柔性执法

Search documents
消防柔性执法展现为企业减负诚意
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-06-04 04:17
Core Viewpoint - The newly announced "Twelve Measures for Convenience and Benefit to Enterprises by Guangdong Fire Rescue Institutions" aims to address the high frequency of fire safety inspections that have been burdensome for businesses, promoting a more balanced approach to fire safety regulation and enterprise development [2][3]. Group 1: Key Measures - Establishing a quantitative management mechanism to limit annual inspections of the same unit to a maximum of 2 times, with a minimum interval of 6 months, effectively reducing the phenomenon of repeated inspections [3][4]. - Implementing a "sunshine law enforcement notification" system, where inspections are announced one day in advance and conducted on working days, allowing businesses to prepare and minimizing disruption to their operations [3][4]. - Creating a provincial-level fire administrative law enforcement exemption list, which introduces a new mechanism for error correction and tolerance, reflecting a more flexible approach to enforcement [3][4]. Group 2: Impact on Enterprises - The new policies are a positive response to enterprise concerns, showcasing a flexible enforcement philosophy that does not compromise fire safety oversight but enhances regulatory efficiency through more scientific and humane methods [3][4]. - The balance between ensuring fire safety and reducing the burden on enterprises is a significant step forward, indicating a deeper transformation in governance logic [4]. - The introduction of a safety credit mechanism for enterprises, where those with three consecutive years of no violations may receive preferential treatment, demonstrates a focus on risk-based management and improved enforcement precision [4].
广东消防回应企业反映“检查频次高”:要求年度抽查不超两次
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-06-03 05:57
Core Viewpoint - Guangdong Province has introduced the "Twelve Measures for Fire Rescue Institutions to Facilitate the Public and Enterprises" to protect the legal rights of enterprises and citizens while supporting high-quality economic and social development in Guangdong [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The new measures aim to reduce the frequency of inspections for the same unit to a maximum of two times per year, with a six-month interval, addressing concerns about excessive inspections [1]. - A "sunshine law enforcement notification" system has been implemented, where all inspections are announced one day in advance, allowing enterprises to prepare adequately [1]. - A provincial-level list of exemptions and light penalties has been established to create a new mechanism for error correction, thereby easing enforcement pressure on businesses [1]. Group 2: Administrative Efficiency - Guangdong Fire Department is exploring unified fire examination and safety inspection standards across the province, implementing parallel approvals to enhance the quality of fire administrative licensing services [2]. - The time for handling credit repair has been reduced to three working days, and the licensing time for registered fire engineers has been cut to ten working days, expediting processes by over 50% compared to conventional methods [2]. - The entire process for applying for a registered fire engineer certificate can now be completed via mobile, with certificates mailed directly to applicants, eliminating the need for cross-city travel [2]. Group 3: Service Innovations - The "Yue Shang Tong" platform allows units to book fire rescue services for "safety inspections + hazard rectification," effectively reducing the risk of fire accidents [2]. - Flexible enforcement policies have exempted over 4,900 enterprises from penalties, thereby reducing burdens and empowering business development [3]. - The fire safety services provided through the "Yue Shang Tong" platform have responded to enterprise needs over 6,600 times, achieving "zero-distance" technical services [3].
层层落实不是层层加码(干部状态新观察·为基层减负赋能)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-05-26 22:20
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to reduce the burden on grassroots officials by addressing issues of excessive task layering and misalignment of responsibilities, ultimately aiming to enhance their work efficiency and morale [2][3]. Group 1: Issues Faced by Grassroots Officials - Grassroots officials are experiencing increased workloads due to layered task requirements and imprecise assessment methods, which create confusion and hinder their ability to serve the public effectively [2][3]. - The phenomenon of "layered increases" is prevalent, where tasks are compounded at various administrative levels, leading to unnecessary burdens on local officials [3][4]. Group 2: Measures Taken to Alleviate Burdens - Qinghai Province's Xining City has implemented clear task lists to reduce the burden on grassroots officials, promoting flexible enforcement in urban management [2][4]. - The city has introduced specific management standards for different types of roads, aiming to minimize disruptions to local vendors while maintaining urban aesthetics [4][5]. Group 3: Communication and Feedback Mechanisms - Xining City has established internal communication channels to facilitate feedback from grassroots officials, allowing for timely corrections of misaligned enforcement practices [6]. - The city promotes a "721" work method, focusing on resolving 70% of issues through service, 20% through management, and only 10% through enforcement, to reduce unnecessary punitive measures [6][7]. Group 4: Educational Initiatives and Policy Framework - Continuous education on the central government's eight regulations has led to the development of a task list aimed at reducing formalism and ensuring compliance with administrative laws [7]. - The city is committed to transforming educational outcomes into tangible benefits for the public, ensuring that the results of these initiatives are felt by the community [7].
时隔13年山东实施道路交通安全法办法拟修正,增加首违不罚、自动驾驶等规定
Qi Lu Wan Bao Wang· 2025-05-23 06:35
Core Points - The Shandong Province is revising the implementation measures of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China for the second time after 13 years, with public consultation open until June 23, 2025 [2][7] - The revision aims to align with national laws and address new challenges in traffic safety management due to rapid economic, social, and technological developments [3][4] Group 1: Legislative Background - The original Road Traffic Safety Law was implemented on May 1, 2004, marking the beginning of a legal framework for traffic safety in China [2] - The first revision of the Shandong implementation measures occurred in 2012, and the law has since played a crucial role in maintaining traffic order and reducing accidents [2] Group 2: Key Changes in the Draft - The draft includes the removal of outdated provisions that conflict with national laws, such as those related to school bus regulations and vehicle speed limits [4] - New provisions are introduced to enhance the regulation of non-motorized vehicles, particularly electric bicycles, by prohibiting the production and sale of non-compliant vehicles [5][8] - The draft emphasizes the responsibility of businesses in emerging sectors like delivery services to ensure compliance with traffic safety laws [6][8] Group 3: Technological Integration - The draft proposes the use of advanced technology for traffic law enforcement, including remote monitoring and handling of traffic violations [6][8] - It also includes provisions for the testing and operation of autonomous vehicles, reflecting the need to adapt to technological advancements in transportation [6][8] Group 4: Public Participation - The public is invited to submit feedback on the draft through various channels, indicating a commitment to community involvement in legislative processes [7]
规范涉企执法见成效!深圳做法被肯定
Shen Zhen Shang Bao· 2025-05-22 17:56
Core Points - The core viewpoint of the articles is the implementation and impact of the nationwide special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, which aims to improve the business environment and reduce unnecessary inspections [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement Actions - The special action to standardize administrative law enforcement was fully launched nationwide in March this year, with a reported problematic case amounting to 335 million yuan, recovering losses of 98.81 million yuan for enterprises by May 21 [1]. - The implementation of the "Opinions on Strictly Standardizing Inspections Related to Enterprises" has led to the development of inspection standards and frequency limits by relevant departments, significantly reducing unnecessary inspections [1]. - In Shenzhen, the establishment of the administrative law enforcement supervision code system has shown effectiveness, with the number of enterprise inspections in Guangming District decreasing from 3,323 to 1,135 since 2025, a reduction of 65.84% [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Improvements and Innovations - The comprehensive cleanup of existing enterprise-related charging policies and the timely update of the charging directory have been emphasized, along with strict compliance reviews of new policies to prevent the introduction of non-compliant charging policies [1]. - The Ministry of Justice is developing management measures for administrative law enforcement personnel to ensure that only qualified individuals perform enforcement duties, with 1,140 leads sent to disciplinary inspection agencies and 1,068 personnel dealt with since the start of the special action [2]. - The exploration of flexible enforcement methods, such as the "flexible enforcement" mechanism in Shenzhen's Longhua District, aims to create a better business environment by providing green channels for enterprises that voluntarily self-check and correct minor violations [2].
对企业反映的突出问题“动真碰硬”——国新办介绍规范涉企行政执法专项行动最新进展
Xin Hua She· 2025-05-22 14:10
Core Viewpoint - The government is actively addressing prominent issues reported by enterprises through a special action aimed at regulating administrative law enforcement related to businesses, resulting in a general decline in administrative fines and a reduction in arbitrary inspections [1][2]. Group 1: Objectives and Focus Areas - The special action targets four major issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and closures; illegal cross-regional law enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by law enforcement officials [2][3]. - Key focus areas for the action include food and drug safety, natural resources, ecological environment, safety production, urban management, and transportation, which are closely related to enterprises and the public [3]. Group 2: Progress and Impact - As of May 21, a total of 6,232 problem leads have been collected, with 5,246 cases addressed, recovering 98.81 million yuan for enterprises from a total of 335 million yuan in involved amounts [3]. - The action aims to optimize the business environment and stimulate market vitality by addressing issues such as unauthorized fees and excessive charges in various sectors, including logistics and utilities [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Measures and Future Directions - The action emphasizes strict adherence to laws and regulations, particularly in sectors affecting public health, with a focus on rigorous standards and accountability [6]. - Future efforts will include increased supervision of problem rectification, targeted handling of prominent issues, and measures to ensure compliance and accountability among local authorities [7].
规范涉企执法专项行动进展如何?司法部最新发声
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-05-22 06:34
Core Points - The article discusses the implementation and progress of a nationwide special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, aiming to protect their legal rights and improve the business environment [2][4][6] Group 1: Special Action Overview - The special action was launched in March this year, focusing on addressing issues such as arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures [2][4] - As of May 21, the action has gathered 6,232 problem clues and urged the handling of 5,246 cases, involving a total amount of 335 million yuan, recovering losses of approximately 98.81 million yuan for enterprises [6] Group 2: Key Issues Addressed - The action targets four main issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures; illegal cross-regional enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by enforcement personnel [4][6] - These issues are widespread and have significant negative impacts, with strong feedback from enterprises [4] Group 3: Implementation and Results - The Ministry of Justice has established a working platform to streamline the collection and processing of problem clues, enhancing efficiency and reducing the burden on local authorities [5] - Initial results show a downward trend in administrative fines and effective curtailment of arbitrary inspections, although there is still a gap between outcomes and enterprise expectations [6] Group 4: Future Plans and Mechanisms - Future efforts will focus on strengthening supervision of problem rectification, addressing prominent enforcement issues, and conducting research to evaluate the effectiveness of the action [6][9] - The establishment of a long-term mechanism for standardized enforcement is emphasized to prevent issues from recurring and to foster a conducive business environment [7][9]
司法部:规范执法不是执法越宽越好,而是依法该严则严、当宽则宽
news flash· 2025-05-22 03:20
行政执法是行政机关履行政府职能、管理经济社会事务的重要方式。在行政执法当中,要体现对各类主 体的平等保护,严格依法平等适用,不能违背"法律面前人人平等"的原则,不能仅仅为了让执法有温度 而突破法律底线,所以要坚持辩证地看这个问题。 规范执法不是执法越宽越好,更不是不执法,而是依法该严则严、当宽则宽,特别是对食品药品安全等 涉及群众切身利益的领域,要坚决落实"四个最严"的要求,以"最严谨的标准、最严格的监管、最严厉 的处罚、最严肃的问责",切实保护人民群众的生命健康安全。要让行政执法"既有力度又有温度",做 到既不缺位也不越位。 据中国网,5月22日,国新办就规范涉企行政执法专项行动开展情况举行新闻发布会,司法部行政执法 协调监督局局长刘波在国新办发布会上表示,目前很多地方在积极探索柔性的执法方式,优化执法理 念,坚持执法和服务相结合。实践中我们也看到,一些地方出台了免罚或者不罚的清单,比如上海出台 了《市场监管领域不予行政处罚和减轻行政处罚实施办法》,细化了轻微违法不予立案的程序。深圳龙 华区建立了"柔性执法"机制,对主动自查自纠的轻微违法企业,开通了免罚清单绿色通道。实践中的这 些探索,为企业营造了良好的营 ...
镇原县市场监管局“春雷行动”筑牢安全防线 护航高质量发展成效显着
Zhong Guo Shi Pin Wang· 2025-05-16 02:10
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the implementation of a two-month "Spring Thunder Action" by the Zhenyuan County Market Supervision Administration to enhance market safety and protect public interests [1] - The action focuses on six key areas related to people's livelihoods, including food, pharmaceuticals, and special equipment, aiming to create a safe and orderly market consumption environment [1] - The "1+19" smart supervision system has been fully implemented in 235 school canteens, with 211 food quick tests conducted and six illegal cases addressed [1] Group 2 - A "Protect Farmers and Ensure Cultivation" special action has been launched during the critical spring farming period, focusing on major agricultural products like fertilizers and agricultural films [2] - A comprehensive regulatory model has been established, including source control, circulation traceability, and terminal sampling, resulting in 40 batches of inspections and the seizure of 1,973 bags of substandard fertilizers [2] - A knowledge property protection initiative has led to the investigation of two trademark infringement cases and the establishment of a 24-hour complaint handling network, recovering economic losses of 72,800 yuan [2] Group 3 - The county's market supervision authority emphasizes that the action is both a defense of safety and an upgrade of the business environment, with plans to establish a task list of 55 key issues for rectification [3] - Training for all enforcement personnel will be conducted to shift the regulatory model towards a preventive approach, fostering a standardized market environment for county economic development [3]
从单一执法者到“监管+服务”双重角色,需要提升哪些能力?
Zhong Guo Huan Jing Bao· 2025-04-30 05:40
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement inspections is crucial for optimizing the business environment and stimulating market vitality [1] - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment has introduced the "law enforcement + service" concept, highlighting the need for innovative regulatory methods to achieve a balance between strictness and leniency [1][2] - The transition from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to "precision enforcement" requires law enforcement personnel to possess stronger legal knowledge and technical skills [1][2] Group 2 - The distinction between "minor violations" and "malicious violations" is critical in flexible law enforcement, necessitating a deep understanding of legal boundaries by enforcement personnel [2] - The implementation of a "comprehensive inspection once" mechanism aims to break down departmental barriers and enhance the effectiveness of cross-sector collaboration [2] - Law enforcement personnel are expected to evolve from mere executors to "guardians of the rule of law" and "service providers for development," ensuring ecological protection while facilitating green enterprise growth [3]