It is time now for money power politics. While the world waits to see if the Supreme Court strikes down the president's tariffs, Costco is not taking any chances. The very popular wholesaler is suing the Trump administration to get a full refund of new tariffs it paid so far this year.It is also looking to block any more import duties from being collected until a final decision is made by the nation's highest court. And dozens of other companies, but much smaller ones, have filed similar suits. Costco is th ...

Tonight, another showdown between Costco and President Trump. This time, not over politics, but over money. The retail giant suing the Trump administration for a full refund of the tariffs they've paid on imported goods under Trump's tariff plan.>> My fellow Americans, this is Liberation Day. >> The administration used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, AIPA for short, to put the tariffs in place. But now, the Supreme Court will decide whether the use of this nearly 50year-old law was unlawful ...

Core Insights - The article compares two consumer staples ETFs: State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK), highlighting their differences in cost, portfolio composition, and sector exposure [1][2]. Cost and Size - XLP has a lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to IYK's 0.38%, making it more cost-effective for investors [3][4]. - XLP has a larger Assets Under Management (AUM) of $15.5 billion, while IYK has an AUM of $1.3 billion [3]. - The one-year return for XLP is -5.4%, while IYK's is -3.9%, indicating IYK has outperformed XLP in the short term [3]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over five years, XLP has a maximum drawdown of -17.8%, while IYK's is -16.3%, suggesting IYK has slightly better risk management [5]. - The growth of $1,000 invested over five years is $1,167 for XLP and $1,239 for IYK, indicating IYK has provided better returns [5]. Portfolio Composition - IYK includes 12% in healthcare and 2% in basic materials, with a total of 55 holdings, while XLP is strictly focused on consumer staples with 100% allocation and 37 holdings [6][7]. - Top holdings for IYK include Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and Philip Morris International, while XLP's largest positions are Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble [6][7]. Investment Considerations - The decision between XLP and IYK may hinge on the trade-off between fees and performance, with XLP being more affordable but IYK potentially offering broader exposure [8][9]. - Investors may prefer IYK if they seek exposure to healthcare and basic materials, despite its higher fees [10][11].

Legal & Trade - Costco sued the Trump administration seeking a refund for tariffs paid [1] - The lawsuit is related to tariffs enacted, with the Supreme Court considering their legality [1]

Core Insights - The article compares two consumer staples ETFs, the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS), highlighting their differing approaches to sector exposure and investment strategies [1][2]. Cost and Size - XLP has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to RSPS's 0.40% [3][4]. - As of November 28, 2025, XLP has a one-year return of -4.5%, while RSPS has a return of -6.6% [3]. - XLP has a much larger Assets Under Management (AUM) of $15.5 billion compared to RSPS's $237.2 million [3]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, RSPS experienced a maximum drawdown of -18.61%, while XLP had a drawdown of -16.32% [5]. - An investment of $1,000 in XLP would have grown to $1,186 over five years, while the same investment in RSPS would have decreased to $990 [5]. Portfolio Composition - XLP holds 38 stocks and is heavily weighted towards large companies like Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble, which can dominate its performance [6]. - RSPS also consists of 38 stocks but employs an equal-weighting strategy, giving each holding similar allocation, featuring companies like Monster Beverage, Bunge Global, and Dollar Tree [7]. Market Context - Consumer staples are generally considered defensive stocks, but many have struggled due to inflation and tariff concerns [8][9]. - Both ETFs provide diversification options for investors concerned about concentration in tech stocks within the S&P 500 [9]. - XLP's focus on larger companies has contributed to its better performance compared to RSPS, which may appeal to those interested in small- and medium-cap stocks [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - Costco has initiated legal action against the U.S. government to secure refunds in the event that the Supreme Court denies President Donald Trump's request for extensive tariff authority [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit aims to protect Costco's financial interests regarding potential tariff impositions [1] - The outcome of the Supreme Court's decision could significantly impact Costco's operations and pricing strategies [1]

Costco is taking the Trump administration to court. The wholesaler is suing to ensure it gets a full refund of the tariffs it paid if the Supreme Court finds the administration's tariffs are unlawful. Costco joins a growing list of major companies who have filed lawsuits regarding the administration's tariffs, including Revlon, Kawasaki, and Bumblebee. ...

PLUS. >> WELCOME BACK. A NEW LAWSUIT FROM COSTCO CHALLENGING THE LEGALITY OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S TARIFFS.EAMON JAVERS OUTSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE WITH THE STORY. EAMON, THIS ONE IS VERY INTERESTING TO ME. >> YEAH THAT'S RIGHT COURTNEY.IN THE 17 PAGE LAWSUIT THAT WAS FILED FRIDAY AGAINST U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, COSTCO SAID IT HAS TO ACT NOW BECAUSE IT'S FACING THIS DECEMBER 15TH DEADLINE FOR A FINAL TALLY OF ITS TARIFFS THIS YEAR. AND IT SAYS THAT CUSTOMS HAS ALREADY DENIED COSTCO'S REQUEST FO ...

Aiman Jabver's outside the White House with the story. Aean, this one is very interesting to me. >> Yeah, that's right, Courtney.In the 17page lawsuit that was actually filed Friday against US Customs and Border Protection, Costco said it has to act now because it's facing this December 15th deadline for a final tally of its tariffs this year. And it says that Customs has already denied Costco's request for an extension given that the tariffs are being litigated in the Supreme Court. So the company says fir ...

Core Argument - Costco has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming that the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) are unlawful and seeking a full refund of all levies paid under these tariffs [2][3]. Group 1: Legal Basis of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit argues that the IEEPA does not clearly authorize the President to set tariffs, thus rendering the challenged tariff orders invalid [2]. - Costco is requesting the Court of International Trade to consider all tariffs collected under IEEPA as illegal [2]. Group 2: Implications for Costco - The company claims it is facing "imminent and irreparable harm" due to anticipated liquidation of entries for which it paid IEEPA duties as early as December 15 [3]. - Costco emphasizes the necessity of the lawsuit, stating that without judicial relief, it is "not guaranteed a refund for those unlawfully collected tariffs" [6]. Group 3: Context of the Lawsuit - Costco joins other companies, including Revlon, Kawasaki, and Bumble Bee Foods, in legal action against the White House regarding tariffs [3]. - The lawsuit coincides with the U.S. Supreme Court's consideration of the legality of these tariffs, following challenges from multiple states and businesses [3][4].