杨忠厚 办事，谁不图个痛快？政策讲清楚，要求说明白，条件符合就利利索索办，哪块儿不行再一起想办法， 办事者有获得感，工作人员有成就感，多好！ 但现实中也有"不痛快"的现象。办一件事儿，今天让你补这个件，明天冲你要那个件，折腾来折腾去， 就是不一次性说清楚；本可立等可取，偏让你等，等多久，没准信儿，逼着你到处找关系说情；动辄拿 规定当挡箭牌，告诉你不行，不告诉你怎么才能行……这么办事，谁不糟心？ 痛痛快快为群众办事，本该如此，本不是事儿。不痛快，原因何在？ 可能是能力问题，办不明白，怕出错，怕担责，那就是不称职，需要换岗换人。可能是态度问题，没把 老百姓的事当成自己家的事来办，那就必须转变思维，少当管理者，多做服务者。还有可能是故意为 之，"不痛快"里留下了权力寻租的空间，那就是失德失职甚至违纪违法了，必须严惩。 全省营商环境大会提出加快建设"五个环境"，其中之一就是高效便利的政务环境，并给出了明确具体的 实践路径。重拳出击、动真碰硬、雷霆手段，这话，每个公职人员都应掂掂其中的分量。 欣喜的是，好的典型正在不断涌现：秒批、零跑路、全科窗口、容缺办理……如此，岂不痛快！ 责编：曹思洋 审核：刘立纲 ...

金融圈再现一起非国家工作人员受贿罪案件。 据裁判文书网近日披露，某评级公司的市场总监刘某利用自身职务便利，为一公司信用等级评定提供帮助，两 次收取好处费162万元。最终，刘某被判处有期徒刑四年，并处罚金10万元。 2025年6月，一审刑事判决结果出炉，法院认为被告人刘某身为公司工作人员，利用职务上的便利，非法收受 他人财物，为他人谋取利益，数额巨大，其行为已经构成非国家工作人员受贿罪，依法应予惩处。鉴于案发前 已归还行贿款，故对刘某判处有期徒刑四年，并处罚金10万元。与此同时，向中某集团有限公司追缴162万 元，予以没收。 不过，一审后，刘某不服，提出上诉，近日披露的即为二审结果。刘某在上诉中称，涉案钱款系王某基于男女 朋友关系支付的生活费和学费。而且其只负责前端市场部工作，工作内容不包括对企业评级，为客户催促评级 报告是其正常履职行为，其没有利用职务便利为中某公司谋取利益。此外，她还称，其在公安机关的有罪供述 系在威胁、引诱下作出，内容不真实。 法院经审定在案证人证言，以及涉案钱款数额、往来背景、时机和方式以及刘某在收受钱款期间的行为等多种 因素，都证明了刘某的犯罪行为。最终，法院维持了一审判决。 金融机构 ...

引言摘要 近日，媒体曝出银川市政府原党组成员、副市长郭柏春（副厅级）涉嫌挪用公款、滥用职权一案，已完 成审查起诉相关准备工作，正等待开庭通知。 该案因郭柏春"官员+高管"的双重身份、跨国追逃的曲折情节及背后盘根错节的资本网络，备受社会关 注。 12月12日，中国金融网刊发《涉案金融副市长被跨国追逃遣返》，以及指尖新闻刊发《银川市原副市长 郭柏春案待开庭 曾跨国追逃归案涉多项罪名》等报道披露了郭柏春一案的相关细节。 综合媒体报道与司法文件，银川市原副市长郭柏春、天娱数科前董事长徐德伟等人曾以"借款纾困"为幌 子，用5亿元国有资金铺路，上演了一出从"权力寻租"到"资本掌控"的连环操作。 这起看似单的违规借款，更像一场精心策划的、以公权谋私利的系统性腾挪——先动用国有资本为民营 企业"输血"，再借道市场化运作完成身份转换，最终实现对目标公司的实际控制，其操作链条之隐蔽、 时间跨度之长，令人瞠目。 5亿国有资金违规"输血"背后 时间拨回到2016年12月。 彼时的郭柏春正担任银川市人民政府党组成员、副市长，手握金融监管重权。 作为分管金融的副市长，郭柏春一直被称为"资本运作高手"，深谙国有资本的运作逻辑。 相关司法材 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of Wu Hua, former president of Wenzhou Bank, highlights severe corruption within the banking sector, emphasizing the need for strict legal enforcement against financial crimes to protect national and public interests [4][5]. Summary by Sections Case Background - Wu Hua, born in 1968, held various positions in banking before becoming the president and vice chairman of Wenzhou Bank in 2009. He was investigated for serious violations in August 2019 and expelled from the party and public office in May 2020 [1]. Corruption Details - In 2016, Wu colluded with a company manager to issue a 500 million yuan guarantee loan, receiving benefits in return. In 2017, he approved another loan of 500 million yuan at an 8% interest rate [1][2]. - The company later agreed to pay Wu a fixed return of 9.5% on the loan, totaling over 142 million yuan disguised as consulting fees [2]. - Wu was found to have misappropriated over 508 million yuan for personal use and facilitated unauthorized loans totaling 501 million yuan, resulting in significant losses for Wenzhou Bank [2][3]. Legal Proceedings - In December 2022, Wu was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve for bribery, along with additional sentences for embezzlement and illegal loan issuance, totaling 29 years in prison [3]. - The Zhejiang Provincial High Court upheld the original ruling, confirming the severity of Wu's actions and the legal consequences [3]. Implications for the Banking Sector - The case serves as a critical example of the risks posed by corrupt practices in banking, where key decision-makers can exploit their positions, leading to substantial financial losses and damage to the financial ecosystem [4][5]. - The judicial response underscores a commitment to combating corruption in the banking industry, reinforcing the importance of integrity and accountability among financial leaders [5].

Core Viewpoint - Recent investigations reveal that while "collective decision-making" processes appear to be followed, they often conceal corruption issues, with some officials manipulating these processes for personal gain [1][2][5] Group 1: Corruption Tactics - Some officials use "collective decision-making" as a facade to hide their corrupt practices, often involving pre-arranged agreements and interest bundling [2][5] - A case was highlighted where a town party secretary, after facing disciplinary action for previous misconduct, began to integrate personal interests into the collective decision-making process [2][3] - In a state-owned grain enterprise, three executives formed a corrupt partnership, manipulating decisions to benefit themselves financially [3][5] Group 2: Distortion of Procedures - The concept of "pre-decision preparation" has been twisted into "pre-arranged agreements," allowing officials to embed personal interests into decision-making [5][8] - Some officials bypass collective discussions by citing "superior's emphasis" or "efficiency priority," effectively making unilateral decisions [6][8] - Instances were reported where local leaders misused collective decision-making to facilitate personal projects, such as splitting contracts to favor relatives [6][7] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest tightening the constraints on "collective decision-making" processes to reduce opportunities for corruption, focusing on the accountability of key decision-makers [8][9] - Implementing a "three must-pass" mechanism for scientific validation, integrity checks, and legality reviews before collective decisions is recommended [8] - Enhancing transparency through technology, such as big data analysis, to identify abnormal decision-making patterns and ensure public access to decision-making information [9]

Core Insights - The IMF report highlights severe systemic corruption issues within Ghana's public procurement system [1] - Companies often need to pay substantial "extra payments" to secure government contracts, fostering a shadow economy around public spending [1] - Over the past 20 years, approximately $358 million in judgment debts have arisen due to this corruption [1] Corruption and Accountability - The ruling party and its affiliates manipulate state institutions for rent-seeking purposes, leading to scandals involving misappropriation of public funds in various sectors, including youth employment agencies and education funds [1] - There is a notable lack of accountability in prosecuting corruption cases involving political figures, which undermines the credibility of the country's anti-corruption mechanisms [1] Sector-Specific Risks - The natural resources sector, particularly oil, mining, and cocoa industries, faces significant revenue loss risks due to weak regulatory frameworks [1]

Core Viewpoint - Nancy Pelosi's investment success, with a staggering return rate of 16,930%, significantly outperforms both the Dow Jones index and Warren Buffett's annual returns, raising questions about the influence of political power on investment opportunities [1][3]. Group 1: Pelosi's Investment Journey - Pelosi's stock trading career began in 1987, coinciding with her political career, and has evolved into a significant portfolio valued at approximately $280 million, alongside other assets totaling $413 million [1][3]. - In 2024, Pelosi achieved a single-year profit of 70.9%, more than double the S&P 500's 25% increase, outperforming many hedge funds [3][4]. Group 2: Investment Strategy and Holdings - Pelosi's portfolio includes major tech stocks, with Apple being her largest holding valued between $25 million and $50 million, alongside other giants like Nvidia and Netflix [4]. - Her trading precision is notable, exemplified by a $2.4 million investment in Nvidia call options that appreciated to over $7.2 million within a year, and an 8-fold increase in Visa stock over a decade [5]. Group 3: Factors Behind Investment Success - The success of Pelosi's investments is attributed to a combination of power, information access, and strategic sector focus, allowing her to leverage policy insights that ordinary investors lack [7][8]. - Pelosi focuses on high-growth sectors influenced by government policy, such as technology and defense, ensuring her investments align with favorable government initiatives [11][12]. - Despite claiming her husband manages the trades, the couple employs a professional investment team, executing a strategy of short-term trading based on policy cycles rather than long-term value investing [13][14]. Group 4: Public Reaction and Legislative Response - Pelosi's investment success has sparked public outrage, with a significant decline in trust in Congress, as evidenced by a record low 9% approval rating [16]. - The emergence of "Pelosi stocks" as a market trend has led to speculative trading based on her investment decisions, distorting market dynamics [17]. - Legislative efforts, such as the proposed "Pelosi Act," aim to restrict stock trading by Congress members, though the bill has faced criticism for its loopholes and lack of comprehensive reform [18][20]. Group 5: Future Implications - The trend of profitable trading among U.S. politicians raises concerns about the sustainability of such practices, with increasing public pressure likely leading to stricter regulations [20]. - If individual stock trading is banned, politicians may resort to indirect investment methods, maintaining their access to market advantages while circumventing regulations [21]. - The disparity in investment returns between politicians and ordinary investors highlights systemic issues in market access and information asymmetry, challenging the integrity of the investment landscape [22].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the alarming issue of unregulated "nutrient soil" being sold online, made from untreated waste materials such as sludge from sewage treatment plants and industrial waste, posing potential health risks to consumers [1][2][3] Group 1: Industry Practices - Numerous well-known companies, including Nanjing Kangshifu and Weigang Dairy, are implicated in supplying sludge for the production of "nutrient soil," which may contain hazardous substances like heavy metals and pesticide residues [1][2] - The production of "nutrient soil" involves the use of industrial sludge, which is classified as "hazardous waste" and must be treated according to strict regulations, yet some manufacturers openly admit their inability to remove heavy metal residues [1][2] Group 2: Regulatory Oversight - In September 2022, the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, and Ministry of Ecology and Environment issued a plan for the harmless treatment and resource utilization of sludge, mandating full-process information management and traceability of sludge [2] - The article reveals a troubling lack of regulatory enforcement, with local market supervision departments potentially neglecting their responsibilities, leading to compromised consumer rights and safety [3] Group 3: Corruption and Influence - The industry is characterized by a complex supply chain and potential corruption, with some companies suggesting that relationships with local authorities are necessary for business operations [2][3] - The involvement of local power dynamics in the "nutrient soil" industry raises concerns about competition manipulation and the potential for power rent-seeking behaviors [3]

Core Viewpoint - The "nutrient soil" industry is facing serious issues as major brands are found to be selling products made from untreated waste materials, posing potential health risks to consumers [1][2][4] Group 1: Industry Practices - Major brands like "Huaxiangni" and "Xiaotianyuan" have been exposed for collaborating with waste disposal factories to produce "nutrient soil" from garbage, industrial sludge, and paper mill waste [1][2] - The raw materials used in the production of these "nutrient soils" include hazardous waste, which should not be utilized without proper treatment [2][3] - The industry is characterized by a lack of compliance with regulations, as some manufacturers openly admit their inability to remove heavy metal residues from their products [2][3] Group 2: Regulatory Oversight - The Chinese government has issued guidelines for the harmless treatment and resource utilization of sludge, emphasizing the need for full-process information management [2] - There are significant gaps in regulatory enforcement, with local market supervision departments potentially failing to act against non-compliant practices [3][4] - The involvement of local authorities in the industry raises concerns about power rent-seeking and the integrity of market competition [3][4] Group 3: Consumer Impact - Consumers who purchase "nutrient soil" for gardening may unknowingly expose themselves to harmful substances, as the products are derived from industrial waste [1][2] - The lack of transparency and accountability in the industry compromises consumer rights and safety [3][4] - The situation highlights the need for a thorough investigation into the industry's practices and regulatory failures to protect public health [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant corruption case involving a former executive at Kuaishou, highlighting the systemic issues of corruption within the internet industry, particularly in the context of rapid expansion and inadequate internal controls [2][11]. Group 1: Corruption Case Details - The case involves a former Kuaishou executive, Feng Dian, who embezzled 140 million yuan (approximately 20 million USD) through a scheme that exploited loopholes in subsidy policies [3][4]. - Feng Dian collaborated with external suppliers to create false applications for subsidies, leading to the illegal appropriation of funds meant for service providers [3][4]. - The embezzled funds were laundered through multiple shell companies and converted into cryptocurrencies to obscure their origin [4][10]. Group 2: Broader Industry Trends - The article notes a rising trend of corruption within the internet sector, with a significant number of cases reported in Haidian District, where 943 corruption cases involving 1,490 individuals were recorded, accounting for 75.26% of total cases [6][8]. - Corruption is prevalent among operational roles, where employees have significant decision-making power, leading to opportunities for misconduct [6][7]. - The article highlights that corruption is not limited to high-level executives; a majority of cases involve lower-level employees, reflecting a shift towards a more decentralized power structure in internet companies [8][10]. Group 3: Company Responses and Industry Implications - Internet companies are increasing their anti-corruption efforts, with enhanced internal controls and digital risk management systems being implemented [10][11]. - Some companies publicly disclose corruption cases to deter misconduct and signal a commitment to transparency, while Kuaishou opted for a low-profile response to avoid potential market backlash [11]. - The case serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities in corporate governance during periods of rapid growth, emphasizing the need for robust internal oversight mechanisms to prevent corruption [11].