必要条件。 （原标题：闻泰科技：希望安世荷兰清醒认识到控制权争议是导致供应链混乱的根本） 人民财讯11月28日电，闻泰科技11月28日发布关于安世半导体控制权争议及全球芯片产业链稳定的官方 声明。闻泰科技郑重敦促安世荷兰：1、立即停止歪曲事实、混淆视听、误导大众的行为，摒弃沉默与 回避，正视核心问题。希望安世荷兰清醒认识到控制权争议是导致供应链混乱的根本，正视核心矛盾， 不再回避与拖延，以坦诚的态度面对各方关切。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The statement from Wentai Technology emphasizes the illegitimate deprivation of its control rights over Nexperia, which is seen as a root cause of the global semiconductor supply chain turmoil [1] Summary by Sections Control Rights Dispute - Wentai Technology asserts that its control rights and shareholder interests in Nexperia have been unlawfully stripped, leading to chaos in the global semiconductor supply chain, as highlighted by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce [1] - The company claims that the interference from the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs has resulted in Nexperia Netherlands initiating improper legal proceedings, which has caused the current supply chain disruptions [1] Importance of Nexperia - Nexperia is identified as a critical node in the global semiconductor supply chain, with its products integrated into various key sectors, including electric vehicles, industrial automation, and consumer electronics [1] - The ongoing control rights dispute poses a risk of supply chain disruptions for numerous clients, potentially affecting production schedules and operational stability across multiple industries [1] Restoration of Control Rights - Wentai Technology's demands focus on restoring its legitimate control rights over Nexperia, which is deemed essential for resolving the current challenges in the semiconductor industry [1] - The company has expressed a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue to resolve the dispute and has received support from Chinese government departments regarding the illegitimate ruling that stripped its control rights [1] Lack of Communication from Nexperia Netherlands - Wentai Technology criticizes Nexperia Netherlands for avoiding core issues and lacking sincerity in communication, despite multiple attempts to seek dialogue [1] - The company perceives Nexperia Netherlands' actions as an attempt to create a "de-China" supply chain while disregarding the interests of a vast number of global clients [1] Call for Action - Wentai Technology urges Nexperia Netherlands to acknowledge the core issues, cease misleading actions, and respond constructively to restore control rights and shareholder interests [1] - The company emphasizes the need for immediate dialogue to resolve the control rights dispute, which is crucial for stabilizing the global semiconductor supply chain [1]

By Eduardo Baptista and Toby Sterling BEIJING/AMSTERDAM (Reuters) -Wingtech, the Chinese parent company of Netherlands-based Nexperia, accused its Dutch unit on Friday of conspiring to build a ​non-Chinese supply chain and permanently strip it of its control, escalating tensions between the two ‌sides. In a separate statement, Nexperia's Chinese arm demanded the Dutch business halt overseas expansion, including in Malaysia. "Abandon improper intentions ‌to replace Chinese capacity," Nexperia China said. ...

Core Viewpoint - The dispute over the control of Nexperia by Wingtech is a significant issue that threatens the stability of the global semiconductor supply chain, with the Dutch side being primarily responsible for the current chaos [1][2][5]. Group 1: Control Rights and Supply Chain Stability - The unlawful deprivation of Wingtech's control and shareholder rights over Nexperia is identified as the root cause of the current chaos in the global semiconductor supply chain [1][2]. - Nexperia is a critical player in the global semiconductor supply chain, with its products integrated into key segments such as new-energy vehicles, industrial automation, and consumer electronics [5][6]. - If the control dispute remains unresolved, it could lead to supply chain disruptions affecting numerous customers, including automakers and industrial equipment manufacturers, thereby jeopardizing production schedules and market competitiveness [7][8]. Group 2: Wingtech's Efforts for Resolution - Wingtech has expressed a willingness to engage in constructive communication with Nexperia to restore its lawful control and resolve the dispute, contrary to claims made by Nexperia [3][4]. - The company emphasizes that its demands are not for additional benefits but solely for the restoration of its rightful control and shareholder rights [11][12]. - The Chinese government has also indicated that the ruling stripping Wingtech of its control is a key obstacle to resolving the issue, urging Nexperia to demonstrate goodwill [13][14]. Group 3: Nexperia's Response and Industry Implications - Nexperia has been criticized for evading core issues and lacking sincerity in communication, failing to respond to Wingtech's legitimate demands [15][16]. - The actions of Nexperia are perceived as attempts to construct a "de-China-ized" supply chain, which could pose significant risks to the stability of the global supply chain [17][18]. - Wingtech urges Nexperia to acknowledge the core issues and work collaboratively to safeguard supply chain stability, emphasizing the need for immediate dialogue and constructive proposals [19][20].

Core Viewpoint - The dispute over the control of Nexperia is a significant issue affecting the stability of the global semiconductor supply chain, with the company emphasizing its role as the legitimate shareholder and the need for resolution to prevent further disruption [1][2][3]. Group 1: Control Rights and Supply Chain Stability - The illegal deprivation of control rights and shareholder interests of the company is identified as the root cause of the current chaos in the global semiconductor supply chain [1][2]. - The company has expressed a willingness to engage in constructive communication with Nexperia Netherlands to restore its legal control rights and resolve the ongoing dispute [2][3]. - The control rights dispute is deemed a major issue that could impact hundreds of thousands of customers and the safety of supply chains across dozens of countries [3]. Group 2: Urgency for Resolution - Restoring the company's legal control rights and ensuring shareholder rights are seen as fundamental to resolving the current challenges in the global semiconductor industry [3][6]. - The company has made multiple attempts to communicate its core demands and willingness to negotiate, but Nexperia Netherlands has consistently avoided addressing the fundamental issues [4][5]. - The company urges Nexperia Netherlands to acknowledge the core problems and engage in dialogue to safeguard the stability of the semiconductor supply chain [5][6].

如果您希望可以时常见面，欢迎标星收藏哦~ Nexperia BV 在官方网站表示，多次尝试通过传统渠道建立直接沟通后，发表了这封公开信。 Nexperia持续寻求与中国境内实体开展建设性合作，并一直要求进行公开对话，以寻求恢复正常 货物供应的途径。Nexperia BV已多次尝试通过正式和非正式的方式，包括电话、电子邮件和提议 会面等直接沟通，提出各种合作方案以寻求互利共赢的解决方案，甚至发出正式函件要求其履行权 利，以期与中国境内实体重建对话。 遗憾的是，Nexperia并未收到任何实质性回复。我们敦促您积极回应Nexperia的沟通，并以建设 性的态度参与其中，以期恢复供应链，因为这符合所有相关方的利益，尤其是我们的客户。 鉴于此，我们不得不公开沟通，以强调此事的紧迫性。 Nexperia始终致力于保持透明度，确保业务连续性，并维护全球客户、供应商、员工和利益相关 者的利益。我们欢迎中国政府承诺为Nexperia中国工厂及其分包商恢复出口提供便利，从而保障 我们的产品能够持续供应全球市场。 然而，各行各业的客户仍然反映即将停产。 这种情况不能再继续下去了。因此，我们敦促Nexperia在华实体领导层立即采 ...

闻泰科技发布关于安世半导体控制权争议及全球芯片产业链稳定的官方声明，我方注意到安世荷兰于11 月27日致安世中国领导层的公开信，该信中存在大量混淆视听的不实指控和虚假信息，并进一步反映了 安世荷兰推卸责任、回避问题，缺乏妥善解决此次事件的诚意。在当前全球芯片产业链面临动荡与风险 的局面下，作为安世半导体的唯一合法股东，同时也是深耕半导体产业、始终致力于维护全球产业链稳 定的企业，闻泰科技郑重发布声明如下：一、闻泰科技对安世半导体的控制权及股东权益遭到非法剥 夺，系导致全球半导体供应链混乱和动荡的根源。二、闻泰科技与安世半导体所面临的控制权争议是关 乎全球半导体供应链稳定的重大议题。三、恢复闻泰科技的合法控制权，保障股东合法权益是解决当前 全球芯片产业链困境的基础与关键。四、安世荷兰始终回避核心问题，缺乏沟通诚意。五、敦促安世荷 兰正视问题，共同守护产业链稳定。 （文章来源：第一财经） ...

安世最新情况 我是芯片超人花姐，入行20年，有50W+芯片行业粉丝。 有很多不方便公开发公众号的， 关于芯片买卖、关于资 源链接等， 我会分享在朋友圈 。 扫码加我本人微信 11月27日 （当地时间） ，安世荷兰在官网 上发布《Nexperia BV致Nexperia中国各实体领导层的 公开信》。 来源： 安世官网 阅读本文，你将了解： 安世事件有哪些最新变化？ 现货市场现在又咋样了？ 01 此次公开信中表示， Nexperia 仍然寻求与其在中国的各实体开展建设性合作，并一直请求进行 坦诚对话，以寻找恢复正常供货的前进路径。Nexperia B.V. 已通过多种方式、多次、正式与非 正式并行地尝试与其在中国的各实体重启对话，包括直接致电、发送电子邮件及提议会面，提出多 项互利合作方案，甚至通过正式函件要求履行相关权利。 遗憾的是， Nexperia 尚未收到任何实质性回应 。我们敦促贵方回应 Nexperia 的联系，并以建 设性的态度参与沟通，着眼于恢复供应链运作，因为这符合包括我们客户在内的所有相关方的共同 利益。 多个行业的客户仍在报告即将面临停产的风险。 在前一天的11月26日， 中国商务部 表示， ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent open letter from Nexperia B.V. (Nexperia) emphasizes the urgent need for constructive dialogue with its Chinese entities to restore the supply chain, as clients are facing imminent production halts due to ongoing disruptions [1][2]. Group 1: Nexperia's Position - Nexperia has expressed its commitment to constructive cooperation with its Chinese entities and has made multiple attempts to re-establish dialogue to restore normal supply chains [1]. - The company has called for immediate action from the leadership of its Chinese entities to engage in structured negotiations and restore predictable supply flows, including production schedules and delivery timelines [1]. - Nexperia has indicated that it continued to supply wafers to its Chinese factories during the export restrictions in October, contradicting earlier statements about halting supplies [2]. Group 2: Chinese Government's Response - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has stated that the root cause of the current disruptions in the global semiconductor supply chain lies with the Dutch side, urging for constructive solutions from the Netherlands [3]. - The Chinese government has taken responsible measures to maintain and restore stability in the global semiconductor supply chain, despite ongoing uncertainties [3]. - Both Chinese and European officials have agreed that companies should lead the resolution of the Nexperia issue and have committed to encouraging constructive communication between Nexperia's Dutch and Chinese entities [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing "Anshi Chaos" involving ASML and the Dutch government's actions, highlighting the complexities of international relations and the implications for Chinese companies in the semiconductor industry. Group 1: Background of the Incident - The European Commission's trade and economic security commissioner expressed gratitude to China for its efforts in resolving the ASML semiconductor issue and indicated a willingness to work together to de-escalate tensions [1] - The Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs announced the suspension of regulatory decisions regarding ASML in response to China's "goodwill," which has been interpreted by many foreign media as a return of control to ASML [1] - Despite the suspension, the underlying issues that triggered the "Anshi Chaos" remain unresolved, indicating that the situation is far from over [1][2] Group 2: Legal and Administrative Developments - The Dutch administrative order has been challenged in court, and the suspension does not alleviate the immediate concerns of Wintech Technology, which is still facing restrictions on its rights [2][4] - The Dutch government's statement regarding the suspension was poorly formatted and lacked clarity, raising questions about its legitimacy [3] - Wintech Technology criticized the Dutch government's response as inadequate, emphasizing that the core issues have not been addressed [4][5] Group 3: International Relations and Strategic Implications - The article suggests that the "Anshi Chaos" may have been a calculated move influenced by external forces, particularly the United States, to undermine China's semiconductor capabilities [7][8] - Evidence indicates that the Dutch government had been in discussions with the U.S. regarding semiconductor regulations prior to the incident, suggesting a coordinated effort to limit China's technological advancements [9][10] - The relationship between the Netherlands and China has been complex, with significant trade growth, yet the Dutch government is increasingly succumbing to U.S. pressure regarding semiconductor exports [20][21] Group 4: Future Considerations for Chinese Companies - The article emphasizes the need for Chinese companies to adapt and strengthen their international strategies in light of the challenges posed by foreign regulatory actions [30][39] - It calls for a coordinated response from the government, enterprises, and society to enhance China's capabilities in dealing with international pressures and to protect the rights of Chinese companies abroad [30][41] - The importance of developing a robust legal and operational framework to safeguard against similar incidents in the future is highlighted, suggesting that a proactive approach is essential for maintaining competitiveness in the global market [40][41]