1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information provided in the report regarding the industry investment rating. 2. Core Views of the Report - On November 14, the convertible bond market contracted in volume and declined, with compressed valuations. The CSI Convertible Bond Index decreased by 0.58% compared to the previous day, and the trading sentiment in the convertible bond market weakened. The total trading volume of the convertible bond market was 71.351 billion yuan, a 9.71% decrease from the previous day [1]. - The convertible bond price center declined, and the proportion of high - priced bonds decreased. The overall weighted average closing price of convertible bonds was 135.02 yuan, a 0.64% decrease from the previous day. The valuation was compressed, with the 100 - yuan par - value fitted conversion premium rate at 31.82%, a 0.82 - percentage - point decrease from the previous day [2]. - In the stock market, more than half of the underlying stock industry indices declined. Among A - share markets, the top three industries with the largest declines were electronics (-3.09%), communication (-2.46%), and media (-2.16%); the top three industries with the largest increases were real estate (+0.39%), banking (+0.26%), and pharmaceutical biology (+0.17%). In the convertible bond market, 23 industries declined, with the top three industries with the largest declines being communication (-2.52%), national defense and military industry (-1.85%), and automobile (-1.66%); the top three industries with the largest increases were steel (+2.31%), environmental protection (+0.82%), and public utilities (+0.27%) [3]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Market Overview - **Index Performance**: The CSI Convertible Bond Index decreased by 0.58% compared to the previous day, the Shanghai Composite Index decreased by 0.97%, the Shenzhen Component Index decreased by 1.93%, the ChiNext Index decreased by 2.82%, the SSE 50 Index decreased by 1.15%, and the CSI 1000 Index decreased by 1.16% [1]. - **Market Style**: Large - cap value stocks were relatively dominant. Large - cap growth stocks decreased by 2.20%, large - cap value stocks decreased by 0.55%, mid - cap growth stocks decreased by 1.48%, mid - cap value stocks decreased by 1.19%, small - cap growth stocks decreased by 1.45%, and small - cap value stocks decreased by 0.85% [1]. - **Fund Performance**: The trading sentiment in the convertible bond market weakened. The trading volume of the convertible bond market was 71.351 billion yuan, a 9.71% decrease from the previous day; the total trading volume of the Wind All - A Index was 1980.382 billion yuan, a 4.13% decrease from the previous day; the net outflow of the main funds in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets was 62.011 billion yuan, and the yield of the 10 - year treasury bond increased by 0.14 bp to 1.81% [1]. Convertible Bond Price and Valuation - **Convertible Bond Price**: The overall weighted average closing price of convertible bonds was 135.02 yuan, a 0.64% decrease from the previous day. The closing price of equity - biased convertible bonds was 178.79 yuan, a 1.27% decrease; the closing price of bond - biased convertible bonds was 121.53 yuan, a 0.10% decrease; the closing price of balanced convertible bonds was 130.91 yuan, a 0.31% decrease. The proportion of high - priced bonds above 130 yuan was 62.34%, a 0.75 - percentage - point decrease from the previous day. The price median was 133.72 yuan, a 0.93% decrease from the previous day [2]. - **Convertible Bond Valuation**: The valuation was compressed. The 100 - yuan par - value fitted conversion premium rate was 31.82%, a 0.82 - percentage - point decrease from the previous day; the overall weighted par value was 104.59 yuan, a 0.52% decrease from the previous day. The premium rate of equity - biased convertible bonds was 10.60%, a 1.34 - percentage - point decrease; the premium rate of bond - biased convertible bonds was 84.51%, a 0.54 - percentage - point decrease; the premium rate of balanced convertible bonds was 22.78%, a 0.24 - percentage - point decrease [2]. Industry Performance - **Underlying Stock Industry**: Among A - share markets, the top three industries with the largest declines were electronics (-3.09%), communication (-2.46%), and media (-2.16%); the top three industries with the largest increases were real estate (+0.39%), banking (+0.26%), and pharmaceutical biology (+0.17%) [3]. - **Convertible Bond Industry**: In the convertible bond market, 23 industries declined, with the top three industries with the largest declines being communication (-2.52%), national defense and military industry (-1.85%), and automobile (-1.66%); the top three industries with the largest increases were steel (+2.31%), environmental protection (+0.82%), and public utilities (+0.27%) [3]. - **Key Indicators by Sector**: - Closing price: The large - cycle sector decreased by 0.15%, the manufacturing sector decreased by 1.11%, the technology sector decreased by 1.59%, the large - consumption sector decreased by 0.64%, and the large - finance sector decreased by 0.66% [3]. - Conversion premium rate: The large - cycle sector decreased by 0.57 percentage points, the manufacturing sector decreased by 0.37 percentage points, the technology sector increased by 0.3 percentage points, the large - consumption sector decreased by 0.29 percentage points, and the large - finance sector increased by 0.051 percentage points [3]. - Conversion value: The large - cycle sector increased by 0.51%, the manufacturing sector decreased by 0.87%, the technology sector decreased by 1.74%, the large - consumption sector decreased by 0.64%, and the large - finance sector decreased by 1.01% [3]. - Pure bond premium rate: The large - cycle sector decreased by 0.23 percentage points, the manufacturing sector decreased by 1.7 percentage points, the technology sector decreased by 2.3 percentage points, the large - consumption sector decreased by 0.82 percentage points, and the large - finance sector decreased by 0.79 percentage points [4].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - After the production rush at the end of the third quarter in October, the economy weakened again at the beginning of the quarter. Coupled with the high base in the service industry, the estimated monthly GDP was around 4.5%, a relatively low level since the beginning of the year [10]. - The incremental impact of the "two 50 billion" in October has not yet appeared, including less - than - expected credit and infrastructure investment effects [12]. - The "broad credit" verification from November to December is still an important observation clue for the fundamentals. The effects of this round of policy tools are expected to continue until the first quarter of 2026 [17]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 "Broad Credit" Effect May Appear with a Lag - **GDP Estimation**: In October, affected by factors such as the end of the peak season in the service industry, weak exports, and more holidays, the GDP dropped to about 4.5%, a low level since the beginning of the year [10]. - **Influence of "Two 50 Billion"**: In October, the incremental impact of the "two 50 billion" was not evident. The new medium - and long - term corporate loans decreased year - on - year, and infrastructure investment was weaker than the seasonal average, with a lower leveraging effect than in 2022 [12]. - **Reasons**: Policy tools were gradually launched from the end of September to the end of October, and the capital effects may not be fully reflected. There may be an overlap between policy - supported projects and special bond projects, and the project scope has expanded to light - asset industries, resulting in a weaker loan - leveraging effect [17]. - **Outlook**: The "broad credit" verification from November to December is crucial. Considering the high base formed by the strong "good start" this year, macro - policies in 2026 may need to be implemented earlier, and the effects of this round of tools are expected to last until the first quarter of 2026 [17]. 3.2 October Data Interpretation: Mild Slowdown of Economic Momentum at the Beginning of the Quarter 3.2.1 Infrastructure - **Investment Situation**: From January to October, the cumulative year - on - year growth rate of infrastructure investment (excluding electricity) was - 0.1%, and the full - scale infrastructure investment was + 1.5%, showing a further decline. In October, the year - on - year growth rate of infrastructure investment excluding electricity was - 8.9%, and the full - scale infrastructure was - 12.1%, accelerating the decline [18]. - **Future Outlook**: Although 50 billion of policy - based financial instruments were fully invested by the end of October, and the new orders and business activity expectations in the construction industry PMI improved, the actual workload may be postponed, and the investment data from November to December need to be verified [18]. 3.2.2 Real Estate - **Investment and Sales**: From January to October, the cumulative year - on - year growth rate of real estate investment was - 14.7%, and the single - month year - on - year was - 23.0%. The decline in construction narrowed, while the decline in new construction and completion expanded. In October, the year - on - year decline in residential sales area was - 19.6%, and the decline had been expanding for three consecutive months. The month - on - month decline in new and second - hand residential sales prices also expanded [23]. - **Future Outlook**: Attention should be paid to the probability of further adjustment of purchase - restriction policies in first - tier cities and the tone of the Central Economic Work Conference at the end of the year [23]. 3.2.3 Manufacturing Investment - **Investment Performance**: In October, the cumulative year - on - year growth rate of manufacturing investment was + 2.7%, and the single - month year - on - year was - 6.7%, with the decline expanding by 4.8 percentage points. Except for the automobile manufacturing and equipment transportation manufacturing industries, the single - month year - on - year growth rates of other industries turned negative [27]. - **Reasons and Outlook**: Due to the high base formed by the concentrated implementation of the equipment renewal policy from October to the end of last year and the bottom - up recovery of corporate profits and capacity control, manufacturing investment may continue to be in an adjustment period in the short term [27]. 3.2.4 Consumption - **Overall Situation**: In October, the year - on - year growth rate of social retail sales was + 2.9%, a slight decline from the previous month. The month - on - month seasonally adjusted growth rate recovered to + 0.16%, a relatively weak seasonal level [31]. - **Sub - items**: In terms of catering, the year - on - year growth rate was + 3.8%, and the month - on - month growth rate was + 15.3%, better than the average of the past three years. In terms of commodity retail, the year - on - year growth rate of above - quota commodity retail was + 1.4%, a decrease of 1.3 percentage points from September. Most subsidized categories showed a decline, while non - subsidized categories such as gold and silver jewelry performed well. The year - on - year growth rate of online commodity retail slowed down [36]. 3.2.5 Industry - **Production Situation**: In October, the year - on - year growth rate of industrial production was + 4.9%, and the month - on - month seasonally adjusted growth rate was + 0.17%, a seasonal decline and a relatively weak level since 2019. The decline in exports and the season - beginning effect dragged down manufacturing production [38]. - **Future Outlook**: In November, with the disappearance of holiday disturbances and the release of policy funds, industrial production may experience seasonal recovery [41].

Group 1: Financial Data Overview - In October 2025, new social financing (社融) amounted to 815 billion, a decrease from the previous value of 3.53 trillion[2] - The year-on-year growth of social financing stock was 8.5%, down from 8.7%[2] - M2 year-on-year growth was 8.2%, a decline from 8.4%[2] - New M1 year-on-year growth was 6.2%, down from 7.2%[2] Group 2: Key Insights - The continuous decrease in corporate medium to long-term loans for four months indicates a potential improvement in supply-demand balance[4] - The decline in household loans over the same period is more closely related to operational loans rather than consumer loans, which still show growth compared to 2024[4] - The significant increase in entrusted loans in October may be linked to the deployment of policy financial tools, although the impact on policy banks' balance sheets appears limited[4] - Direct financing through corporate bonds and domestic stock financing has shown consistent year-on-year growth, indicating a positive trend for high-tech and innovative enterprises[4] Group 3: Deposit Trends - Non-bank financial institution deposits increased by 770 billion year-on-year, suggesting stability in equity market transaction volumes[5] - The new M1's year-on-year decline is attributed to seasonal factors, with a notable drop from September's high growth[5] - The old M1 is expected to show a year-on-year decline, potentially dropping from 6.2% in September to around 3.4% by year-end, still above the -1.4% expected for the end of 2024[5] Group 4: Economic Indicators - Economic cycle indicators have shown a shift from the upward trend observed in the first eight months of the year, with September and October maintaining a fluctuating trend[6] - The change in the enterprise-resident deposit scissors difference indicates a potential slowdown in economic activity, which could impact future corporate profits[6]

Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information provided in the report regarding the industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints - In October 2025, new RMB loans were 220 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 280 billion yuan, and the credit balance growth rate dropped to 6.5%. The new social financing scale was 815 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 597 billion yuan, and the social financing stock growth rate declined from 8.7% to 8.5%. The year-on-year growth rate of M2 decreased from 8.4% to 8.2% due to the base effect, and the growth rate of the new M1 caliber dropped from 7.2% to 6.2%. Overall, October is a small month for credit at the beginning of the quarter, mainly relying on on-balance-sheet bills to make up for the shortfall. Among them, short-term household loans are the main drag, and the "shopping festival" effect has limited driving force. In the fourth quarter, due to the high base of government bond issuance, the growth rate of social financing continues to decline. The M2 growth rate slightly declines, with non-bank deposits being the main supporting item, and the M1 growth rate ends its six-month upward trend [1][7]. Summary by Related Catalogs Credit: Short-term Household Loans as the Main Drag, and Long-term Corporate Loans Weakening - **Household Sector**: In October, short-term household loans decreased by 286.6 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 335.6 billion yuan, continuing to be significantly lower than the seasonal level. Long-term household loans decreased by 70 billion yuan, recording a negative growth for the first time in recent years, a year-on-year decrease of 180 billion yuan. The month-on-month sprint effect of new and second-hand housing sales is not significant. Under the high base and policy stability, the overall sales performance is weaker than that in September [2][10]. - **Corporate Sector**: In October, long-term corporate loans only increased by 30 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 140 billion yuan. The relatively strong corporate loans at the end of September may have partially overdrawn the quota for October. Coupled with the limited driving force of policy-based financial instruments and the approach of the economic "off-season" at the end of the year, it is difficult for long-term corporate loans to have a significant increase. In terms of bills, bill financing increased by 500.6 billion yuan in the same month, a year-on-year increase of 331.2 billion yuan, and the demand for bills to "make up for the shortfall" significantly increased [2][15]. Social Financing: The Support of Government Bonds Declines at the End of the Year, and Entrusted Loans Increase - **Government Bonds**: The issuance of government bonds decreased in October, with new government bonds of 489.3 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 560.2 billion yuan. In the fourth quarter, it enters the off-season for bond issuance. The net financing of government bonds from November to December may be 1.8 trillion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 1.1 trillion yuan. The growth rate of social financing may decline to around 8.2% by the end of the year [3][17]. - **Entrusted Loans and Undiscounted Bills**: Driven by the "500 billion" policy-based financial instruments, entrusted loans increased by 165.3 billion yuan in October, a year-on-year increase of 187.2 billion yuan, becoming an important supporting item for social financing. In addition, undiscounted bills decreased by 289.4 billion yuan in October, 149.8 billion yuan lower than the same period last year. Due to the relatively strong credit performance in September, the conversion of undiscounted bills to on-balance-sheet was limited. In October, banks' concentrated "ticket grabbing" in the secondary market led to a significant decrease in off-balance-sheet bills [3][23]. Deposits: High Growth of Non-bank Deposits, Possibly Driven by Both Wealth Management Growth and the Equity Market - **M1 and M2 - M1 Spread**: The month-on-month increase of the new M1 caliber was lower than that of the same period last year, and the M2 - M1 spread slightly widened. In October last year, there was a high base for M1. In October, the new M1 caliber decreased by 1.1 trillion yuan, 1.0 trillion yuan more than the decrease in 2024. In terms of growth rate, the year-on-year reading of M1 decreased from 7.2% to 6.2% [4][27]. - **Non-bank Deposits and Household Deposits**: Among the M2 components, non-bank deposits increased significantly beyond the seasonal level again, while household deposits were slightly lower than the historical average. By sector, non-bank deposits increased by 1.85 trillion yuan in October, 770 billion yuan more than the same period in 2024. Household deposits decreased by 1.34 trillion yuan in the same month, 770 billion yuan more than the decrease in the same period last year. Since October, the equity market has continued to be strong, and the growth of wealth management product scale at the beginning of the quarter may jointly drive the decrease in household deposits and the significant increase in non-bank deposits [4][31].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Strong Buy" rating for 康耐特光学 (02276.HK) [1] Core Views - The company has seen a significant increase in sales of smart glasses, with a 25-fold year-on-year growth in transaction value during the Double Eleven shopping festival, ranking as the top seller in the smart glasses category on Tmall [1] - The company is expected to benefit from its strong position in the XR (Extended Reality) market, with a focus on consumer-grade products gaining traction [1] - The company is actively expanding its production capacity, with a new factory in Japan expected to enhance its North American business and reduce tariffs [1] - The report projects steady revenue growth, with total revenue expected to reach 2,061 million HKD in 2024, growing to 3,380 million HKD by 2027, representing a CAGR of approximately 19.2% [1][7] - Net profit is forecasted to grow from 428 million HKD in 2024 to 869 million HKD in 2027, with a CAGR of about 25% [1][7] - The target price for the stock is set at 63.63 HKD, reflecting a valuation of 40 times earnings for 2026 [2][6] Financial Summary - Total revenue projections: - 2024A: 2,061 million HKD - 2025E: 2,347 million HKD - 2026E: 2,835 million HKD - 2027E: 3,380 million HKD - Net profit projections: - 2024A: 428 million HKD - 2025E: 564 million HKD - 2026E: 696 million HKD - 2027E: 869 million HKD - Earnings per share (EPS) projections: - 2024A: 0.89 HKD - 2025E: 1.18 HKD - 2026E: 1.45 HKD - 2027E: 1.81 HKD - Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio projections: - 2024A: 47 - 2025E: 40 - 2026E: 33 - 2027E: 26 [1][7]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Strong Buy" rating for the company, expecting it to outperform the benchmark index by over 20% in the next six months [2][9]. Core Views - The company reported a revenue of 4.03 billion yuan in Q3 2025, a year-on-year decrease of 4.4%. The net profit attributable to shareholders was 920 million yuan, down 10.3% year-on-year [2][9]. - The traditional business is under pressure due to industry conditions, but the company is actively developing new products and moving towards smart ecosystems to mitigate the impact of low demand in the real estate sector [9]. - The company is making significant progress in its new energy business, which is expected to form a second growth curve in the future [9]. - The gross margin for Q3 2025 was 41.7%, a decline of 1.8 percentage points year-on-year, primarily due to the increasing revenue share from the lower-margin new energy business [9]. - Operating cash flow improved significantly, with a net cash flow of 1.24 billion yuan in Q3 2025, up 90.2% year-on-year [9]. Financial Summary - Total revenue projections for 2024A, 2025E, 2026E, and 2027E are 16.83 billion, 16.66 billion, 17.81 billion, and 18.71 billion yuan respectively, with a year-on-year growth rate of 7.2%, -1.0%, 6.9%, and 5.0% [4][10]. - Net profit attributable to shareholders is projected to be 4.27 billion, 3.99 billion, 4.38 billion, and 4.66 billion yuan for the same years, with corresponding growth rates of 10.4%, -6.6%, 9.7%, and 6.3% [4][10]. - The earnings per share (EPS) forecast for 2025E is 2.21 yuan, with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 20 [4][10]. - The target price is set at 54.6 yuan, compared to the current price of 43.80 yuan [4][10].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: A-share Market Cap/GDP Ratio (Buffett Indicator) - **Model Construction Idea**: The ratio of the total market capitalization of the stock market to GDP is used to measure the alignment between market valuation and the economic fundamentals. A lower ratio indicates the market is undervalued relative to the economy, suggesting potential room for a bull market, while a higher ratio signals potential market bubbles[16][17]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The formula is: $ \text{Buffett Indicator} = \frac{\text{Total Market Cap of A-share}}{\text{GDP}} $ - Interpretation: - Below 60%: Severely undervalued, often seen during major bear markets or periods of extreme economic pessimism (e.g., 2005, 2008, 2013-2014, 2018, and October 2022)[16] - Above 100%: Significantly overvalued, indicating potential market bubbles (e.g., 150% during the 2007 bull market peak, 120% during the 2015 bull market peak)[17] - **Model Evaluation**: This indicator is a useful tool for long-term asset allocation and strategic market timing. However, it should not be used as the sole decision-making tool and is not suitable for short-term trading[20]. 2. Model Name: Ratio of Household Deposits to Total Market Cap - **Model Construction Idea**: This ratio reflects the relative abundance of "off-market funds" compared to "on-market assets." It is conceptualized as the "water reservoir" (household deposits) versus the "irrigated farmland" (stock market capitalization)[21]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The formula is: $ \text{Ratio} = \frac{\text{Household Deposits}}{\text{Total Market Cap of A-share}} $ - Interpretation: - A higher ratio indicates more off-market funds relative to the stock market, suggesting potential for market inflows - A lower ratio indicates a higher proportion of funds already invested in the market - **Model Evaluation**: Similar to the Buffett Indicator, this ratio provides a general indication of market conditions but cannot pinpoint exact turning points. It is also slightly overestimated as it does not account for Chinese investments in overseas markets like Hong Kong and the US[24]. 3. Model Name: Financing Balance/Total A-share Free-float Market Cap Ratio (Leverage Activity Indicator) - **Model Construction Idea**: This ratio measures the activity level of leveraged funds in the A-share market and serves as a barometer for market risk appetite. It evaluates the proportion of the market driven by borrowed funds[25]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The formula is: $ \text{Leverage Activity Ratio} = \frac{\text{Financing Balance}}{\text{Total A-share Free-float Market Cap}} $ - Interpretation: - A higher ratio indicates high investor sentiment and optimism, with more willingness to leverage - A lower ratio indicates lower investor confidence - **Model Evaluation**: While this indicator is useful for gauging market trends, it should be used cautiously as leverage can amplify both market gains and losses. It is essential to remain aware of the potential risks associated with high leverage[28]. 4. Model Name: Stock-Bond Investment Cost-Effectiveness (Equity Risk Premium) - **Model Construction Idea**: This model compares the expected returns of stocks and bonds to determine which asset class offers better value. It measures the equity risk premium, which is the additional return investors expect for taking on the higher risk of stocks[29]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The formula is: $ \text{Equity Risk Premium} = \text{Expected Stock Market Return} - \text{Bond Yield} $ - Interpretation: - Equity risk premium > 4%: Stocks are undervalued and have high cost-effectiveness - Equity risk premium between 2%-4%: Stocks are slightly more attractive, suggesting a balanced allocation - Equity risk premium < 2%: Bonds become more attractive due to their defensive value - **Model Evaluation**: This indicator is a reliable measure of relative attractiveness between stocks and bonds. However, it should be used in conjunction with other macroeconomic indicators for a comprehensive analysis[32]. 5. Model Name: Market Overall Valuation - **Model Construction Idea**: This indicator evaluates the overall valuation level of the market. When the valuation reaches historically high levels, it signals that asset prices are expensive, and market sentiment is overly optimistic, potentially forming a market top[33]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The valuation is calculated based on historical data and compared to previous market peaks - Historical reference points include 2015 (valuation of 23.11) and 2018 (valuation of 19.12) - **Model Evaluation**: While this indicator is useful for identifying potential market tops, it should be used alongside macroeconomic factors. High valuations do not always indicate an imminent market top, as markets can remain overvalued for extended periods[36]. 6. Model Name: Low-Priced Stock Ratio - **Model Construction Idea**: This indicator analyzes the proportion of low-priced stocks in the market, which tends to increase during the late stages of a bull market due to speculative behavior. It serves as an auxiliary indicator for market trend analysis[37]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The ratio is calculated as the proportion of low-priced stocks in the market - Historical trends are analyzed to identify correlations between low-priced stock ratios and market trends - **Model Evaluation**: This indicator is not an absolute signal but serves as a supplementary tool for market analysis. It is particularly useful for identifying speculative bubbles in the market[40]. 7. Model Name: Shareholder Reduction - **Model Construction Idea**: This indicator tracks the behavior of corporate insiders (e.g., shareholders) who are considered to have the best understanding of a company's intrinsic value. A significant increase in shareholder reduction may indicate overvaluation[41]. - **Model Construction Process**: - Monthly frequency data is used to calculate: $ \text{Net Reduction Events} = \frac{\text{Reduction Events} - \text{Increase Events}}{\text{Total Number of Stocks}} $ - **Model Evaluation**: This indicator is more effective in identifying market bottoms when shareholder increases outnumber reductions. It is less reliable for identifying market tops but can still provide valuable insights when combined with other indicators[44]. 8. Model Name: Small Transaction Volume - **Model Construction Idea**: This indicator reflects market sentiment and changes in participant structure. It is based on the logic of the transition between "retail investors entering" and "smart money exiting"[45]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The indicator is calculated as follows: 1. Calculate the ratio of small order net active buy volume to total trading volume for each stock on a weekly basis 2. Select the top 10% of stocks with the highest retail participation 3. Compute the average of the indicator for these stocks and standardize it using a 150-week rolling z-score - **Model Evaluation**: This indicator is a useful supplementary signal for market sentiment. However, it should be used in conjunction with other indicators, as small transaction volume alone may not provide a complete picture of market conditions[48]. 9. Model Name: CSI 300 Turnover Ratio - **Model Construction Idea**: This indicator measures the proportion of CSI 300 turnover relative to the total A-share market turnover. It is used to assess changes in market capital flow and risk appetite, providing insights into whether the market is driven by value or speculation[49]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The formula is: $ \text{CSI 300 Turnover Ratio} = \frac{\text{CSI 300 Turnover}}{\text{Total A-share Turnover}} $ - A 5-day moving average is used for stability - **Model Evaluation**: This indicator is effective in identifying market tops, especially when the ratio exceeds 45%. Currently, the ratio is at 26%, indicating a healthy market condition[53]. 10. Model Name: Proportion of Equity Fund Issuance - **Model Construction Idea**: This classic market sentiment indicator examines the relationship between equity fund issuance and market performance. Extreme values and trends in this ratio are considered warning signs of market overheating[54]. - **Model Construction Process**: - The formula is: $ \text{Proportion of Equity Fund Issuance} = \frac{\text{Monthly Equity Fund Issuance}}{\text{Total A-share Free-float Market Cap}} $ - **Model Evaluation**: The peak values of this indicator have a strong correlation with market trends. Currently, the proportion is relatively low, indicating a healthy market condition[57]. --- Model Backtesting Results 1. A-share Market Cap/GDP Ratio (Buffett Indicator) - Current value: 88%[17] 2. Ratio of Household Deposits to Total Market Cap - Current value: 47.35%[24] 3. Financing Balance/Total A-share Free-float Market Cap Ratio - Current value: 2.5%[28] 4. Stock-Bond Investment Cost-Effectiveness (Equity Risk Premium) - Current value: 3.96%[32] 5. Market Overall Valuation - Current value: 17.33[36] 6. Market Low-Priced Stock Ratio - Current value:

Report Title - "Bond Daily Report: Emphasize the Transmission of Monetary Policy and Balance the Interest Rate Parity Relationship - Interpretation of the 2025 Q3 Monetary Policy Report" [1] Report Summary - On November 12, 2025, the central bank released the Q3 2025 Monetary Policy Implementation Report. The overall tone has changed, with liquidity, entity financing, cost reduction, exchange rate, and interest rate policies all showing corresponding adjustments [6]. Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the report. Core Viewpoints - The report sends a strong signal for steady growth, is more cautious about the external situation, and strengthens the demand for steady growth led by domestic demand. The policy tone has been adjusted, and the possibility of front - loaded monetary policy next year cannot be ruled out. Although the statement of "preventing capital idling" is removed, the space for significant easing is limited. It also guides the market to rationally view the credit growth rate affected by factors such as debt replacement and proposes to maintain a "reasonable interest rate parity relationship" [3][32]. Summaries According to the Table of Contents 1. Focus on Steady Growth and Acknowledge the Improvement in Price Operation - Be cautious about the external situation and have a strong demand for domestic steady growth and stable expectations. The description of the external environment has become more cautious, and more emphasis is placed on expanding domestic demand in the internal environment. The report describes price operation more positively, acknowledging the marginal changes in CPI and PPI and also emphasizing long - term supply - demand contradictions [3][7][8] 2. Change from "Implementing in Detail" to "Implementing Well", and from "Counter - cyclical" to "Counter - cyclical and Cross - cyclical" - "Implementing in detail" is changed to "implementing well", and "counter - cyclical adjustment" is adjusted to "counter - cyclical and cross - cyclical adjustment". This does not mean that the window for aggregate easing is completely closed [3][11] 3. Do Not Mention "Preventing Capital Idling", but Still Pay Attention to Overnight Fund Operation - The statement of "preventing capital idling" is not mentioned, but the control over the money market is strengthened, and it is difficult to expect a significant loosening of capital prices. The operation time of outright repurchase and MLF is clearly defined [3][14][15] 4. Maintain a Reasonable Growth of Financial Aggregates and Pay More Attention to Social Financing and Money Supply - Emphasize maintaining a reasonable growth of financial aggregates, mainly focusing on social financing scale and money supply. The credit growth rate has declined due to the crowding - out effect of replacement bonds. Continue to promote the reduction of the comprehensive social financing cost and pay attention to stabilizing the net interest margin of banks [3][19][20] 5. Exchange Rate Pressure Eases, and the Statement of "Three Resolves" Fades - In the exchange rate statement, the emphasis is on preventing exchange rate over - adjustment risks, and the statement of "three resolves" is faded, indicating that the pressure on the RMB exchange rate has eased [3][23] 6. Do Not Directly Mention "Pay Attention to the Trend of Long - term Interest Rates", but Emphasize Maintaining a Reasonable Interest Rate Parity - The text does not directly mention "pay attention to the trend of long - term yields", but proposes to balance the interest rate parity relationship of each group to smooth the transmission of monetary policy, and lists several key interest rate relationships [3][27]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Strong Buy" rating for Anjuke Food (603345) with a target price of 100 CNY [2][6]. Core Insights - The sales momentum is accelerating, indicating a clear operational turning point for the company. The recent sales data from October to November shows a positive trend, driven by factors such as low channel inventory and the introduction of new products. The upcoming winter season is expected to further boost demand for frozen food products [6][2]. - The report highlights that the price war in the frozen food industry is showing signs of easing, which could lead to an improved market structure. The supply side is stabilizing as new capacity additions are expected to decrease, while demand is recovering from previous lows [6][2]. - Anjuke Food is anticipated to enter a prolonged improvement cycle, with the potential for significant market share gains and profit elasticity if demand continues to recover [6][2]. Financial Summary - **Revenue Forecast**: Projected total revenue for 2024 is 15,127 million CNY, with a growth rate of 7.7%. By 2027, revenue is expected to reach 18,231 million CNY, growing at a rate of 7.4% [2][7]. - **Net Profit Forecast**: The net profit attributable to the parent company is forecasted to be 1,485 million CNY in 2024, with a slight increase to 1,679 million CNY by 2027, reflecting a growth rate of 9.8% [2][7]. - **Earnings Per Share (EPS)**: EPS is projected to be 4.46 CNY in 2024, increasing to 5.04 CNY by 2027 [2][7]. - **Valuation Ratios**: The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is expected to decrease from 18 in 2024 to 16 in 2027, indicating a more attractive valuation over time [2][7]. Market Position and Competitive Landscape - Anjuke Food is positioned as a market leader in the frozen food sector, actively innovating and expanding its product lines while effectively managing costs. The company is expected to leverage its competitive advantages to capture more market share as the industry stabilizes [6][2]. - The report notes that the overall industry dynamics are improving, with a potential for Anjuke Food to replicate past successes during recovery phases, similar to the period from 2013 to 2016 [6][2].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Strong Buy" rating for the company, indicating an expectation to outperform the benchmark index by over 20% in the next six months [1][17]. Core Insights - The company reported significant year-on-year growth in Q3 2025, with revenue reaching 20.39 billion yuan, up 13.89%, and net profit attributable to shareholders at 3.25 billion yuan, up 160.22% [1]. - The third quarter revenue was 7.06 billion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 21.22% but a quarter-on-quarter decrease of 6.22%. The net profit for Q3 was 1.20 billion yuan, up 186.55% year-on-year but down 3.6% quarter-on-quarter [1]. - The report highlights the ongoing upward trend in the third-generation refrigerants market, with expectations for continued price increases due to supply-demand dynamics [7]. Financial Performance Summary - For the first three quarters of 2025, the company achieved total revenue of 20.39 billion yuan, with a net profit of 3.25 billion yuan [1]. - The financial projections for 2024 to 2027 indicate a steady growth trajectory, with total revenue expected to rise from 24.46 billion yuan in 2024 to 40.78 billion yuan in 2027, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.4% [3]. - The net profit is projected to increase from 1.96 billion yuan in 2024 to 8.32 billion yuan in 2027, with corresponding growth rates of 107.7% in 2024 and 25.7% in 2027 [3]. Market Position and Outlook - The company is positioned as a leader in the third-generation refrigerants market, benefiting from strong pricing power and industry dynamics that favor continued price increases [7]. - The report anticipates that the company will achieve net profits of 4.37 billion yuan in 2025, 6.62 billion yuan in 2026, and 8.32 billion yuan in 2027, with respective growth rates of 123.1%, 51.5%, and 25.7% [7]. - The target price for the company's stock is set at 49 yuan, based on a 20x price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio for 2026, indicating significant upside potential from the current price of 34.70 yuan [3][7].