Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the challenges faced by job seekers in the online recruitment space, emphasizing the need for regulatory measures to protect their rights and ensure the integrity of job postings [1][2][3]. Group 1: Online Recruitment Trends - Over 83% of job seekers in China are expected to use online recruitment platforms from 2024 to 2025, with nearly 40% relying solely on online channels [1]. - The rise of digital economy has made online recruitment the primary channel for job searching, but it has also led to issues such as unauthorized recruitment services and misleading job postings [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Measures - The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, along with other governmental bodies, has issued a notification to standardize the release of recruitment information on online platforms [1][3]. - The new regulations aim to enhance the accountability of online platforms, improve compliance operations, and protect job seekers' rights through rigorous information verification and monitoring [1][3]. Group 3: Addressing Misleading Practices - Job seekers have reported experiences of misleading job advertisements, such as age discrimination and exaggerated salary offers [5]. - The authorities have set standards for job postings, requiring clear and accurate information about job roles, conditions, and compensation to prevent "blind applications" [5]. Group 4: Strengthening Platform Accountability - Online platforms are required to implement real-name verification for account registration and to conduct regular audits of recruitment service accounts to ensure compliance [3]. - The regulations mandate that platforms must verify the qualifications of employers and maintain updated records to prevent the spread of false job information [3]. Group 5: Collaboration Among Regulatory Bodies - Various departments, including human resources, cybersecurity, and financial regulation, will collaborate to enhance oversight and ensure that regulatory measures are effectively implemented [5]. - The focus will be on creating a cohesive regulatory framework that prevents loopholes and ensures the protection of job seekers [5].

Core Viewpoint - The governance of the online ecosystem is a crucial task for building a strong network nation, impacting national development, security, and the interests of the people [1] Group 1: Policy and Regulation - A series of new regulations addressing privacy concerns have been implemented throughout 2025, indicating a stronger legal framework for personal information protection [3] - The "Network Data Security Management Regulations" came into effect on January 1, 2025, emphasizing the protection and regulation of personal information and important data [3] - The revised "Cybersecurity Law" integrates challenges related to artificial intelligence governance, further solidifying the legal foundation for data protection [3] Group 2: Organizational Initiatives - The Guangdong Provincial Network Data Security and Personal Information Protection Association was established in the summer of 2025, marking a national first in social organization for data security and personal information rights [2][6] - The association aims to connect government, industry, and the public, enhancing personal information protection awareness and compliance [6] - The association has organized numerous policy seminars and compliance training sessions to clarify boundaries and provide pathways for nearly a thousand institutions [7] Group 3: Community Engagement and Awareness - The Southern Metropolis Daily has actively engaged in compliance investigations, revealing issues such as mandatory facial recognition in hospitals and delivery services [9] - The media has transformed complex legal texts into accessible compliance tools, making it easier for the public to understand personal information protection principles [10] - Collaborative efforts have been made to establish a mechanism for regular communication on personal information protection among the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [8]

Group 1 - The core of cultivating a healthy online ecosystem lies in establishing a governance system based on "rule of law, multi-party collaboration, and dynamic optimization" [1] - The revised Cybersecurity Law, effective from January 1, 2026, serves as the core institutional support for this governance system, providing a solid legal guarantee for the implementation of long-term mechanisms [1][2] - The revision reflects a strong sense of the times and scientific nature, addressing shortcomings in past network security responsibilities and regulatory gaps in emerging technologies [2][3] Group 2 - The revised law balances development security and innovation incentives, allowing for a dynamic equilibrium between safety guarantees and industrial development [3] - A layered and categorized responsibility system for network operators is established, matching responsibilities with capabilities based on business attributes, technical abilities, and risk levels [4][5] - Key information infrastructure operators bear the highest level of security obligations, while general network operators must implement security protection and compliance responsibilities [6] Group 3 - The construction of a multi-party collaborative governance framework is essential for the healthy operation of the online ecosystem, involving government regulation, corporate self-discipline, and public participation [7][8] - Government should enhance top-level planning and departmental collaboration to form a regulatory synergy, while enterprises must actively engage in cybersecurity technology development and assume social responsibilities [7][8] - Public participation is crucial for building a secure online environment, with citizens encouraged to learn and comply with cybersecurity laws and actively protect personal information [8]

Core Viewpoint - The recent joint notice issued by multiple government departments aims to strengthen the governance of the online recruitment ecosystem and regulate the order of the online recruitment market [1] Group 1: Regulatory Requirements - The notice mandates that human resource service agencies must obtain a human resource service license to publish recruitment information or provide recruitment services on online platforms [1] - Online platforms are required to fulfill their primary responsibilities by enhancing account registration management and authenticating the real identity information of registered users [1] Group 2: Information Standards and Monitoring - The notice emphasizes the need for standardized formats for recruitment information, ensuring that all published information is truthful and legal, prohibiting illegal activities disguised as recruitment [1] - There is a call for enhanced monitoring of recruitment service accounts' online behavior, with a focus on promptly identifying and addressing illegal or non-compliant activities [1]

专家指出，网络生态治理是一项系统工程，要采取政策指导、行政许可等举措，推动行政监管与行业自 律相衔接。对网络招聘服务实施许可管理是人力资源市场管理的一项重要制度。 此外，《通知》强调，网络平台要规范招聘信息格式标准，发布招聘信息应真实、合法，严禁以招聘信 息为名非法引流。要强化对招聘服务类账号网络行为的规范，加强招聘信息发布动态监测，及时发现处 置违法违规行为。 人力资源社会保障部人力资源流动管理司相关负责人表示，近年来，网络招聘在促进高质量充分就业和 优化人力资源配置中发挥了重要作用，但同时，还存在一些问题，如未经许可擅自从事网络招聘服务、 对用人单位资质和招聘信息真实性与合法性审核把关不严等。 为进一步规范网络招聘秩序，《通知》要求，加强网络招聘服务许可监管，经营性人力资源服务机构发 布招聘信息或网络平台为用人单位提供招聘信息发布等网络招聘服务，应依法取得人力资源服务许可 证。网络平台要履行主体责任，强化账号注册管理，对申请注册用户进行真实身份信息认证，分类核验 认证账号资质，设置专门标签，并在账号主页明示资质和认证信息。 （来源：经济参考报） 记者1月13日获悉，为进一步加强网络生态治理，规范网络招聘市 ...

Core Viewpoint - The importance of network ecological governance is emphasized as a crucial aspect of building a strong cyber nation, directly impacting national security and the well-being of the populace [1][2]. Group 1: Principles of Network Ecological Governance - Adherence to the Party's leadership is essential for ensuring that network ecological governance progresses in the right direction [2]. - The principle of putting people first is highlighted, as the governance outcomes must be evaluated by the people [2]. - A balance between maintaining core values and fostering innovation is necessary to enhance the vitality of network ecological governance [2]. - Legal frameworks must be strengthened to ensure the healthy operation of the internet within a legal framework [2]. - A systematic approach is required to enhance the effectiveness of governance by integrating various aspects of development and security [2]. Group 2: Long-term Governance Strategies - The governance of network ecology is a long-term task that requires a scientific understanding of the internet's characteristics and the establishment of a long-term governance mechanism [3]. - A comprehensive governance structure involving multiple stakeholders, including government, platforms, and users, is essential for effective governance [3]. - Political responsibility and collaboration among various departments are crucial for effective network governance [3]. Group 3: Innovative Governance Methods - A combination of educational, administrative, and legal measures is necessary to create a positive online environment [4]. - The importance of moral education in the online space is emphasized, with a focus on enhancing societal network literacy [4]. - Legislative efforts should be advanced to cover key areas and emerging technologies, ensuring effective law enforcement [4]. Group 4: Balancing Regulation and Innovation - The governance of network ecology must adapt to the unique characteristics of the online space, emphasizing both robust regulation and high-quality innovation [5]. - A tiered safety regulation mechanism and improved industry access standards are necessary for effective governance [5]. - Encouragement of new technology development in the internet sector is vital for healthy growth [5]. Group 5: International Cooperation - Network ecological governance is a global challenge that requires international collaboration and participation in global internet governance [6]. - Strengthening international cooperation in areas such as cybersecurity and data flow is essential for building a community of shared future in cyberspace [6]. - Enhancing international communication capabilities is crucial for promoting a positive image of the country and gaining influence in global discourse [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of online ecological governance and the protection of minors in the digital age, highlighting the collaborative efforts and initiatives taken in 2025 to enhance the online safety and well-being of minors [3][4][5]. Group 1: Online Ecological Governance - The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China has prioritized online ecological governance as a crucial task for national development and security, with clear directions and paths outlined for improvement [3]. - The National Internet Information Office has reiterated the need to enhance the effectiveness of online ecological governance, indicating a strong commitment to this cause [3]. Group 2: Minors' Online Protection Initiatives - In 2025, significant advancements were made in the minors' online protection system, including the introduction of the "minor mode" and various initiatives like "Clear and Bright" and "Protecting Seedlings" actions aimed at enhancing digital safety for minors [4][5]. - The South China Morning Post and the South Data Research Institute have actively engaged in constructive supervision and innovative educational programs to address issues such as the phenomenon of minor internet celebrities and the ethical use of AI [5][9]. Group 3: Policy and Regulatory Developments - In 2025, several policy drafts were released to regulate online content, protect personal information, and prevent internet addiction among minors, reflecting a multi-faceted approach to creating a healthier online environment [7]. - By January 2026, 23 out of 29 provinces in China had included "minors' online protection" in their 14th Five-Year Plan proposals, indicating widespread recognition of the issue across the country [6]. Group 4: Educational and Community Engagement - The South Data Research Institute has initiated various educational activities aimed at improving minors' online literacy, including workshops and creative campaigns that integrate traditional culture with modern technology [10][11]. - The organization has also developed online courses and interactive activities to educate minors about personal information protection and online safety, receiving positive feedback from the community [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the "Five Persistences" as a comprehensive framework for internet ecological governance in the new era, highlighting the importance of political leadership, people-centered values, innovation, legal support, and a systematic approach [4]. Group 1: Political Leadership - The leadership of the Communist Party is identified as the fundamental guarantee for maintaining the correct political direction in internet ecological governance, which is crucial given the political nature of internet governance [1]. - The article stresses the need to integrate Xi Jinping's thoughts on building a strong internet nation into governance practices to enhance the influence of mainstream ideology online [1]. Group 2: People-Centered Approach - The essence of internet ecological governance is to serve the people, focusing on their needs and expectations, and enhancing their sense of gain, happiness, and security in the online space [2]. - There is a call to promote positive voices and mainstream values in the digital environment, enriching the cultural and spiritual lives of the populace [2]. Group 3: Innovation and Tradition - The article highlights the necessity of balancing tradition and innovation in governance, where "guarding the right" means adhering to ideological safety, and "innovation" involves adapting to technological advancements [3]. - This dual approach is seen as essential for improving governance effectiveness in the face of evolving challenges [3]. Group 4: Legal Framework - Legal support is described as a critical foundation for internet ecological governance, necessitating the establishment of a comprehensive legal system to regulate online behavior and maintain order [3]. - The article advocates for the acceleration of legislative processes to convert successful governance practices into formal regulations [3]. Group 5: Systematic Approach - A systematic perspective is deemed essential for addressing the complexities of internet governance, promoting a collaborative and comprehensive strategy that maximizes governance effectiveness [3]. - The article calls for a coordinated approach that balances development and security, as well as domestic governance and international cooperation [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a systematic approach to internet ecological governance, integrating education, administration, and legal measures, with a strong focus on the role of law in establishing a long-term governance mechanism [1] - The construction of internet civilization should incorporate socialist core values throughout the legal framework, with law enforcement agencies responsible for promoting these values in daily regulation [2] - The legal system for internet ecological governance needs to be improved, enhancing judicial capabilities and promoting a collaborative regulatory environment to ensure a clear and lawful online space [3] Group 2 - The legal framework should support the healthy development of new internet business models while ensuring the protection of personal information and intellectual property rights [2][3] - There is a need for strict enforcement against online crimes that harm social ethics and public interests, with a focus on protecting vulnerable groups such as minors and the elderly [2] - The governance of the internet ecosystem should involve both administrative regulation and industry self-discipline, fostering innovation while managing risks associated with new technologies like generative AI [3]

在中共中央政治局第二十三次集体学习时，习近平总书记指出，网络生态治理是网络强国建设的重要任 务，事关国家发展和安全，事关人民群众切身利益。网络乱象污染社会风气，侵犯群众利益，要敢于亮 剑、坚决打击，切断利益链和产业链，铲除其滋生的土壤和条件。 加强网络生态治理，需要深度解构网络生态的产业链和利益链。目前，网络生态已形成"基础支撑—内 容生产—流量分发—商业变现"的完整产业链条，环环相扣，共同维系生态运转。与这一产业链相伴生 的，是一条以价值变现为核心的利益链，其运作逻辑与产业链深度绑定、环环相扣，共同构成网络生态 的价值循环体系。 深入解构产业链与利益链的运作机制，可以发现，网络平台掌控核心资源、主导链路运作，是贯穿始终 的核心枢纽，天然具备"链主"特征。这也意味着其必须承担起维护产业链健康、规范利益链走向的核心 责任。一旦平台"链主"责任缺失或履责不到位，利益链就容易偏离合法合规与公序良俗轨道，演变为灰 色乃至黑色利益链。 这类畸形利益链路在实践中规模化存在，且呈现出专业化、闭环化的特点，具体可分为三类典型乱象： 一是刷量变现闭环，黑灰产技术团队专攻刷量脚本开发，MCN机构采购服务为旗下账号刷取虚假互动 数 ...