Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for vigilance against Japan's right-wing forces attempting to revive militarism, particularly in light of recent statements by Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide regarding Taiwan's situation, which could lead to military intervention [2][3][4]. Group 1: Political Context - Prime Minister Suga's remarks about Taiwan potentially posing an existential crisis for Japan reflect a dangerous trend of right-wing militarism in Japan, aiming to escape the constraints of the post-war "peace constitution" [2][3]. - The suggestion of military intervention in Taiwan is seen as a blatant threat of war, contradicting Japan's commitments under international law and its own constitution [3][4]. Group 2: Historical Precedents - The article draws parallels between current rhetoric and historical instances where Japan exaggerated external threats to justify military aggression, such as the invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and the broader expansion during World War II [4][5]. - Experts highlight that Japan's past actions, justified by fabricated crises, serve as a warning against repeating history [4][5]. Group 3: Regional Implications - The potential shift in Japan's defense policy, including increased military spending and the development of offensive capabilities, raises concerns among neighboring countries about regional security [5][6]. - The article calls for a united response from peace-loving nations to counteract the revival of militarism and uphold international peace [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering historical lessons, particularly regarding Japanese militarism, and condemns recent statements by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan as a potential justification for collective self-defense, reflecting a dangerous historical perspective [1][2]. Group 1 - Takaichi's remarks about Taiwan represent a revival of militaristic views in Japan, which are rooted in a distorted understanding of history [1][2]. - The article highlights the atrocities committed by Japanese troops during the Nanjing Massacre, illustrating the historical context that informs current political rhetoric [1]. - There is a contrast drawn between Takaichi and other Japanese politicians who acknowledge and reflect on Japan's wartime actions, suggesting a divide in contemporary Japanese political thought [2][3]. Group 2 - The article recalls the visits of former Japanese Prime Ministers who have shown remorse for Japan's wartime actions, indicating that there are still voices in Japan advocating for a correct understanding of history [2]. - It stresses that denying historical facts does not erase them, and that recognizing the truth is essential for peace and reconciliation between China and Japan [3].

Group 1 - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's recent remarks regarding Taiwan are seen as a betrayal of Japan's pacifist constitution and a provocation against China's internal affairs and post-war international order [1] - Concerns over deteriorating Sino-Japanese relations have led to a decline in Japanese stocks related to inbound tourism, with significant cancellations of Chinese tourist bookings to Japan [1] - The establishment of a new intelligence agency in Japan has drawn criticism, being compared to a similar institution from Japan's militaristic past, raising alarms about a potential revival of militarism [1] Group 2 - Russia is commemorating the 80th anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials with an international forum, emphasizing the historical significance and principles of the trials [2] - The Nuremberg Trials serve as a warning to the world on how to properly address historical responsibilities and accountability [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan have fundamentally harmed the political foundation of China-Japan relations, provoking strong public outrage in China [1] - The Chinese government has issued a stern warning to Japan, urging it to retract its erroneous statements and to cease creating incidents related to China, indicating that failure to do so will result in severe countermeasures from China [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that Japan's historical use of the concept of "survival crisis" as a pretext for military aggression is a dangerous precedent that must not be repeated, referencing past events such as the Mukden Incident and the Pacific War [3] Group 2 - The article mentions that China has suspended imports of Japanese seafood due to Japan's failure to provide promised technical materials ensuring product safety, which is a prerequisite for such exports [3] - The spokesperson noted that the current political climate, exacerbated by Kishida's controversial statements, has led to a lack of market for Japanese seafood in China, regardless of its quality [3]

Core Views - The article emphasizes that the deterioration of China-Japan relations due to Japanese Prime Minister Kishi's provocative remarks on Taiwan will ultimately lead to negative consequences for Japan [4][5][6][8][12]. Summary by Sections Japan's Provocative Actions - Prime Minister Kishi's comments about potential military intervention in Taiwan are seen as a serious violation of the One China principle and the political foundation of China-Japan relations [4][5]. - Kishi's statements are viewed as a deliberate provocation that threatens peace in the Taiwan Strait and regional stability [5][8]. Historical Context and Political Agreements - The article references the 1972 normalization of diplomatic relations between China and Japan, highlighting the commitments made in the Joint Communiqué and subsequent political documents regarding Taiwan [4][5]. - It stresses that any deviation from these commitments undermines the political and legal basis of China-Japan relations [4][5]. Domestic Reactions in Japan - Kishi's remarks have faced widespread criticism within Japan, with various political figures and the public expressing their discontent [6][9]. - The article notes that there is a significant portion of Japanese society that values peace and opposes militaristic rhetoric [9][10]. Economic Implications - The potential economic fallout from Kishi's comments is highlighted, with estimates suggesting that a significant reduction in Chinese tourists could lead to substantial economic losses for Japan [12]. - The Tokyo stock market has already shown signs of decline following Kishi's statements, indicating immediate economic repercussions [12]. Broader Regional Concerns - The article discusses the resurgence of militaristic sentiments in Japan, linking Kishi's actions to a broader trend of right-wing nationalism and historical revisionism [14][15]. - It warns that such movements pose a risk not only to Japan's own peace but also to regional stability in East Asia [16]. Call for Reflection and Action - The article urges Kishi and his government to reflect on historical lessons and retract their provocative statements to maintain the political foundation of China-Japan relations [10][13]. - It emphasizes that any continued aggression will lead to severe consequences for Japan, echoing sentiments from historical conflicts [10][13].

Economic Impact - Japan's economy is facing potential recession due to deteriorating relations with China, which is Japan's largest trading partner [4][6][7] - The tourism sector is particularly vulnerable, with reports of significant cancellations from Chinese tourists leading to losses of approximately 20 to 30 million yen [4][6] - The retail sector is also at risk, as Chinese customers account for 60% of sales in certain duty-free stores, prompting businesses to closely monitor the situation [4][5] Stock Market Reaction - The Japanese stock market has reacted negatively, with the Nikkei index dropping by 165.28 points to 48,537.70 on November 19 [6] - Concerns over the impact of strained Sino-Japanese relations on foreign investment and corporate valuations are prevalent among investors [6][7] Broader Economic Concerns - The tourism industry contributes approximately 7% to Japan's GDP, making it a critical driver of economic growth [5][6] - Analysts estimate that the current measures taken by China could result in annual losses exceeding $14 billion for Japan [7] Diplomatic Isolation - Japan's recent diplomatic stance has led to increased isolation in the region, with deteriorating relations with neighboring countries such as South Korea and Russia [9][12] - High-profile statements from Japanese officials have raised concerns about a potential resurgence of militarism, which could further alienate Japan from its regional partners [11][12] Future Projections - If the current diplomatic tensions persist, Japan's GDP could be adversely affected, with potential long-term implications for economic stability [6][7] - The ongoing situation may lead to a military buildup in the region, exacerbating tensions and potentially triggering a broader arms race [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for Japan to confront its wartime responsibilities and warns against the spread of historical revisionism, which could lead to a resurgence of militarism [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Responsibility - Professor Yamada Akira from Meiji University calls for Japan to acknowledge its wartime aggression and warns against the dangers of historical revisionism, particularly regarding the Second Sino-Japanese War [1]. - Yamada suggests that enhancing public awareness and understanding of historical truths is essential to prevent the revival of militarism [1]. Group 2: Exhibition Details - The "War Atrocity Illustrated Exhibition" has been organized by the civil group "Promoting Memory and Heritage Kanagawa Association" since 2016, focusing on Japan's wartime atrocities [2]. - The current exhibition runs from August 8 to 15 in Yokohama, showcasing materials related to the Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, chemical warfare, and comfort women [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for Japan to confront its wartime responsibilities and warns against the spread of historical revisionism, which could lead to a resurgence of militarism [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Responsibility - Professor Yamada Akira from Meiji University calls for Japan to acknowledge its wartime aggression and warns against the dangers of historical revisionism, particularly regarding the Second Sino-Japanese War [1]. - Yamada criticizes Japan's post-war tendency to downplay its war responsibilities and advocates for enhanced public awareness and education on historical truths to prevent militarism from resurfacing [1]. Group 2: Exhibition Details - The "War Atrocity Graphic Exhibition" has been organized by the civil group "Promoting Memory and Heritage Kanagawa Association" since 2016, focusing on Japan's wartime atrocities during World War II [2]. - The current exhibition runs from August 8 to 15 in Yokohama, showcasing materials related to the Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, chemical warfare, and comfort women [2].

Core Points - The article emphasizes the need for Japan to confront its wartime responsibilities and warns against the spread of historical revisionism, which could lead to a resurgence of militarism [1][2] - Yamada Akira, a professor at Meiji University, criticizes Japan's post-war tendency to downplay its war responsibilities and advocates for enhanced historical reflection and education to prevent militarism [1] - The "War Atrocity Exhibition" aims to raise awareness of Japan's wartime actions, including the Nanjing Massacre and the actions of Unit 731, and is part of a broader effort to promote peace through historical education [2] Group 1 - Yamada Akira calls for Japan to recognize its wartime aggression and warns of the dangers of historical revisionism, particularly regarding the Second Sino-Japanese War [1] - The exhibition highlights Japan's wartime atrocities and aims to foster a deeper understanding of history among the Japanese public [2] - The exhibition is organized by a civic group and has been held annually since 2016, focusing on Japan's wartime actions against other countries [2] Group 2 - The exhibition features materials related to significant historical events, including the Nanjing Massacre, Unit 731, and the use of chemical weapons [2] - Yamada Akira stresses that without acknowledging its wartime actions, Japan's claims for peace will lack credibility on the global stage [1]