Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, emphasized the need for the international community to revive multilateralism to maintain international peace and security, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the United Nations [1] Group 1: Historical Context - Fu Cong highlighted the significance of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, which established the fundamental principles of international relations as outlined in the UN Charter [1] - The current global landscape is characterized by turmoil and transformation, indicating that the pursuit of peace and development remains a significant challenge [1] Group 2: Call to Action - The international community is urged to use the 80th anniversary of the UN as an opportunity to reaffirm its commitment to multilateralism and the collective ideal of maintaining world peace [1] - Fu Cong stressed the importance of peaceful dispute resolution, advocating for respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity among countries [1] Group 3: Recommendations for Major Powers - Major powers are encouraged to facilitate dialogue and cooperation rather than exacerbate tensions or promote confrontation [1] - The emphasis is placed on mutual understanding and compromise to resolve differences and build consensus through dialogue [1]

当地时间22日，联合国教科文组织总干事阿祖莱发表声明，回应美国宣布再次退出教科文组织的决定。 阿祖莱对美方做法表示遗憾，并指出此举"违背多边主义的基本原则"。(央视新闻) ...

Core Points - The United States has announced its decision to withdraw from UNESCO again, citing perceived anti-Israel bias and divisive social issues promoted by the organization [1][3] - The withdrawal will officially take effect at the end of December 2026, marking a return to a previous stance taken during the Trump administration [1][4] - The U.S. has previously exited UNESCO twice, with the last exit occurring in 2018 under Trump, and rejoining in 2023 [1][4] Summary by Sections U.S. Withdrawal Reasons - The U.S. State Department claims that UNESCO promotes divisive social and cultural issues, which contradicts the policies supported by American voters [1] - Allegations of the organization being anti-American, anti-Israel, and pro-China were also cited as reasons for the withdrawal [1] Impact on UNESCO - Reuters describes the U.S. withdrawal as a setback for UNESCO, while the Associated Press notes that the organization will still be able to operate despite the reduced U.S. funding, which has decreased to 8% of its budget [3] - UNESCO was founded in 1946, with the U.S. being one of the 37 founding members [3] Historical Context - The U.S. first withdrew from UNESCO in 1984 due to mismanagement and political exploitation, only to rejoin in 2003 [3] - The organization faced tensions with the U.S. after accepting Palestine as a member in 2011, leading to the U.S. halting its annual contributions of $80 million [4] - The U.S. last exited UNESCO in 2018 after the organization designated a site in Hebron as a Palestinian World Heritage site, which was met with strong opposition from the U.S. and Israel [4]

Group 1 - The article discusses the impact of Trump's return to power on transatlantic relations, highlighting the challenges and adjustments faced by the EU in maintaining its alliance with the US while addressing issues related to security, trade, and international order [2][22][36] - The EU has adopted a multi-faceted approach to cope with Trump's policies, utilizing cultural ties and institutional channels to maintain communication and cooperation with the US [4][5][22] - The article emphasizes that the EU has refrained from retaliating against US tariffs, opting instead for negotiations, reflecting a strategic choice to avoid direct confrontation with Trump [7][8][19] Group 2 - The EU's response to the Ukraine conflict illustrates its ability to adapt to Trump's stance, as it continues to support Ukraine while also aligning with Trump's calls for peace negotiations [9][10][22] - The article notes that the EU has shifted its approach towards China, moving from criticism to cooperation, which serves as a bargaining chip in negotiations with the US [14][16][22] - The historical context of transatlantic relations is explored, indicating that the relationship has entered a phase of decline due to the absence of a common enemy and changing geopolitical dynamics [25][36][36]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. President Trump's announcement of potential 100% tariffs on Russia and secondary sanctions on countries purchasing Russian energy has raised significant international concern, particularly from India, which relies heavily on Russian oil imports [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policy - The proposed 100% tariffs on Russian goods are unlikely to have a substantial direct impact on the Russian economy, as the total U.S.-Russia trade is only about $3.5 billion, with over 85% of U.S. imports from Russia consisting of fertilizers and inorganic chemicals [1]. - The real threat lies in the secondary sanctions targeting countries that buy Russian energy, which could impose tariffs as high as 100% or more [1][3]. Group 2: India's Response - India, as the third-largest oil consumer globally, imports 85% of its oil, with approximately 35% sourced from Russia. The Indian government emphasizes the importance of securing its energy needs and is wary of double standards in trade [3]. - Indian officials have indicated that they can diversify their oil imports, increasing the number of sourcing countries from 27 to 40, thus mitigating the impact of potential U.S. sanctions [3]. Group 3: Geopolitical Implications - The U.S. tariff threats may inadvertently strengthen cooperation between China and India, as both countries face similar trade pressures from the U.S. [5]. - India's strategic autonomy is challenged by U.S. actions, leading to discussions about reviving trilateral cooperation with Russia and China [3][5]. Group 4: Criticism of U.S. Policy - Critics in the U.S. argue that secondary tariffs will not deter countries from purchasing Russian energy and may damage the U.S.'s reputation as a reliable trade partner [5][7]. - Research indicates that imposing such tariffs could result in significant economic losses for the U.S., potentially up to $30 trillion, and increase the likelihood of a recession [5][7]. Group 5: Global Trade Dynamics - The unilateral approach of the U.S. is seen as damaging to multilateral trade systems and could accelerate the shift towards a multipolar international order [7]. - The ongoing geopolitical tensions and trade disputes highlight the complexities of global interdependence, suggesting that dialogue and cooperation are essential for resolving conflicts [7].

Core Points - The upcoming 25th China-EU leaders' meeting is significant as it marks the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and the EU, as well as the 80th anniversary of the United Nations [1] - China-EU relations have become one of the most influential bilateral relationships globally, yielding substantial cooperation results that benefit nearly 2 billion people in both regions [1] - The current international situation is characterized by increasing turbulence, unilateralism, and protectionism, making the leaders' meeting crucial for enhancing strategic communication and deepening dialogue and cooperation [1] - China expresses willingness to work with the EU to send a positive signal of commitment to strengthening partnership and upholding multilateralism and open cooperation through a successful meeting [1]

Core Points - The article discusses the escalating trade tensions between the United States and the European Union, particularly focusing on the U.S. decision to increase tariffs on EU goods, which has sparked a potential trade war [1][3][9] Group 1: U.S. Tariff Actions - The U.S. has proposed raising tariffs on most European goods to 15% or higher, exceeding the EU's previous compromise target of 10% [1] - The U.S. maintains a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum and a 25% tariff on automobiles from the EU, which has put significant pressure on European economies, especially Germany [3] - Trump's recent letter indicated that the new 30% tariff would take effect on August 1, marking a 10 percentage point increase from the previously proposed 20% [3] Group 2: EU's Response - Germany has shifted from a conciliatory stance to a more aggressive position, indicating readiness to implement retaliatory tariffs and other countermeasures against U.S. actions [4] - The EU is preparing a first round of counter-tariffs valued at €21 billion, with a second round of €72 billion already on the agenda [7] - The EU is considering measures such as limiting U.S. companies' access to public procurement markets and introducing a digital services tax [7] Group 3: Internal EU Dynamics - There are divisions within the EU regarding the response to U.S. tariffs, with countries like France advocating for immediate retaliation, while export-oriented nations like Germany prefer negotiation [9] - The EU's strategy includes sincere negotiations, preparation for countermeasures, coordination with other countries, and enhancing competitiveness [7] - The deadline of August 1 is approaching, and if the U.S. maintains its stringent demands, a global trade war seems inevitable [9] Group 4: Broader Implications - The article suggests that the U.S. tariff policies are reshaping global trade dynamics, with Germany's newfound assertiveness reflecting a broader resistance to unilateralism and protectionism [9] - Strengthening cooperation between China and the EU is seen as a strategic move to counter U.S. tariffs, with significant trade volumes between the two regions [6] - The evolving situation indicates a potential shift towards a new multilateral trade order, as countries seek to resist unequal trade rules imposed by the U.S. [9]

2025.07. 22 本文字数：1155，阅读时长大约2分钟 封图 | 7 月 7日从 加 沙 边 境 以 色 列 一 侧 拍摄的加沙地带遭袭后升起浓烟 据环球网援引法新社报道，当地时间7月21日，英国、法国等25个国家发表联合声明称，加沙战 争"必须立即结束"。 根据英国政府网站21日发布的消息，英国、澳大利亚、奥地利、比利时、加拿大、丹麦、爱沙尼 亚、芬兰、法国、冰岛、爱尔兰、意大利、日本、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、卢森堡、荷兰、新西兰、挪 威、波兰、葡萄牙、斯洛文尼亚、西班牙、瑞典、瑞士发表了联合声明。 "加沙平民的苦难已达到前所未有的程度。以色列政府发放援助物资的模式是危险的，加剧不稳定， 剥夺加沙居民的人格尊严。"这些国家在声明中称，谴责对那些寻求满足自身最基本需求的民众进行 杀戮等行为。 声明还称，"我们敦促各方和国际社会团结一致，共同努力，促使通过立即无条件永久停火来结束这 场可怕的冲突"。 综合英国《卫报》等媒体报道，巴勒斯坦加沙地带卫生部门20日称，以军当天对援助物资分发点及 援助车队附近的民众开火，造成至少85人死亡。以军20日称，以方起初向加沙地带北部聚集的数千 名巴勒斯坦人鸣枪警告，随后为解 ...

蔡润说，50年来，中欧关系从建交到建立全面战略伙伴关系，经历国际风云变幻考验，保持稳定发 展势头，取得丰硕合作成果，也积累了重要的经验和启示：一是坚持元首外交对中欧关系的战略引领； 二是尊重各自人民选择的社会制度和发展道路，尊重彼此核心利益和重大关切；三是坚持伙伴定位，中 欧双方合作远大于竞争，共识远大于分歧，是伙伴而不是对手，更不是敌人；四是坚持互利共赢，中欧 务实合作的本质是优势互补、互利共赢，合作成果造福双方人民，也促进了世界的发展繁荣；五是坚持 多边主义，中欧都主张维护以联合国为核心的国际体系和国际秩序，维护以世界贸易组织为核心的多边 贸易体制，致力于推动世界多极化和经济全球化，共同应对气候变化、发展赤字等全球性挑战。 蔡润说，经贸合作是中欧关系的重要组成部分，在中欧关系中发挥着稳定器、促进器的作用。中国 和欧盟经济总量超过世界经济总量三分之一，贸易体量超过全球贸易体量四分之一。中欧经贸合作为世 界各国树立了互利共赢的典范，也有力拉动了全球经济增长，是世界发展繁荣的重要引擎。 蔡润说，中欧都是以世界贸易组织为核心的多边贸易体制的支持者和维护者，都主张自由贸易。面 对单边主义、保护主义的冲击，国际社会更 ...

中国外交部7月21日宣布，经中欧双方商定，欧洲理事会主席科斯塔、欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩将于7月 24日访华。国家主席习近平将会见科斯塔主席和冯德莱恩主席，国务院总理李强将同欧盟两主席共同主 持第二十五次中国—欧盟领导人会晤。在中欧建交50周年之际，双方借此契机将达成哪些共识，受到各 方高度关注。 一个健康稳定的中欧关系，不仅成就彼此，而且照亮世界。作为推动多极化的两大力量、支持全球化的 两大市场、倡导多样性的两大文明，只要中欧选择对话合作，阵营对立就不会形成；只要中欧选择开放 共赢，经济全球化的趋势就不会逆转。当前，人类再次站在历史的十字路口，中欧要本着相互尊重、平 等相待、合作共赢的精神，加强对话和沟通，寻求利益最大公约数，不断增进战略互信，推进各领域务 实合作，共同维护战后国际秩序，为变乱交织的世界提供更多确定性，为人类文明进步作出更大贡献。 责任编辑：何俊熹 在当前复杂形势下，中欧要谈的具体议题之多可想而知。但越是这样，就越有必要跳出具体问题本身， 从解决问题的"方法论"着手，在根本上促进中欧关系良性发展。在这当中，尤其重要的是从中欧建交50 年的宝贵经验中汲取力量。 中欧50年合作成绩斐然，本身就证明 ...