证券日报网讯 2月3日，奥联电子在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示，截至2026年1月30日，公司股东人 数合计15610户。 （文章来源：证券日报） ...

每经头条（nbdtoutiao）——核电建设热潮下，设备厂忙到"飞起"！订单已排至2028年，员工三班倒， 产线24小时不停 （记者 王晓波） 每经AI快讯，奥联电子1月30日晚间发布业绩预告，预计2025年归属于上市公司股东的净利润亏损6000 万元~6800万元。上年同期归属于上市公司股东的净利润亏损850.6万元。报告期内，归属于上市公司股 东的净利润变动主要受非经常性损益影响，2025年非经常性损益金额预计-5850万元至-5350万元，主要 原因是针对投资者诉讼案件整体计提了预计负债。报告期内，面对汽车电子行业的激烈竞争，公司持续 聚焦并深耕主业，紧抓产品创新与技术升级，积极拓展市场并加大客户协同合作，营业收入同比增长约 6%；深入推进系列降本增效专项工作，提升生产经营效率及组织效能，加强成本费用精细化管控，并 加大分子公司管理力度，持续优化分子公司资产结构，逐步改善公司整体经营成效，扣除非经常性损益 后的净利润实现同比减亏。 ...

证券代码：300585 证券简称：奥联电子 公告编号：2026-002 南京奥联汽车电子电器股份有限公司 2025年年度业绩预告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确、完整，没有 虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、本期业绩预计情况 （一）业绩预告期间 2025 年 1 月 1 日—2025 年 12 月 31 日 （二）业绩预告情况 1、预计的业绩：预计净利润为负值 2、报告期内，面对汽车电子行业的激烈竞争，公司持续聚焦并深耕主业，紧 抓产品创新与技术升级，积极拓展市场并加大客户协同合作，营业收入同比增长约 6%；深入推进系列降本增效专项工作，提升生产经营效率及组织效能，加强成本 费用精细化管控，并加大分子公司管理力度，持续优化分子公司资产结构，逐步改 善公司整体经营成效，扣除非经常性损益后的净利润实现同比减亏。 四、风险提示 1、依据《企业会计准则第 13 号——或有事项》等相关规定，鉴于公司投资者 诉讼案件大多处于受理登记阶段，公司基于审慎原则，结合案件情况及历史案例等 因素进行了分析，并基于一定的前提条件下对案件整体预计负债金额进行了合理预 估。由于相关案件最终判决结果存在不确定性，可 ...

案情回溯，2024年4月7日晚，奥联电子发布《关于收到行政处罚决定书的公告》，公告显示，证监会查 明，奥联电子存在以下违法事实：奥联电子披露的胥明军在钙钛矿领域的业绩存在误导性陈述。关于胥 明军在钙钛矿行业主要业绩的内容存在误导性陈述，关于胥明军及团队的核心竞争力的内容存在误导性 陈述。根据当事人违法行为的事实、性质、情节与社会危害程度，依据《证券法》第一百九十七条第二 款的规定，证监会决定：对奥联电子责令改正，给予警告，并处以300万元罚款；对相关责任人员给予 警告，并各处以罚款。 根据虚假陈述司法解释，上市公司等因信息披露违法导致投资者权益受损，受损投资者可以依法起诉索 赔，索赔范围包括：投资差额、佣金、印花税损失等。 "我们正在代理最后一批股民起诉。"厉健律师表示，根据司法解释，暂定：在2022年12月12日到2023年 2月21日上午收盘前买入奥联电子股票，并在2023年2月21日下午开盘后卖出或继续持有该股票的受损投 资者，可以索赔。索赔条件以法院认定为准。（奥联电子维权入口） 投资者索赔需提供证券开户信息查询单原件、股票对账单原件（2022年12月1日至2023年12月底）、联 系方式等。 【本文 ...

Group 1 - The A-share market saw a strong performance in lithium mining stocks, with notable gains from companies such as Chuaneng Power, which rose over 7%, and Tibet Summit and Guocheng Mining, which increased by over 6% [1] - The main contract for lithium carbonate surged by more than 5%, reaching a new high of 178,000 yuan per ton [1] Group 2 - Chuaneng Power's stock increased by 7.72%, with a total market capitalization of 25.8 billion yuan and a year-to-date increase of 19.83% [2] - Tibet Summit's stock rose by 6.47%, with a market cap of 19 billion yuan and a year-to-date increase of 37.83% [2] - Guocheng Mining's stock increased by 6.38%, with a market cap of 34.6 billion yuan and a year-to-date increase of 5.00% [2] - Other notable performers include Dazhong Mining (up 5.37%), Yiyaton (up 5.36%), and Ganfeng Lithium (up 4.54%) [2]

Group 1 - The A-share market saw a strong performance in lithium mining stocks, with notable gains from companies such as Chuaneng Power, which rose over 7%, and Tibet Summit and Guocheng Mining, which increased by over 6% [1] - The main contract for lithium carbonate surged by over 5%, reaching a new high of 178,000 yuan per ton [1] Group 2 - Chuaneng Power's market capitalization is 25.8 billion yuan, with a year-to-date increase of 19.83% [2] - Tibet Summit has a market capitalization of 19 billion yuan and a year-to-date increase of 37.83% [2] - Guocheng Mining's market capitalization stands at 34.6 billion yuan, with a year-to-date increase of 5.00% [2] - Other companies like Dazhong Mining and Yiyaton also reported gains of over 5%, with market capitalizations of 48.7 billion yuan and 15.3 billion yuan respectively [2] - Ganfeng Lithium, with a market capitalization of 153.1 billion yuan, saw a year-to-date increase of 16.11% [2] - Yongxing Materials and Aolian Electronics reported increases of 4.29% and 4.21% respectively, with market capitalizations of 29.5 billion yuan and 3.22 billion yuan [2] - The overall trend indicates a positive momentum in the lithium sector, supported by the MACD golden cross signal [2]

Core Viewpoint - Recent changes in the transfer of control rights in listed companies indicate a shift towards more structured and regulated transactions, aiming to prevent speculative behaviors and ensure that only capable buyers engage in acquisitions [4][11][12]. Group 1: Changes in Control Rights Transfer - The transfer of control rights in listed companies has seen a significant increase, with new practices emerging, such as shareholders relinquishing voting rights and committing to long lock-up periods [3][7]. - For instance, Huashi Technology (301218.SZ) reported a transfer of 11.32% of its shares while the original shareholders gave up 33.97% of their voting rights, indicating a trend away from voting rights delegation [3][9]. - New shareholders in companies like ST Keli Da (603828.SH) and Tian Chuang Fashion (603608.SH) are committing to a 60-month lock-up period, while original shareholders are agreeing to a 36-month lock-up [3][9]. Group 2: Regulatory and Market Implications - The recent changes are seen as a response to the explosive growth in control rights transactions, which have led to excessive stock price increases and potential market manipulation [4][11]. - Analysts suggest that these commitments will lead to a restructuring of evaluation standards and a more complex design of transaction schemes, promoting a competitive environment where only strong, demand-driven buyers prevail [5][12]. - The introduction of regulations by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) prohibiting the delegation of voting rights further emphasizes the move towards stricter control in these transactions [10]. Group 3: Long-term Commitments and Financial Integrity - The new requirements, such as a 60-month non-transfer period and a minimum of 50% self-funding for acquisitions, aim to create a "risk firewall" and prevent the transfer of risks to the listed companies [13][14]. - These measures are intended to protect the integrity of listed companies and ensure that funds are used to enhance core business operations rather than for personal asset support [14]. - The shift signifies a transition from valuing control rights as mere power to recognizing the long-term responsibilities associated with governance and shareholder value creation [14].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights a new trend in A-share control transactions, where five companies have collectively committed to a 60-month lock-up period for their acquisitions, significantly exceeding the 18-month legal minimum [1] - The companies involved in this trend include Tianchuang Fashion, Aolian Electronics, Zhongzhi Holdings, ST Keli Da, and Jianghua Micro, all of which have announced the extension of their share lock-up periods [1] - A private equity insider indicated that many recent acquisition projects have failed to materialize due to disagreements over lock-up period terms, contrasting sharply with the booming A-share merger and acquisition market since 2025 [1] Group 2 - Since the implementation of supportive policies like the "merger and acquisition six guidelines," the number of A-share merger cases and transaction volumes has significantly increased, showcasing various innovations in acquisition methods and structural entities [1] - The emergence of cases with 60-month extended lock-up periods marks a notable departure from the previously common short-term lock-up practices in the market [1] - The article suggests that the recent concentration of such long lock-up period cases reflects a shift in capital logic and market behavior in the context of A-share acquisitions [1]

Group 1 - The company faced regulatory penalties for disclosing false information, leading to investor lawsuits for compensation [1][3] - The compensation claims stem from a cross-industry cooperation announcement made by the company in December 2022 [1][5] - A clarification statement from Huaneng Qingneng Institute on February 21, 2023, denied the company's claims about its partner's achievements, causing a significant drop in the company's stock price [2][6] Group 2 - Many affected investors have initiated lawsuits after the penalty decision, seeking compensation for losses incurred due to the company's misleading disclosures [3][7] - Investors who purchased shares between December 9, 2022, and February 20, 2023, and sold or still hold shares after February 21, 2023, are eligible to participate in the compensation claims [3][7] - The statute of limitations for these claims will expire on February 20, 2026, emphasizing the urgency for eligible investors to act quickly [3][7]

从单一个案到密集涌现，收购方为何纷纷主动加码锁定期承诺？这一集体性交易安排背后，暗藏着怎样的资本逻辑？又释放出哪些值得关注的监管与市场信 号？每经资本眼研究员就此展开探究。 每经记者｜吴永久 张宛 每经编辑｜何建川 1月19日晚间，国内湿电子化学品龙头江化微披露控制权拟变更公告，收购方上海福迅科技承诺的60个月股份锁定期，再度点燃资本市场对超长锁定期的热 议。这一期限较《上市公司收购管理办法》规定的18个月法定期限，大幅延长超2倍。 公告显示，上海福迅科技拟通过协议转让方式受让江化微9238.23万股股份，占公司总股本的23.96%。交易完成后，江化微控股股东将变更为上海福迅科 技，实控人也将由淄博市财政局划转至上海市国资委。受此消息提振，江化微股票自1月20日复牌，截至本文发稿，已收获三个一字板涨停，市场对此次控 制权变更的关注度较高。 事实上，江化微并非孤例。每经资本眼研究员梳理发现，这已是近一个月内A股市场出现的第五起60个月超长锁定期控制权变更案例。自2025年12月底至 今，天创时尚、奥联电子、中持股份、ST柯利达与江化微接连披露相关公告，收购方均主动将股份锁定期延长至5年，集体突破18个月的法定下 ...