Core Viewpoint - The company, Qingdao Inpace Health Technology Co., Ltd., has announced the reappointment of Heshin Accounting Firm as its auditor for the year 2025, ensuring the continuity of its auditing services and compliance with regulatory requirements [9][10][19]. Financial Data - The first quarter report for the company has not been audited [8]. - The company has repurchased 1,256,700 shares, accounting for 0.85% of the total share capital as of the reporting period [5]. Shareholder Information - The company has confirmed that there are no changes in the major shareholders and their shareholding status compared to the previous period [6]. Audit Firm Information - Heshin Accounting Firm has been selected for reappointment, with an audit fee of 850,000 yuan and an internal control audit fee of 280,000 yuan, remaining the same as the previous year [10][17]. - The firm has a total of 45 partners and 254 registered accountants, with 139 of them having signed audit reports for securities services [11]. - The firm has not faced any criminal penalties or disciplinary actions in the last three years [13][15]. Audit Committee and Board Decisions - The audit committee has reviewed and approved the reappointment of Heshin Accounting Firm, emphasizing its qualifications and independence [18]. - The board of directors unanimously approved the proposal to reappoint the audit firm, which will be subject to shareholder approval [19].

日照港股份有限公司 二〇二四年度 内部控制审计报告 致同会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙） 致同会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙） 中国北京 朝阳区建国门外大街 22 号 赛特广场 5 层 邮编 100004 电话 +86 10 8566 5588 传真 +86 10 8566 5120 www.grantthornton.cn 按照《企业内部控制审计指引》及中国注册会计师执业准则的相关要求， 我们审计了日照港股份有限公司（以下简称日照港公司）2024 年 12 月 31 日 的财务报告内部控制的有效性。 一、企业对内部控制的责任 按照《企业内部控制基本规范》、《企业内部控制应用指引》、《企业 内部控制评价指引》的规定，建立健全和有效实施内部控制，并评价其有效 性是日照港公司董事会的责任。 二、注册会计师的责任 我们的责任是在实施审计工作的基础上，对财务报告内部控制的有效性 发表审计意见，并对注意到的非财务报告内部控制的重大缺陷进行披露。 三、内部控制的固有局限性 内部控制具有固有局限性，存在不能防止和发现错报的可能性。此外， 由于情况的变化可能导致内部控制变得不恰当，或对控制政策和程序遵循的 程度降低，根据内部控制审计 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant issue of internal control failures in listed companies, which serve as a breeding ground for financial fraud, and emphasizes the need for a thorough examination of the auditing mechanisms and corporate governance systems in place [2][5]. Summary by Sections Financial Fraud Cases - Dongfang Group was fined millions by the CSRC for significant financial fraud, having inflated business revenue by over 16 billion yuan through fictitious business operations over four years [3]. - A staggering 80% of companies penalized by the CSRC had received unqualified audit opinions regarding their internal controls in the five years leading up to their penalties [4][8]. Audit Mechanisms and Internal Controls - The audit process is likened to a health check for a company, focusing on the compliance of financial reporting and internal controls [7]. - The Ministry of Finance and the CSRC issued guidelines in 2010 stating that any significant internal control deficiencies should lead to a negative audit opinion [7]. - Despite clear evidence of financial misconduct, many companies received standard unqualified opinions on their internal controls during the years of their violations [10][12]. Statistics on Audit Opinions - From 2022 onwards, 257 companies were penalized for financial reporting violations, with many having never received non-standard audit opinions in the five years prior [12][13]. - Among the companies that faced penalties, 178 had internal control audits that were deemed effective, despite their violations [13]. Discrepancies in Audit Findings - The article discusses the disconnect between audit opinions and regulatory penalties, attributing it to differences in the focus and capabilities of auditors versus regulatory bodies [17][18]. - Auditors often prioritize financial reporting over internal controls, leading to a lack of attention to potential internal control failures [18]. Recommendations for Improvement - To restore the credibility of audits, experts suggest enhancing auditor independence, adopting modern auditing techniques, and addressing low-cost competition that undermines audit quality [23][25][26]. - A comprehensive digital system is recommended to improve internal governance and reduce violations of internal control procedures [30]. - Cultivating a compliance culture within companies is essential, with suggestions for regular risk training and establishing a whistleblower system to encourage reporting of misconduct [31]. Conclusion - The article concludes that the effectiveness of internal controls is crucial for corporate governance, and there is an urgent need for companies to address the systemic issues that lead to audit failures and financial misconduct [28][29].