作为深耕本土的城商行，厦门银行始终将服务民营企业作为支持地方发展的重要工作之一，持续打造区域领先的民企债券服务品牌。截至2025年末，该行 已累计为十余家民营企业提供专业、高效的债券承销、发行支持，助力企业拓宽融资渠道、优化财务结构。在夯实服务基础的同时，厦门银行积极创新民 营企业债券融资支持模式。通过主动创设信用风险缓释凭证（CRMW），为包括弘信电子等多家民营企业债券发行提供市场化增信支持，有效降低投资 者信用风险顾虑，提升债券市场认可度。这一创新举措，不仅帮助民营企业特别是科创型企业突破融资瓶颈，也有力地推动区域直接融资生态的持续完 善，实现"信用赋能、融资通畅"的良性循环。 创新发行金融债券精准滴灌重点产业 在助力企业发债的同时，厦门银行也通过自主发行专项金融债券，拓宽资金供给来源，实现对重点领域的靶向支持，助力企业降低融资成本。2025年，厦 门银行先后成功发行30亿元绿色金融债券，资金专项用于基础设施绿色升级、节能环保产业以及清洁能源产业等领域，助力企业绿色低碳转型；发行10亿 元科创金融债券，重点支持集成电路、生物医药等战略性新兴产业发展，为科创企业注入创新成长新动能。这一系列举措不仅有助于降低 ...

1月23日，厦门银行职工林某聚餐酒后骑电动车发生交通事故身亡一事引关注。同事称，2025年12月31 日晚加班后，行长组织聚餐。酒后林某曾谢绝同事相送，没想到他会发生意外。该银行内部知情人士透 露，监控显示，当晚支行行长先离场，林某从房间取出酒水。林某酒后骑车未戴头盔、曾使用手机，最 终撞上路边石墩。目前，涉事支行行长已被免职，银行与林某家属协商确定补偿慰问金额。家属称，不 想继续追责，正在料理林某后事。 责任编辑：秦艺 1月23日，厦门银行职工林某聚餐酒后骑电动车发生交通事故身亡一事引关注。同事称，2025年12月31 日晚加班后，行长组织聚餐。酒后林某曾谢绝同事相送，没想到他会发生意外。该银行内部知情人士透 露，监控显示，当晚支行行长先离场，林某从房间取出酒水。林某酒后骑车未戴头盔、曾使用手机，最 终撞上路边石墩。目前，涉事支行行长已被免职，银行与林某家属协商确定补偿慰问金额。家属称，不 想继续追责，正在料理林某后事。 责任编辑：秦艺 ...

Market Overview - The city commercial bank sector experienced a decline of 0.55% on January 21, with Chongqing Bank leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4116.94, up 0.08%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14255.12, up 0.7% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Ningbo Bank closed at 28.88, with an increase of 1.16% and a trading volume of 432,300 shares, amounting to a transaction value of 1.246 billion [1] - Chongqing Bank closed at 10.25, down 1.82%, with a trading volume of 106,800 shares and a transaction value of 110 million [2] - Other notable performers include Xiamen Bank, which closed at 7.13, down 1.66%, and Chengdu Bank, which closed at 15.72, down 1.38% [2] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 508 million from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 566 million [2] - The capital flow for individual stocks indicates that Hangzhou Bank had a net inflow of 158 million from institutional investors, while it faced a net outflow of 86.5 million from retail investors [3] - Shanghai Bank also saw a net inflow of 107 million from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 121 million from retail investors [3]

Core Insights - The city commercial bank sector experienced a rise of 1.35% on January 20, with Chengdu Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4113.65, down 0.01%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14155.63, down 0.97% [1] Stock Performance - Chengdu Bank (601838) closed at 15.94, up 3.10% with a trading volume of 606,000 shares and a transaction value of 9.56 billion [1] - Chongqing Bank (601963) closed at 10.44, up 2.96% with a trading volume of 133,800 shares and a transaction value of 138 million [1] - Other notable performers include: - Changsha Bank (601577): closed at 9.36, up 2.41% [1] - Qilu Bank (601665): closed at 5.48, up 2.05% [1] - Beijing Bank (601169): closed at 5.32, up 1.92% [1] - Qingdao Bank (002948): closed at 4.30, up 1.90% [1] - Xiamen Bank (601187): closed at 7.25, up 1.54% [1] - Shanghai Bank (601229): closed at 9.79, up 1.35% [1] - Nanjing Bank (601009): closed at 10.56, up 1.34% [1] - Hangzhou Bank (600926): closed at 15.24, up 1.20% [1] Capital Flow - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 266 million from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 42.84 million [1] - Detailed capital flow for selected banks includes: - Shanghai Bank (601229): net inflow of 1.051 billion from institutional investors, with net outflows from retail and speculative investors [2] - Hangzhou Bank (600926): net inflow of 90.48 million from institutional investors, with significant outflows from retail and speculative investors [2] - Nanjing Bank (601009): net inflow of 26.57 million from institutional investors, with outflows from retail investors [2] - Other banks also showed varying levels of net inflows and outflows [2]

Group 1 - The article highlights the top 20 stocks in the S&P China A-Share Dividend Opportunity Index (CSPSADRP) based on their daily and year-to-date performance as of January 16, 2026 [1][6] - The stock with the highest daily increase is Aotewi (688516.SH) with a rise of 8.22% and a year-to-date increase of 43.17%, along with a dividend yield of 3.51% [1][6] - Other notable performers include Daimai Co. (603730.SH) with a daily increase of 5.32% and a year-to-date increase of 6.28%, and Weichai Power (000338.SZ) with a daily increase of 3.66% and a year-to-date increase of 21.74% [1][6] Group 2 - The list includes various companies with significant dividend yields, such as Gree Electric Appliances (000651.SZ) with a yield of 7.46% and Nanshan Aluminum (600219.SH) with a yield of 6.57% [1][6] - The data is sourced from the Shanghai Stock Exchange and reflects the closing prices as of January 16, 2026, with dividend yields calculated up to January 15, 2026 [1][6]

Core Viewpoint - The city commercial bank sector experienced a decline of 1.27% on January 16, with Jiangsu Bank leading the drop. The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4101.91, down 0.26%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14281.08, down 0.18% [1]. Group 1: Stock Performance - Ningbo Bank closed at 29.30, up 1.70% with a trading volume of 589,500 shares and a transaction value of 1.723 billion [1]. - Xiamen Bank closed at 7.20, up 0.70% with a trading volume of 128,700 shares and a transaction value of 92.3661 million [1]. - Jiangsu Bank closed at 9.76, down 2.69% with a trading volume of 2,061,300 shares and a transaction value of 2.033 billion [2]. - Shanghai Bank closed at 9.64, down 2.43% with a trading volume of 961,200 shares and a transaction value of 933.3 million [2]. Group 2: Capital Flow - The city commercial bank sector saw a net outflow of 229 million from main funds, while speculative funds had a net inflow of 716 million, and retail investors experienced a net outflow of 487 million [2]. - Hangzhou Bank had a main fund net inflow of 153 million, while retail investors saw a net outflow of 113 million [3]. - Nanjing Bank recorded a main fund net inflow of 70.5 million and a retail net outflow of 131 million [3].

Core Insights - The report highlights the need for improved sustainable information disclosure capabilities among small and medium-sized banks in China, revealing significant disparities influenced by regulatory pressures, market listing status, and regional characteristics [1][9]. Group 1: Research Findings - Finding 1: There is a notable divergence between mandatory and voluntary disclosures, with listed banks generally having more robust frameworks due to external compliance pressures, while non-listed banks rely heavily on management's strategic vision [3][4]. - Finding 2: Regional characteristics shape disclosure practices, with banks in green finance reform pilot areas leveraging policy advantages to innovate in areas like green credit and carbon accounting [5][6]. - Finding 3: Common capacity bottlenecks include insufficient internal motivation, weak data foundations, lack of organizational structure, and inadequate integration of environmental risks into core processes [7][8]. Group 2: Recommendations - The report proposes a tiered capability enhancement roadmap, suggesting banks improve internal governance, develop comprehensive ESG risk management systems, and establish practical climate risk stress testing mechanisms [8][9]. - Specific actions include clarifying board responsibilities for ESG oversight, creating dedicated departments, and developing localized carbon accounting practices [8].

Core Viewpoint - The city commercial bank sector experienced a decline of 2.11% on January 14, with Beijing Bank leading the drop, while the overall market showed mixed results with the Shanghai Composite Index down 0.31% and the Shenzhen Component Index up 0.56% [1] Group 1: Market Performance - The closing price of Beijing Bank was 5.38, down 2.71%, with a trading volume of 4.6089 million shares and a transaction value of 2.514 billion [1] - Other notable declines included Chongqing Bank at 10.30 (-2.37%), Hangzhou Bank at 15.62 (-2.13%), and Qilu Bank at 5.57 (-2.11%) [1] - The city commercial bank sector saw a net outflow of 729 million in main funds, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 53.1975 million [1] Group 2: Fund Flow Analysis - Hangzhou Bank had a main fund net inflow of 1.20 billion, but a net outflow from retail investors of 92.9469 million [2] - Suzhou Bank recorded a net inflow of 52.503 million from main funds, while retail investors had a net outflow of 54.0558 million [2] - Shanghai Bank experienced a main fund net inflow of 45.3249 million, with a retail net outflow of 46.6735 million [2]

Core Insights - The city commercial bank sector experienced a rise of 1.55% on January 13, with Ningbo Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4138.76, down 0.64%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14169.4, down 1.37% [1] Stock Performance - Ningbo Bank (002142) closed at 29.26, up 4.24%, with a trading volume of 655,400 shares and a transaction value of 1.904 billion [1] - Hangzhou Bank (600926) closed at 15.96, up 3.70%, with a trading volume of 1,208,400 shares and a transaction value of 1.912 billion [1] - Suzhou Bank (002966) closed at 8.26, up 1.35%, with a trading volume of 485,800 shares [1] - Chengdu Bank (601838) closed at 16.29, up 1.24%, with a trading volume of 426,400 shares and a transaction value of 693 million [1] - Nanjing Bank (600109) closed at 10.88, up 1.21%, with a trading volume of 1,192,800 shares and a transaction value of 1.303 billion [1] - Qilu Bank (601665) closed at 5.69, up 1.07%, with a trading volume of 649,900 shares and a transaction value of 368 million [1] - Chongqing Bank (601963) closed at 10.55, up 0.96%, with a trading volume of 99,300 shares and a transaction value of 10.5 million [1] - Jiangsu Bank (616009) closed at 10.60, up 0.95%, with a trading volume of 1,504,800 shares and a transaction value of 1.593 billion [1] - Xi'an Bank (600928) closed at 3.77, up 0.53%, with a trading volume of 363,100 shares and a transaction value of 13.8 million [1] - Changsha Bank (601577) closed at 9.50, up 0.53%, with a trading volume of 183,100 shares and a transaction value of 174 million [1] Capital Flow - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 238 million from institutional investors, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 199 million [2] - The sector experienced a net outflow of 437 million from speculative funds [2] Individual Stock Capital Flow - Hangzhou Bank (600926) had a net inflow of 70.42 million from institutional investors, while it faced a net outflow of 12.4 million from speculative funds [3] - Shanghai Bank (601229) saw a net inflow of 66.71 million from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 33.15 million from speculative funds [3] - Ningbo Bank (002142) had a net inflow of 37.18 million from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 1.4 million from speculative funds [3] - Suzhou Bank (002966) experienced a net inflow of 34.87 million from institutional investors, while facing a net outflow of 24.25 million from speculative funds [3] - Jiangsu Bank (601577) had a net inflow of 20.83 million from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 15.24 million from speculative funds [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the top-performing stocks in the S&P China A-Share Dividend Opportunity Index as of January 12, 2026, showcasing significant daily and year-to-date gains along with their respective dividend yields. Group 1: Stock Performance - The top stock, Chongqing Department Store (600729.SH), experienced a daily increase of 10.01% and a year-to-date increase of 11.58%, with a dividend yield of 5.17% [1] - Jiufeng Energy (605090.SH) saw a daily rise of 9.22% and a year-to-date rise of 18.21%, with a dividend yield of 2.42% [1] - Aotewei (688516.SH) reported a daily increase of 8.81% and a year-to-date increase of 35.02%, with a dividend yield of 3.74% [1] - Other notable performers include China Merchants Energy (600026.SH) with a daily increase of 7.24% and year-to-date increase of 16.70%, and Xin'ao Co. (603888.SH) with a daily increase of 6.35% and year-to-date increase of 9.56% [1] Group 2: Dividend Yields and Valuation Metrics - The average dividend yield for the index is reported at 4.76%, with a historical price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 11.75 times [2] - The expected P/E ratio is noted to be 11.07 times, indicating a stable valuation outlook for the index constituents [2]