公开资料显示，康希通信的主营业务聚焦于射频前端芯片(FEM)及相关产品的研发、设计、销售与技术 服务，主要应用场景为Wi-Fi通信。2024年5月份，康希通信发布公告称，该公司的海外主要竞争对手 Skyworks在美国加州中区联邦地区法院起诉康希通信部分Wi-Fi射频前端模块侵犯了其在美国的5项专 利；2024年7月份，Skyworks根据《美国1930年关税法》第337节规定向国际贸易中心(即ITC)提出调查 申请，主张康希通信子公司和相关企业，制造及对美出口、销售的特定射频前端模块以及含有该模块的 下游产品侵犯其5项专利权，这即"337调查"。此后，康希通信与Skyworks进行专利诉讼与337调查。 1月26日，格兰康希通信科技(上海)股份有限公司(以下简称"康希通信"或"公司")发布公告称，美国国际 贸易委员会行政法官就Skyworks与康希通信全资子公司之间的337调查(案号为Inv.No.337-TA-1413)作出 初步裁决：公司全资子公司未侵犯Skyworks的专利权，未违反《美国1930年关税法》第337条。 "这初步意味着，公司可以继续加强对美业务拓展；同时，市场准入的明朗化，将促进公司更 ...

证券日报网1月27日讯，康希通信在接受调研者提问时表示，337调查已历时18个月，对公司主营业务造 成了较大的干扰，公司认为也在一定程度上影响了二级市场对公司的判断。337调查初裁的胜诉将极大 提振市场对公司研发技术独特性的认可。但是，公司并没有因337调查延缓营业收入的提升，2024年公 司全年收入5.23亿元，同比增长26%；2025年前三季度营收已超2024年全年，预计2025年全年收入也会 比2024年有所增长，公司期待此次初裁结果的胜诉给2026年业绩带来提升的动力。公司相信，稳定的业 绩增长和海外市场的持续拓展，会给公司市值带来增长可能性。市值管理是以提高上市公司质量为基 础，为提升公司投资价值和股东回报能力而实施的战略管理行为。公司正积极从信息披露、股权激励和 员工持股计划、投资者关系管理、股份回购、多元化投资并购相结合等多方面着手推进市值管理相关工 作。公司相信，公司好的基本面，结合扎实的风险防范能力，必将获得广大投资者的认可。 ...

证券日报网1月27日讯，康希通信在接受调研者提问时表示，研发创新是公司的战略根基，公司将持续 进行研发投入。目前，公司已开始Wi-Fi8射频前端芯片的预研，并在深耕低空经济、布局蜂窝类等泛 IoT产品，进一步巩固技术优势，开拓新的应用场景。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, 康希通信, has successfully defended itself against a patent infringement claim by Skyworks in a "337 investigation" by the ITC, marking a significant victory for Chinese semiconductor firms in international intellectual property disputes [1][3]. Group 1: Company Overview - 康希通信 specializes in the design of RF front-end chips, with products widely used in various applications including home routers, smart homes, and IoT [2]. - The company has developed a complete product line for Wi-Fi 5/6/6E/7, with certifications from major SoC manufacturers like Broadcom and Qualcomm [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The "337 investigation" initiated by Skyworks involved claims of patent infringement related to five RF front-end modules exported to the U.S. [2]. - After a lengthy process of evidence disclosure and trial preparations, 康希通信 was ruled not to have infringed on any of the five patents by the ITC [3][5]. Group 3: Financial Impact - The company incurred legal expenses of approximately 38.84 million yuan in 2024 and 50.6 million yuan in the first three quarters of 2025, with total costs expected to exceed 90 million yuan [5]. - The initial ruling in favor of 康希通信 is anticipated to improve market perceptions and facilitate global market expansion [5]. Group 4: Industry Context - The case represents a growing trend of Chinese companies facing patent challenges from global leaders, with "337 investigations" becoming a common tool for U.S. tech firms [6]. - The outcome of the ITC ruling is expected to significantly influence ongoing and future litigation in U.S. courts, potentially weakening the basis for Skyworks' claims [6].

康希通信 20260126 摘要 康熙通信在 337 调查中初裁胜诉，证明其射频前端芯片核心技术无侵权， 为公司技术实力提供背书，并为美国市场出口提供法律支撑，利于全球 化战略推进。 公司积极应对 Skyworks 指控，组建专业应诉团队，系统梳理技术细节， 配合 ITC 调查，并针对对方专利提起 IPR 程序和国内专利诉讼，形成有 效反制。 胜诉打破海外巨头利用专利壁垒遏制中国半导体企业出海的套路，为国 内同行提供维权经验，激励自主创新和国际化发展，对行业发展具有重 要意义。 初裁胜诉意味着康熙通信产品可继续进入美国市场，提振欧洲、东南亚 等客户信心，有利于全球市场开拓，并加速 WiFi 7、WiFi 8 等新技术产 品推广。 公司 2024 年因专利诉讼及 337 调查花费 3,884 万元，2025 年前三季 度已支付 5,060 万元，预计全年超 9,000 万元，胜诉后诉讼费用有望大 幅降低，改善现金流和盈利。 Q&A 康熙通信在 337 调查中取得胜诉的关键因素是什么？ 康熙通信在 337 调查中取得胜诉的关键因素主要包括以下几个方面：首先，公 司拥有扎实的技术实力和自主研发能力。公司在功率放大器 ...

Core Viewpoint - Kangxi Communication's subsidiary has successfully defended against allegations of patent infringement in a preliminary ruling by the ITC, allowing its products to continue entering the U.S. market [2][5][6]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - On January 24, Kangxi Communication learned of the ITC's preliminary ruling, stating that it and its subsidiaries did not violate Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and did not infringe on Skyworks' patents [2][5]. - The lawsuit initiated by Skyworks in May 2024 accused Kangxi Communication's subsidiary of infringing on five patents related to RF front-end modules [4][5]. - The ITC's preliminary ruling confirmed that Kangxi Communication did not infringe on two specific patents, while three others were withdrawn by Skyworks during the evidence disclosure phase [5][6]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Legal expenses related to the lawsuit are projected to exceed 90 million yuan by the end of 2025, with 38.84 million yuan incurred in 2024 and an additional 50.60 million yuan in the first three quarters of 2025 [4]. - For the first three quarters of 2025, Kangxi Communication reported a revenue of 526 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 39.32%, although it recorded a net loss of 30.53 million yuan [7]. Group 3: Research and Development - Kangxi Communication's R&D investment for the first three quarters of 2025 totaled 69.27 million yuan, accounting for 13.17% of its revenue [6]. - The company is focusing on the development of Wi-Fi RF front-end chips, with ongoing research into Wi-Fi 8 technology and a commitment to low-altitude economy initiatives [6].

国产射频芯片厂商康希通信迎来重要利好，其在应对美国射频芯片巨头Skyworks发起的337调查中轿获初裁胜诉，涉案的5项专利均未被认定侵权, 证券代码:688653 证券简称:康希通信 公告编号:2026-001 格兰康希通信科技(上海)股份有限公司 关于公司子公司涉及 337 调查及专利诉讼的进展公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏,并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 重要内容提示: ●根据 ITC 初裁结果:公司子公司康希通信科技(上海)有限公司、GRAND CHIP LABS,INC.和相关企业未违反《美国 1930年关税法》第 337节的规定,未侵犯 Skyworks 的专利权。 格兰康希通信科技(上海)股份有限公司(以下简称"康希通信"或"公司") 于 2024 年 8 月 21 日发布了《康希通信关于公司子公司涉及 337 调查及专利诉讼 的进展公告》(公告编号:2024-022),Skyworks Solutions,Inc.,Skyworks Global Pte Ltd.和 Skyworks Solutions Canada, ...

Core Viewpoint - 康希通信's subsidiary achieved significant progress in the 337 investigation initiated by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), with a preliminary ruling stating that it did not violate the relevant patent laws [3][4] Group 1: Investigation Details - The 337 investigation was initiated by Skyworks Solutions, Inc. in July 2024, accusing 康希通信's subsidiary of infringing on five patents related to specific radio frequency front-end modules (FEMS) [3] - The investigation case number is Inv. No. 337-TA-1413 [3] Group 2: Preliminary Ruling Outcomes - The preliminary ruling indicated that 康希通信 did not infringe on the two patents claimed by Skyworks, specifically US9,917,563 and US8,717,101 [4] - Three additional patents (US9,450,579, US9,148,194, and US7,409,200) were withdrawn by Skyworks during the evidence disclosure phase, leading to the termination of the investigation regarding these patents [4] Group 3: Company Position and Future Steps - 康希通信 emphasized its commitment to intellectual property management and protection, highlighting its independent and complete intellectual property system [4] - The preliminary ruling provides crucial legal support for 康希通信's product exports to the U.S. market [4] - The ruling is preliminary, and both parties have the right to request a review from the ITC within the statutory period, leading to administrative review and final ruling stages [4]

Core Viewpoint - The initial ruling by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) found that the company's subsidiaries did not infringe on the patents claimed by Skyworks Solutions, allowing the company to continue exporting its products to the U.S. market [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - On May 2024, Skyworks filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the company's subsidiary, claiming infringement of five patents related to specific RF front-end modules (FEMS) [4]. - The ITC issued a notice of investigation in August 2024, formally opening the case under Inv.No.337-TA-1413 [4]. - The ITC's administrative law judge issued a preliminary ruling on January 24, 2026, stating that the company did not violate Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [4][6]. Group 2: Patent Status - Three of the patents involved in the investigation (US 9,450,579, US 9,148,194, and US 7,409,200) were withdrawn by Skyworks during the evidence disclosure phase, terminating the investigation for those patents [5]. - The company has not infringed on any of the five patents claimed by Skyworks [6]. Group 3: Business Implications - A favorable ruling in the 337 investigation would allow the company's products to continue entering the U.S. market, strengthening its market share and industry influence [6][9]. - The outcome of the investigation will not directly affect the company's operations in markets outside the U.S. due to the territorial nature of patents [7][9]. - The 337 investigation does not involve monetary damages, and any litigation costs will cease following the final ruling, indicating no significant legal expenses for 2026 [7][9]. Group 4: Company Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, the company reported total revenue of 526 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 39.32%, but incurred a net loss of 30.53 million yuan [10]. - The company faced significant litigation and attorney fees amounting to 50.6 million yuan from January to September 2025, which impacted its net profit [10].

Core Viewpoint - The company, 康希通信科技 (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and its subsidiary GRAND CHIP LABS, INC. have not violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as per the preliminary ruling by the ITC administrative judge, thus not infringing on Skyworks' patents [2][4][5]. Group 1: Case Background - The case is currently at the stage of the ITC's preliminary ruling regarding a Section 337 investigation initiated by Skyworks Solutions, Inc. and its affiliates, claiming patent infringement related to specific RF front-end modules (FEMS) [2][3]. - Skyworks filed a lawsuit in May 2024 against 康希通信科技 (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and GRAND CHIP LABS, INC. for patent infringement, which led to the initiation of the ITC investigation in July 2024 [2][3]. Group 2: Preliminary Ruling Results - On January 24, 2026, the ITC administrative judge issued a preliminary ruling stating that 康希通信科技 (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and GRAND CHIP LABS, INC. did not infringe on two of Skyworks' patents (US 9,917,563 and US 8,717,101) [4]. - Three other patents (US 9,450,579, US 9,148,194, and US 7,409,200) were withdrawn by Skyworks during the evidence disclosure phase, leading to their termination in the investigation [4][5]. Group 3: Company Response and Impact - The company emphasizes its commitment to intellectual property management and protection, maintaining a complete intellectual property system and conducting thorough IP checks before technology implementation [6][7]. - The favorable preliminary ruling is seen as a significant legal support for the company's product exports to the U.S. market, although both parties retain the right to request a review within the statutory period [7].